|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
22nd January 2014, 05:18 PM | #41 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
It has already been moved. Evidently the OP's intent was well known even though the Pentagon wasn't specified.
So how do you know the dudes "picking up" the plane parts weren't planting them? Isn't it odd that they were cleaning up plane parts so quickly? You'd think they'd want to search for survivors. |
22nd January 2014, 05:22 PM | #42 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
If I ran the zoo fallacy and unsupported speculation.
|
22nd January 2014, 05:26 PM | #43 | ||
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
If they're not planting plane parts what are they doing collecting souvenirs? Don't they know they're moving evidence, and without gloves?
http://www.newsfollowup.com/images/2...missile_lo.jpg
|
||
22nd January 2014, 05:28 PM | #44 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
I outlined the largest pieces of WTC plane ejecta on page 1. If you or anyone else have proof those objects were planted please present it. If you or anyone else has proof of airplane debris planted inside the Pentagon please present it. I have word from someone I consider a reliable witness that a horrific tangle of plane parts and gruesome human remains were thoroughly intermingled with building debris.
|
22nd January 2014, 05:29 PM | #45 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
Loaded questions are not proof but speculation.
|
22nd January 2014, 05:29 PM | #46 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:31 PM | #47 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:34 PM | #48 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:36 PM | #49 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:36 PM | #50 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:39 PM | #51 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15,720
|
Because that would require a massive coordinated coverup under the eyes of non military personel.
Because the military cannot do what you claim at a moments notice and certainly not the time scale available on 9/11 Because one is not like the other and they are not comparable. |
__________________
Audiophile/biker/sceptic |
|
22nd January 2014, 05:40 PM | #52 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
Quote:
|
22nd January 2014, 05:44 PM | #53 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15,720
|
|
__________________
Audiophile/biker/sceptic |
|
22nd January 2014, 05:45 PM | #54 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 60,375
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:46 PM | #55 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15,720
|
|
__________________
Audiophile/biker/sceptic |
|
22nd January 2014, 05:55 PM | #56 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
What non-military personnel? With the kind of money spent on the War on Terra, why would non-military personnel be more trustworthy than the military personnel. Aren't you really saying "it's too big for me to wrap my brain around, so it can't be true"? Isn't that the definition of the Big Lie?
The Afghan War began while the towers were still smoking, that's close enough to a moment's notice for me, but if you'd like to split that hair then let me correct that to "very quickly". Means, motive and opportunity. The military is the most likely suspect with the most infrastructure in place to be able to pull it off, and after the last 12 years of promotions and war money the military has been rolling in, the motive is unquestionably there. |
22nd January 2014, 05:57 PM | #57 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
|
22nd January 2014, 05:58 PM | #58 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
Questions and speculation are not proof.
My brother was in the Pentagon. He told me he saw aircraft debris and human remains thoroughly comingled with building debris inside the building. I have no reason to disbelieve his testimony. We both had God's Own security clearances and swapped classified stories. |
22nd January 2014, 06:01 PM | #59 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
|
22nd January 2014, 06:04 PM | #60 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
Why would they touch any of the plane parts. Wasn't there an effort to photograph the crime scene as it was? Why did cleanup commence prior to rescue efforts?
True believers are pushovers for authority to manipulate. They believe authority by virtue of their authority. Power corrupts sure, but the more important lesson is the corrupt seek power. |
22nd January 2014, 06:08 PM | #61 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
Why would they be clearing the area? Is that what usually happens at plane crashes? Were they with the FAA crash investigation? Were they collecting the parts to put them in a big warehouse and rebuild the plane? No? Pity, much could have been learned.
Wonder why they were so concerned with putting those parts there. |
22nd January 2014, 06:08 PM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
The general public isn't smart enough to see a few flatbed trucks with aircraft debris pull up to the side of a massive office building that's on fire, and have suited businessmen and first responders sprinkle parts over the lawn?
In broad daylight? Lemme guess...YOU'RE smart enough. Amirite?? |
22nd January 2014, 06:13 PM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
|
22nd January 2014, 06:16 PM | #64 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
|
22nd January 2014, 06:19 PM | #65 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
Lmfao
They are collecting pieces off the lawn because vehicles and rescue personnel will be using that area. Its collection and preservation. Other than work gloves to protect from cuts why would they need gloves? Why would it be required to delay rescue and fire fighting to put gloves on? |
22nd January 2014, 06:25 PM | #66 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,794
|
|
22nd January 2014, 06:29 PM | #67 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
That might be true, might not. I have no information either way, nor do I have any way of vetting the source. I do have a way of vetting the source of my information. I've known him "for a while" and our pattern of communication included sharing of true information to which on or the other of us had classified access.
You might not believe it, but your disbelief alone does not constitute proof of anything. |
22nd January 2014, 06:33 PM | #68 |
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
|
If I Ran The Zoo fallacy again, with speculative questions. I don't have enough context for the photograph -- all I see is men holding scraps of plane. I don't know who took the picture, when it was taken or what data gathering may or may be appropriate or have been performed prior to this point in time.
Quote:
|
22nd January 2014, 06:38 PM | #69 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
|
22nd January 2014, 06:41 PM | #70 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
There is a reason why most of the time that people running into burning buildings are not dressed in white shirts, ties and dress shoes. It tends to simply increase the number of people requiring rescue.
So, having found a laughably scant , far from conclusive, and skewed iota of evidence to bolster planted aircraft parts, will you now move onto evidence of radar data? |
22nd January 2014, 07:07 PM | #71 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,753
|
So we're at the stage where we are asking yankee to provide the evidence that debris was planted?
Asking a no planer to provide evidence.. that's never going to happen guys. |
__________________
Common sense has clearly been snuck up on from behind beaten several times on the head and left to bleed. For my complete compilation of evidence showing AAL77 hit the Pentagon -http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/ For my compilation of evidence for UAL93 - http://ual93.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/user/cjnewson88 |
|
22nd January 2014, 07:08 PM | #72 |
I would save the receptionist.
Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 28,352
|
A) That only works if your definition of "moment" is "eight months." B) That only works if the US doesn't mind every single person with a camera being able to record everything they're doing. It's not like Saddam Hussein didn't know we were massing troops in Saudi Arabia. He just had no way to defend his western border. [url=http://www.questia.com/library/1P2-33363275/us-military-in-gulf-builds-toward-blockade-of-iraq\The Christian Science Monitor]/url] somehow got wind of the US deployment six months before we invaded Iraq. |
__________________
I have the honor to be Your Obdt. St L. Leader |
|
22nd January 2014, 07:11 PM | #73 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15,720
|
|
__________________
Audiophile/biker/sceptic |
|
22nd January 2014, 07:14 PM | #74 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15,720
|
|
__________________
Audiophile/biker/sceptic |
|
22nd January 2014, 07:32 PM | #75 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,440
|
|
22nd January 2014, 08:19 PM | #76 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,440
|
So can I assume you don't think Truthers have the burden of proof to back their claims? With the many Truther claims of planted plane wreckage, there has never been any evidene to support their claims. The fact the planes existed, were crashed by terroists, the people on the planes were never seen again, there were scores of eye witnesses to the crashes and plane debris was photographed and recovered is proof positive the planes and resulting plane wreckage existed.
Or do you think everything was a hologram? Clearly you are a no planer. Where is your evidence to back your position that the wreckage was planted (or that no planes crashed)? |
22nd January 2014, 08:25 PM | #77 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,440
|
|
22nd January 2014, 08:32 PM | #78 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,440
|
|
22nd January 2014, 08:36 PM | #79 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,425
|
|
__________________
My boss told me to stop procrastinating. I think I will… tomorrow. |
|
22nd January 2014, 08:38 PM | #80 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,425
|
|
__________________
My boss told me to stop procrastinating. I think I will… tomorrow. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|