ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Non-USA & General Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Australia elections , Australia politics , Julie Bishop , Malcolm Turnbull , Peter Dutton , Scott Morrison

Reply
Old 13th January 2019, 01:06 PM   #601
fromdownunder
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,167
Originally Posted by lionking
Jeez, is anyone denying the success of immigration to Australia? Certainly not me. Non-discriminatory immigration? Nope. Multiculturalism? Again no.

I was not denying the success of immigration. I was applauding it. Where would any of us be without it?


If my great great great whatevers had not migrated here I would be somewhere in the Midlands worrying about how Brexit was going to affect my pension.



Norm
__________________
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in Vain


fromdownunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 01:17 PM   #602
Norman Alexander
Illuminator
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,923
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
You have no idea how many people want to escape their own circumstances and live in Australia. And what happens if their application for asylum is knocked back? They turn straight to a people smuggler.

If you don't make it loud and clear to people smugglers that they can't succeed they will operate in droves.
Sorry, that's being naive in the extreme. People smugglers are already outside the law, one boat or a flotilla. They are illegal in Indonesia, not just Australia. The reason they operate is simply for the money. They are prepared to be caught and imprisoned in Australia for a number of years because their family will be paid much more than they could earn as fisherman in that time. It's a highly lucrative business, lucrative enough to break the law for.

Given the business model, it's a VERY silly idea that "turning the boats back" is going to discourage people-smugglers. It's going to do the opposite - encourage them. Because they will already have been paid before they start out. So throwing a boat full of refugees back gives the smugglers a ready supply of desperate customers willing to pay to have another go soon after. You are multiplying their business, making it worse! Good job!

You are right in one thing. The people whom you need to convince in order to cut off this smuggling are the refugees. So if you can process them before they get the extreme idea to try the boats then it stops there. No need for them to go people smuggling, thrown back, try again, lather rinse repeat.

Since the vast majority of these couple of thousand people (that's all it is, not millions) are genuine refugees, it is going to be easier and cheaper to process and bring those qualifying in, rather than the expense and international opprobrium of throwing them back on the beach at Kuta again. And then have then do it all again a few months later.



Quote:
The camps were all filled to the brim again thanks to Rudd. They were pretty much in mothballs by the end of Howard's term though this isn't about the hard-on-refugees libs. They are expected to act like this.

In the end, Rudd acted more Howard like over the incessant people smuggling. He know of no other way to stop what was happening. (And I'm sure he thought of "speedy" processing).
True. Neither of them did that very well.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015

Last edited by Norman Alexander; 13th January 2019 at 02:47 PM.
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 08:42 PM   #603
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 13,755
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
Since the vast majority of these couple of thousand people (that's all it is, not millions) are genuine refugees, it is going to be easier and cheaper to process and bring those qualifying in, rather than the expense and international opprobrium of throwing them back on the beach at Kuta again. And then have then do it all again a few months later.
"Sorry, that's being naive in the extreme." You think that the "couple of thousand people" who successfully landed on Australian shores is the extent of the demand.

Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
True. Neither of them did that very well.
And neither would you. You have no original ideas on how to tackle people smugglers.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 11:22 PM   #604
Norman Alexander
Illuminator
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,923
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
"Sorry, that's being naive in the extreme." You think that the "couple of thousand people" who successfully landed on Australian shores is the extent of the demand.
You only have to get four A380's land here in Sydney and you have a couple of thousand people to process ALL AT ONCE. And this happens many times per day, every day of the week. If we can get that number of people through Customs control in a couple of hours, surely it should not take many years to process a few hundred people on a boat or two.

So the notion that it is too daunting to process "so many" refugees doesn't fly. We can; we just choose not to by policy. We are being subject to the "great yellow brown hordes descending on Australian shores" scare tactic. Yes it is that old. And it is still not true.

Quote:
And neither would you. You have no original ideas on how to tackle people smugglers.
No I don't. That's not my field of expertise.

But I do know that throwing them back is not effective. Especially not discouraging for people-smugglers. They don't care if the boats get turned back, sink, get lost, or go to Hawaii instead. They are paid for the boats to LEAVE. So if you keep giving them repeat customers then they will keep trying to send them, and making more profit. That is not a discouragement at all. It is the direct opposite of what you are trying to achieve. Is that not obvious and clear?

Because it's been that way since the 1970's with the original Vietnamese boat people. And as soon as a way was found to accommodate getting Vietnamese refugees here (a political solution, btw), those boats stopped.

Clearly a better solution to stopping the boats revolves around resolving the refugee issues about getting to Australia BEFORE they get on any boat. I've suggested processing in the transit camps. Others have suggested something like that too and they have researched on the ground and know about this. Seems worth the effort of investigating if it could work better than what we do now. Do you have any better ideas?
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th January 2019, 01:11 PM   #605
Thor 2
Illuminator
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brisbane, Aust.
Posts: 4,346
Norman

Of course psion's strategy is well known and we are all familiar with it. The strategy of downplaying the severity of the plight of the refugees and exaggerating the number. All figures demonstrating the bona fides of the people under threat, and the genuine danger they face in making this perilous journey, (thus re-enforcing the knowledge of their desperation), are ignored.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.

Last edited by Thor 2; 14th January 2019 at 02:02 PM.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th January 2019, 07:12 PM   #606
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 13,755
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
. . . < repeats previous posts > . . .
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Norman

. . . < tries the race card > . . .
* Original posts altered to summary form

You guys have NO . . . . CLUE . . . . WHATSOEVER.

As soon as the Rudd government relaxed to previous Howard government's border policy, the empty assylum centres filled to overflowing. That is a FACT.

You would repeat the same result under your vague "do something different" ideas - - unless you believe that doing the same thing would generate a different result.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975

Last edited by psionl0; 14th January 2019 at 07:13 PM.
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th January 2019, 10:59 PM   #607
Thor 2
Illuminator
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brisbane, Aust.
Posts: 4,346
Typical crap from psion. Did I mention race in my post?

The following is topical to this discussion.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-...sylum/10716182

Quote:
In a week, Rahaf al Qunun has gone from being barricaded inside a Bangkok airport hotel room to being the most recognised refugee on the planet.

She went to the Australian embassy in Bangkok on Wednesday, but by Friday her case was still being processed.
With growing concerns over her security and no clear timeline over how long Australia would take, the UNHCR then referred her case to Canada and her visa was processed within several hours.

How can the Canadians do this so much better and with such expediency and we in Australia cannot? Shame Australia shame.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th January 2019, 11:14 PM   #608
Norman Alexander
Illuminator
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,923
*SIGH*

How about some light reading on the subject, psion? Sorry, but this is full of facts, and runs pretty much counter to your statements about deterrence. Here's some people who should know telling you.

Quote:
The UNHCR has long been aware of the tensions specific to the Asia Pacific region, posing challenges for all the regional governments, including Australia. However, it questions the effectiveness of increasingly harsh deterrence measures in stemming asylum flows, arguing that in the long-term the threat of detention or even drowning may be perceived to be the lesser evil for desperate asylum seekers. Former United Nations Assistant High Commissioner for Protection, Erica Feller, asserts that investment in deterrence is inevitably ‘doomed to failure’ for those reasons:

Investment in deterrence as the preferred solution to the challenge posed [to] States by irregular boat arrivals is doomed to failure … boats … have long been and remain a lifeline for the desperate … the boats will continue as long as the root causes of departure remain unresolved.

In the long-term, greater cooperation with our regional neighbours on a burden-sharing basis is seen by the UNHCR to be a key component of future progress. Many other stakeholders agree, arguing that there should be more focus on genuine cooperative engagement and burden-sharing with our neighbours.

Under such an approach, regional processing of asylum seekers under the auspices of the UNHCR and the IOM might be negotiated through a regional cooperative framework such as the Bali Process. Other long-term burden-sharing options might include the development of programs like the Comprehensive Plan of Action (established to deal with the Indochinese asylum flows) together with the creation of more protection space for those found to be in need of protection along the ‘displacement corridors’.
A comparison of Coalition and Labor government asylum policies in Australia since 2001, as published on the Parliament of Australia website.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015

Last edited by Norman Alexander; 14th January 2019 at 11:15 PM.
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 10:03 PM   #609
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 13,755
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
*SIGH*

How about some light reading on the subject, psion? Sorry, but this is full of facts, and runs pretty much counter to your statements about deterrence. Here's some people who should know telling you.



A comparison of Coalition and Labor government asylum policies in Australia since 2001, as published on the Parliament of Australia website.
Other than its conclusion that offshore processing "doesn't work", the report says pretty much what I have been saying.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 10:48 PM   #610
Norman Alexander
Illuminator
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,923
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
Other than its conclusion that offshore processing "doesn't work", the report says pretty much what I have been saying.
Apart from all the assertions that "investment in deterrence is inevitably ‘doomed to failure’...as long as the root causes of departure remain unresolved" stuff.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:14 PM   #611
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 13,755
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
Apart from all the assertions that "investment in deterrence is inevitably ‘doomed to failure’...as long as the root causes of departure remain unresolved" stuff.

Yep, that's the one. It is completely inconsistent with its recital of history:
Quote:
There were almost no boats arriving when the Rudd Government came to power at the end of 2007. Subsequently, on 8 February 2008 it was announced that the centres on Manus and Nauru would no longer be used and that any future unauthorised boat arrivals would be processed on Christmas Island.[10]

However, in response to rising numbers of boat arrivals, the Labor Government reversed this decision. In her first major policy speech in July 2010, Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced that the Labor Government had begun discussions with neighbouring countries over a proposal to re-establish ‘a regional processing centre for the purpose of receiving and processing irregular entrants to the region’.[11] Throughout this period the Coalition also supported the reintroduction of an offshore processing regime, but favoured the reinstatement of a processing centre specifically on Nauru.[12]
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:43 PM   #612
Norman Alexander
Illuminator
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,923
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
Yep, that's the one. It is completely inconsistent with its recital of history:
It is? Plenty of hard data supports the assertion that refugee numbers by boat correspond to the size of the forces driving them out of their home counties. After all, nothing else happened in the world in 2007 except for cranking up the Afghanistan war and Middle East tensions, forcing hundreds of thousands out of their countries. Also, the number of "boat people" was minuscule, a tiny fraction, compared to those arriving by plane daily and seeking asylum who didn't get in the news.

But you stick with your simplistic view if you wish.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:11 AM   #613
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 13,755
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
It is? Plenty of hard data supports the assertion that refugee numbers by boat correspond to the size of the forces driving them out of their home counties. After all, nothing else happened in the world in 2007 except for cranking up the Afghanistan war and Middle East tensions, forcing hundreds of thousands out of their countries. Also, the number of "boat people" was minuscule, a tiny fraction, compared to those arriving by plane daily and seeking asylum who didn't get in the news.
And none of that is in the report you linked to.

But you stick with your simplistic view if you wish.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Non-USA & General Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:58 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.