IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Economics, Business and Finance
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags bitcoin

Reply
Old 12th January 2021, 06:34 PM   #921
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
 
a_unique_person's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for the pod bay door to open.
Posts: 43,042
Originally Posted by zooterkin View Post
Schroedinger's bitcoin.
__________________
Continually pushing the boundaries of mediocrity.
Everything is possible, but not everything is probable.
“Perception is real, but the truth is not.” - Imelda Marcos
a_unique_person is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2021, 10:15 PM   #922
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,373
Originally Posted by a_unique_person View Post
Schroedinger's bitcoin.
Watching it cross the event horizon
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2021, 10:21 PM   #923
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by blutoski 36 hours ago View Post
So, like, later this afternoon, I guess.
Well that was a terrible guess. The price hasn't done much of anything for at least 36 hours (although it is down from the $40K+ of last week).

Mind you, a quick study of the price history shows that the odds were massively against such a prediction. Although the price has been in free fall several times in its history, I can't find any instance of a 50% price drop in a single day.

The current bubble may still have some time to go before the price comes crashing down again.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th January 2021, 11:16 AM   #924
Armitage72
Philosopher
 
Armitage72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,230
A man in the UK accidentally threw away a hard drive containing his Bitcoins back in 2013, which would now be worth about $273 million. He's offering the town $70 million to let him excavate the landfill looking for it, the payment depending on him finding the drive and the data being recoverable. The town is saying that the excavation would have a significant environmental impact and could cost millions, with no guarantee of him being able to pay.
Armitage72 is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th January 2021, 10:32 PM   #925
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
 
a_unique_person's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for the pod bay door to open.
Posts: 43,042
Anyone want to trade some Tesla shares for Bitcoin.
__________________
Continually pushing the boundaries of mediocrity.
Everything is possible, but not everything is probable.
“Perception is real, but the truth is not.” - Imelda Marcos
a_unique_person is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th January 2021, 09:52 AM   #926
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by blutoski View Post
So, it's volatile, like gambling, and you can win if you have a time machine to go back to a few hours/days earlier. Got it.
I just checked with my time machine and it says: "Have bets placed before Jan 29,2021. Insert 10 BTC for more info".

Last edited by ChrisBFRPKY; 18th January 2021 at 09:53 AM. Reason: sp
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2021, 01:31 AM   #927
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 28,263
This will help Bitcoin's value: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...ryptocurrency/

I tend to agree with the idea that Bitcoin is mainly used for illegal purposes.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2021, 02:42 AM   #928
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,373
I will consume an appendage if bitcoin does not see 20,000 shortly.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2021, 10:27 AM   #929
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
I tend to agree with the idea that Bitcoin is mainly used for illegal purposes.
Have you got any data that shows that transactions for illegal purposes outweighs speculation?
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2021, 10:39 AM   #930
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
I will consume an appendage if bitcoin does not see 20,000 shortly.
I hope and pray you're right. But not because of the appendage thing. I would suggest a pickled pigs foot though. If you've never tried one, and most people have not, you may be pleasantly surprised if you don't think about it too much.
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2021, 11:39 AM   #931
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 28,263
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
Have you got any data that shows that transactions for illegal purposes outweighs speculation?
Apologies, I didn't make clear that I'm talking about purchases of goods.

In terms of what's actually purchased via Bitcoin, there aren't any numbers available because criminals tend not to report the value of their dug deals are, but I'd be amazed if it turned out that more than 5% of market purchases made were legal usage.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2021, 01:07 PM   #932
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
Apologies, I didn't make clear that I'm talking about purchases of goods.
If you eliminate the most common reason for buying bitcoins (speculation) then I guess that purchasing illegal goods and services would be the next most likely reason but I suspect that this would be well down the ladder.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 12:04 AM   #933
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
 
a_unique_person's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for the pod bay door to open.
Posts: 43,042
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
If you eliminate the most common reason for buying bitcoins (speculation) then I guess that purchasing illegal goods and services would be the next most likely reason but I suspect that this would be well down the ladder.
If the only measure of worth of an object it's speculation before, it's not a good sign.
__________________
Continually pushing the boundaries of mediocrity.
Everything is possible, but not everything is probable.
“Perception is real, but the truth is not.” - Imelda Marcos
a_unique_person is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 12:27 AM   #934
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by a_unique_person View Post
If the only measure of worth of an object it's speculation before, it's not a good sign.
It hasn't been a good sign for 12 years.

Don't forget that just because bitcoin is not evil-person proof doesn't mean that it hasn't achieved its designed technological objective.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 02:19 AM   #935
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,373
One man's (person's) reversal pattern is another man's continuation pattern.
This is what bedevils technical analysis of trends in free markets.
I can report that bitcoin is a beautifully behaving technical market, which is exactly to be expected in a theoretical construct devoid of intrinsic value.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 07:11 AM   #936
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
 
a_unique_person's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for the pod bay door to open.
Posts: 43,042
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
It hasn't been a good sign for 12 years.

Don't forget that just because bitcoin is not evil-person proof doesn't mean that it hasn't achieved its designed technological objective.

From a technology point of view it's failure. In the 21st century it can take days to do a simple transaction.
__________________
Continually pushing the boundaries of mediocrity.
Everything is possible, but not everything is probable.
“Perception is real, but the truth is not.” - Imelda Marcos
a_unique_person is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 08:40 AM   #937
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by a_unique_person View Post
From a technology point of view it's failure. In the 21st century it can take days to do a simple transaction.
Yeah, bitcoin is a complete failure if you evaluate it on either the basis of what it tried to achieve. It's not a functional currency and never will be.

Even without the failure of the technology itself bitcoins failure to become a functional currency was easily predicable. It attempted to solve a problem that didn't exist and viewed strengths of the established monetary system as problems to be "fixed"
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 10:42 AM   #938
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by a_unique_person View Post
From a technology point of view it's failure. In the 21st century it can take days to do a simple transaction.
After all these years and thousands of posts on bitcoin you still don't know how it works?

It takes 10 minutes to get a transaction confirmed and 1 hour for 6 confirmations after which forking can't touch the transaction. It's on the blockchain forever. Of course you have to offer a transaction fee or no miner will touch your transaction but it was never meant to be a free service. On the most recent blocks, the average transaction fee is of the order of about 0.0005 btc or $15.

For transferring large amounts of wealth around the world without interference from a third party or the need to justify your transaction to financial authorities, crypto currencies can't be beaten. That is its "intrinsic" value.

Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
It's not a functional currency and never will be.
Who said that bitcoin has to be a "functional currency" (whatever that means)? michaelsuede?
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975

Last edited by psionl0; 22nd January 2021 at 10:55 AM.
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 08:34 PM   #939
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Interesting piece:

"Crypto Whale Abruptly Drains Wallet, Moving $615,000,000 in Bitcoin in Single Transaction for a fee of about $3.00"

https://dailyhodl.com/2021/01/19/cry...20about%20%243.
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 08:38 PM   #940
Dr.Sid
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 3,169
Damn .. imaging hodling that !
Dr.Sid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd January 2021, 10:26 PM   #941
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
I thought it was a neat write up and example that illustrates an important use of BTC. A method of transferring wealth at ultra low cost. Maybe it'll help some understand better how BTC works.
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2021, 12:27 AM   #942
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by ChrisBFRPKY View Post
Interesting piece:

"Crypto Whale Abruptly Drains Wallet, Moving $615,000,000 in Bitcoin in Single Transaction for a fee of about $3.00"

https://dailyhodl.com/2021/01/19/cry...20about%20%243.
0.00008320 BTC seems like a pretty stingy fee compared to the current average. I wonder how long it took for the whale to get his first confirmation.

ETA this seems like a reasonable fee a week ago. On block 666216 there were 2643 transactions and the total fees collected was 1.28898737 BTC. That makes an average fee per transaction of 0.000048378 BTC.

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/block/666216
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975

Last edited by psionl0; 23rd January 2021 at 12:43 AM.
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2021, 12:02 PM   #943
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
0.00008320 BTC seems like a pretty stingy fee compared to the current average. I wonder how long it took for the whale to get his first confirmation.

ETA this seems like a reasonable fee a week ago. On block 666216 there were 2643 transactions and the total fees collected was 1.28898737 BTC. That makes an average fee per transaction of 0.000048378 BTC.

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/block/666216
Yep, that transaction was on the 16th.
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th January 2021, 09:58 AM   #944
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by ChrisBFRPKY View Post
I thought it was a neat write up and example that illustrates an important use of BTC. A method of transferring wealth at ultra low cost. Maybe it'll help some understand better how BTC works.
AKA tax evasion and/or money laundering.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th January 2021, 09:59 AM   #945
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
AKA tax evasion and/or money laundering.
There's the Jedi mind at work again.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th January 2021, 01:53 PM   #946
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
AKA tax evasion and/or money laundering.
Not at all. It's a transfer of wealth.

In the US, when those coins are converted into a physical currency, (cashed out) that's when Uncle Sam gets his share. Getting an account to do so is no different than applying for a bank account. The current "Know your customer" stuff takes care of illicit activities like money laundering by identifying the person converting their BTC to USD. Not only is the person identified, their bank account and amount transferred is as well. One thing's for certain, when you convert BTC to USD Uncle Sam WILL GET his money.

Otherwise, the BTC is still an unrealized investment gain with no tax due.

I suppose if you were to transfer BTC to a Country that offers private banking transactions and cash out there you could get away with money laundering, but that's nothing new and certainly not limited to BTC.

And as a hypothetical, if you were to purchase bullion with BTC, there must be a shipping address to go with those purchase records, then you have to sell it. If I was going to set up some sort of illegal activity that I didn't want traced back to me I'd use cash, US dollars, like everyone else does. BTC leaves too many trails getting in and out.
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th January 2021, 07:37 AM   #947
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by ChrisBFRPKY View Post
Not at all. It's a transfer of wealth.

In the US, when those coins are converted into a physical currency, (cashed out) that's when Uncle Sam gets his share. Getting an account to do so is no different than applying for a bank account. The current "Know your customer" stuff takes care of illicit activities like money laundering by identifying the person converting their BTC to USD. Not only is the person identified, their bank account and amount transferred is as well. One thing's for certain, when you convert BTC to USD Uncle Sam WILL GET his money.

Otherwise, the BTC is still an unrealized investment gain with no tax due.

I suppose if you were to transfer BTC to a Country that offers private banking transactions and cash out there you could get away with money laundering, but that's nothing new and certainly not limited to BTC.

And as a hypothetical, if you were to purchase bullion with BTC, there must be a shipping address to go with those purchase records, then you have to sell it. If I was going to set up some sort of illegal activity that I didn't want traced back to me I'd use cash, US dollars, like everyone else does. BTC leaves too many trails getting in and out.
In the story we are discussing over $600 million in Bitcoin were exchanged for something. Probabaly money. Even if it were traded for something capital gains tax likely should have applied. It's HIGHLY likely that this was a case of tax evasion, and may have been done for money laundering reasons as well.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th January 2021, 10:45 AM   #948
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
In the story we are discussing over $600 million in Bitcoin were exchanged for something. Probabaly money. Even if it were traded for something capital gains tax likely should have applied. It's HIGHLY likely that this was a case of tax evasion, and may have been done for money laundering reasons as well.
It's not uncommon for someone that's holding BTC to make transfers to a new wallet address without any exchange of ownership of said BTC.

Nothing in the chain analytics suggests these transactions were in any way illegal activities. If we're going to speculate it's just as likely the large transfers were broken up going to a new account opened somewhere and the smaller transactions to the other addresses could have simply been business expenses for things like monthly payroll etc.....
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th January 2021, 12:27 PM   #949
The_Animus
Illuminator
 
The_Animus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,253
Originally Posted by a_unique_person View Post
From a technology point of view it's failure. In the 21st century it can take days to do a simple transaction.
Assuming you set an average confirmaron fee it takes minutes to get the first confirmation and maybe an hour to have it fully confirmed.
The_Animus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th January 2021, 12:59 PM   #950
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by ChrisBFRPKY View Post

Nothing in the chain analytics suggests these transactions were in any way illegal activities.
Of course you can't. This is because bitcoin was designed to prevent you from knowing who sent money to whome. The reason WHY it gets used for criminal activities.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th January 2021, 01:54 PM   #951
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
Of course you can't. This is because bitcoin was designed to prevent you from knowing who sent money to whome. The reason WHY it gets used for criminal activities.
If it is your claim that NO bitcoin transactions are legitimate then the onus is on you to prove it. Your idle speculation is worthless.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th January 2021, 06:59 PM   #952
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
Of course you can't. This is because bitcoin was designed to prevent you from knowing who sent money to whome. The reason WHY it gets used for criminal activities.
I think you must be thinking of privacy coins like Monero. Their transactions can be secretive and likely untraceable.

In contrast, BTC transactions are viewable on the blockchain and therefore traceable. While there is no name listed for who the BTC goes to or from, the transaction and wallet ID is 100% traceable to the end user when conversion to physical currency or goods takes place.

Meaning at some point the end user will convert it into physical currency or goods, all of which leave traceable transactions to identify them. Otherwise the end user only has numbers on a computer to look at with no financial gain at all. It would be sad to know you're an unrealized multi-millionaire that doesn't have enough cash to pay the monthly utility bills....
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 07:38 AM   #953
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
If it is your claim that NO bitcoin transactions are legitimate then the onus is on you to prove it. Your idle speculation is worthless.
It's not, so your strawman arguments loose again.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 07:40 AM   #954
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by ChrisBFRPKY View Post
I think you must be thinking of privacy coins like Monero. Their transactions can be secretive and likely untraceable.

In contrast, BTC transactions are viewable on the blockchain and therefore traceable. While there is no name listed for who the BTC goes to or from, the transaction and wallet ID is 100% traceable to the end user when conversion to physical currency or goods takes place.
If there is no name attached it's not traceable.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 10:43 AM   #955
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
It's not, so your strawman arguments loose again.
So you didn't say, "It's HIGHLY likely that this was a case of tax evasion, and may have been done for money laundering reasons as well"?

Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
If there is no name attached it's not traceable.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975

Last edited by psionl0; 29th January 2021 at 10:44 AM.
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 11:35 AM   #956
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
So you admit that I did not in fact say:
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
NO bitcoin transactions are legitimate
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post

If you think it's funny then by all means explain to us how authorities can trace who transferred money to whome without know the owner of the wallet?
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 01:05 PM   #957
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
So you admit that I did not in fact say:
You can't hide behind weasel words. The first and only thought you had about this transaction was ILLEGAL.

Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
If you think it's funny then by all means explain to us how authorities can trace who transferred money to whome without know the owner of the wallet?
There is no need to ask me. ChrisBFRPKY has done a good job of explaining how transactions can be tracked. If you think that he is too biased then you could always check out the technical web sites.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 01:19 PM   #958
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,348
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
You can't hide behind weasel words. The first and only thought you had about this transaction was ILLEGAL.


There is no need to ask me. ChrisBFRPKY has done a good job of explaining how transactions can be tracked. If you think that he is too biased then you could always check out the technical web sites.
You constructed a stawman, got called out on it and are now

Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post

There is no need to ask me.
Yes there is. You responded I asked you to justify your response. I'm not surprise that you can't, in fact I knew you couldn't.

Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post

ChrisBFRPKY has done a good job of explaining how transactions can be tracked.
ChrisBFRPKY failed for the reasons I already pointed out.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 01:42 PM   #959
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,993
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
ChrisBFRPKY failed for the reasons I already pointed out.
Of course you will say that ChrisBFRPKY failed because you don't want to admit that he addressed your objection. You didn't give any reasons. You just repeated a non-sequitur.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th January 2021, 03:56 PM   #960
ChrisBFRPKY
Illuminator
 
ChrisBFRPKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
If there is no name attached it's not traceable.
I get that you are hard focused on one specific point as the foundation for your objection. This is a sound tactic of debate and I applaud the effort.

However there is an important detail required for this method to come to fruition. Using the specific argument that "the traceable BTC transaction does not include the person's name(s) therefore you cannot know who they are". would have to mean that the FBI or other law enforcement agencies are limited to tracing a name only within the transaction. There is the flaw in your position.

Let's look at it this way, if I were to join your objection on this point about the name not being listed and further add that an IP address does not list the user's name either. See where I'm going?

Now I can surmise you're likely thinking about VPN software right? Exactly, but that's not the point I'm trying to clarify. My point to address your objection is that Law Enforcement is not deterred by the missing name from the BTC transactions when they trace them, the name will eventually be revealed and the transactions on the blockchain are used as evidence of criminal activity for prosecution.
ChrisBFRPKY is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Economics, Business and Finance

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.