ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Trials and Errors
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags "A Wilderness of Error" , "Fatal Vision" , errol morris , Jeffrey MacDonald , Joe MacGinniss , murder cases

Reply
Old 1st March 2018, 06:08 PM   #1
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,511
Jeffrey MacDonald did it. He really did. Part II

Mod Info Continued from here.
As is usual, the split point is arbitrary and posters are free to quote from the previous thread.
Posted By:Agatha






Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
That's a load of bollocks, if you pardon my French. The matter is explained at this website, and it was demolished by MacDonald lawyer Gary Bostwick at the McGinniss trial in 1987:

http://dingeengoete.blogspot.co.uk/2...macdonald.html
Your man crush wasn't drug free.

Long before there was any serious issues with amphetamines in the general population, amphetamines were commonly available in the military, even as late as when I was in 74-80.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...oldier/477183/

One of the "perks" of being a military physician was the nearly uncontrolled availability of controlled substance pharmaceuticals. The uncontested fact is that your man crush had a ******** of pharmaceuticals in hand in his home.
__________________
"When a man who is honestly mistaken, hears the truth, he will either cease being mistaken or cease being honest." - Anonymous

"Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus

Last edited by Agatha; 3rd March 2018 at 01:35 PM.
BStrong is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd March 2018, 09:11 AM   #2
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by BStrong View Post
One of the "perks" of being a military physician was the nearly uncontrolled availability of controlled substance pharmaceuticals. The uncontested fact is that your man crush had a ******** of pharmaceuticals in hand in his home.
The matter of diet pills in the MacDonald case is explained at this website. It was another invention by Kassab.:

https://www.sfgate.com/books/article...is-3042069.php

Quote:
Their debunking is helped along by an unlikely source: McGinniss himself, responding under oath to a civil lawsuit filed by MacDonald alleging fraud and breach of contract pertaining to "Fatal Vision." When asked whether he believed the theory advanced in his book -- that diet pills caused a psychotic snap in MacDonald -- McGinniss explained that he had to give his readers more than a "rehash" of the trial, the authors write. He then replied: "I'm not convinced that it actually happened."
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd March 2018, 11:17 PM   #3
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Cognitive Sheep

The Eskatrol issue is another example of the landlord being unable to think for himself. He simply hears or sees an advocacy piece for inmate and his thought process is set in stone. He clearly doesn't consider the distinct possibility that the authors of said pieces have not taken the time to read the documented record. At the Article 32 hearing, inmate admits that he has used Amphetamines, he repeats this admission on the very 1st page of his case journal, and it is a medical fact that Amphetamine use can cause a rage reaction. As if the landlord needed a reminder, this case is a classic example of a rage killing.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th March 2018, 03:52 AM   #4
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
In the Joe McGinniss Fatal Vision book, somewhere in the 600s pages, he wrote that the Army CID lab at Ford Gordon was not capable of detecting amphetamines, and that supposedly was why the amphetamine psychosis theory without facts was never detected. That is patently untrue. No traces of amphetamines were ever found in MacDonald's body. It was manufactured evidence, and a strange delusion by Kassab, which McGinniss swallowed, like Kassab's theory without facts that there had been child abuse of the two little girls by MacDonald. There was never a shred of medical evidence, or any other evidence to back that up, and only a very bad judge would believe it.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th March 2018, 06:08 AM   #5
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
Once again henri is ignoring FACT.
Fact 1: The CID was NOT the one who would have tested for drug use, that is the provenance of the HOSPITAL.
Fact 2: There WAS NOT a test available to identify amphetamines use by a person at the time the testing would have been done.
Fact 3: INMATE HIMSELF ADMITTED THAT HE'D BEEN TAKING THE ESKATROL. IT WAS THE VERY FIRST ITEM LISTED ON HIS 'NOTES' FOR HIS LAWYERS. THE LIST OF THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW.
Fact 4: Joe M said amphetamine psychosis was HIS theory YEARS AFTER inmate was convicted. It was NOT a part of the trial, it had NOTHING to do with his rightful convictions, and it was part of an epilogue of FV reprint several years AFTER inmate's conviction (FV was first published 4 years after conviction and the epilogue was in a reprint done a few years later - JTF probably knows the exact dates).
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th March 2018, 10:00 AM   #6
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
McGinniss was looking for a motive for Jeff MacDonald for his publisher and he came up with some lame theory that MacDonald seemed to be agitated about the death of his family, according to Dr. Bronstein at the military hospital, which 'could be' due to amphetamines from diet pills. That was after talking personally to MacDonald about the "pseudo-science" of Stombaugh of the FBI. That is something only a bad judge would believe. McGinniss was a con artist.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th March 2018, 12:54 PM   #7
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
Once again HENRI is ignoring FACTS.

FACT #1 - INMATE HIMSELF ADMITTED TO USING AMPHETAMINES. IT WAS THE VERY FIRST ITEM ON HIS HANDWRITTEN "THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW" LIST FOR HIS LAWYERS.

FACT #2 - Fatal Vision had already been published at least 4 years prior to Joe McG adding the epilogue where he postulated the POSSIBLE amphetamine psychosis theory.

FACT # 3 - Dr. Bronstein stated under oath that he had medicated inmate HEAVILY with enough meds that he should have been down for the count but inmate never got even so much as sleepy.

The FACT that Joe McG said himself it was a THEORY seems to be lost on henri as is the FACT that the theory and its being postulated HAD ABSOLUTELY NO IMPACT ON INMATE'S CONVICTION. INMATE WAS CONVICTED ON THE EVIDENCE. Fatal Vision was not published for the first time until FOUR YEARS after inmate's conviction and the amphetamine theory was not postulated for another couple of years. I know henri hates it when we insist on clouding the issues with FACTS, but the FACTS show that inmate brutally and savagely slaughtered his family like the coward that he is, he has yet to admit it.
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th March 2018, 05:14 PM   #8
desmirelle
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 444
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
In the Joe McGinniss Fatal Vision book, somewhere in the 600s pages, he wrote that the Army CID lab at Ford Gordon was not capable of detecting amphetamines, and that supposedly was why the amphetamine psychosis theory without facts was never detected. That is patently untrue. No traces of amphetamines were ever found in MacDonald's body. It was manufactured evidence, and a strange delusion by Kassab, which McGinniss swallowed, like Kassab's theory without facts that there had been child abuse of the two little girls by MacDonald. There was never a shred of medical evidence, or any other evidence to back that up, and only a very bad judge would believe it.
Wait, are you calling your man crush a liar? Because he's the one who brought up amphetamines and wrote that he was taking them, had lost some weight taking them.
desmirelle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th March 2018, 06:36 PM   #9
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Role Model

Considering that inmate is a serial fabricator, it makes sense that his fellow con artists would use similar tactics to defend his, ahem, innocence. The landlord is unable to produce a single piece of SOURCED exculpatory evidence, so he jumps to case issues that have NOTHING to do with the evidence that led to conviction of his role model.

After a brief mention of inmate's amphetamine use at the Article 32 hearing, the issue NEVER came up again at either the Grand Jury Hearing or at the 1979 trial. It's important to remember that inmate was indicted AND convicted of murdering his family without a single mention of his admitted use of amphetamines.

Shortly after inmate was returned (e.g., Spring of 1982) to his concrete domicile, McGinniss was provided access to inmate's written notes and guess what inmate wrote about on the FIRST PAGE of those notes? Yup, his potential ingestion of Eskatrol.

The interesting thing about this discovery is that it is unlikely that Joe knew about inmate's testimony at the Article 32 hearing. If he was aware of inmate's admission, he most certainly would have included it in Fatal Vision.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com

Last edited by JTF; 5th March 2018 at 06:37 PM.
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th March 2018, 10:10 AM   #10
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
All that stuff about diet pills was something MacDonald provided to his lawyers early on, and it was in confidence, as is normal. It was not something MacDonald intended to be published in a book or newspaper to be used as so-called evidence against him.

There was some legal waffle about diet pills and amphetamines and amphetamine psychosis at the McGinniss trial in 1987:

http://www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.c...niss3-081.html
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th March 2018, 03:08 PM   #11
desmirelle
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 444
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
All that stuff about diet pills was something MacDonald provided to his lawyers early on, and it was in confidence, as is normal. It was not something MacDonald intended to be published in a book or newspaper to be used as so-called evidence against him.

<snip of henri waffle >
Uh, guess again. Jeffrey Macdonald himself gave that information to Joe for use in the book, which was published literally years after the trial. So, whine all you want, but your man crush is the one who made his amphetamine usage available for publication in a book Macdonald wanted published (at the time).
desmirelle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th March 2018, 05:48 AM   #12
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
The Fourth Circuit Court is taking too damned long to render its decision....
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th March 2018, 09:33 AM   #13
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Jeff MacDonald is innocent. He is only in prison because of very bad judges, like Judge Dupree and Judge Fox, who were clearly in error and the poor quality of journalists in America. It looks as though the original MacDonald case thread on this forum will now vanish into oblivion so that the public can remain in sheer ignorance of the facts. It's a subtle form of censorship, like any mention of Rhodesia.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th March 2018, 07:07 PM   #14
Border Reiver
Philosopher
 
Border Reiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,424
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
Jeff MacDonald is innocent. He is only in prison because of very bad judges, like Judge Dupree and Judge Fox, who were clearly in error and the poor quality of journalists in America. It looks as though the original MacDonald case thread on this forum will now vanish into oblivion so that the public can remain in sheer ignorance of the facts. It's a subtle form of censorship, like any mention of Rhodesia.
MacDonald was properly convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers. He has been allowed to appeal his conviction more than anyone else has. He has gone up to the Supreme Court and failed.

Rhodesia can be mentioned at any time, except as a nation it has not existed for over 30 years and has less relevance to modern life than your opinion on the MacDonald trial.
__________________
Questions, comments, queries, bitches, complaints, rude gestures and/or remarks?
Border Reiver is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th March 2018, 08:41 PM   #15
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist.
Moderator
 
Loss Leader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 25,795
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
Jeff MacDonald is innocent. He is only in prison because of very bad judges, like Judge Dupree and Judge Fox, who were clearly in error and the poor quality of journalists in America. It looks as though the original MacDonald case thread on this forum will now vanish into oblivion so that the public can remain in sheer ignorance of the facts. It's a subtle form of censorship, like any mention of Rhodesia.

The original thread is linked to right at the top of this page. It was closed and a new thread opened due to its length. You can find it by clicking right here.
__________________
I have the honor to be
Your Obdt. St

L. Leader
Loss Leader is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th March 2018, 04:49 AM   #16
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
The FACTS of this case will remain available to the public via this continuation thread as well as at:

www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.com"

"www.macdonaldcasefacts.com"

"www.themacdonaldcase.com"

there are, of course, sites that have fantasy and fiction rather than FACT but we have henri for that here.....

Last edited by byn63; 12th March 2018 at 04:51 AM. Reason: link issues
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th March 2018, 01:28 PM   #17
ScottPletcher
Scholar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 66
McGinnis's theory was well chosen

McGinnis's theory was well chosen: it matched the facts of the case and was logical and reasonable. I think that's one of the main reasons inmate was so upset about it, because McG had uncovered the truth, providing the missing element the prosecution couldn't. Inmate -- narcissist that he was -- thought that no one would be able to see past his various lies and ruses.
ScottPletcher is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th March 2018, 03:53 AM   #18
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by ScottPletcher View Post
McGinnis's theory was well chosen: it matched the facts of the case and was logical and reasonable. I think that's one of the main reasons inmate was so upset about it, because McG had uncovered the truth, providing the missing element the prosecution couldn't. Inmate -- narcissist that he was -- thought that no one would be able to see past his various lies and ruses.
I flatly disagree. The MacDonald lawyer, Gary Bostwick said the McGinniss book Fatal Vision was truly outrageous. This is what MacDonald himself thought about it all:

http://www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.c...vil-trial.html
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th March 2018, 04:45 AM   #19
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
Of course, certain people (including inmate) will believe that just because inmate or one of his PAID advocates say "poo-poo" to something it should be taken as fact. The PROBLEM with this is that the EVIDENCE AND FACTS back up the veracity of Fatal Vision. The FACT that the book was not published until 4 years after inmate was convicted always seems to escape the few misguided (giving benefit of the doubt) believers in inmate. It also seems to escape their attention that the amphetamine psychosis theory (which fits the evidence and facts) wasn't brought out until at least 2 years AFTER Fatal Vision was published. Like the ostrich, macolites are forever sticking their heads in the sand.....or like little kids that don't want to hear something they won't like they stick their fingers in their ears and say "na-na-na-na-na-na-na" as loud as they can manage.
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th March 2018, 11:14 AM   #20
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,511
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
I flatly disagree. The MacDonald lawyer, Gary Bostwick said the McGinniss book Fatal Vision was truly outrageous. This is what MacDonald himself thought about it all:

http://www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.c...vil-trial.html
Murdering ******* didn't like being exposed? Stop The Presses!

Your man crush is guilty and will live out his days in exactly the right environment.
__________________
"When a man who is honestly mistaken, hears the truth, he will either cease being mistaken or cease being honest." - Anonymous

"Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus
BStrong is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th March 2018, 05:02 AM   #21
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
Wow! it appears that BStrong has rendered henri speechless (at least temporarily)! Way to go!
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th March 2018, 01:32 PM   #22
Garrison
Illuminator
 
Garrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,411
Originally Posted by byn63 View Post
Wow! it appears that BStrong has rendered henri speechless (at least temporarily)! Way to go!
No, he has just temporarily abandoned Jeffery MacDonald in favour of Neville Chamberlain...
__________________
So I've started a blog about my writing. Check it out at: http://fourth-planet-problem.blogspot.com/
And my first book is on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077W322FX
Garrison is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th April 2018, 05:57 AM   #23
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
it is like waiting for the other shoe to drop......ominous, to say the least......
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th April 2018, 04:37 PM   #24
wasapi
Philosopher
 
wasapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,253
Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
No, he has just temporarily abandoned Jeffery MacDonald in favour of Neville Chamberlain...
Last seen on the Darlie Routier thread where he continues to ignore evidence.

As to the murderer, Jeffrey McDonald, is anyone aware if he has any visitors in prison that still support him? (Not counting Henri).
__________________
Julia
wasapi is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th April 2018, 11:59 PM   #25
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Known Visitors

WASAPI: Considering that inmate has stolen his brother's rightful piece of their mother's estate, the only consistent visitor is his wife. Oh, he'll get the occasional wide-eyed "journalist" to visit him, but that is about it.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th April 2018, 08:15 AM   #26
wasapi
Philosopher
 
wasapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,253
Originally Posted by JTF View Post
WASAPI: Considering that inmate has stolen his brother's rightful piece of their mother's estate, the only consistent visitor is his wife. Oh, he'll get the occasional wide-eyed "journalist" to visit him, but that is about it.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
Thanks. I wasn't aware he remarried. It isn't surprising really, it seems many prisoners can find women if they want.
__________________
Julia
wasapi is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2018, 03:47 AM   #27
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Strip Mall Queen

WASAPI: From 1982-1997, inmate was being visited by various female groupies (e.g., single/married) and professionals (e.g., media types). Inmate received "services" from these women ranging from pawing one another to a few agreeing to secretly audiotape members of the prosecution team. Inmate was apparently hoping to catch James Blackburn and/or Paul Stombaugh in a "gotcha" moment.

A visitor in the mid-late 90's decided to weed the herd and by 2000, she was inmate's lone female confidant. Inmate and Kathryn MacDonald married in 2002, and she has periodically made the media rounds in the past 16 years. She is notorious for spreading falsehoods about this case and has even made attempts to get certain individuals (e.g., proponents of inmate's guilt) fired from their jobs.

In the past several years, however, the worm has turned as evidenced by Kathryn's continual run-ins with the law. It seems she has been before a Judge more times than she has appeared on radio/television talk shows. Kathryn's behaviors also led to her closing her drama school for children.

In my opinion, the seminal moment of Kathryn's bizarre inclusion in this case occurred at her husband's 2005 parole hearing. After Brian Murtagh destroyed inmate's ridiculous attempt to garner freedom, Colette's brother was granted the opportunity to speak directly to inmate and his wife. At one point, Bob Stevenson told Kathryn that she was nothing more than a "Strip Mall Queen." Classic.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st April 2018, 08:43 AM   #28
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
There is an article on the internet about the MacDonald case which may have been written by Fred Bost:

https://www.dvusd.org/cms/lib011/AZ0...0MacDonald.pdf

Quote:
Jeffery MacDonald- The Crime Scene

It was as if the crime was put in the charge of amateurs instead of trained investigators.

Many people, including civilians, roamed through the crime scene that was never properly secured, greatly interfering with the collection of evidence.
The agents did not draw lines around the bodies prior to this examination, making it difficult to determine the original position of the bodies.

They moved things in the kitchen, made coffee using MacDonald's coffee pot, washed dishes in the sink, used the toilet, sat on the furniture, read magazines and listened to their stereo, long before all the evidence was collected or the investigation was complete.

They also allowed the trash to be picked up without being checked for evidence!

Last edited by Henri McPhee; 21st April 2018 at 08:45 AM.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st April 2018, 04:16 PM   #29
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Shell Game

In order to avoid addressing the mountain of inculpatory physical evidence, all of inmate's most outspoken advocates (e.g., Bost, Morris, Silverglate) played the crime scene preservation shell game. They were all aware of the impossible task of rebutting the mass of evidence pointing to inmate as being the lone perp, so they simply stated that the evidence was contaminated. O.J. Simpson's defense team played the same shell game, but unlike the jurors at inmate's trial, the jurors at the Simpson trial were swayed by this con game.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com

Last edited by JTF; 21st April 2018 at 04:17 PM.
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd April 2018, 04:36 AM   #30
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
the shell game includes bringing up "possible" evidence (anything in the trash that was picked up before being investigated or the hospital disposing of inmate's pj trousers) as if that MEANS something. the trouble with that premise is that inmate was not convicted using evidence that WAS NOT FOUND.....he was convicted on evidence that WAS FOUND.
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd April 2018, 08:27 AM   #31
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by byn63 View Post
..he was convicted on evidence that WAS FOUND.
Manufactured evidence more like, and disregarding leads and suspects.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd April 2018, 06:39 PM   #32
Ygraine
New Blood
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 18
Well, shoot, Henri. I had hoped that you were researching new and convincing evidence during your absence here. Alas....
Ygraine is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th April 2018, 02:53 AM   #33
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Ygraine View Post
Well, shoot, Henri. I had hoped that you were researching new and convincing evidence during your absence here. Alas....
Blackburn in his closing argument to the jury at the 1979 trial said the conclusive evidence was that there were pajama fibers on the murder weapon. Fred Bost said that there were no pajama fibers on the murder weapon. It was manufactured evidence.

There is a bit about all this sort of thing in a letter Fred Bost sent to JTF when he was alive:

http://www.crimearchives.net/1979_ma..._callahan.html
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th April 2018, 04:13 AM   #34
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
henri it has been proven REPEAT PROVEN that your comments on manufactured evidence is the only manufactured evidence in this case. 2 pajama fibers were found on the murder club, adhered to it in blood, they were removed by the CID and placed in a pill container, and all properly documented in lab notes etc. Inmate was convicted on actual evidence that was found at the scene not "hypothetical evidence" that got away.
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2018, 05:04 AM   #35
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Rinse And Repeat

After taking a brake from his usual rinse and repeat routine, Henriboy is back in full carnival barker mode. Despite his history of ignoring the following rebuttal...

In 1979, co-lead prosecutor Brian Murtagh requested an FBI re-analysis of the fibers found at the crime scene. Two dark woolen fibers were found on the club during this re-analysis. Considering the fact that these dark woolen fibers were not listed in the 1970 CID lab reports or the 1974 FBI lab reports, advocates for MacDonald felt that something was amiss.

They ultimately concluded that the two fibers listed in the initial lab reports as coming from Jeffrey MacDonald's pajamas, were actually the two dark woolen fibers listed in the 1979 FBI fiber re-analysis. In essence, advocates for MacDonald claimed that this was a classic case of fiber misidentification. The documented record says otherwise. In 1970, CID chemist Dillard Browning labeled the debris found on the club as CID Exhibit E-205.

Browning noted that two pajama fibers were found adhering to the club in Colette MacDonald's blood and he subsequently placed the two fibers in a vial. In 1974, FBI physical science technician Shirley Green labeled the debris from the club as FBI Exhibit Q89. Green placed the pajama fibers in a pillbox, and Paul Stombaugh later matched the fibers to the seam threads from Jeffrey MacDonald's pajama top.

In 1989, the FBI took two color photographs of the seam threads in the pillbox and the photographs were labeled as FBI Exhibits 76 and 77. The documented record clearly indicates that both pajama fibers and dark woolen fibers were found on the club. Dark woolen fibers were also found on Colette MacDonald's bicep and near her mouth.

In 1990, FBI hair and fibers expert Michael Malone found that these fibers differed in optical properties which meant that the fibers came from different source materials. This conclusion mirrored the chemical composition analysis of the two dark woolen fibers found on the club. The two dark woolen fibers also differed in optical properties.

Henriboy also leaves out the fact that Fred Bost admitted (e.g., Fatal Justice endnotes) that lab notes indicate the distinct possibility that BOTH dark woolen fibers and pajama fibers were found on the club.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com

Last edited by JTF; 25th April 2018 at 05:07 AM.
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2018, 08:45 AM   #36
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by byn63 View Post
henri it has been proven REPEAT PROVEN that your comments on manufactured evidence is the only manufactured evidence in this case. 2 pajama fibers were found on the murder club, adhered to it in blood, they were removed by the CID and placed in a pill container, and all properly documented in lab notes etc. Inmate was convicted on actual evidence that was found at the scene not "hypothetical evidence" that got away.
That's a lie. It was forensic fraud fabricated out of whole cloth.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th April 2018, 04:17 PM   #37
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
It Is What It Is

The following excerpt can be found on page 433 of the hardback addition of FATAL JUSTICE. Notice how Bost and Potter couldn't even get the little details (e.g., Shirley Green inventoried the fiber evidence in question, not Kathy Bond) right?

"The debris from the club had been presented to Frier and Bond in three forms: in a vial, in a pillbox, and on a slide. Apparently the two threads thought to be from the pajama top were residing in the pillbox, because Kathy Bond's initial inventory note, before any actual analyses took place, stated: "(2) Pillbox contains 2 short pc's sew thr (like blue PJ top)". An element that causes further confusion is her following notation, "(left as is)." Did this mean that Frier and Bond ignored the fibers in the pillbox, and never examined them, choosing only to examine the other materials? Perhaps. And if this is what happened, then the two "pajama" fibers were still in existence, still serving as thorns gouging the defense."

Once the FBI's color photographs of the fibers in the pillbox were published for public consumption, I realized that Bost and Potter had NEVER viewed the photographs. Adding to their incompetence is the FACT that FATAL JUSTICE was published 6 years AFTER these photographs were taken. Classic.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th April 2018, 03:58 AM   #38
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,087
Frier of the FBI lab was the expert examiner concerning alleged pajama fibers on the murder weapon and he said they were black wool fibers, as well as some other fibers. Stombaugh and Kathy Bond and Shirley Green, and JTF and Byn, were pseudo experts.

Logan made a sensible comment about all this on the Google Groups forum in 1999:

Quote:
Black wool fibers were found on Colette's mouth, on her shoulder, her biceps,and on the murder club found out back.

In 1970 the army said the black wool fibers on the murder club were blue
fibers from Jeff's pajama top. Brian Murtagh had some of the evidence
reexamined shortly before trial. Along with other evidence the supposed
"pajama fibers" on the club were also reexamined. The FBI agent concluded
that these "pajama fibers" were in fact Black wool fibers that were similiar
to the fibers found on Colette's mouth, shoulder, and biceps. He concluded
that these fibers did not match Jeff's pajama top.

The FBI tried to match these fibers to anything they could find in the home but came up empty.

In closing arguments of the trial lead prosecutor Jim Blackburn waved the
club and the pajama top in front of the jury. He told the jury that two
fibers from Jeff's pajama top were found on the club. He told the jury that
they could ignore all of the other evidence because the two pajama fibers on
the club were enough to convict MacDonald.

They presented known false evidence to a jury.

When the defense found out about this in 1989 thru FOIA documents they filed
an appeal based on these fibers and based on the wig fibers that had been
witheld from the defense. Michael Malone re-examined these fibers in 1990
and also concluded that the fibers were in fact black wool and not pajama
fibers. The FBI again tried to match these black wool fibers to anything
found in the home but came up with no match again. Malone then stated under
oath that these black wool fibers were simply "household debris" and were not
forensically significant.

MacDonald lived at the apartment. He wore the pajama top that night and it
was ripped that night and fibers were found on the floor in different places.
His pants were also ripped. The club has been proven to have come from the
MacDonald home. When two supposed pajama fibers are found on the club that is the most important evidence against MacDonald but when it turns out that the fibers are not pajama fibers and are in fact black wool that matches black wool on Colette's mouth, shoulder, and biceps the fibers are simply household debris.

I just can't understand this reasoning or how anybody could believe it.
Any comment Mirse? Anybody?
Logan
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th April 2018, 01:21 PM   #39
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,026
Ah, What?

HENRIBOY: I always get a kick out of your disjointed talking points. Please keep being yourself, you intellectual child, you.

No loyalty to Fred Bost, eh? I provided you with an entire paragraph from his work of fiction, yet he goes from a reliable source to a "pseudo-expert?" Hilarious. When you use a 20 year old opinion presented on a forum as your main talking point, you're dealing in weak sauce. Heck, your boy Logan simply regurgitated information contained in the work of a "pseudo-expert." Logan makes no mention of...

- Inmate discarding most of the family clothing items.
- Two pajama fibers were placed in a pillbox and then photographed by the FBI.
- Animal hair was also found on the club.
- A significant number of pajama fibers were sourced to a specific portion or section of the garment.
- The two pajama seam threads found on the club were adhering to the club in Colette's blood.
- Three of the five dark woolen fibers found on Colette's body differed in chemical composition indicating multiple source materials.
- The two dark woolen fibers found on the club differed in chemical composition indicating separate source materials.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com

Last edited by JTF; 27th April 2018 at 01:24 PM.
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st May 2018, 04:58 AM   #40
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 719
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
That's a lie. It was forensic fraud fabricated out of whole cloth.
No it is not henri and you KNOW it! You are the one who gets on the boards year after year spouting disproven and/or misleading nonsense. YOU are the one who advocates for a lying sociopathic narcissistic familial slaughterer.

You want to take me on? FINE! Do it with ACTUAL FACTS not the nonsense you keep spouting! Until you can do so, don't come after me!
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Trials and Errors

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:29 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.