ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 8th September 2010, 02:24 AM   #1
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 16,678
Roll Call: What do you think happened on 9/11, and why?

Hey everybody,

Rule 1: No discussion, please!
I don't want to debate anybody's opinion, so please refrain entirely from quoting anybody, calling them names, demanding evidence etc.
Only exception: Requests to clear up statements you did not understand.

I would like everybody, debunkers and truthers alike, to state as consisely as possible your working hypothesis of what happened on 9/11, who did it, how they did it, and why they did it. You may indicate which parts of your hypothesis you consider hard fact, and which you only guess or are unsure about.

Here's a little checklist of the elements you might want to consider:
- 4 civilian planes - real? hijacked? remote controlled? crashed where?
- Twin Towers - plane crashes? Cause of collapse?
- WTC7 - cause of collapse?
- Pentagon - plane crash? Missile?
- Shanksville - plane? Shot down?
- If Al Quaeda: Do they hate our freedom? Mindless killers? Is it about Israel? Did they want the wars?
- If the government: Who was involved? Bush? Cheney? Any foreign agents? MIHOP or LIHOP?
- What about the investigations? 9/11 Commission? NIST? FEMA? FBI? Need a new one? if so, what objectives? Who should chair it?
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 02:31 AM   #2
Quad4_72
AI-EE-YAH!
 
Quad4_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,354
I refer you to the 9/11 Commission Report and the findings of NIST.
__________________
Looks like the one on top has a magazine, thus needs less reloading. Also, the muzzle shroud makes it less likely for a spree killer to burn his hands. The pistol grip makes it more comfortable for the spree killer to shoot. thaiboxerken
Quad4_72 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 03:02 AM   #3
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 16,678
I go first:

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that 4 civilian airplanes were hijacked and intentionally flown into 3 buildings. One crashed near Shanksville.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that all the physical damage and loss of life on that day were a result of the plane crashes and the fires they started. No bombs, no additional incendiaries, no controlled demolition

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackers commaded the cockpits and flew the planes. No remote control.

About flights 11, 175 and 77, I have nothing additional to say.
I am certain, but allow residual doubt, that flight 93 crashed because its passengers resisted and violently iterferred, thus making the hijacker-pilot lose control and crash. No shoot-down to be sure.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackings caught FAA and the military units that were on alert to defend the airspace by surprise, that they did everything they could to handle the situation, but were unable to do anything about the 4 planes. The main reasons for this inability were: Too little time; no contingency plans for such situations, resources too thinly spread; inadequate sharing of information between civilian and military agencies due to inadequate or incompatible technology.

I am fairly certain that some agencies of the US goverment had in their possession information that, if assembled and interpreted lucidly ahead of time, might have enabled them to intervene and bust the terrorists before 9/11. I can't judge fairly if the failure to do so is due to avoidable incompetence, or if the odds of finding such information in a sea of data are just prohibitively slim. I do not believe that anyone in these agencies knew of the plan and consciously decided not to interfere. I allow for the remote possibility that there are nefarious elements in the agencies who might be so inclined.

I am certain that the hijackers were a group of 19 or 20 Arabs, mostly from Saudi-Arabia, who were recruited by Al Quaeda, had the blessing of OBL. Among their leaders were KSM and Mohammed Atta. I admit that there is a little wiggle room for doubt, as KSM was abducted in secrecy and tortured. I want to take information presented by secret services with a good grain of salt.

I believe the suicide terrorists were personally motivated mainly by a general feeling of hatred and powerlessness towards the USA and the secualar west. Grievances in connection with the situation in Palestine, and other middle-eastern issues may also individually have placed a role. They were mostly devout muslims of a radical provenance who believed the preaching that they will go to paradise if killed in action against non-believers.

I believe OBL and Al Quaeda hoped to lure the USA into a violent and costly reaction. Secondary goals may have been to gain prestige and attract recruits and other support from muslims around the world, position Al Quaeda as the leading islamist resistance group, or stir up popular uprisings in Arab lands against regimes that Al Quaeda opposes (the monarchies of Saudi-Arabia and Jordan for example, or the Israeli occupations).

I am satisfied with the forensic investigations. They were humongous tasks, had do dive deep into unknown territories, and by and large the efforts were carried out honestly, competently and with sufficient thoroughness. With hindsight, some minor weaknesses may be lamented, such as the failure to investigate WTC7 with the same diligence as WTC1 and 2 were. It is my understanding that the debris of the twin towers was investigated more thoroughly, which undoubtfully is due to its containing so many human remains. There is no foul play.

I think the 9/11 Commission did a great job.

I believe the government, and some agencies thereof, have been too hesitant to allow reviews of their roles in desaster management and preparedness.

I lament that no co-ordinated debate has taken place about the political implications and the fall-out of the attacks. 9/11 has been abused by the Bush administration to further unrelated and sweeping agendas to the detriment of the American people.
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 03:29 AM   #4
ozeco41
Philosopher
 
ozeco41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia
Posts: 7,508
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I go first:

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that 4 civilian airplanes were hijacked and intentionally flown into 3 buildings. One crashed near Shanksville.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that all the physical damage and loss of life on that day were a result of the plane crashes and the fires they started. No bombs, no additional incendiaries, no controlled demolition

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackers commaded the cockpits and flew the planes. No remote control.

About flights 11, 175 and 77, I have nothing additional to say.
I am certain, but allow residual doubt, that flight 93 crashed because its passengers resisted and violently iterferred, thus making the hijacker-pilot lose control and crash. No shoot-down to be sure....
Fully my opinions on those matters.

On the remaining matters I am in broad agreement with the "situation" assessment parts of the statements but not as firmly decided on the "reason" parts.

I can give more detailed explanations later if it seems appropriate. For information I am a British born Australian citizen with civil/structural engineering qualifications and military engineering/demolitions training.

Last edited by ozeco41; 8th September 2010 at 03:31 AM.
ozeco41 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 12:36 PM   #5
Sabretooth
No Ordinary Rabbit
 
Sabretooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wyoming, NY
Posts: 6,710
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I go first:

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that 4 civilian airplanes were hijacked and intentionally flown into 3 buildings. One crashed near Shanksville.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that all the physical damage and loss of life on that day were a result of the plane crashes and the fires they started. No bombs, no additional incendiaries, no controlled demolition

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackers commaded the cockpits and flew the planes. No remote control.

About flights 11, 175 and 77, I have nothing additional to say.
I am certain, but allow residual doubt, that flight 93 crashed because its passengers resisted and violently iterferred, thus making the hijacker-pilot lose control and crash. No shoot-down to be sure.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackings caught FAA and the military units that were on alert to defend the airspace by surprise, that they did everything they could to handle the situation, but were unable to do anything about the 4 planes. The main reasons for this inability were: Too little time; no contingency plans for such situations, resources too thinly spread; inadequate sharing of information between civilian and military agencies due to inadequate or incompatible technology.

I am fairly certain that some agencies of the US goverment had in their possession information that, if assembled and interpreted lucidly ahead of time, might have enabled them to intervene and bust the terrorists before 9/11. I can't judge fairly if the failure to do so is due to avoidable incompetence, or if the odds of finding such information in a sea of data are just prohibitively slim. I do not believe that anyone in these agencies knew of the plan and consciously decided not to interfere. I allow for the remote possibility that there are nefarious elements in the agencies who might be so inclined.

I am certain that the hijackers were a group of 19 or 20 Arabs, mostly from Saudi-Arabia, who were recruited by Al Quaeda, had the blessing of OBL. Among their leaders were KSM and Mohammed Atta. I admit that there is a little wiggle room for doubt, as KSM was abducted in secrecy and tortured. I want to take information presented by secret services with a good grain of salt.

I believe the suicide terrorists were personally motivated mainly by a general feeling of hatred and powerlessness towards the USA and the secualar west. Grievances in connection with the situation in Palestine, and other middle-eastern issues may also individually have placed a role. They were mostly devout muslims of a radical provenance who believed the preaching that they will go to paradise if killed in action against non-believers.

I believe OBL and Al Quaeda hoped to lure the USA into a violent and costly reaction. Secondary goals may have been to gain prestige and attract recruits and other support from muslims around the world, position Al Quaeda as the leading islamist resistance group, or stir up popular uprisings in Arab lands against regimes that Al Quaeda opposes (the monarchies of Saudi-Arabia and Jordan for example, or the Israeli occupations).

I am satisfied with the forensic investigations. They were humongous tasks, had do dive deep into unknown territories, and by and large the efforts were carried out honestly, competently and with sufficient thoroughness. With hindsight, some minor weaknesses may be lamented, such as the failure to investigate WTC7 with the same diligence as WTC1 and 2 were. It is my understanding that the debris of the twin towers was investigated more thoroughly, which undoubtfully is due to its containing so many human remains. There is no foul play.

I think the 9/11 Commission did a great job.

I believe the government, and some agencies thereof, have been too hesitant to allow reviews of their roles in desaster management and preparedness.

I lament that no co-ordinated debate has taken place about the political implications and the fall-out of the attacks. 9/11 has been abused by the Bush administration to further unrelated and sweeping agendas to the detriment of the American people.
I agree with every word, except the highlighted portion.

Based on the CVR transcripts, I believe the hijackers intentionally steered FL93 into the ground to prevent the passengers from taking back control over the plane.

A minor detail...but a non-shootdown none the less.
__________________
--------------------------------------
Stop asking me about that stupid fruity cereal...that's the OTHER rabbit!

Sabretooth is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 12:51 PM   #6
willhaven
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,049
1) 19 crazy religious nuts with a political agenda.
2) 4 airliners.
3) Nearly 3,000 casualties.
4) Lots of structural damage due to airliner impacts and fire.

Why? Blowback. Meddling in the affairs of others can have consequences. Did we deserve it? No. Should we have been wondering why they hate us? Of course not. We should know exactly why they hate us.

If we had a policy of non-intervention and simply humanitarian aid to the middle east, it's unlikely that 9/11 or similar attacks would have happened. At least not with the same severity, frequency and acceptance by some (small number of) Muslims.
willhaven is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 12:59 PM   #7
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
 
jaydeehess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,843
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post

- 4 civilian planes - real? hijacked? remote controlled? crashed where?
Hijacked by 19 Islamic militants
Quote:
- Twin Towers - plane crashes? Cause of collapse?
Fire damage compounded by significant impact damage and the long span construction of the structures.
Quote:
- WTC7 - cause of collapse?
Fire damage compounded by several specifics of the structure's design.
Quote:
- Pentagon - plane crash? Missile?
Plane crash
Quote:
- Shanksville - plane? Shot down?
Crashed jetliner
Quote:
- If Al Quaeda: Do they hate our freedom? Mindless killers? Is it about Israel? Did they want the wars?
It was Al-Qada's oft stated plan to rid the Islamic Holy Land of western, non-Islamic influences.
Quote:
- What about the investigations? 9/11 Commission? NIST? FEMA? FBI? Need a new one? if so, what objectives? Who should chair it?
NIST could go into greater detail about some specifics (ie. did a floor girder get pushed off its col 79 seat by thermal expansion or pulled off during contraction in WTC 7) But is it worth the added expense? IMO, no.
jaydeehess is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 01:05 PM   #8
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,705
No need for me to post here. It's all been said. What a great place the JREFF is!

__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 01:42 PM   #9
Dog Town
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,862
Originally Posted by willhaven View Post

If we had a policy of non-intervention and simply humanitarian aid to the middle east, it's unlikely that 9/11 or similar attacks would have happened.
First off, I agree with most of what others posted already. No big changes need to be addressed.

Considering the whole reason OBL hated the US was for being on Saudi soil, and not his fighters for hire (got his widdle feelings hurt). While all we were doing was helping out Kuwait, and keeping Saddam from even thinking about entering the House of Saud Kingdom. F-him, we did what we should have done!

Sorry broke rule one!

Last edited by Dog Town; 8th September 2010 at 01:44 PM.
Dog Town is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 01:49 PM   #10
9/11 Chewy Defense
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,593
I agree with what's been said too.

Why do I think that's what happened? Because we need to keep the reality that events transpired & were caused by terrorists. And also to keep those retarded Truthers at bay, with evidence to prove them wrong at every turn.
9/11 Chewy Defense is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 01:52 PM   #11
MG1962
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,252
Originally Posted by Dog Town View Post
First off, I agree with most of what others posted already. No big changes need to be addressed.

Considering the whole reason OBL hated the US was for being on Saudi soil, and not his fighters for hire (got his widdle feelings hurt). While all we were doing was helping out Kuwait, and keeping Saddam from even thinking about entering the House of Saud Kingdom. F-him, we did what we should have done!

Sorry broke rule one!
What he/she said.

Osama - anytime you want to have a policy debate, I have a lovely softball bat with your name on it waiting
MG1962 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 01:56 PM   #12
tsig
a carbon based life-form
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto View Post
No need for me to post here. It's all been said. What a great place the JREFF is!

What's the yellow F for?
tsig is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 01:57 PM   #13
tsig
a carbon based life-form
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I go first:

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that 4 civilian airplanes were hijacked and intentionally flown into 3 buildings. One crashed near Shanksville.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that all the physical damage and loss of life on that day were a result of the plane crashes and the fires they started. No bombs, no additional incendiaries, no controlled demolition

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackers commaded the cockpits and flew the planes. No remote control.

About flights 11, 175 and 77, I have nothing additional to say.
I am certain, but allow residual doubt, that flight 93 crashed because its passengers resisted and violently iterferred, thus making the hijacker-pilot lose control and crash. No shoot-down to be sure.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackings caught FAA and the military units that were on alert to defend the airspace by surprise, that they did everything they could to handle the situation, but were unable to do anything about the 4 planes. The main reasons for this inability were: Too little time; no contingency plans for such situations, resources too thinly spread; inadequate sharing of information between civilian and military agencies due to inadequate or incompatible technology.

I am fairly certain that some agencies of the US goverment had in their possession information that, if assembled and interpreted lucidly ahead of time, might have enabled them to intervene and bust the terrorists before 9/11. I can't judge fairly if the failure to do so is due to avoidable incompetence, or if the odds of finding such information in a sea of data are just prohibitively slim. I do not believe that anyone in these agencies knew of the plan and consciously decided not to interfere. I allow for the remote possibility that there are nefarious elements in the agencies who might be so inclined.

I am certain that the hijackers were a group of 19 or 20 Arabs, mostly from Saudi-Arabia, who were recruited by Al Quaeda, had the blessing of OBL. Among their leaders were KSM and Mohammed Atta. I admit that there is a little wiggle room for doubt, as KSM was abducted in secrecy and tortured. I want to take information presented by secret services with a good grain of salt.

I believe the suicide terrorists were personally motivated mainly by a general feeling of hatred and powerlessness towards the USA and the secualar west. Grievances in connection with the situation in Palestine, and other middle-eastern issues may also individually have placed a role. They were mostly devout muslims of a radical provenance who believed the preaching that they will go to paradise if killed in action against non-believers.

I believe OBL and Al Quaeda hoped to lure the USA into a violent and costly reaction. Secondary goals may have been to gain prestige and attract recruits and other support from muslims around the world, position Al Quaeda as the leading islamist resistance group, or stir up popular uprisings in Arab lands against regimes that Al Quaeda opposes (the monarchies of Saudi-Arabia and Jordan for example, or the Israeli occupations).

I am satisfied with the forensic investigations. They were humongous tasks, had do dive deep into unknown territories, and by and large the efforts were carried out honestly, competently and with sufficient thoroughness. With hindsight, some minor weaknesses may be lamented, such as the failure to investigate WTC7 with the same diligence as WTC1 and 2 were. It is my understanding that the debris of the twin towers was investigated more thoroughly, which undoubtfully is due to its containing so many human remains. There is no foul play.

I think the 9/11 Commission did a great job.

I believe the government, and some agencies thereof, have been too hesitant to allow reviews of their roles in desaster management and preparedness.

I lament that no co-ordinated debate has taken place about the political implications and the fall-out of the attacks. 9/11 has been abused by the Bush administration to further unrelated and sweeping agendas to the detriment of the American people.
Yep
tsig is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 02:00 PM   #14
Spindrift
Time Person of the Year, 2006
 
Spindrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Right here!
Posts: 19,246
4 planes were holograms

Super nanothermite was planted in WTC 1 & 2 when it was built.

WTC-7 was rigged to explode when the.....


Oh, I can't even type this stuff as a joke. It's so absurd it makes my brain hurt.



I agree with Oystein
__________________
I've always believed that cluelessness evolved as an adaptation to allow the truly appalling to live with themselves. - G. B. Trudeau
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. - Kay, Men in Black.
Enjoy every sandwich. - Warren Zevon
Spindrift is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 04:16 PM   #15
Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11,494
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I go first:

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that 4 civilian airplanes were hijacked and intentionally flown into 3 buildings. One crashed near Shanksville.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that all the physical damage and loss of life on that day were a result of the plane crashes and the fires they started. No bombs, no additional incendiaries, no controlled demolition

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackers commaded the cockpits and flew the planes. No remote control.

About flights 11, 175 and 77, I have nothing additional to say.
I am certain, but allow residual doubt, that flight 93 crashed because its passengers resisted and violently iterferred, thus making the hijacker-pilot lose control and crash. No shoot-down to be sure.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackings caught FAA and the military units that were on alert to defend the airspace by surprise, that they did everything they could to handle the situation, but were unable to do anything about the 4 planes. The main reasons for this inability were: Too little time; no contingency plans for such situations, resources too thinly spread; inadequate sharing of information between civilian and military agencies due to inadequate or incompatible technology.

I am fairly certain that some agencies of the US goverment had in their possession information that, if assembled and interpreted lucidly ahead of time, might have enabled them to intervene and bust the terrorists before 9/11. I can't judge fairly if the failure to do so is due to avoidable incompetence, or if the odds of finding such information in a sea of data are just prohibitively slim. I do not believe that anyone in these agencies knew of the plan and consciously decided not to interfere. I allow for the remote possibility that there are nefarious elements in the agencies who might be so inclined.

I am certain that the hijackers were a group of 19 or 20 Arabs, mostly from Saudi-Arabia, who were recruited by Al Quaeda, had the blessing of OBL. Among their leaders were KSM and Mohammed Atta. I admit that there is a little wiggle room for doubt, as KSM was abducted in secrecy and tortured. I want to take information presented by secret services with a good grain of salt.

I believe the suicide terrorists were personally motivated mainly by a general feeling of hatred and powerlessness towards the USA and the secualar west. Grievances in connection with the situation in Palestine, and other middle-eastern issues may also individually have placed a role. They were mostly devout muslims of a radical provenance who believed the preaching that they will go to paradise if killed in action against non-believers.

I believe OBL and Al Quaeda hoped to lure the USA into a violent and costly reaction. Secondary goals may have been to gain prestige and attract recruits and other support from muslims around the world, position Al Quaeda as the leading islamist resistance group, or stir up popular uprisings in Arab lands against regimes that Al Quaeda opposes (the monarchies of Saudi-Arabia and Jordan for example, or the Israeli occupations).

I am satisfied with the forensic investigations. They were humongous tasks, had do dive deep into unknown territories, and by and large the efforts were carried out honestly, competently and with sufficient thoroughness. With hindsight, some minor weaknesses may be lamented, such as the failure to investigate WTC7 with the same diligence as WTC1 and 2 were. It is my understanding that the debris of the twin towers was investigated more thoroughly, which undoubtfully is due to its containing so many human remains. There is no foul play.

I think the 9/11 Commission did a great job.

I believe the government, and some agencies thereof, have been too hesitant to allow reviews of their roles in desaster management and preparedness.

I lament that no co-ordinated debate has taken place about the political implications and the fall-out of the attacks. 9/11 has been abused by the Bush administration to further unrelated and sweeping agendas to the detriment of the American people.
Originally Posted by Dog Town View Post
First off, I agree with most of what others posted already. No big changes need to be addressed.

Considering the whole reason OBL hated the US was for being on Saudi soil, and not his fighters for hire (got his widdle feelings hurt). While all we were doing was helping out Kuwait, and keeping Saddam from even thinking about entering the House of Saud Kingdom. F-him, we did what we should have done!

Sorry broke rule one!
Dittos (not breakin rule 1).

EDIT I meant Oysteins rule 1. Only in a world run by truthers would saying the above be a criminal matter.

Last edited by Sword_Of_Truth; 8th September 2010 at 04:17 PM.
Sword_Of_Truth is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 04:19 PM   #16
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
Hey everybody,

Rule 1: No discussion, please!
haa!! good luck. this is a discussion forum bud.
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 04:20 PM   #17
JihadJane
not a camel
 
JihadJane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70,621
I don't know.
__________________
"Someone is a woman if she has no functional SRY gene, or no functional androgen response." Rolfe
JihadJane is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 04:31 PM   #18
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
i dunno nuttin less i sees it wit me own eyes...cause everyone else is tellin me lies!!!

Wait...was that a black helicopter.

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 04:37 PM   #19
leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
 
leftysergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,863
Nineteen religious whackadoodles went kamikaze and the people who were supposed to have defended against it got caught with their pants down and serious design problems with a few high-rise buildings were revealed in the resulting fires.

The resulting destruction pushed a few sociopaths over the edge and caused such wide-spread PTSD that utterly absurd behavior and ideation became almost normal.
__________________
No civilization ever collapsed because the poor had too much to eat.
leftysergeant is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 05:09 PM   #20
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,705
Originally Posted by tsig View Post
What's the yellow F for?
Ffforum.
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 05:29 PM   #21
Lyrandar
Thinker
 
Lyrandar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 211
I agree with Oystein.
Lyrandar is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 08:25 PM   #22
grandmastershek
Graduate Poster
 
grandmastershek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,461
Dylan Avery & Co, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Griffin, & Gage snuck inside all three buildings and cut all vertical columns down to 1/16 of an inch with a sawz-all. They then attached M80's to the columns and ignited them using GI Joe walkie talkies which they got in by dressing as Santa the previous Christmas season. And somehow Seth Macfarlane was involved because he just happened to miss his flight.

Hey...cui bono?
__________________
For as the NWO are higher than the people, so are their ways higher than your ways, and their thoughts than your thoughts. (A amalgam of Isaiah 55:9 & truther logic)
grandmastershek is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2010, 08:29 PM   #23
roger
Penultimate Amazing
 
roger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 11,465
crazy mofos with box cutters.
__________________
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view. May your mountains rise into and above the clouds. - Edward Abbey

Climb the mountains and get their good tidings.
Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves. - John Muir
roger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 10:13 AM   #24
Dragonrock
Militant Elvisian Tacoist
 
Dragonrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kotzebue, Alaska. A.K.A. Santa's first stop on his way out.
Posts: 10,229
19 Terrorists, 4 planes, crashed, fires, structural failure, buildings fall, CTists feel impotent and scared and want something to make them feel empowered so they twist the facts to fit their bigoted views.

That's what happened.
__________________
...it rings a bell in my head that just don't chime...--pillory

There is no God but the Great Taco In The Sky and Elvis is his prophet.
Dragonrock is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 10:40 AM   #25
uke2se
Penultimate Amazing
 
uke2se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,357
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I go first:

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that 4 civilian airplanes were hijacked and intentionally flown into 3 buildings. One crashed near Shanksville.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that all the physical damage and loss of life on that day were a result of the plane crashes and the fires they started. No bombs, no additional incendiaries, no controlled demolition

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackers commaded the cockpits and flew the planes. No remote control.

About flights 11, 175 and 77, I have nothing additional to say.
I am certain, but allow residual doubt, that flight 93 crashed because its passengers resisted and violently iterferred, thus making the hijacker-pilot lose control and crash. No shoot-down to be sure.

I am convinced, and have no doubt, that the hijackings caught FAA and the military units that were on alert to defend the airspace by surprise, that they did everything they could to handle the situation, but were unable to do anything about the 4 planes. The main reasons for this inability were: Too little time; no contingency plans for such situations, resources too thinly spread; inadequate sharing of information between civilian and military agencies due to inadequate or incompatible technology.

I am fairly certain that some agencies of the US goverment had in their possession information that, if assembled and interpreted lucidly ahead of time, might have enabled them to intervene and bust the terrorists before 9/11. I can't judge fairly if the failure to do so is due to avoidable incompetence, or if the odds of finding such information in a sea of data are just prohibitively slim. I do not believe that anyone in these agencies knew of the plan and consciously decided not to interfere. I allow for the remote possibility that there are nefarious elements in the agencies who might be so inclined.

I am certain that the hijackers were a group of 19 or 20 Arabs, mostly from Saudi-Arabia, who were recruited by Al Quaeda, had the blessing of OBL. Among their leaders were KSM and Mohammed Atta. I admit that there is a little wiggle room for doubt, as KSM was abducted in secrecy and tortured. I want to take information presented by secret services with a good grain of salt.

I believe the suicide terrorists were personally motivated mainly by a general feeling of hatred and powerlessness towards the USA and the secualar west. Grievances in connection with the situation in Palestine, and other middle-eastern issues may also individually have placed a role. They were mostly devout muslims of a radical provenance who believed the preaching that they will go to paradise if killed in action against non-believers.

I believe OBL and Al Quaeda hoped to lure the USA into a violent and costly reaction. Secondary goals may have been to gain prestige and attract recruits and other support from muslims around the world, position Al Quaeda as the leading islamist resistance group, or stir up popular uprisings in Arab lands against regimes that Al Quaeda opposes (the monarchies of Saudi-Arabia and Jordan for example, or the Israeli occupations).

I am satisfied with the forensic investigations. They were humongous tasks, had do dive deep into unknown territories, and by and large the efforts were carried out honestly, competently and with sufficient thoroughness. With hindsight, some minor weaknesses may be lamented, such as the failure to investigate WTC7 with the same diligence as WTC1 and 2 were. It is my understanding that the debris of the twin towers was investigated more thoroughly, which undoubtfully is due to its containing so many human remains. There is no foul play.

I think the 9/11 Commission did a great job.

I believe the government, and some agencies thereof, have been too hesitant to allow reviews of their roles in desaster management and preparedness.

I lament that no co-ordinated debate has taken place about the political implications and the fall-out of the attacks. 9/11 has been abused by the Bush administration to further unrelated and sweeping agendas to the detriment of the American people.
This.
uke2se is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 11:34 AM   #26
fezzic
Muse
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 499
I agree pretty much with Oystein's posting as regards the events and circumstances of 9/11/01 and with Sword of Truth's slight modification thereof.
fezzic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 04:43 PM   #27
9/11-investigator
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,032
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com

- Flight school trails laid by Mossad agents.
- 4 real civilian planes; crew + passengers killed in a matter of seconds by Kolokol-1 or similar incapacitating agent stored in cylinders stored in air ducts and opened by timer mechanism some 20 minutes after take-off; remote control takes over. Updated flight path send to planes by flight controller Pete Zalewski.
- WTC-1/2 hit by planes; towers collapse due to controlled demolition;
- Dancing Israelis 'documenting the event' were anticipating the attack and celebrating. Reason celebration: their mission was accomplished.
- Zionist Jerome Hauer ready to 'explain' situation to global public.
- Pentagon: internal explosion + fly-over scenario; F77 missed target and was shot over the Atlantic. Hastily unplanned confiscation of Pentagon videos by the FBI was hence necessary.
- F93 was shot down due to unforseen delay of 41 minutes by col. Rick Gibney. Gibney confirmed that everybody on board was dead. Target of F93 was not Washington but WTC7. That explains the otherwise inexplicable controlled demolition of that building.
- Perps were CIA + Mossad (as Italian ex-president Cossiga said)
- Goal: internally 'Sovietization' of the US and externally terrorism meme used to intervene in the Middle East.
- 9/11 will be solved by the global internet community and will bring down ZOG-USA.

Last edited by 9/11-investigator; 9th September 2010 at 05:42 PM.
9/11-investigator is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 04:53 PM   #28
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 25,266
1. terrorists killed pilots
2. terrorists flew planes into buildings
3. flight 93 passengers figured out 911 and stopped terrorists
why did they do it? UBL promised he would kill Americans when he could. He warned all of us in the 90s, and he is still working on making his promise good. Terrorist 75 percent.

Then a bunch of dirt dumb paranoid conspiracy theorists and moron neoNAZIs made up delusional lies because the plot was too complex for them to grasp. Called themselves 911 truth, a movement without evidence. Why do these fringe idiots make up lies? They are too stupid to grasp reality. 911 truth 0 percent.

On 911 we have terrorists who can understand and carry out a simple plan, and paranoid conspiracy theorists who can't figure out 911 after 9 years.
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 04:56 PM   #29
fuelair
Banned
 
fuelair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,582
Covered it all above, well done , tied up and wish all the supporters of the terrorists and those like them a long slow death over a slow smoky fire.
fuelair is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th September 2010, 05:05 PM   #30
Resume
Troublesome Passenger
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16,071
Originally Posted by beachnut View Post
1. terrorists killed pilots
2. terrorists flew planes into buildings
3. flight 93 passengers figured out 911 and stopped terrorists
why did they do it? UBL promised he would kill Americans when he could. He warned all of us in the 90s, and he is still working on making his promise good. Terrorist 75 percent.

Then a bunch of dirt dumb paranoid conspiracy theorists and moron neoNAZIs made up delusional lies because the plot was too complex for them to grasp. Called themselves 911 truth, a movement without evidence. Why do these fringe idiots make up lies? They are too stupid to grasp reality. 911 truth 0 percent.

On 911 we have terrorists who can understand and carry out a simple plan, and paranoid conspiracy theorists who can't figure out 911 after 9 years.
Simple, elegant. This.
Resume is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 02:38 AM   #31
JihadJane
not a camel
 
JihadJane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70,621
Originally Posted by Resume View Post
Simple, elegant. This.
Ahem!

Originally Posted by Oystein View Post

Rule 1: No discussion, please!
__________________
"Someone is a woman if she has no functional SRY gene, or no functional androgen response." Rolfe
JihadJane is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 08:06 AM   #32
Rolfe
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 43,486
Originally Posted by 9/11-investigator View Post
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com

- Flight school trails laid by Mossad agents.
- 4 real civilian planes; crew + passengers killed in a matter of seconds by Kolokol-1 or similar incapacitating agent stored in cylinders stored in air ducts and opened by timer mechanism some 20 minutes after take-off; remote control takes over. Updated flight path send to planes by flight controller Pete Zalewski.
- WTC-1/2 hit by planes; towers collapse due to controlled demolition;
- Dancing Israelis 'documenting the event' were anticipating the attack and celebrating. Reason celebration: their mission was accomplished.
- Zionist Jerome Hauer ready to 'explain' situation to global public.
- Pentagon: internal explosion + fly-over scenario; F77 missed target and was shot over the Atlantic. Hastily unplanned confiscation of Pentagon videos by the FBI was hence necessary.
- F93 was shot down due to unforseen delay of 41 minutes by col. Rick Gibney. Gibney confirmed that everybody on board was dead. Target of F93 was not Washington but WTC7. That explains the otherwise inexplicable controlled demolition of that building.
- Perps were CIA + Mossad (as Italian ex-president Cossiga said)
- Goal: internally 'Sovietization' of the US and externally terrorism meme used to intervene in the Middle East.
- 9/11 will be solved by the global internet community and will bring down ZOG-USA.

OK, I get it, no discussion.

But somebody, please tell me this is a spoof before my head asplodes!

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 08:10 AM   #33
SpitfireIX
Illuminator
 
SpitfireIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Posts: 4,751
Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post
OK, I get it, no discussion.

But somebody, please tell me this is a spoof before my head asplodes!

Rolfe.

No, he really believes this. He also believes the holocaust didn't happen. Please, no further responses in this thread; if anyone wishes to respond, there are other threads available.
__________________
Handy responses to conspiracy theorists' claims:
1) "I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." --Charles Babbage
2) "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." --Wolfgang Pauli
3) "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." --Inigo Montoya
SpitfireIX is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 08:44 AM   #34
Greediguts
Atheist for Jesus
 
Greediguts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 653
Originally Posted by fezzic View Post
I agree pretty much with Oystein's posting as regards the events and circumstances of 9/11/01 and with Sword of Truth's slight modification thereof.
This.
Greediguts is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 08:47 AM   #35
SpitfireIX
Illuminator
 
SpitfireIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Posts: 4,751
I agree with Oystein's comments, as qualified by sabretooth47.
__________________
Handy responses to conspiracy theorists' claims:
1) "I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." --Charles Babbage
2) "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." --Wolfgang Pauli
3) "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." --Inigo Montoya
SpitfireIX is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 09:29 AM   #36
Scott Jurgenson
Critical Thinker
 
Scott Jurgenson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 292
Do the "Truthers" on this board, (Chris, Bill Smith, etc) really believe what they are saying? Or are they just 16 year old kids using their parents interwebz to get a rise out of rational thinking people such as the ones found here on JREF?

I'm almost 100 posts in and I still can't figure out if some of these ideas they spin are for real.

Ex: Bill's theory that building 7 was supposed to be the "Grand Finale" and oxygen tanks were supposed to let off a few seconds before impact from flight 93 which was heading for building 7 and the fire ball was going to be so massive it would be a great F U in our face...(as if two towers and the pentagon weren't enough).

I mean that's not a serious post right? I convince myself it's done just for a rise but who knows.

-Scotty
Scott Jurgenson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 09:34 AM   #37
paloalto
Muse
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 626
RE: What actually happened on 9/11!

see link: http://www.democraticunderground.com...mesg_id=294127

From prior posts:

"Furthermore when the information first started filtering out that Bush knew much more than he was letting on and the horrific information that the intelligence agencies had known about Mihdhar and Hazmi for almost 21 months and did nothing to stop them or this attack, the big push to have a 9/11 Commission investigate the attacks on 9/11 and see why the US intelligence agencies had allowed these attacks to take place, gained momentum."


From another DU poster:

"You are actually claiming the intelligence agencies knew of this attack and did nothing? You are claiming they allowed the attacks to take place. Really? I assume you are aware there is zero evidence this is true. In fact everything I have ever read or watched regarding intelligence foreknowledge indicates they knew something was up, but had little in the way of specifics. If you are claiming this you need to provide proof they had specific foreknowledge."

I can hardly wait."

No I am not claiming that they did nothing, it is much worse than that. They first criminally with held material information from the FBI investigation into the Cole bombing. Then they shut down or blocked all FBI criminal investigations of al Qaeda terrorists found to be inside of the US, even when they knew that a huge al Qaeda attack was going to take place inside of the US.

Edited by LibraryLady:  Edited for Rule 4 and Rule 10

Last edited by LibraryLady; 12th September 2010 at 02:25 PM.
paloalto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 10:51 AM   #38
dafydd
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 35,398
Originally Posted by Scott Jurgenson View Post
Do the "Truthers" on this board, (Chris, Bill Smith, etc) really believe what they are saying? Or are they just 16 year old kids using their parents interwebz to get a rise out of rational thinking people such as the ones found here on JREF?

I'm almost 100 posts in and I still can't figure out if some of these ideas they spin are for real.

Ex: Bill's theory that building 7 was supposed to be the "Grand Finale" and oxygen tanks were supposed to let off a few seconds before impact from flight 93 which was heading for building 7 and the fire ball was going to be so massive it would be a great F U in our face...(as if two towers and the pentagon weren't enough).

I mean that's not a serious post right? I convince myself it's done just for a rise but who knows.

-Scotty
Bill is a bad troll,Telltale Tom is a master parodist,the rest are nutcases.
dafydd is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 11:44 AM   #39
Sabretooth
No Ordinary Rabbit
 
Sabretooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wyoming, NY
Posts: 6,710
Originally Posted by paloalto View Post
tl:dr

You also failed Reading Comprehension 101.

The OP question is asking what you believe happened on 9/11, not before or after.
__________________
--------------------------------------
Stop asking me about that stupid fruity cereal...that's the OTHER rabbit!

Sabretooth is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2010, 11:49 AM   #40
Marquis de Carabas
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 27,051
I woke up about 11:00AM, had some lunch, and went to teach a few classes. That evening, I probably had some beer, but I can't say for sure.
Marquis de Carabas is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.