[Merged] Jeffrey MacDonald did it. He really did. - Page 93

BStrong · 1st March 2018, 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by Henri McPhee

That's a load of bollocks, if you pardon my French. The matter is explained at this website, and it was demolished by MacDonald lawyer Gary Bostwick at the McGinniss trial in 1987:

http://dingeengoete.blogspot.co.uk/2...macdonald.html

Your man crush wasn't drug free.

Long before there was any serious issues with amphetamines in the general population, amphetamines were commonly available in the military, even as late as when I was in 74-80.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...oldier/477183/

One of the "perks" of being a military physician was the nearly uncontrolled availability of controlled substance pharmaceuticals. The uncontested fact is that your man crush had a ******** of pharmaceuticals in hand in his home.

Henri McPhee · 2nd March 2018, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by BStrong

One of the "perks" of being a military physician was the nearly uncontrolled availability of controlled substance pharmaceuticals. The uncontested fact is that your man crush had a ******** of pharmaceuticals in hand in his home.

The matter of diet pills in the MacDonald case is explained at this website. It was another invention by Kassab.:

https://www.sfgate.com/books/article...is-3042069.php

Quote:

Their debunking is helped along by an unlikely source: McGinniss himself, responding under oath to a civil lawsuit filed by MacDonald alleging fraud and breach of contract pertaining to "Fatal Vision." When asked whether he believed the theory advanced in his book -- that diet pills caused a psychotic snap in MacDonald -- McGinniss explained that he had to give his readers more than a "rehash" of the trial, the authors write. He then replied: "I'm not convinced that it actually happened."

JTF · 2nd March 2018, 11:17 PM

The Eskatrol issue is another example of the landlord being unable to think for himself. He simply hears or sees an advocacy piece for inmate and his thought process is set in stone. He clearly doesn't consider the distinct possibility that the authors of said pieces have not taken the time to read the documented record. At the Article 32 hearing, inmate admits that he has used Amphetamines, he repeats this admission on the very 1st page of his case journal, and it is a medical fact that Amphetamine use can cause a rage reaction. As if the landlord needed a reminder, this case is a classic example of a rage killing.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com

Agatha · 3rd March 2018, 01:33 PM

This thread is getting long and slow, so I have opened a continuation thread here.

Posted By:Agatha

1st March 2018, 06:08 PM	#3681
BStrong Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: San Francisco Posts: 13,087	Originally Posted by Henri McPhee That's a load of bollocks, if you pardon my French. The matter is explained at this website, and it was demolished by MacDonald lawyer Gary Bostwick at the McGinniss trial in 1987: http://dingeengoete.blogspot.co.uk/2...macdonald.html Your man crush wasn't drug free. Long before there was any serious issues with amphetamines in the general population, amphetamines were commonly available in the military, even as late as when I was in 74-80. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...oldier/477183/ One of the "perks" of being a military physician was the nearly uncontrolled availability of controlled substance pharmaceuticals. The uncontested fact is that your man crush had a ******** of pharmaceuticals in hand in his home.
	__________________ Music is what feelings sound like "Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus

2nd March 2018, 09:11 AM	#3682
Henri McPhee Illuminator Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Bristol UK Posts: 4,126	Originally Posted by BStrong One of the "perks" of being a military physician was the nearly uncontrolled availability of controlled substance pharmaceuticals. The uncontested fact is that your man crush had a ******** of pharmaceuticals in hand in his home. The matter of diet pills in the MacDonald case is explained at this website. It was another invention by Kassab.: https://www.sfgate.com/books/article...is-3042069.php Quote: Their debunking is helped along by an unlikely source: McGinniss himself, responding under oath to a civil lawsuit filed by MacDonald alleging fraud and breach of contract pertaining to "Fatal Vision." When asked whether he believed the theory advanced in his book -- that diet pills caused a psychotic snap in MacDonald -- McGinniss explained that he had to give his readers more than a "rehash" of the trial, the authors write. He then replied: "I'm not convinced that it actually happened."
	Last edited by Henri McPhee; 2nd March 2018 at 09:13 AM.

2nd March 2018, 11:17 PM	#3683
JTF Graduate Poster Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,518	Cognitive Sheep The Eskatrol issue is another example of the landlord being unable to think for himself. He simply hears or sees an advocacy piece for inmate and his thought process is set in stone. He clearly doesn't consider the distinct possibility that the authors of said pieces have not taken the time to read the documented record. At the Article 32 hearing, inmate admits that he has used Amphetamines, he repeats this admission on the very 1st page of his case journal, and it is a medical fact that Amphetamine use can cause a rage reaction. As if the landlord needed a reminder, this case is a classic example of a rage killing. http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
JTF Graduate Poster Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,518