ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags donald trump , mental illness issues , psychiatry incidents , psychiatry issues , Trump controversies

Reply
Old 16th July 2018, 08:05 AM   #281
WilliamSeger
Illuminator
 
WilliamSeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,017
Originally Posted by xjx388 View Post
A fact is something that is true regardless of what you believe. "My beliefs happen to be true," is something you hear from woo peddlers of all stripes. Fundamentally, that's what we have here -something that some believe is true (Trump is dangerously mentally ill) and an attempt to use the statements of the Yale group to turn that belief into a fact.
It seems you're still not aware of this, but there is no secret science litmus test for personality disorders: It's always an opinion. It appears you want to dismiss expert opinion simply because you don't want it to be true. But I do believe that there is a reason your efforts to turn your own beliefs into facts have been such a miserable failure: The Yale group's opinion is very well founded, whereas yours seems to be politically biased pseudo-science and irrational devotion to dogma.
WilliamSeger is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 08:19 AM   #282
xjx388
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,562
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Nope. The nature of something like Trump's obsession over inaugural crowd attendance was pathologic in nature.
Why exactly? He could be pandering to his base or messing with his critics. It could be a deliberate distraction to keep the media focused on frivolities. Seems to be working . . .

Quote:
The fact you can't tell the difference between a pathologically self-absorbed obsession and garden variety self-absorption illustrates the problem. You don't seem to recognize there is a difference.
Of course there is a difference. The question here is: who cares? What extra knowledge are you gaining by slapping a "sick" label on Trump? Does being mentally ill automatically disqualify someone from the Presidency? A look at past Presidents would indicate the answer to that is, "no."

Quote:
What is it you think a psychiatrist is doing when they look at the NPD criteria in the DSM to determine when someone has a disorder and when someone is simply on the extreme end of non-pathologic narcissism? You seem to think there is no way to determine pathology from non-pathology.
Things are often not as they seem...

Quote:
Just because you can't tell the difference doesn't mean someone educated and experienced in personality disorders can't.


I've addressed this. A year ago the news media was still discussing Trump becoming presidential. I said it wasn't going to happen because he was incapable. And, it turned out he was incapable.
Wow. I came to this exact same conclusion all on my own and I didn't need a white coat, fancy titles and a book of diagnosis to do it!

Quote:
The sooner people recognize it's pathology and Trump cannot override it, the sooner they will quit expecting him to act differently.
I don't expect him to act differently because this has been the way he has acted the whole time I've known about him and he's 70 years old now. He's an old dog and he has no new tricks. So, I'm confused: of what use is that "pathology" label again?
__________________
Hello.

Last edited by xjx388; 16th July 2018 at 08:21 AM.
xjx388 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 08:27 AM   #283
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30,487
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
The sooner people recognize it's pathology and Trump cannot override it, the sooner they will quit expecting him to act differently.
Who's expecting him to act differently? As far as I can tell, everyone - right, left, fans, foes, heil trumpers and never trumpers - everyone seems to agree that he's acting pretty much exactly as they expected him to act, and everybody seems to agree he'll continue to act this way.

Is that supposed to be the Yale group's big insight? "Hey guys, you know the way Trump is? Well, that's the way he is!"
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 08:38 AM   #284
xjx388
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,562
Originally Posted by WilliamSeger View Post
It seems you're still not aware of this, but there is no secret science litmus test for personality disorders: It's always an opinion.
Well, no duh! Of course it's always an opinion. Usually, it's an objective opinion formed by several sessions of interaction with a patient, interviews with family, etc. That's what the standards of practice call for. You are, of course, free to cite an alternative standard that I've missed, but I won't hold my breath.
Quote:
It appears you want to dismiss expert opinion simply because you don't want it to be true.
That's an uncharitable misreading of my posts.
Quote:
But I do believe that there is a reason your efforts to turn your own beliefs into facts have been such a miserable failure: The Yale group's opinion is very well founded, whereas yours seems to be politically biased pseudo-science and irrational devotion to dogma.
If you think the standards and ethics of Psychiatry and Psychology are pseudoscience and an insistence on adhering to sound, ethical practice is "irrational devotion to dogma," well, that's an interesting opinion.
__________________
Hello.
xjx388 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 08:47 AM   #285
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by xjx388 View Post
A fact is something that is true regardless of what you believe. "My beliefs happen to be true," is something you hear from woo peddlers of all stripes. Fundamentally, that's what we have here -something that some believe is true (Trump is dangerously mentally ill) and an attempt to use the statements of the Yale group to turn that belief into a fact.
I've never used the "Yale group" to support my belief because I don't need to. Trump's narcissism is on display for everyone to see.
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:20 AM   #286
WilliamSeger
Illuminator
 
WilliamSeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,017
Originally Posted by xjx388 View Post
Well, no duh! Of course it's always an opinion. Usually, it's an objective opinion formed by several sessions of interaction with a patient, interviews with family, etc. That's what the standards of practice call for. You are, of course, free to cite an alternative standard that I've missed, but I won't hold my breath.That's an uncharitable misreading of my posts.If you think the standards and ethics of Psychiatry and Psychology are pseudoscience and an insistence on adhering to sound, ethical practice is "irrational devotion to dogma," well, that's an interesting opinion.
Yes, trying to buttress your arguments by insisting that an ethics rule is based on imaginary science is definitely pseudo-science. It's one thing to have a different opinion about the ethics here, but simply refusing to acknowledge any ethical dilemma here is either irrational devotion to a dogma that won't allow any such thing, or it's ordinary disingenuous argument, so I'm actually giving you the benefit of a doubt. On the one hand, you can't credibly deny that the Yale group is right -- anyone (with the possible exception of theprestige) can see that if Trump isn't NPD, then there's no such thing -- but on the other you want to claim that it's just politically motivated so it doesn't really mean anything. I have to wonder why you are so concerned about protecting a profession if you really don't really believe it serves any useful purpose.
WilliamSeger is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:21 AM   #287
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70,485
Tell me that Trump/Putin press conference didn't demonstrate a pathologic obsession with the Mueller investigation. That is what pathology looks like.

No, that was not playing to any base.

Even some people on Fox News are stunned.
__________________
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 16th July 2018 at 09:24 AM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:32 AM   #288
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Tell me that Trump/Putin press conference didn't demonstrate a pathologic obsession with the Mueller investigation. That is what pathology looks like.

No, that was not playing to any base.

Even some people on Fox News are stunned.
It was stunning. This is another clear case of a line being drawn: if you're with Trump after this, you're now a traitor. There's no way around it.
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:35 AM   #289
Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
 
Emily's Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 10,090
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Going back to do some cleanup, it's been busy over there in the USA politics threads and I missed a few of these I wanted to reply to.

OK let's trim this up. Do you even remember what you posted? You seem to have drifted quite a bit.




You think med schools and schools of psychiatry don't use the DSM-5?
The DSM is a diagnostic reference, it isn't practice standards.
__________________
I am me. I am just me. I'm a little like other cats... but mostly I am just me.
Emily's Cat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:36 AM   #290
Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
 
Emily's Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 10,090
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
I've posted numerous examples here of Trump behavior specifically tied to his pathology.
And why should any of us believe your "diagnosis"?
__________________
I am me. I am just me. I'm a little like other cats... but mostly I am just me.
Emily's Cat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:47 AM   #291
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70,485
Originally Posted by Emily's Cat View Post
The DSM is a diagnostic reference, it isn't practice standards.
You might want to look at a few pages.
__________________
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:49 AM   #292
Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
 
Emily's Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 10,090
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
You might want to look at a few pages.
Do you also consider the CPT-4 and the ICD-10 to be "practice standards"?
__________________
I am me. I am just me. I'm a little like other cats... but mostly I am just me.
Emily's Cat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:51 AM   #293
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by Emily's Cat View Post
And why should any of us believe your "diagnosis"?
Do you still think it's possible Trump DOESN'T have some severe personality disorder?
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:52 AM   #294
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30,487
Originally Posted by Fudbucker View Post
Do you still think it's possible Trump DOESN'T have some severe personality disorder?
That was never the question.
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 09:54 AM   #295
Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
 
Emily's Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 10,090
Originally Posted by Fudbucker View Post
Do you still think it's possible Trump DOESN'T have some severe personality disorder?
Yes.

I think it's possible that he does have a "severe" personality disorder. I also think it's possible that he has a mild personality disorder. I also think it's possible that he doesn't have a personality disorder at all, and is just an average run of the mill narcissist (in the colloquial sense), who is also a rich, entitled, jerk and an *******.

I think all of those are possible.
__________________
I am me. I am just me. I'm a little like other cats... but mostly I am just me.
Emily's Cat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 10:03 AM   #296
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70,485
Originally Posted by Emily's Cat View Post
Do you also consider the CPT-4 and the ICD-10 to be "practice standards"?
I take it you didn't look at the DSM.
__________________
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 10:04 AM   #297
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70,485
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
That was never the question.
Well, actually it was despite xjx claiming it wasn't.
__________________
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 10:07 AM   #298
Steve
Illuminator
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,176
Originally Posted by Emily's Cat View Post
And why should any of us believe your "diagnosis"?
Based on the evidence and links in this very thread SG's "diagnosis" (as you designate it) is very believable. Solid evidence that Trump's ongoing bizarre behavior is *not* the result of a mental disorder is sadly lacking in this thread. Even many of those here who argue against the psychiatric professionals ethics in publicly releasing their opinion accept that there is something seriously wrong with the man.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 10:21 AM   #299
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30,487
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Well, actually it was despite xjx claiming it wasn't.
It wasn't the question because it was never in dispute. You're getting broad agreement from everyone here that Trump has some kind of personality flaw, regardless of how you refer to it.

The things in dispute are:

... Whether the Yale group can actually diagnose personality disorders remotely.
... Whether the Yale group acted ethically in publishing their diagnosis.
... Whether the Cabinet should act on the Yale group's recommendation to start 25th Amendment proceedings against the president, on the strength of the group's remote diagnosis.

We know you and xjx agree that Trump is in some sense, "crazy".

We know that you are convinced that remote diagnosis is possible, and that the Yale group acted ethically in publishing their diagnosis.

I guess the only point left to discuss, really, is whether the Cabinet should act on the Yale group's recommendation and try to remove the President from office. What do you think?
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 11:29 AM   #300
Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
 
Emily's Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 10,090
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
I take it you didn't look at the DSM.
I did. It provides diagnostic criteria. It doesn't provide practice standards. Unless your idea of practice standards is somewhat different from what I understand it to be.
__________________
I am me. I am just me. I'm a little like other cats... but mostly I am just me.
Emily's Cat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 11:39 AM   #301
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70,485
When you actually do look at the manual, I'll be curious to hear how you spin what you mean by practice standards.
__________________
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 12:24 PM   #302
carlitos
"más divertido"
 
carlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18,838
Originally Posted by The Norseman View Post
Originally Posted by carlitos View Post
I think that he probably is, but if we start down the road of evaluating mental and emotional health for public office, we would lose a lot of qualified leaders. Our system sucks at selecting the best and brightest as it is; why make it worse?
Are you truly serious here?
Yes.

Originally Posted by The Norseman View Post
Someone who is borderline a danger to themselves or others isn't a disqualification in your view for government office?
Whatever a "borderline danger to themselves and others" is, that's not what I said or meant. We already have a system that eliminates too many qualified leaders, whether due to lack of pay, lack of interest, or overly-intrusive background vetting. If we start to police "borderline" personality disorders we would only make it worse.


Study - 1/2 of all US Presidents had mental illness.


Originally Posted by The Norseman View Post
Why have any standards at all, such as an age qualification then if being emotionally healthy and well-balanced is too high a bar for some to reach?
Yes, why have any standards at all. That's exactly my point.
carlitos is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:00 PM   #303
Leftus
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Stacyhs View Post
Out of curiosity, what would it take for you to think Trump's narcissism goes way beyond "garden variety self-absorption"?
A diagnose by a doctor who actually evaluated him in person. Of course, they could never come out and say it. HIPAA and all that.

Not from armchair doctors and nurse with an agenda.
Leftus is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:11 PM   #304
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70,485
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
A diagnose by a doctor who actually evaluated him in person. Of course, they could never come out and say it. HIPAA and all that.

Not from armchair doctors and nurse with an agenda.
We've addressed each of these points in the thread already.
__________________
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:22 PM   #305
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
A diagnose by a doctor who actually evaluated him in person. Of course, they could never come out and say it. HIPAA and all that.

Not from armchair doctors and nurse with an agenda.
Do you think what you're seeing regarding Trump is normal behavior?
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:23 PM   #306
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30,487
Originally Posted by Fudbucker View Post
Do you think what you're seeing regarding Trump is normal behavior?
That was never the question.
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:28 PM   #307
Steve
Illuminator
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,176
Originally Posted by Stacyhs View Post
Out of curiosity, what would it take for you to think Trump's narcissism goes way beyond "garden variety self-absorption"?
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
A diagnose by a doctor who actually evaluated him in person. Of course, they could never come out and say it. HIPAA and all that.

Not from armchair doctors and nurse with an agenda.

A doc who evaluates him in person cannot talk about it. A doc who evaluates his public behavior you call "armchair" and do not believe. Quite convenient that there is no way that you could ever think Trump's narcissism goes way beyond "garden variety self-absorption". Hope you enjoy what your country has become.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:29 PM   #308
Steve
Illuminator
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,176
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
That was never the question.
Seems to be now. Fudbucker just asked it.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:32 PM   #309
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30,487
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
A doc who evaluates him in person cannot talk about it. A doc who evaluates his public behavior you call "armchair" and do not believe. Quite convenient that there is no way that you could ever think Trump's narcissism goes way beyond "garden variety self-absorption". Hope you enjoy what your country has become.
Why is it so important to you to get agreement about the exact medical degree of Trump's narcissism?

Do you think the Cabinet should act on the Yale group's recommendation, and try to remove him from office?
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:33 PM   #310
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
That was never the question.
It's my question. Isn't there some conservative you should be distancing yourself from? Maybe Trump? Are you still pleased with the **** show you voted for?
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 01:57 PM   #311
Steve
Illuminator
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,176
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
Why is it so important to you to get agreement about the exact medical degree of Trump's narcissism?

Do you think the Cabinet should act on the Yale group's recommendation, and try to remove him from office?
Not very important to me at all. That agreement will never happen. I am more curious about why some posters here are so quick to deny that the man is a raving lunatic (with short periods of apparent lucidity).

The internal affairs of the US government are not my concern. US Republicans as a group seem to be determined to retain a lunatic as their president so I think it is likely that he will stay in office, to the detriment of most of the rest of the world, Russia and NK being the exceptions.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 02:00 PM   #312
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30,487
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Seems to be now. Fudbucker just asked it.
Fudbucker is pretending that point is in dispute for some reason.
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 02:06 PM   #313
Slings and Arrows
Graduate Poster
 
Slings and Arrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,743
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
… nurse with an agenda.

Slings and Arrows is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 02:06 PM   #314
Steve
Illuminator
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,176
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
Fudbucker is pretending that point is in dispute for some reason.
There are several posters in this thread who seem to dispute the point in question. Leftus, to whom the question was directed, seems to be one of them IMO.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th July 2018, 02:32 PM   #315
WilliamSeger
Illuminator
 
WilliamSeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,017
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
Fudbucker is pretending that point is in dispute for some reason.
There are several points in dispute, and that indeed has been one of them, whether or not by you. Another is whether or not this mental illness that you and I, but not everyone, acknowledges makes him a danger to the country in his current position. And then, of course, there is the dispute over whether or not qualified professionals who think he is dangerous should just keep their mouths shut because of an ethics rule that most psychologists today think should be changed -- largely due to Donald Trump.

Your position seems to be that everyone knew he was crazy when they voted for him, so now we just have to suffer the consequences. I have to seriously doubt the premise, but it doesn't matter; you're right about the consequences. But even though the 25th will not be invoked on Trump, it's still an issue because (assuming there will be presidents after Trump) we NEED a debate about the Goldwater rule.
WilliamSeger is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th July 2018, 02:54 AM   #316
Roboramma
Penultimate Amazing
 
Roboramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 11,444
Originally Posted by Fudbucker View Post
It's my question. Isn't there some conservative you should be distancing yourself from? Maybe Trump?
Hold on, you think it's a character flaw that theprestige isn't an evangelical christian?
Quote:
Are you still pleased with the **** show you voted for?
One more time, he's not happy it's a **** show, he just doesn't care that much, he's happy about other aspects of the outcome. He was very clear about that.
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
Isaac Asimov
Roboramma is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th July 2018, 07:30 AM   #317
Leftus
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Fudbucker View Post
Do you think what you're seeing regarding Trump is normal behavior?
Normal? By what standard? I don't see it as dangerous.

I do see what the Yale group is trying to accomplish as dangerous.
Leftus is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th July 2018, 07:37 AM   #318
Leftus
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
There are several posters in this thread who seem to dispute the point in question. Leftus, to whom the question was directed, seems to be one of them IMO.
I'm not saying that it is "normal" as I really have no idea what that means in the context of mental health. What I am saying is that having a diagnoses and then forcing the evidence to fit is not the best way to determine the sanity of a person. That X number of people offering an unsolicited medical opinion without any professional standards is not something we should rely on to shape our government.

Belief in a god is "Normal"
Right handed is "Normal"

You can function in the world being abnormal.
Leftus is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th July 2018, 07:59 AM   #319
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by Roboramma View Post
Hold on, you think it's a character flaw that theprestige isn't an evangelical christian?
I think any Trump support these days is a character flaw. A rather large one.


Quote:
One more time, he's not happy it's a **** show, he just doesn't care that much, he's happy about other aspects of the outcome. He was very clear about that.
I'm not sure he doesn't care that much. Theprestige, you care what went down yesterday? Did that bother you at all? I think it did.
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th July 2018, 08:00 AM   #320
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,537
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
Normal? By what standard? I don't see it as dangerous.

I do see what the Yale group is trying to accomplish as dangerous.
By whatever standard you've come up with as you've gone through life. Is Trump normal? It's not a hard question to answer. He's not.

Last edited by Fudbucker; 17th July 2018 at 08:02 AM.
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:55 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.