IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 18th April 2016, 02:48 PM   #81
waypastvne
Muse
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 539
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Of course they wouldn't launch just one missile.
No, that would be silly.
waypastvne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2016, 02:53 PM   #82
Andy_Ross
Penultimate Amazing
 
Andy_Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 47,040
So we are talking about how many missiles?
Did they fly in formation or arrive one after the other?
Andy_Ross is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2016, 02:58 PM   #83
yankee451
Master Poster
 
yankee451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
Originally Posted by waypastvne View Post
No, that would be silly.
Of course. Now I know you're mocking me but forgive me if I can't understand how the swept back wing striking on the right corner of the columns while traveling south, could damage the columns on the left corner and bend and gouge them towards the west. This is of course assuming that the wingtip that would no longer be attached to the rest of the jet and that would not have been filled with fuel could damage the steel in such a way after it changed course.
yankee451 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2016, 03:02 PM   #84
threadworm
Graduate Poster
 
threadworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,830
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Of course. Now I know you're mocking me but forgive me if I can't understand how the swept back wing striking on the right corner of the columns while traveling south, could damage the columns on the left corner and bend and gouge them towards the west. This is of course assuming that the wingtip that would no longer be attached to the rest of the jet and that would not have been filled with fuel could damage the steel in such a way after it changed course.
Because you've convinced yourself that there wasn't a plane and have concocted a fantasy about missiles and no amount of logical reasoning or argument will persuade you back to reality?
__________________
Facts are simple and facts are straight, facts are lazy and facts are late, facts don't come with points of view, facts don't do what I want them to.

**************************

Apollo Hoax Debunked
threadworm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2016, 06:36 PM   #85
Axxman300
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 6,863
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Of course. Now I know you're mocking me but forgive me if I can't understand how the swept back wing striking on the right corner of the columns while traveling south, could damage the columns on the left corner and bend and gouge them towards the west. This is of course assuming that the wingtip that would no longer be attached to the rest of the jet and that would not have been filled with fuel could damage the steel in such a way after it changed course.
So you can't figure out why the thinnest past of the wing did less damage than the thin part with internal structural reinforcement?

Yet you want to run a test with a high speed sled?

Okay.
Axxman300 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2016, 03:20 AM   #86
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
 
Dave Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
So you think that if you write lies on a picture, that will make people see things that aren't there? An interesting approach, but hardly one that will expose the truth.

Dave
__________________
There is truth and there are lies.

- President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021
Dave Rogers is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2016, 06:02 PM   #87
yankee451
Master Poster
 
yankee451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
Originally Posted by Dave Rogers View Post
So you think that if you write lies on a picture, that will make people see things that aren't there? An interesting approach, but hardly one that will expose the truth.

Dave
I'm sure the readers can make up their own minds as to whether the perspectives are correct or not.
yankee451 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2016, 06:29 PM   #88
Jrrarglblarg
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop View Post
So we are talking about how many missiles?
Did they fly in formation or arrive one after the other?
They were precision flown in a formation that looked exactly like a Boeing. Truly amazing work. And they would have gotten away with it, too, except for those pesky kids.
Jrrarglblarg is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2016, 07:18 PM   #89
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
I'm sure the readers can make up their own minds as to whether the perspectives are correct or not.
Indeed.
Easy peasy. Did you post something?
If yes, then it's wrong.

Simple.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2016, 07:59 PM   #90
ProBonoShill
Master Poster
 
ProBonoShill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,323
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Hey look, I can post links youtube links too:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQFfiYMQ14o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p80hXaM4QgU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpZ9PPdERC4
__________________
"CD does not prove 9/11 was an inside job. It only proves CD"- FalseFlag
ProBonoShill is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2016, 07:47 AM   #91
geggy
Muse
 
geggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 598
Here are strong evidence that the attacks were allowed to happen. If you look at each of the trainings as an isolated incident, it may seem it was innocuous that each of the person had mistakenly the attacks as part of a training exercise. But the overlapping of these reports indicated the trainings were designed to confused everyone and move the fighter jets further away from the path of the hijacked planes before they reached their destinations

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...e_911_timeline
geggy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2016, 08:24 AM   #92
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 26,122
14 years of nonsense, and it gets dumber

Originally Posted by geggy View Post
Here are strong evidence that the attacks were allowed to happen. If you look at each of the trainings as an isolated incident, it may seem it was innocuous that each of the person had mistakenly the attacks as part of a training exercise. But the overlapping of these reports indicated the trainings were designed to confused everyone and move the fighter jets further away from the path of the hijacked planes before they reached their destinations

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...e_911_timeline
Yes you have nothing but a hit and run post; zero evidence. Did you lie? Where is your evidence? Source with the evidence, you failed to make a point.

There was no confusion on 9/11 about the attacks and exercises; there is confusion in people like you who cherry pick and quote mine stuff to make up lies like your post; all based on nothing.

14 years and you can't produce evidence of anything to support your lie.

IF you had strong evidence, you could earn a Pulitzer. You have nothing but fantasy. You will fail to produce evidence.

When fighter launch they can't rush into FAA civilian controlled airspace, but alert birds and ad hoc launched planes can proceed immediately to the Warning Areas controlled by military using procedures in place to launch at will; but to enter FAA space requires clearance... Thus your going the wrong way is not a point, but a fact due to peace time airspace and zero procedures before 9/11 to intercept airliners over the USA, it had never been done from an alert takeoff. You know nothing about 9/11, and this sad trend continues 14 years after 9/11.

If you studied 9/11 instead of making up lies, you might learn something. Why do you lie about 9/11? Why can't you state your point, your story of 9/11?

Your claim exposes an overwhelming ignorance on 9/11, NORAD, FAA, airspace, USAF, etc... big fail
__________________
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein
"... education as the means of developing our greatest abilities" - JFK

Last edited by beachnut; 28th April 2016 at 08:33 AM.
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2016, 09:28 AM   #93
fuelair
Banned
 
fuelair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
In Truth you will find no Truthers.
In Truthers you will find no Truth.
fuelair is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2016, 11:24 AM   #94
ProBonoShill
Master Poster
 
ProBonoShill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,323
Originally Posted by geggy View Post
Here are strong evidence that the attacks were allowed to happen. If you look at each of the trainings as an isolated incident, it may seem it was innocuous that each of the person had mistakenly the attacks as part of a training exercise. But the overlapping of these reports indicated the trainings were designed to confused everyone and move the fighter jets further away from the path of the hijacked planes before they reached their destinations

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...e_911_timeline
You've been here since 2006 and should know better. Use the search function, the idiocy from your link was debunked many times, long ago.
__________________
"CD does not prove 9/11 was an inside job. It only proves CD"- FalseFlag
ProBonoShill is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.