IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Coronavirus , medical issues

Reply
Old 23rd September 2022, 08:42 AM   #201
lobosrul5
Illuminator
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,282
Originally Posted by dann View Post
I don't know. Some things seem to be pretty similar. Denmark declared that Covid-19 was no longer a crisis, i.e. "a threat to society," and removed mask mandates and all other restrictions on Feb 1, 2022. At that point, Denmark had had 3,770 Covid-19 deaths - in a relatively well-vaccinated population. Now, Sep 22, we have 7,021. So by the end of this year, we will have had as many Covid-19 deaths since February as we had since the beginning of the pandemic until it stopped being a "threat to society" on Feb 1. And people in general and in particular old people seem to think that 'not a threat to society' means not a threat to their own health and lives. It doesn't.
So deaths since removing mandates in Denmark are almost half of your total. Our governor removed mask mandates on February 17th of this year. Before that day we had 6,751 COVID deaths. Since then we've had 1,654 deaths. Thats a starkly different ratio than Denmarks.

However, some counties have gone back to mask mandates a few times since then, there's metrics the state DoH looks at to decide. Like I said we have MAGA territory areas with low vacc rates, while the state at large is pretty "blue".

Also, someone was quoting Dr Watcher who said he wouldn't go unmasked until test positivity rates were under 5 per 100k. Our test rates in my country are right around 7 per 100k so we're getting close.

Last edited by lobosrul5; 23rd September 2022 at 08:45 AM.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd September 2022, 10:27 AM   #202
bignickel
Mad Mod Poet God
 
bignickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,267
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
The 1.5% was a myth at every stage of the pandemic, and as noted, the current death rate is very low.

There have been 100M notified cases in the past 4.5 months. During that same period, 240,000 people have died. That's a whopping 0.2% fatality rate, and note that number is considerably inflated by there being a lot more people sick in May than September, and the case rate hugely understated due to people not self-reporting.

So yes, the rate is well below 1.5%.
What is your evidence that the 1-2% fatality rate since 2020 was a myth. I'm not saying 'no way, you're wrong'; I really want to know where you're getting that from.

As for the fatality rate being currently at .2%, I would love for that to be the case. Please point me to a page where they break that down; I don't know where you're currently located. I didn't want to auto-assume that you were in the USA.

Quote:
The current 7-day average is 286 a day, just over half what it was at the start of that 28-day period.
That would be great if that continued, but we're about to hit 3 months of festivities. Based on what happened in 2020 and 2021, would we expect those numbers to sharply go up in a month or so?

Quote:
By a neat turn of statistics, the covid death rate will be less than 10% of the cardiovascular death rate in America within the next few days.

I wonder if we gave things like that the panicked response some people think we should be taking towards covid we might actually save a lot more lives than a disease which is now an endemic disease that we need to learn to live with.
When cardiovascular disease starts being spread by airborne contact, I will take a much sharper notice and interest in those numbers.
__________________
"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real. I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that."
- Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone
bignickel is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd September 2022, 10:57 AM   #203
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 49,353
He's in New Zealand.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th September 2022, 11:24 AM   #204
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 32,256
Originally Posted by bignickel View Post
What is your evidence that the 1-2% fatality rate since 2020 was a myth. I'm not saying 'no way, you're wrong'; I really want to know where you're getting that from.
Every statistic since the pandemic began.

Have a look at the cumulative case & death totals here: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

The fatality rate shows at a neat 1%, but the official numbers of cases have always been massively under-reported.

This was all covered in the Covid thread in the science section. Early estimates of there being 5-10 times more cases than were notified has held all the way through. This is so well known that links aren't even easy to find now, but this, from 2021 tells you: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...than-you-think

Deaths have also been under-reported - India's have been a bad joke since the very start - and WHO estimates the stated total is only 40% of the real total. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...s-the-who-says

If we err on the low side of cases and say the total should be 3 billion, and deaths 15 million, then we have a tidy 0.5% actual fatality rate.

Originally Posted by bignickel View Post
As for the fatality rate being currently at .2%, I would love for that to be the case. Please point me to a page where they break that down; I don't know where you're currently located. I didn't want to auto-assume that you were in the USA.
I used the official numbers to arrive at that, but it's actually a very high estimate, with reality being that covid is under 0.1% fatal right now.

Again, it's simple maths. Vaccination has lowered the death rate, we now have antivirals that didn't exist early on, and there are less-deadly strains circulating.

USA is showing a fully vaccinated death rate of 0.68%. Again, we know for sure that since vaccinations reached high coverage, case numbers have been under-reported even more than before, because so many people don't even have symptoms, or don't bother self-reporting. I'm very confident that reported numbers are less than 10% of the actual number, and that for vaccinated people, the chances of dying are indeed less than 0.1%.

Originally Posted by bignickel View Post
That would be great if that continued, but we're about to hit 3 months of festivities. Based on what happened in 2020 and 2021, would we expect those numbers to sharply go up in a month or so?
Most likely, but influenza will be in the mix as well.

New Zealand and Australia are a good case study of how it goes, with totally open statistics, and it was notable all through winter that the overwhelming majority of people dying of covid already had their toe tags printed. Hospices and care homes took the burden of deaths. People who otherwise got very sick with covid went to hospital and came out again in almost all cases.

And just a word of caution - despite what some may claim, I'm not trying to minimise anything. Two and a half years of posting factually in the covid thread covers where I've been, and if you fancy going back to the very first thread you'll see me laying into people who downplayed the disease in Feb/March 2020.

My position now is that we can't continue panicking over a disease that is no more deadly than influenza. People can still wear masks - heck I wear one myself in some situations and was very grateful last Thursday when an obscure shop I went in had a cashier who was clearly sick and coughing.

But the pandemic, as we've known it, is buried. Get your bivalent vaccination, keep up to date with them and boosters as they become available, get your 'flu vaccine and carry on.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th September 2022, 09:21 AM   #205
bignickel
Mad Mod Poet God
 
bignickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,267
You've indicated that the vaccinated fatality rate in the USA is .68%. Do you know what the unvaccinated rate is? (this isn't any kind of statement or gotcha. I actually would like to know what you think it is, and where that number comes from)

EDIT: Shoulda clicked your link. It's 7.73% for the unvaxxed. Dang, that's much higher than I'd expected. It also doesn't make sense... I thought it was always 1-2% for everyone, but it's actually much worse for the unvaxxed.
__________________
"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real. I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that."
- Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone

Last edited by bignickel; 27th September 2022 at 09:24 AM. Reason: I click stuff on interwebs
bignickel is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th September 2022, 11:23 AM   #206
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 32,256
Originally Posted by bignickel View Post
EDIT: Shoulda clicked your link. It's 7.73% for the unvaxxed. Dang, that's much higher than I'd expected. It also doesn't make sense... I thought it was always 1-2% for everyone, but it's actually much worse for the unvaxxed.
You need to allow for the ridiculously high rate of unreported cases. I'd say this year the unreported cases are more than ten times the official numbers, so the unvaxed death rate is like to be closer to 0.5% than 7%.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th September 2022, 12:02 PM   #207
marting
Illuminator
 
marting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,436
Originally Posted by bignickel View Post
You've indicated that the vaccinated fatality rate in the USA is .68%. Do you know what the unvaccinated rate is? (this isn't any kind of statement or gotcha. I actually would like to know what you think it is, and where that number comes from)

EDIT: Shoulda clicked your link. It's 7.73% for the unvaxxed. Dang, that's much higher than I'd expected. It also doesn't make sense... I thought it was always 1-2% for everyone, but it's actually much worse for the unvaxxed.
That chart does not show IFR. Rather it's the death rate in terms of people per 100,000 in each group (vaxxed, unvaxxed, ...). 7.73 is not a percentage. It means that 7.73 people in a group of 100,000 unvaxxed, died in the week shown on the X axis.

To estimate IFR you would need estimates of how many in that group were infected (not diagnosed or it would be CFR) 2 to 5 weeks earlier.

CFR numbers in the USA have been running about .5%. Almost no positive rapid flow tests are even counted in the US. Since Feb., estimates are that infections are 10X the reported cases which would put overall IFR down around .05%. Unvaxxed probably around .15%.

The reasons IFR is so low is that most people in the US have already been infected and a large majority of those most at risk are also vaccinated.
__________________
Flying's easy. Walking on water, now that's cool.
marting is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th September 2022, 01:04 PM   #208
bignickel
Mad Mod Poet God
 
bignickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,267
So would you say that .15% fatality rate for unvaxxed people would because of a combination of better treatment, combined with so many people already either vaccinated, or previously infected by Covid? Any other factor lowering it down to .15%
__________________
"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real. I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that."
- Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone
bignickel is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th September 2022, 01:38 PM   #209
marting
Illuminator
 
marting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,436
Originally Posted by bignickel View Post
So would you say that .15% fatality rate for unvaxxed people would because of a combination of better treatment, combined with so many people already either vaccinated, or previously infected by Covid? Any other factor lowering it down to .15%
1. Most of the unvaxxed have already had covid. For that matter most of the vaxxed has probably had Covid too. IHME's estimate is that 95% (not sure I believe it's actually that high but it is high) of Americans have been infected at least once. That provides protection against severe disease roughly similar to vaccination. But neither vax nor prior infection are good at preventing infection since Omicron and marginal with Delta.

2. Omicron is generally considered 25% to 50% less virulent.

3. Treatment has improved (Paxlovid and mon-clonals) but indications are it's not reaching that many in the US so not a big factor.

Thus IFR for the unvaxxed has dropped about 5x
__________________
Flying's easy. Walking on water, now that's cool.

Last edited by marting; 27th September 2022 at 01:40 PM.
marting is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th September 2022, 03:25 PM   #210
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 32,256
Originally Posted by marting View Post
That chart does not show IFR. Rather it's the death rate in terms of people per 100,000 in each group (vaxxed, unvaxxed, ...). 7.73 is not a percentage. It means that 7.73 people in a group of 100,000 unvaxxed, died in the week shown on the X axis.
You're a top bloke - I never even looked!

To estimate IFR you would need estimates of how many in that group were infected (not diagnosed or it would be CFR) 2 to 5 weeks earlier.


Originally Posted by marting View Post
CFR numbers in the USA have been running about .5%.
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
...reality being that covid is under 0.1% fatal right now.
Nice to see us still on the same wavelength there, too.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 07:03 AM   #211
Chanakya

 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,668
The pandemic's over in Canada, apparently: https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2077207619813
Chanakya is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 07:21 AM   #212
Chanakya

 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,668
At this point, as we're apparently at the cusp of moving over from pandemic to no-longer-pandemic, depending on which geography you're at, I think it's important to remember one obvious but very important distinction:

When the pandemic was raging all around, and some crazies refused to wear masks and comply with other restrictions, then these were ******** that were endangering not just their own worthless lives, but that of others as well, and were therefore a public menace, an enabler of disease and death. Today, in those places where the pandemic's gone --- or almost gone --- and masking et cetera may not be strictly necessary, those oddballs that insist on continuing to mask are at worst eccentrics, at worst germaphobes. They're most certainly not hurting anyone else. Arguably, and even without Covid in the equation at all, they're contributing towards better health, theirs as well others', by keeping at bay other infectious diseases that spread via breath.

What I'm getting at is this obvious distinction: Those that were contrarians during the pandemic were lowlives, ********, a danger to society, a public menace, a threat to health and life, criminals, people who should have been ashamed of themselves, people whose friends and family should have been ashamed of them. While today, contrarians who insist on masking et cetera even when the consensus seems to be moving away from the necessity of doing this, and regardless of whether they're doing this temporarily and deliberately as a better-safe-than-sorry measure, or even because they've become germaphobic, but either way there're at worst entirely harmless eccentrics.



But yes, I guess the pandemic is indeed coming to an end now. There are differences, basis local conditions, obviously. But by and large, I have to say this ---- even as I myself continue, for the time being, to wear masks, and try to maintain the distancing thing as much as possible, and continue to avoid crowds and even smaller gatherings unless absolutely necessary ---- it does seem to me that the world's starting to get back to normal again. Not just pretend-normal, but actual normal.
Chanakya is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 11:15 AM   #213
RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,973
Has this been repeated yet:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...-fall-n1235644

That was the goal for "return to normal". We (US) never got there. We're potentially still on track for Covid being the #3 killer again this year.

Last edited by RecoveringYuppy; 28th September 2022 at 11:16 AM.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 11:19 AM   #214
lobosrul5
Illuminator
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,282
Originally Posted by Chanakya View Post
At this point, as we're apparently at the cusp of moving over from pandemic to no-longer-pandemic, depending on which geography you're at, I think it's important to remember one obvious but very important distinction:

When the pandemic was raging all around, and some crazies refused to wear masks and comply with other restrictions, then these were ******** that were endangering not just their own worthless lives, but that of others as well, and were therefore a public menace, an enabler of disease and death. Today, in those places where the pandemic's gone --- or almost gone --- and masking et cetera may not be strictly necessary, those oddballs that insist on continuing to mask are at worst eccentrics, at worst germaphobes. They're most certainly not hurting anyone else. Arguably, and even without Covid in the equation at all, they're contributing towards better health, theirs as well others', by keeping at bay other infectious diseases that spread via breath.

What I'm getting at is this obvious distinction: Those that were contrarians during the pandemic were lowlives, ********, a danger to society, a public menace, a threat to health and life, criminals, people who should have been ashamed of themselves, people whose friends and family should have been ashamed of them. While today, contrarians who insist on masking et cetera even when the consensus seems to be moving away from the necessity of doing this, and regardless of whether they're doing this temporarily and deliberately as a better-safe-than-sorry measure, or even because they've become germaphobic, but either way there're at worst entirely harmless eccentrics.



But yes, I guess the pandemic is indeed coming to an end now. There are differences, basis local conditions, obviously. But by and large, I have to say this ---- even as I myself continue, for the time being, to wear masks, and try to maintain the distancing thing as much as possible, and continue to avoid crowds and even smaller gatherings unless absolutely necessary ---- it does seem to me that the world's starting to get back to normal again. Not just pretend-normal, but actual normal.
And anyone giving them grief for it needs to get a life and mind their own business. I occasionally saw people with masks before COVID. Are they eccentric or are they immunocompromised? None of my business.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 01:34 PM   #215
RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,973
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
We're potentially still on track for Covid being the #3 killer again this year.
I understated. Pretty definitely there already.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 04:51 PM   #216
marting
Illuminator
 
marting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,436
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
Has this been repeated yet:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...-fall-n1235644

That was the goal for "return to normal". We (US) never got there. We're potentially still on track for Covid being the #3 killer again this year.
I don't understand the need for binarys. Why does the definition of pandemic matter? It's pretty clearly entered an endemic phase where vaccines and/or prior infections do little to reduce new infections even while reducing severe disease.

We are at a point where Covid-19's IFR is similar to, or even less than influenza. But we are also going to see considerably more deaths from Covid-19 than influenza. This may seem contradictory, but it's because Covid-19 is far more infectious than influenza. And that is what's kicking up the covid-19 deaths which will almost certainly be much higher than a bad flu season.

That said, flu has long been endemic with 10% to 15% getting flu each season. But covid-19's variants have evolved rapidly and we could well have over 50% of the US infected in 2022. So even if Covid-19 had a bit lower IFR than flu, it will still produce way more deaths than flu.

However, flu is likely to contribute more than it's usual share this winter since flu immunity has dropped from 2 years of very low flu infections due to covid-19 NPIs. I think Covid-19 deaths will exceed flu this winter and that flu will still be a larger factor than usual.
__________________
Flying's easy. Walking on water, now that's cool.

Last edited by marting; 28th September 2022 at 04:53 PM.
marting is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th September 2022, 04:55 PM   #217
novaphile
Quester of Doglets
 
novaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sunny South Australia
Posts: 3,491
Originally Posted by Chanakya View Post
I had no clue you could have cloth masks that can hold N95 filters. Are you sure those filters stay effective even after washing? If they do, then agreed, those cloth masks would then be no less effective than the regular N95s, and what's more they'd then look like a better proposition (in terms of both the ecological impact, as well as the cost). Add to that the comfort factor that both you and TM speak of --- and that I've no opinion on, never having used them --- and absolutely, cloth masks would then come out as decisively better than the disposables.

eta: And add on top of all of that the eshetics of it, because I'm sure cloth masks can be made out to look better than these disposables.
Hiya, the filters aren't washable. The filters are removed and thrown out.
(They're quite cheap too, similar in price to the disposable N95s)

The cloth masks are washable.

I haven't tried wearing an N95 mask under the cloth mask, I'll give that a go and see how it goes.
__________________
We would be better, and braver, to engage in enquiry, rather than indulge in the idle fancy, that we already know -- Plato.
novaphile is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 01:58 AM   #218
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 32,256
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
We're potentially still on track for Covid being the #3 killer again this year.
Based on what?

USA is showing 72,000 deaths over the past six months. I see no reason the rate will double in the next six months, and with better vaccines and still-working treatments, it shouldn't be any higher than the past 6 months, which would put it just outside the top 5.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 07:15 AM   #219
RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,973
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
USA is showing 72,000 deaths over the past six months.
We're nine months in to the year and I'm not even sure your six month number is right. We're past 225,000 deaths this year in the US.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/225000...ry?id=90339579

Note that I clarified in a later post that Covid is already in the number three position, not just potentially as I said in the earlier post of mine.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 08:07 AM   #220
Chanakya

 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,668
Originally Posted by ponderingturtle View Post
What it means is it has gone from pandemic to endemic, of course there are people getting sick and dying from it, but not in the huge waves like when it was a pandemic. COVID is certainly not going to go away any time soon.

Originally Posted by marting View Post
I don't understand the need for binarys. Why does the definition of pandemic matter? It's pretty clearly entered an endemic phase where vaccines and/or prior infections do little to reduce new infections even while reducing severe disease.

We are at a point where Covid-19's IFR is similar to, or even less than influenza. But we are also going to see considerably more deaths from Covid-19 than influenza. This may seem contradictory, but it's because Covid-19 is far more infectious than influenza. And that is what's kicking up the covid-19 deaths which will almost certainly be much higher than a bad flu season.

That said, flu has long been endemic with 10% to 15% getting flu each season. But covid-19's variants have evolved rapidly and we could well have over 50% of the US infected in 2022. So even if Covid-19 had a bit lower IFR than flu, it will still produce way more deaths than flu.

However, flu is likely to contribute more than it's usual share this winter since flu immunity has dropped from 2 years of very low flu infections due to covid-19 NPIs. I think Covid-19 deaths will exceed flu this winter and that flu will still be a larger factor than usual.

Agreed, absolutely, it's not quite a black-and-white binary, with full-on protection measures called for when the pandemic switch is marked 'on', and one lets it all hang out when the switch gets marked "off"!

Still, I suppose the pandemic designation keeps it all simple. That is, you know that masking, distancing, all of that, is necessary for most everybody (bar maybe some small island country somewhere in the middle of nowhere that maybe for now happens to be safe). There's no two ways about it.

When there's no pandemic, local conditions may still necessitate those restrictions. Or one's own particular situation might make those restrictions necessary --- because one is especially vulnerable, and/or because one is infected. But the blanket no-fine-nuance everyone-needs-to-be-on-full-alert situation, that whole emergency thing, that ...I guess that classification matters, that no-nuance in-your-face emergency red-alert, to get everyone (bar of course the inveterately and pathologically stupid/ignorant/anti-social/suicidal-murderous/crazy) fully on board with all of these measures.



So yeah, agreed, depending on local conditions, depending on one's individual situation, depending on all of that, it isn't as if no-pandemic translates into letting it all hang out now. (Although unfortunately that's exactly what seems to be actually happening, by and large, at this point. Let's just hope this doesn't come back and bite us!)

Last edited by Chanakya; 29th September 2022 at 08:08 AM.
Chanakya is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 08:50 AM   #221
lobosrul5
Illuminator
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,282
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
We're nine months in to the year and I'm not even sure your six month number is right. We're past 225,000 deaths this year in the US.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/225000...ry?id=90339579

Note that I clarified in a later post that Covid is already in the number three position, not just potentially as I said in the earlier post of mine.
We're currently seeing 350 deaths a day. Which at that rate would be 127000 dead a year. Below the following:

Heart disease: 696,962
Cancer: 602,350
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 200,955
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 160,264
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 152,657
Alzheimer’s disease: 134,242

Of course we don't know for certain if the COVID death rate will continue dropping or surge in the fall/winter.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:06 AM   #222
RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,973
Originally Posted by lobosrul5 View Post
We're currently seeing 350 deaths a day. Which at that rate would be 127000 dead a year. Below the following:

Heart disease: 696,962
Cancer: 602,350
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 200,955
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 160,264
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 152,657
Alzheimer’s disease: 134,242

Of course we don't know for certain if the COVID death rate will continue dropping or surge in the fall/winter.
I'm not sure what you and The Atheist are thinking. It doesn't matter what the current rate is. We're 9 months in to the year and there are already more than 200,955 (The "Accidents" category in your table). About 25,000 more. Even if Covid stops entirely today Covid is sill already in the number 3 slot unless something goes really out of whack with some other category in the next 3 months. No matter how low the rate goes it can't start raising people from the dead.

Right?

Last edited by RecoveringYuppy; 29th September 2022 at 09:07 AM.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:32 AM   #223
lobosrul5
Illuminator
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,282
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
I'm not sure what you and The Atheist are thinking. It doesn't matter what the current rate is. We're 9 months in to the year and there are already more than 200,955 (The "Accidents" category in your table). About 25,000 more. Even if Covid stops entirely today Covid is sill already in the number 3 slot unless something goes really out of whack with some other category in the next 3 months. No matter how low the rate goes it can't start raising people from the dead.

Right?
Umm you missed my point... I think? The number of deaths early in 2022 was roughly 5 to 6 times than what it is now. COVID deaths plummeted by spring and have remained relatively low, that skews the data, unless we go back to those kind of figures in the fall. The number of people dying of those other causes is pretty much static. If you divide those causes of death by 365 you'd find that 1900 people a day are dying of heart disease,

Here is California data showing that the death rate is .7 per million for the vaccinated. Thats .07 for 100,000. While the death rate for just heart disease is 211 per 100,000.... 3,000 times higher.

https://covid19.ca.gov/state-dashboard/#latest-update
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:39 AM   #224
RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,973
So, if you're trying to make the point that Covid may not be number 3 next year I get it. But you agree Covid is already locked in to number 3 for this year, correct?

Originally Posted by lobosrul5 View Post
Umm you missed my point... I think? The number of deaths early in 2022 was roughly 5 to 6 times than what it is now. COVID deaths plummeted by spring and have remained relatively low, that skews the data, unless we go back to those kind of figures in the fall.
It doesn't skew it for the purpose I'm using. It skews it improperly if you are trying to calculate a current average to make a prediction. But it you are trying to calculate the total for this calendar year as I was then leaving them out skews the data improperly.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:50 AM   #225
lobosrul5
Illuminator
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,282
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
So, if you're trying to make the point that Covid may not be number 3 next year I get it. But you agree Covid is already locked in to number 3 for this year, correct?
Yes, I just think current daily averages are far more important in making pandemic policy decisions. Now then, if the CDC has models showing COVID deaths dramatically rising to levels in February or March of this year then thats different. My odds of going out and getting very sick or dying right now is more important than what it was in February. If my odds of dying from COVID is REALLY just .7 per million (Cali DOH numbers) then I'm just not going to be very concerned about it.

ETA: but their chart showed a low of .2 per million early this year. So is it rising because there are no restrictions, or is it because immunity from the original vaccine and boosters are wearing off?

Last edited by lobosrul5; 29th September 2022 at 09:54 AM.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:52 AM   #226
marting
Illuminator
 
marting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,436
Originally Posted by Chanakya View Post
So yeah, agreed, depending on local conditions, depending on one's individual situation, depending on all of that, it isn't as if no-pandemic translates into letting it all hang out now. (Although unfortunately that's exactly what seems to be actually happening, by and large, at this point. Let's just hope this doesn't come back and bite us!)
Bob Wachter, head of UC San Fran Medical, nerds out about exactly this. Discusses his risk calculation and how he determines whether it's safe to eat indoors at a restuarant w/o masks and where and when to mask up. His calculations gives great weight to risk of long covid more than serious disease/death after reviewing the most current papers and in light of his wife's long covid which is mostly reverted after 6 months but some still remains.

He goes into considerable, and very nerdy detail on his thinking in earlier threads.

https://twitter.com/Bob_Wachter/stat...82749817167872
__________________
Flying's easy. Walking on water, now that's cool.

Last edited by marting; 29th September 2022 at 09:54 AM.
marting is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:55 AM   #227
RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,973
Originally Posted by lobosrul5 View Post
Yes, I just think current daily averages are far more important in making pandemic policy decisions.
Yeah, I totally agree with that. You'll note I didn't say anything about pandemic policy decisions.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 09:55 AM   #228
Chanakya

 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,668
Originally Posted by lobosrul5 View Post
We're currently seeing 350 deaths a day. Which at that rate would be 127000 dead a year. Below the following:

Heart disease: 696,962
Cancer: 602,350
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 200,955
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 160,264
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 152,657
Alzheimer’s disease: 134,242

Of course we don't know for certain if the COVID death rate will continue dropping or surge in the fall/winter.

I think the comparison with deaths from heart disease, and cancer, and accidents, and stroke, and Alzheimers --- all of the above, bar possibly lung disease, or at least a subset of it --- is dodgy.

The thing is, the Corona virus is infectious. Those others aren't. That for one.

And in any case, the corona virus thing is over and above the rest. That is, if we got a Venn, I guess there'd technically be a sliver of commonality in there, not as if the intersection is entirely zero I guess, but that's just a technicality. For all practical purposes this one's an addition, an extra.

So that, even if it turns out Corona virus is at #7, say, that's still nothing to sneeze at. It isn't as if this thing gets taken seriously only if it is at #1!



eta: Not saying that's what you're arguing, exactly the opposite, I think. This kind of complements your argument I suppose, adds to it I guess.

etaa: Just read through your other posts, so maybe not? (My ETA above, I mean to say.) Whatever, either way.

Last edited by Chanakya; 29th September 2022 at 09:59 AM.
Chanakya is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 10:46 AM   #229
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 32,256
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
We're nine months in to the year and I'm not even sure your six month number is right.
It is, I gave you the link showing the exact details.

Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
Note that I clarified in a later post that Covid is already in the number three position, not just potentially as I said in the earlier post of mine.
We're working at cross purposes.

When looking at whether the pandemic is over, what happened in the past isn't relevant when the current situation is vastly different.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 11:01 AM   #230
lobosrul5
Illuminator
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,282
Originally Posted by Chanakya View Post
I think the comparison with deaths from heart disease, and cancer, and accidents, and stroke, and Alzheimers --- all of the above, bar possibly lung disease, or at least a subset of it --- is dodgy.

The thing is, the Corona virus is infectious. Those others aren't. That for one.

And in any case, the corona virus thing is over and above the rest. That is, if we got a Venn, I guess there'd technically be a sliver of commonality in there, not as if the intersection is entirely zero I guess, but that's just a technicality. For all practical purposes this one's an addition, an extra.

So that, even if it turns out Corona virus is at #7, say, that's still nothing to sneeze at. It isn't as if this thing gets taken seriously only if it is at #1!



eta: Not saying that's what you're arguing, exactly the opposite, I think. This kind of complements your argument I suppose, adds to it I guess.

etaa: Just read through your other posts, so maybe not? (My ETA above, I mean to say.) Whatever, either way.
Its not necessarily dodgy depending on what the purpose of the comparison is. If Cali DOH figures are right and my odds of dying from COVID in a year are really just .07 per 100k per year as a vaccinated person, then its irrelevant for my decision making. Its basically negligible compared to common causes of death. Also, I can't find odds of contracting long COVID which indeed might influence my decisions.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 11:26 AM   #231
Warp12
King of Kings
 
Warp12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,597
Pretty much over in the US. Worldometer is showing 1% fatality, which is obviously heavily weighted to the early period of the pandemic. In my state, under 25 deaths per day, out of a population of over 8 million.

My doctor's office still requires a mask. I have no issue with that. Otherwise, I don't wear one or take any other precautions. Triple-vaxxed.
__________________
Tell them Johnny Wadd is here.
Warp12 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th September 2022, 02:26 PM   #232
marting
Illuminator
 
marting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,436
Originally Posted by lobosrul5 View Post
Its not necessarily dodgy depending on what the purpose of the comparison is. If Cali DOH figures are right and my odds of dying from COVID in a year are really just .07 per 100k per year as a vaccinated person, then its irrelevant for my decision making. Its basically negligible compared to common causes of death. Also, I can't find odds of contracting long COVID which indeed might influence my decisions.
Agree that would be negligible. For a California population of about 40M assuming 90% vax rate, that comes out to 25 per year or just over 2 vaxxed, covid-19 deaths per month in Calif.

It isn't true.
__________________
Flying's easy. Walking on water, now that's cool.
marting is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th September 2022, 01:48 AM   #233
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 32,256
'Straya hasn't declared the pandemic over, they've just removed all the rules: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-63084976
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.