Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 5 - Page 10

Cervelo · 31st December 2015, 02:56 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

Other than the PGF, the most concrete thing I can think of is the geographical and seasonal patterns that can be seen across reports. They rule out misidentification as being a significant source for reports and they suggest that Sasquatch are biologically real entities.

Reports equal....

Which leads your bias brain to do this...again

Please bring something new to the conversation, maybe spend more time "researching" on BFF they might get you up to speed.

William Parcher · 31st December 2015, 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by rockinkt

Edited...I thought this was an actual OS quote and took it seriously.

Good one Parcher!

ROFL! I saw your post before you edited it. I couldn't reply because... I couldn't think of any civil response other than a laugh.

Anyway, we need to all team up and swing this thread back to the PGF topic.

OntarioSquatch · 31st December 2015, 03:09 PM

Originally Posted by RayG

What geographical/seasonal patterns? Do you believe they migrate? If so, where are the migration routes? Where is the hair, scat, and other physical evidence that should be evident?

RayG

I can answer these, but it won't convince you the slightest. The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own.

William Parcher · 31st December 2015, 03:13 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

I can answer these, but it won't convince you the slightest. The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own.

Your response doesn't include a reference to the PGF and so it is off topic.

Patty: Filmed in broad daylight on an October day in northern California.

Patty in relation to geographic and seasonal patterns for the Bigfoot species.

OntarioSquatch says....

Cervelo · 31st December 2015, 03:15 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

I can answer these, but it won't convince you the slightest. The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own.

Nope a consensus doesn't make a myth reality and eyewitness reports mean nothing without...wait for it.....you know what's coming...
A BODY or a big chunk...keep dreaming the the dream OS!

Ok to get back on track....

PGF
Dude making movie about Bigfoot
What you see is a another dude in a suit
Prove me wrong... You can't!
Game, Set, Match.....really nothing else to discuss

Other than a sub-culture of PGF'ers that spend an exorbitant amount of time doing this....

Bigfoot proponent's the dung beetles of the scientific world!

The Shrike · 31st December 2015, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

Here's the link http://www.isu.edu/rhi/

Indeed. That's Meldrum's Relict Hominoid Inquiry. Meldrum and his buddies made up their own journal in which to disseminate their ill-founded ideas. The so-called journal is not in any meaningful way peer-refereed, nor is it indexed via Web of Science.

To suggest that Kathy Strain's "hairy man" interpretation of the referenced pictographs is legitimized by its appearance in this virtual rag of a journal demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of scientific publication.

OOH - oh okay. The PGF was a hoax perpetuated by Roger Patterson to 1) make him some dough and 2) advance the belief in bigfoot among the simple-minded.

abaddon · 31st December 2015, 04:03 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

Other than the PGF, the most concrete thing I can think of is the geographical and seasonal patterns that can be seen across reports. They rule out misidentification as being a significant source for reports and they suggest that Sasquatch are biologically real entities.

I'm sorry? Crap you made up out of whole cloth should be regarded as evidence? Really?

Resume · 31st December 2015, 04:15 PM

Originally Posted by The Shrike

OOH - oh okay. The PGF was a hoax perpetuated by Roger Patterson to 1) make him some dough and 2) advance the belief in bigfoot among the simple-minded.

If I could have a beer with him, the first question wouldn't be where's the suit, but did you expect to fool this many people for this long?

Then comes where's the ****in suit already?

William Parcher · 31st December 2015, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by Resume

If I could have a beer with him, the first question wouldn't be where's the suit, but did you expect to fool this many people for this long?

Patterson: Exactly how many did I fool? That many? Are you counting the pretenders too?

Resume · 31st December 2015, 04:23 PM

Originally Posted by William Parcher

Patterson: Exactly how many did I fool? That many? Are you counting the pretenders too?

Yes, as they won't say they're pretending, and unlike DWA or WSA, I don't have a built-in lie detector (susser) up my anus.

Cervelo · 31st December 2015, 04:26 PM

Originally Posted by Resume

If I could have a beer with him, the first question wouldn't be where's the suit, but did you expect to fool this many people for this long?

Then comes where's the ****in suit already?

From what I can tell, I'll bet it would be a blast to have heard him tell the story.

William Parcher · 31st December 2015, 04:47 PM

Originally Posted by Cervelo

From what I can tell, I'll bet it would be a blast to have heard him tell the story.

Especially if Gimlin was within earshot.

P: We were there for a week.
G: No we weren't.
P: We tracked her for 3.5 miles after we filmed her.
G: No we didn't.
P: You used your Indian skills to follow her path and you had the long Indian hair.
G: No and no. Roger, please stop lying.
Cervelo: Gimlin, you shut up and let Roger tell the story. This is serious business.

jaydeehess · 31st December 2015, 09:44 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

The real ones can be seen by people in real life.

Yet so far only very few claim to have done so, and no specimen exists in any zoo or collection.
Right?

tsig · 31st December 2015, 10:31 PM

Originally Posted by Maurice Ledifficile

Love that one. Looks like a tree hugger taking the relationship to the next level. Watch out for that chipmunk.

George, George
George of the Jungle,
Strong as he can be.
(Ahhhhhhhh)
Watch out for that tree.

source: http://www.lyricsondemand.com/tvthem...glelyrics.html

Gilbert Syndrome · 1st January 2016, 09:38 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own.

You've never seen a Bigfoot, OS. You're not even out looking for one, oddly. You'd rather spend your time on a sceptical forum trying to get people to feel sorry for your plight, which ironically, is being a believer who's never had an encounter, complaining to sceptics about how they won't take you seriously.

Go figure.

Cervelo · 1st January 2016, 04:48 PM

Oh boy.....

abaddon · 1st January 2016, 05:42 PM

Originally Posted by Cervelo

Oh boy.....

http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/y...8BC53F2889.jpg

Wow, he wants to shave the monkey. WTF?

Cervelo · 1st January 2016, 05:49 PM

Different strokes for different folks

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 05:55 PM

Without hair, that would be one of the strangest looking human females ever. Physically she is unlike a human female.

Resume · 1st January 2016, 06:01 PM

Maybe OS thinks these folks are real?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106598/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coneheads
Explains much.

Tomtomkent · 1st January 2016, 06:42 PM

I too believe that under the hair is a human.

I just think there was costumers foam and a zipper between them.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 06:52 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

almost identical to a regular human being

A regular gal.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 07:01 PM

Another artist shows us the regular human lady.

eerok · 1st January 2016, 07:23 PM

Hubba hubba.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 07:26 PM

Beneath the hair is a regular woman.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 07:36 PM

Female Bigfoot filmed by Roger Patterson at Bluff Creek California 1967.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 07:39 PM

It would be easy to think that the costume was originally intended to be a male and then the breasts were added as an afterthought. If you removed the breasts you'd instantly have a male. There is nothing "female" about the face or physique.

OntarioSquatch · 1st January 2016, 08:24 PM

Women with short hair can look very masculine http://s.huffpost.com/contributors/l...n/headshot.jpg

Originally Posted by William Parcher

A regular gal.

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w...psoqq8a1zj.png

You're posting drawings of her that makes her look far more masculine. Red flag.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 08:43 PM

Are you denying that Patty looks like that? Is anxiety fueling your denial?

They kill deer and pigs with their bare hands, don't they?

OntarioSquatch · 1st January 2016, 08:50 PM

She looks like that, but not that toned. There's also no reason to believe that female Sasquatch will on average look exactly as feminine as regular human females.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 08:53 PM

Why couldn't the alien genetic modifiers create a male Bigfoot with female-looking breasts? Would you deny that they could or would do that?

OntarioSquatch · 1st January 2016, 08:56 PM

It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts?

captain koolaid · 1st January 2016, 09:02 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts?

A very freaky advantage. Bigfoot is into that stuff. It makes sense, OS. Think about it.

jaydeehess · 1st January 2016, 09:06 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

Women with short hair can look very masculine http://s.huffpost.com/contributors/l...n/headshot.jpg

You're posting drawings of her that makes her look far more masculine. Red flag.

It doesn't matter since a drawing could show it with bright purple fur and prehensile tail and still be as accurate in portraying a fictitious beast.
Might as well show drawings of Orcs.

Resume · 1st January 2016, 09:08 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts?

Wouldn't you want some to keep you company on those long, cold, bigfootless nights?

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 09:09 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts?

You said that the aliens are performing experiments.

jaydeehess · 1st January 2016, 09:12 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts?

I've read Sci-Fi in which the male is the care giver for offspring.

William Parcher · 1st January 2016, 09:16 PM

The aliens can make lactating males who can nurse offspring. We might be better off just calling it "Pat".

Drs_Res · 1st January 2016, 10:20 PM

It's Pat!

But seriously, Figboot is a hermaphrodite. It screws itself and becomes pregnant. The pocket penis stays tucked away until needed. That's why you don't need a breeding population, all you need is a couple here and there.

Cervelo · 2nd January 2016, 05:39 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

She looks like that, but not that toned. There's also no reason to believe that female Sasquatch will on average look exactly as feminine as regular human females.

You seem to be contradicting yourself....you really have no shame do you?

Oh and just in case someone hasn't been following this bull **** show, OS posted these two statements within 24hrs of each other. It would appear he's jerking the BFF around as well?

31st December 2015, 02:56 PM	#361
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch Other than the PGF, the most concrete thing I can think of is the geographical and seasonal patterns that can be seen across reports. They rule out misidentification as being a significant source for reports and they suggest that Sasquatch are biologically real entities. Reports equal.... Which leads your bias brain to do this...again Please bring something new to the conversation, maybe spend more time "researching" on BFF they might get you up to speed.
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528

31st December 2015, 03:07 PM	#362
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Originally Posted by rockinkt Edited...I thought this was an actual OS quote and took it seriously. Good one Parcher! ROFL! I saw your post before you edited it. I couldn't reply because... I couldn't think of any civil response other than a laugh. Anyway, we need to all team up and swing this thread back to the PGF topic.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

31st December 2015, 03:13 PM	#364
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch I can answer these, but it won't convince you the slightest. The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own. Your response doesn't include a reference to the PGF and so it is off topic. Patty: Filmed in broad daylight on an October day in northern California. Patty in relation to geographic and seasonal patterns for the Bigfoot species. OntarioSquatch says....
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

31st December 2015, 03:15 PM	#365
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch I can answer these, but it won't convince you the slightest. The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own. Nope a consensus doesn't make a myth reality and eyewitness reports mean nothing without...wait for it.....you know what's coming... A BODY or a big chunk...keep dreaming the the dream OS! Ok to get back on track.... PGF Dude making movie about Bigfoot What you see is a another dude in a suit Prove me wrong... You can't! Game, Set, Match.....really nothing else to discuss Other than a sub-culture of PGF'ers that spend an exorbitant amount of time doing this.... Bigfoot proponent's the dung beetles of the scientific world!
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Last edited by Cervelo; 31st December 2015 at 04:08 PM.

31st December 2015, 03:56 PM	#366
The Shrike Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oklahoma, USA Posts: 5,147	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch Here's the link http://www.isu.edu/rhi/ Indeed. That's Meldrum's Relict Hominoid Inquiry. Meldrum and his buddies made up their own journal in which to disseminate their ill-founded ideas. The so-called journal is not in any meaningful way peer-refereed, nor is it indexed via Web of Science. To suggest that Kathy Strain's "hairy man" interpretation of the referenced pictographs is legitimized by its appearance in this virtual rag of a journal demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of scientific publication. OOH - oh okay. The PGF was a hoax perpetuated by Roger Patterson to 1) make him some dough and 2) advance the belief in bigfoot among the simple-minded.
	Last edited by The Shrike; 31st December 2015 at 03:58 PM. Reason: gotta get back on track!

31st December 2015, 03:09 PM	#363
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	Originally Posted by RayG What geographical/seasonal patterns? Do you believe they migrate? If so, where are the migration routes? Where is the hair, scat, and other physical evidence that should be evident? RayG I can answer these, but it won't convince you the slightest. The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own.

31st December 2015, 04:03 PM	#367
abaddon Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Republic of Ireland Posts: 23,499	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch Other than the PGF, the most concrete thing I can think of is the geographical and seasonal patterns that can be seen across reports. They rule out misidentification as being a significant source for reports and they suggest that Sasquatch are biologically real entities. I'm sorry? Crap you made up out of whole cloth should be regarded as evidence? Really?
	__________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...

31st December 2015, 04:15 PM	#368
Resume Troublesome Passenger Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 21,549	Originally Posted by The Shrike OOH - oh okay. The PGF was a hoax perpetuated by Roger Patterson to 1) make him some dough and 2) advance the belief in bigfoot among the simple-minded. If I could have a beer with him, the first question wouldn't be where's the suit, but did you expect to fool this many people for this long? Then comes where's the ****in suit already?
	__________________ " Glory to our Allies . . . Glory to Ukraine!" President Volodymyr Zelenskyy

31st December 2015, 04:21 PM	#369
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Originally Posted by Resume If I could have a beer with him, the first question wouldn't be where's the suit, but did you expect to fool this many people for this long? Patterson: Exactly how many did I fool? That many? Are you counting the pretenders too?
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

31st December 2015, 04:23 PM	#370
Resume Troublesome Passenger Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 21,549	Originally Posted by William Parcher Patterson: Exactly how many did I fool? That many? Are you counting the pretenders too? Yes, as they won't say they're pretending, and unlike DWA or WSA, I don't have a built-in lie detector (susser) up my anus.
	__________________ " Glory to our Allies . . . Glory to Ukraine!" President Volodymyr Zelenskyy

31st December 2015, 04:26 PM	#371
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Originally Posted by Resume If I could have a beer with him, the first question wouldn't be where's the suit, but did you expect to fool this many people for this long? Then comes where's the ****in suit already? From what I can tell, I'll bet it would be a blast to have heard him tell the story.
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528

31st December 2015, 04:47 PM	#372
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Originally Posted by Cervelo From what I can tell, I'll bet it would be a blast to have heard him tell the story. Especially if Gimlin was within earshot. P: We were there for a week. G: No we weren't. P: We tracked her for 3.5 miles after we filmed her. G: No we didn't. P: You used your Indian skills to follow her path and you had the long Indian hair. G: No and no. Roger, please stop lying. Cervelo: Gimlin, you shut up and let Roger tell the story. This is serious business.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

31st December 2015, 09:44 PM	#373
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch The real ones can be seen by people in real life. Yet so far only very few claim to have done so, and no specimen exists in any zoo or collection. Right?

31st December 2015, 10:31 PM	#374
tsig a carbon based life-form Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 39,049	Originally Posted by Maurice Ledifficile Love that one. Looks like a tree hugger taking the relationship to the next level. Watch out for that chipmunk. George, George George of the Jungle, Strong as he can be. (Ahhhhhhhh) Watch out for that tree. source: http://www.lyricsondemand.com/tvthem...glelyrics.html

1st January 2016, 09:38 AM	#375
Gilbert Syndrome Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Liverpool, UK Posts: 7,301	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch The only thing that will convince anyone here is proof that's accepted by mainstream or perhaps a sighting of their own. You've never seen a Bigfoot, OS. You're not even out looking for one, oddly. You'd rather spend your time on a sceptical forum trying to get people to feel sorry for your plight, which ironically, is being a believer who's never had an encounter, complaining to sceptics about how they won't take you seriously. Go figure.
	__________________ Generic proclamation of positivity: Scouse saying - Go 'ed, is right, nice one, boss, well in, sound, belter, made up. Usage: 'Go 'ed, lad, get us an ale in, nice one.'

1st January 2016, 04:48 PM	#376
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Oh boy.....
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528

1st January 2016, 05:42 PM	#377
abaddon Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Republic of Ireland Posts: 23,499	Originally Posted by Cervelo Oh boy..... http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/y...8BC53F2889.jpg Wow, he wants to shave the monkey. WTF?
	__________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...

1st January 2016, 05:49 PM	#378
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Different strokes for different folks
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528

1st January 2016, 05:55 PM	#379
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Without hair, that would be one of the strangest looking human females ever. Physically she is unlike a human female.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 06:01 PM	#380
Resume Troublesome Passenger Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 21,549	Maybe OS thinks these folks are real? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106598/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coneheads Explains much.
	__________________ " Glory to our Allies . . . Glory to Ukraine!" President Volodymyr Zelenskyy Last edited by Resume; 1st January 2016 at 06:02 PM.

1st January 2016, 06:42 PM	#381
Tomtomkent Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 8,607	I too believe that under the hair is a human. I just think there was costumers foam and a zipper between them.
Tomtomkent Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 8,607	__________________ @tomhodden Never look up an E-book because this signature line told you. Especially not Dead Lament (ASIN: B00JEN1MWY). Or A Little Trouble (ASIN: B00GQFZZQW).

1st January 2016, 06:52 PM	#382
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch almost identical to a regular human being A regular gal.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 07:01 PM	#383
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Another artist shows us the regular human lady.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 07:23 PM	#384
eerok Quixoticist Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: ON Canada Posts: 5,369	Hubba hubba.
	__________________ "Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." - Oscar Wilde

1st January 2016, 07:26 PM	#385
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Beneath the hair is a regular woman.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 07:36 PM	#386
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Female Bigfoot filmed by Roger Patterson at Bluff Creek California 1967.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 07:39 PM	#387
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	It would be easy to think that the costume was originally intended to be a male and then the breasts were added as an afterthought. If you removed the breasts you'd instantly have a male. There is nothing "female" about the face or physique.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 08:24 PM	#388
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	Women with short hair can look very masculine http://s.huffpost.com/contributors/l...n/headshot.jpg Originally Posted by William Parcher A regular gal. http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w...psoqq8a1zj.png You're posting drawings of her that makes her look far more masculine. Red flag.
	Last edited by OntarioSquatch; 1st January 2016 at 08:34 PM.

1st January 2016, 08:43 PM	#389
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Are you denying that Patty looks like that? Is anxiety fueling your denial? They kill deer and pigs with their bare hands, don't they?
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 08:50 PM	#390
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	She looks like that, but not that toned. There's also no reason to believe that female Sasquatch will on average look exactly as feminine as regular human females.

1st January 2016, 08:53 PM	#391
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Why couldn't the alien genetic modifiers create a male Bigfoot with female-looking breasts? Would you deny that they could or would do that?
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

1st January 2016, 08:56 PM	#392
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts?

1st January 2016, 09:02 PM	#393
captain koolaid Muse Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 538	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts? A very freaky advantage. Bigfoot is into that stuff. It makes sense, OS. Think about it.
captain koolaid Muse Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 538	__________________ "Bigfoot does not leave hair samples for us unless he is in our dimension to begin with, obviously. Once the hair is separated from the electrical field associated with the Bigfoot's free quanta energy loops, the hair becomes independant and remains in it's most stable dimension, which presumably is our dimension."(Historian)

1st January 2016, 09:06 PM	#394
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch Women with short hair can look very masculine http://s.huffpost.com/contributors/l...n/headshot.jpg You're posting drawings of her that makes her look far more masculine. Red flag. It doesn't matter since a drawing could show it with bright purple fur and prehensile tail and still be as accurate in portraying a fictitious beast. Might as well show drawings of Orcs.

1st January 2016, 09:08 PM	#395
Resume Troublesome Passenger Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 21,549	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch It's totally possible, but what kind of advantage would it serve to make a male with female breasts? Wouldn't you want some to keep you company on those long, cold, bigfootless nights?
	__________________ " Glory to our Allies . . . Glory to Ukraine!" President Volodymyr Zelenskyy