ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Allais Effect , Dark Flow , relativity , Theory of Relativity

Reply
Old 18th July 2018, 08:44 AM   #1
halleyscomet
Philosopher
 
halleyscomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,909
The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017 - Part III

Originally Posted by abaddon View Post
There is one key difference though. Nancy has followers.
I think it more likely the Mills thread will produce proof of Hydrinos before Bjarn recruits a single follower.

Mod InfoThis is a continuation thread. It's totally fair to quote from the previous thread to here, it's just that the old thread was getting to large. Enjoy.
Posted By:kmortis
__________________
Look what I found! There's this whole web site full of skeptics that spun off from the James Randy Education Foundation!

Last edited by kmortis; 18th July 2018 at 09:22 AM.
halleyscomet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th July 2018, 08:49 AM   #2
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,194
Originally Posted by halleyscomet View Post
I think it more likely the Mills thread will produce proof of Hydrinos before Bjarn recruits a single follower.
Hah. And Johan is my mom.
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th July 2018, 10:33 AM   #3
Hellbound
Merchant of Doom
 
Hellbound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not in Hell, but I can see it from here on a clear day...
Posts: 14,010
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...1#post12366391

Ah, thank you phunk. I was operating under a misapprehension then I thought it was just outside.

Either way, it's still moon orbiting Earth
Hellbound is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th July 2018, 01:38 PM   #4
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
An explanation of the difference between rotation and orbit gets a redacted reply rather than a thank you!

My post in reply to an ignorant assertion that the Moon does not rotate:
Quote:
Even English as a second language cannot excuse this very ignorant statement. But just in case:

Bjarne: Rotating means spinning on an interior axis. If you turn 360 degrees, you are rotating. The Earth rotates to produce day and night.
This is not the same as orbit which is an object being in a path around a central, external axis. If you go on a carousel, you are on an orbit around the center of the carousel. Earth obits around the Sun and so we have years.

The Moon is tidally locked. The Moon presents one face to the Earth. To do that the Moon has to rotate so that face is always toward the Earth. The Moon rotates 360 degrees in each orbit.

The Tidal locking Wikipedia article has a nice graphic showing that the Moon has to rotate to show only one face to the Earth.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th July 2018, 07:41 PM   #5
rustypouch
Philosopher
 
rustypouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,736
Can't be bothered to read the previous thread.

It's more than halfway through 2018.

Can someone give me a TL;DR for whatever was supposed to happen in 2016?
rustypouch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th July 2018, 08:55 PM   #6
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
Originally Posted by rustypouch View Post
Can someone give me a TL;DR for whatever was supposed to happen in 2016?
There were an pair of atomic clocks that were supposed to be installed on the International Space Station in 2016. That has slipped to this year. Data should be available maybe in 2020.

Bjarne has ignorant fantasies about what that data will show.
Start with the still debated dark flow (a possible flow of galaxy clusters million of light years away toward a part of the sky).
Add a delusion that whatever force caused that flow still exists and can affect the atomic clocks on the ISS.
Guess that this will be significant enough to be measured as changes in the clock data as the ISS orbits.
A delusion that this means the theory of relativity is wrong.

The last point has not been emphasized yet. Say dark flow was caused by a mass outside the observable universe that caused measured changes to the ISS clocks. This would be evidence for that mass. It is not evidence that relativity is wrong. Evidence for theory A is not evidence against theory B unless it can be shown that they are the only 2 theories possible (logical fallacy of false dichotomy).

Another example: The ISS orbits and goes between day and night. Let the change in outgassing from the ISS cause accelerations big enough to change the clock data. It would be stupid to conclude that this makes relativity fall apart.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th July 2018, 11:53 PM   #7
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 31,534
Remember, Bjarne: we can still see your posts in the previous thread.
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th July 2018, 08:18 AM   #8
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 12,717
Oh gee whiz!

These silly ideas about Relativity are now getting a thread thread.
__________________
On 22 JUL 2016, Candidate Donald Trump in his acceptance speech: "There can be no prosperity without law and order."
On 05 FEB 2019, President Donald Trump said in his Sate of the Union Address: "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
On 15 FEB 2019 'BobTheCoward' said: "I constantly assert I am a fool."
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th July 2018, 01:54 AM   #9
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5,673
Originally Posted by Crossbow View Post
These silly ideas about Relativity are now getting a thread thread.
That is dark flow for you!
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th July 2018, 06:19 AM   #10
rustypouch
Philosopher
 
rustypouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,736
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
There were an pair of atomic clocks that were supposed to be installed on the International Space Station in 2016. That has slipped to this year. Data should be available maybe in 2020.

Bjarne has ignorant fantasies about what that data will show.
Start with the still debated dark flow (a possible flow of galaxy clusters million of light years away toward a part of the sky).
Add a delusion that whatever force caused that flow still exists and can affect the atomic clocks on the ISS.
Guess that this will be significant enough to be measured as changes in the clock data as the ISS orbits.
A delusion that this means the theory of relativity is wrong.

The last point has not been emphasized yet. Say dark flow was caused by a mass outside the observable universe that caused measured changes to the ISS clocks. This would be evidence for that mass. It is not evidence that relativity is wrong. Evidence for theory A is not evidence against theory B unless it can be shown that they are the only 2 theories possible (logical fallacy of false dichotomy).

Another example: The ISS orbits and goes between day and night. Let the change in outgassing from the ISS cause accelerations big enough to change the clock data. It would be stupid to conclude that this makes relativity fall apart.
Thanks!
rustypouch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 09:45 AM   #11
Crawtator
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 366
What do you know? It's still NOT falling apart...

https://phys.org/news/2018-07-gravit...e-massive.html
Crawtator is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 10:04 AM   #12
Diablo
Muse
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
There are two problems with general relativity which have been plugged by inventing dark matter and dark energy.

None of the candidates for dark matter has been found, and CERN has found no new particles which would support that theory. There are also major problems with the modified gravity theories which try to explain the discrepancies. Refer to this month's SciAm.

No one knows what dark energy is, except a plug to explain the increasing rate of the observed expansion of the universe. Maybe we need a new cosmological constant.

So the theory is not falling apart but it doesn't explain all the data.
Diablo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 12:14 PM   #13
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 12,717
I expect that the 'Theory of Relativity Will Fall Apart' at just about the same time that Trump will 'Make America Great Again'.

My faith in the one outcome is approximately equal to my faith in the other outcome.
__________________
On 22 JUL 2016, Candidate Donald Trump in his acceptance speech: "There can be no prosperity without law and order."
On 05 FEB 2019, President Donald Trump said in his Sate of the Union Address: "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
On 15 FEB 2019 'BobTheCoward' said: "I constantly assert I am a fool."
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 12:30 PM   #14
halleyscomet
Philosopher
 
halleyscomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,909
Einstein’s Theory of Relativity Passes Yet Another Test
Einstein's theory says the fabric of the universe is not simply space, but a more complex entity called space-time, which is warped by the presence of heavy objects.


Quote:
NEW YORK (AP) — More than a century after Albert Einstein proposed it, his theory of general relativity has passed another test.

With giant telescopes pointed at the center of our galaxy, a team of European researchers observed a fast-moving star that got close to a monstrous black hole. They saw that the black hole distorted the light waves from the star in a way that agrees with Einstein’s theory.

The result was reported Thursday in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.
__________________
Look what I found! There's this whole web site full of skeptics that spun off from the James Randy Education Foundation!
halleyscomet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 12:45 PM   #15
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,850
Originally Posted by Crawtator View Post
What do you know? It's still NOT falling apart...

https://phys.org/news/2018-07-gravit...e-massive.html
Indeed! The free access paper (press release) is here:

Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole
Abuter, R. et al.
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ab...a33718-18.html
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 01:40 PM   #16
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,194
Originally Posted by Crossbow View Post
I expect that the 'Theory of Relativity Will Fall Apart' at just about the same time that Trump will 'Make America Great Again'.

My faith in the one outcome is approximately equal to my faith in the other outcome.
Problem here is that for a given hypothesis, does it succeed or fail?

The given hypothesis has dismally failed. Everyone can see that. The TOR has not fallen apart in 2016/2017. Bjarne, on the other hand, is busily trying to rehabilitate his failed notions. The only reason this thread continues is because Bjarne cannot drop his religious belief (because it is nothing other than that). Thus we see that Bjarne has kicked the can down the road to 2019. In 2019, this same discussion will repeat. Bjarne's idea will fail again and Bjarne will simply kick the can down the road again.

As simple as it is, if a "prophet" makes a prediction and said prediction turns out to be false, you have a false prophet on your hands. If said prophet makes more than one failed prediction, that is something else.
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2018, 02:52 PM   #17
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
Originally Posted by Diablo View Post
There are two problems with general relativity which have been plugged by inventing dark matter and dark energy. ...
This is not correct, Diablo.
The evidence for dark matter is from Newtonian mechanics and from GR (e.g. in cosmological models). Dark matter is detected using GR. Dark matter is a not a problem for GR.

The evidence for dark energy is from astrophysics measuring the expansion of the universe. This is not a problem with GR. A positive cosmological constant as an explanation for dark energy has always been in GR.

None of the candidates for dark matter need to be found! If dark matter is particles that we cannot detect currently (or ever) then of course we will not detect them.

Null experiments (not finding stuff) is good. It means that we can concentrate on looking for other candidates.

We know that there are major problems with non-relativistic and relativistic MOND. That is a minor reason why the preferred solution is particles. The major reason is that the large amount of evidence for dark matter includes evidence that it is particles - dark matter "gas" separating from normal matter gas in colliding galaxies + modeling the CMB tells us that there is non-baryonic matter matching the amount of dark matter.

We do not need a "new" cosmological constant (see above).
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2018, 08:55 PM   #18
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,374
Originally Posted by Diablo View Post
There are two problems with general relativity which have been plugged by inventing dark matter and dark energy.
Right

Quote:
None of the candidates for dark matter has been found, and CERN has found no new particles which would support that theory. There are also major problems with the modified gravity theories which try to explain the discrepancies. Refer to this month's SciAm.
Right

Quote:
No one knows what dark energy is,
Wrong. I know, but right (almost) nobody don't know or understand what it is.
The new Modified Theory of Relativity has solved what Dark Energy really is.
The nature of space is elastic, - and matter is absorbing that elastic property of space. Dark energy is release of that elastic"substance".

Matter, gravity, energy - are different expressions for a certain tension of space at a given place and time. The tension of space is responsible for the Lorentz transformation.
Tension / transformation includes the tension of 1 second (a short of long second) - as well the tension of the ruler (the reality we see).
This process is always a proportional process, - which mean everything (time and local reality is expanding or shrinking proportional to each other) - that transformation process is simply the crankshaft in the new MTR theory.

Quote:
except a plug to explain the increasing rate of the observed expansion of the universe.
Such plug and play is only invented to cheat brainwashed fools, - getting them to waste their time, and sometimes wasting their entire live, - with total nonsense.
Its done to cover up how stupid "we" really are.
We have even seen how the scientific community accepted that new knowledge that could have been a door opener, - was swept under the carpet ( The Pioneer Anomaly)
Amazing that only few was protesting, - but really not so strange because those that will not "pray to the same mainstream god", must be very strange.
Real scientist are trying to understand the plenty and growing amount of evidence, - we already have and continues to get - all pointing to a completely new coherent paradigm.

Quote:
Maybe we need a new cosmological constant.
No, only to understand the common cause of hundred of "mysteries"

Quote:
So the theory is not falling apart but it doesn't explain all the data.
The new theory of relativity is based on understanding the true cause of the Lorentz Transformation.
We are now on the threshold to be forced to understand that true relativity is about a energy-space-tension-process.

ISS time dilation will be one more gigantic "hint" telling us that we are totally lost.
DFA another HUGE wake up call.
Add to that plenty of evidence all showing that something is terrible wrong.

All we have to do is now starting to put this bricks / puzzle correct together.
This is a job where even kindergartens can contribute, really not so demanding.
Kindergarten student have the advantage that in contrast to the massive brainwash that is going on the last 100 years, - causing irreparable brain-damages world wide each day - kindergarten student are (still) free to use their own brain. .
So from these unspoiled students we will only hear innocent crystal clear truths.

Last edited by Bjarne; 30th July 2018 at 09:18 PM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2018, 11:11 PM   #19
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
Thumbs down Ignorant agreement with an obviously wrong statement about GR

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Right
31 July 2018 Bjarne: Ignorant agreement with an obviously wrong statement about GR.
Dark matter is not part of GR. Dark energy has an explanation within GR.
These are not problems with GR.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2018, 11:15 PM   #20
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
Repeats a lie that he can explain anything with delusions about elastic space

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Wrong. I know, but right (almost) nobody don't know or understand what it is.....
31 July 2018 Bjarne: Repeats a lie that he can explain anything with delusions about elastic space.
Deluded, meaningless statements do not explain anything. Replace "elastic space" with "pixy dust" and he makes as much sense !
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2018, 11:19 PM   #21
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
A insane "brainwashed fools" insulting rant

[quote=Bjarne;12379163Such plug and play is only invented to cheat brainwashed fools, - getting them to waste their time, and sometimes wasting their entire live, - with total nonsense.[/QUOTE]
31 July 2018 Bjarne: A insane "brainwashed fools" insulting rant.
This is insane because he insults genius's like Stephen Hawking and physics students who learn about cosmology.
This is insane because the increasing rate of the observed expansion of the universe (dark energy) is what he says he can explain!
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2018, 11:21 PM   #22
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25,880
Thumbs down Back to the stupid lie that the Pioneer Anomaly was swept under the carpet

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
...- was swept under the carpet ( The Pioneer Anomaly).
31 July 2018 Bjarne: Back to the stupid lie that the solved Pioneer Anomaly was swept under the carpet.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2018, 03:39 AM   #23
halleyscomet
Philosopher
 
halleyscomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,909
At what point does continuing to engage with an obviously delusional person become abusive of said person?
__________________
Look what I found! There's this whole web site full of skeptics that spun off from the James Randy Education Foundation!
halleyscomet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2018, 11:01 AM   #24
Dancing David
Penultimate Amazing
 
Dancing David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,699
Originally Posted by halleyscomet View Post
At what point does continuing to engage with an obviously delusional person become abusive of said person?
At the point of using or engaging in abusive behaviors
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn
And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch
You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager
Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar
Dancing David is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd October 2018, 06:38 AM   #25
halleyscomet
Philosopher
 
halleyscomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,909
Einstein's Theory of Relativity Tested at Tokyo Skytree
Quote:
On October 3rd, two high-accuracy clocks were placed in Tokyo Skytree. One was installed on a ground floor meeting room, while the other went all the way to the observation deck, 634 meters up. They were put there by a group of scientists from The University of Tokyo. Why? To test Einstein's theory of relativity, of course.
YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
__________________
Look what I found! There's this whole web site full of skeptics that spun off from the James Randy Education Foundation!
halleyscomet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th December 2018, 02:07 PM   #26
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,329
A couple of Galileo Satellites initially in a faulty orbit have proven an opportunity to make the most accurate test of relativity to date:

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Na...t_accuracy_yet

Wonder if Bjarne has comments.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th December 2018, 02:32 PM   #27
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,850
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
A couple of Galileo Satellites initially in a faulty orbit have proven an opportunity to make the most accurate test of relativity to date:

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Na...t_accuracy_yet

Wonder if Bjarne has comments.

Hans
You'd have thought that the effects measured by the very first GPS satellite would have caused any doubters to stop doubting. To cut a long story short, there were people who still doubted that these corrections would be needed for GR and SR. So a synthesiser was included that could change the frequency of the clock, should it prove necessary. After 20 or so days of not using it, it became apparent that they needed to use it. The predictions of the necessary correction were correct to 3 parts in a trillion (1012).
One hell of a coincidence? Or GR and SR are real effects? I know what my money is on.

http://www.leapsecond.com/history/Ashby-Relativity.htm
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 03:37 AM   #28
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5,673
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
A couple of Galileo Satellites initially in a faulty orbit have proven an opportunity to make the most accurate test of relativity to date:

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Na...t_accuracy_yet

Wonder if Bjarne has comments.
Interesting, thanks.

What happened to Bjarne? Did he just lose interest because his religious views on science were too difficult to defend? Or sheer exhaustion?

It does not look to me that he was banned.
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 04:01 AM   #29
Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
 
Pixel42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 11,305
According to his user profile Bjarne last visited the forum yesterday, a couple of hours before this thread was bumped.
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett
Pixel42 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 06:49 AM   #30
halleyscomet
Philosopher
 
halleyscomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,909
Originally Posted by Pixel42 View Post
According to his user profile Bjarne last visited the forum yesterday, a couple of hours before this thread was bumped.


The question becomes, will he ignore this thread, concede he was wrong, or come up with another poorly conceived excuse to explain why this additional proof of general relativity is somehow not quite right?
__________________
Look what I found! There's this whole web site full of skeptics that spun off from the James Randy Education Foundation!
halleyscomet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 08:16 AM   #31
Diablo
Muse
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
This is not correct, Diablo.
The evidence for dark matter is from Newtonian mechanics and from GR (e.g. in cosmological models). Dark matter is detected using GR. Dark matter is a not a problem for GR.

The evidence for dark energy is from astrophysics measuring the expansion of the universe. This is not a problem with GR. A positive cosmological constant as an explanation for dark energy has always been in GR.

None of the candidates for dark matter need to be found! If dark matter is particles that we cannot detect currently (or ever) then of course we will not detect them.

Null experiments (not finding stuff) is good. It means that we can concentrate on looking for other candidates.

We know that there are major problems with non-relativistic and relativistic MOND. That is a minor reason why the preferred solution is particles. The major reason is that the large amount of evidence for dark matter includes evidence that it is particles - dark matter "gas" separating from normal matter gas in colliding galaxies + modeling the CMB tells us that there is non-baryonic matter matching the amount of dark matter.

We do not need a "new" cosmological constant (see above).
Thanks for partially quoting me.

DM is a problem because we can't say what it is. Once we find that out we can say this explanation works.

Not the cosmological constant again! The first one, which stopped the universe expanding, ended up at the bottom of the parrot's cage, so saying that a CC explains everything is nonsense. It's just a plug to make it work. All we have is that GR does not fit with the data.
Diablo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 09:57 AM   #32
Trebuchet
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trebuchet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwet
Posts: 23,471
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
What happened to Bjarne?
2018 happened.
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Trebuchet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 10:13 AM   #33
Steve001
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,565
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
Interesting, thanks.

What happened to Bjarne? Did he just lose interest because his religious views on science were too difficult to defend? Or sheer exhaustion?

It does not look to me that he was banned.
Likely rounding up his unicorn to make another charge.
Steve001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th December 2018, 01:30 PM   #34
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,329
Originally Posted by halleyscomet View Post
The question becomes, will he ignore this thread, concede he was wrong, or come up with another poorly conceived excuse to explain why this additional proof of general relativity is somehow not quite right?
Based on experience, the latter.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th January 2019, 11:48 AM   #35
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 12,717
Say ...

Did anyone happen to notice if the Theory of Relativity fall apart in the year 2018?

As for me, I was too busy chasing girls and flying racing planes to have noticed such a mundane event.

__________________
On 22 JUL 2016, Candidate Donald Trump in his acceptance speech: "There can be no prosperity without law and order."
On 05 FEB 2019, President Donald Trump said in his Sate of the Union Address: "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
On 15 FEB 2019 'BobTheCoward' said: "I constantly assert I am a fool."
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th January 2019, 01:22 PM   #36
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,329
I think, with Bjarne's usual MO in mind, that he will not return to this thread, but he will eventually start another one, with some new, but equally lame claims.

Some of them never learn.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th January 2019, 01:11 PM   #37
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,374
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
A couple of Galileo Satellites initially in a faulty orbit have proven an opportunity to make the most accurate test of relativity to date:

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Na...t_accuracy_yet

Wonder if Bjarne has comments.

Hans
Sorry for the late reply, - I first read this today

The GR influence is confirmed to be true, and mention to a sinus curve +/- 370 ns.
No one have ever disputed the GR influence, also not me.

The SR influence is much less, as you can read in the MTR paper, - its only active a short period each orbit and predicted to be + 8.9e-12 instead of -3.57e-11 predicted by SR.

So we are speaking about a hitten anomaly in the data at the magnitude +0,0089 ns instead of -0,0357 ns

From the article
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Na...t_accuracy_yet
you can also read:

“While every Galileo satellite carries two rubidium and two hydrogen maser clocks, only one of them is the active transmission clock. During our period of observation, we focus then on the periods of time when the satellites were transmitting with PHM clocks and assess the quality of these precious data very carefully. Ongoing improvements in the processing and in particular in the modelling of the clocks, might lead to tightened results in the future.”

So it’s still hope, they can get it precise enough to discover that the SR values deviate from what is expected.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th January 2019, 01:25 PM   #38
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,329
Happy new year, Bjarne. Your prediction is now two years overdue, and further away than ever.

You might start considering the possibility that you are simply .... wrong.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th January 2019, 01:36 PM   #39
MikeG
Now. Do it now.
 
MikeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 24,804
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
Happy new year, Bjarne. Your prediction is now two years overdue, and further away than ever.

You might start considering the possibility that you are simply .... wrong.

Hans
Well, if you were being uncharitable, you'd say three.
__________________
"The Conservatives want to keep wogs out and march boldly back to the 1950s when Britain still had an Empire and blacks, women, poofs and Irish knew their place." The Don That's what we've sunk to here.
MikeG is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th January 2019, 01:39 PM   #40
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,374
Double

Last edited by Bjarne; 6th January 2019 at 03:21 PM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.