Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 5 - Page 8

tsig · 1st December 2015, 10:31 AM

Originally Posted by William Parcher

Again, if you believe that Heironimus is telling the truth then the PGF was intended to be a hoax. I will give one example but there are many others.

Patterson & Gimlin were already at Bluff Creek and had been camping there when Heironimus arrived to be filmed wearing the costume. He was instructed by P&G to hide his vehicle (his mother's car) with brush/branches and they did do that. This was obviously done so that anyone who might come by would only see Gimlin's truck and not notice that another person had come to the scene. Such a witness could destroy the hoax by later saying that they saw two vehicles at the camp instead of simply seeing Gimlin's truck.

If the intent is to film a guy in a costume to show what a Bigfoot would look like for your documentary then the concealment of your actor's vehicle is entirely unnecessary.

What's so hard about believing that a con man is pulling a hoax? What would be unbelievable is that he was doing anything straight.

Con men gotta con, it's what they do.

The Shrike · 1st December 2015, 11:36 AM

"If you're Roger Patterson, you hoax bigfoot. It's what you do."

William Parcher · 1st December 2015, 12:33 PM

By 1967, Patterson had already seen that no meaningful disadvantages come to those who tell Bigfoot lies. Instead he could see the reverse. They become cultural celebrities. Newspapers and other media wouldn't dare call them liars and instead say that they are "a man who says he saw Bigfoot" or even a "Bigfoot witness." As long as he did not confess, he had nothing to lose.

Nakani · 21st December 2015, 10:33 AM

Topic of discussion: My boob strap theory.

My apologies if this has been suggested already,

I am thinking that the suit, regardless of what it was made from would be quite hot for the wearer. After a few practice walks and general preparation for the shoot, I surmise Bob got thirsty and because of his fake arm extentions couldn't hold the bottle. He needed someone else to give him a drink(which rarely works out well) and in the process spilled some on his right breast creating the "strap".

Drewbot · 21st December 2015, 11:37 AM

Pics or it didn't happen.

Nakani · 21st December 2015, 11:59 AM

I'm afraid those pics and the infamous water fight reel are locked away in the Patterson vault.

The Shrike · 21st December 2015, 06:26 PM

??

I'm sure it was nice and warm inside the suit. So what? Whether Bob H. or not, all the guy in the suit had to do was "walk from here to over there." It's not like he was filming all day in Tunisia whilst dressed as a wookie.

Guy gets dressed in bigfoot suit. Gets hot. Starts to sweat. Gets thirsty. No worries - filming is completed in a jiffy. Guy takes off sweaty suit, wipes his brow, and pounds an ice cold Old Milwaukee that Roger left for him* in the creek.

*Roger had Bob Gimlin buy the beer - told him he would pay him back but never did.

OntarioSquatch · 24th December 2015, 08:35 AM

A frame that shows the separation between the individual glutes

A comparison that shows the difference in quality that exists between different copies of the film

Cervelo · 24th December 2015, 09:06 AM

^^^^^
Yawn....pretty sure everyone here has seen this lame stuff before.

Maurice Ledifficile · 24th December 2015, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

A frame that shows the separation between the individual glutes

http://i.imgur.com/BwiPDJx.jpg

A comparison that shows the difference in quality that exists between different copies of the film

http://i.imgur.com/M4M7O5z.png

Wolrab · 24th December 2015, 01:50 PM

Patty's Pooper Perfectly Partitioned Pampers

jaydeehess · 24th December 2015, 03:26 PM

Just checking in. Haven't perused this thread in awhile.
It hasn't been in the news but has anyone captured or killed a bigfoot and brought it out of the bush for scientific investigation yet?

LTC8K6 · 24th December 2015, 07:44 PM

Originally Posted by jaydeehess

Just checking in. Haven't perused this thread in awhile.
It hasn't been in the news but has anyone captured or killed a bigfoot and brought it out of the bush for scientific investigation yet?

Yes, "they" have.

Cosmic Yak · 25th December 2015, 01:24 AM

But the other "they" have taken it away, hidden all the evidence and silenced the witnesses.

tsig · 25th December 2015, 10:02 AM

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak

But the other "they" have taken it away, hidden all the evidence and silenced the witnesses.

It's "they" vs "they".

LTC8K6 · 25th December 2015, 06:36 PM

Originally Posted by tsig

It's "they" vs "they".

They know who they are...

Nakani · 25th December 2015, 08:00 PM

Originally Posted by The Shrike

??

I'm sure it was nice and warm inside the suit. So what? Whether Bob H. or not, all the guy in the suit had to do was "walk from here to over there." It's not like he was filming all day in Tunisia whilst dressed as a wookie.

Guy gets dressed in bigfoot suit. Gets hot. Starts to sweat. Gets thirsty. No worries - filming is completed in a jiffy. Guy takes off sweaty suit, wipes his brow, and pounds an ice cold Old Milwaukee that Roger left for him* in the creek.

*Roger had Bob Gimlin buy the beer - told him he would pay him back but never did.

Well yes, you could come up with any number of scenarios. You could suggest that Patty is an undocumented ape who was drinking from a creek and spilled water on her bullet shaped monkey breast causing a streak that we refer to as the strap. Since we weren't there all we can do is speculate as to what is the most plausible explanation.

I think my suggestion is very plausible but I also think you might be on to something with the beer. If they were having a few beers on hoax day, maybe BobH (or whoever was in the suit) had a shot before his big scene and some spilled on the suit.

The Shrike · 26th December 2015, 05:59 AM

Could you provide us with a brief synopsis of this "strap", Nakani? This is a claim new to me.

Bear in mind, however, that pariedolia resulting from anomaly hunting in that film suggests to me that Roger constructed the suit entirely out of red herrings.

Nakani · 26th December 2015, 11:20 AM

Shrike,

During the turn and look back part of the film, a vertical stripe is visible on the right breast. There was a lengthy discussion on the BFF but I'm not sure how to link to it.

Drew, do you know what I'm talking about? Could you post a picture and/or possibly a link to that thread?

I guess I should have first found out if this "strap" appears in more than one frame. If not, in all probability it's just a film anomaly and the result of pariedolia like you say.

The Shrike · 26th December 2015, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Nakani

During the turn and look back part of the film, a vertical stripe is visible on the right breast.

We can try OntarioSquatch's post #117 in this thread. I see no stripe.

Nakani · 26th December 2015, 04:19 PM

Shrike,
I went back to the BFF, to search for "the strap" and found that I wasn't remembering it very well. In my mind it was more pronounced. The picture OS posted shows what they were talking about, the little dark line coming from underneath and up the side.

It looks to me like an artifact of the film and not worth discussing.

The Shrike · 26th December 2015, 04:24 PM

I'm confident that if there's a real smoking gun on the suit itself, it would have come to light in 1967. Even Ivan Marx's suit shows no zipper, however.

Gilbert Syndrome · 27th December 2015, 03:12 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

A frame that shows the separation between the individual glutes

http://i.imgur.com/BwiPDJx.jpg

A comparison that shows the difference in quality that exists between different copies of the film

http://i.imgur.com/M4M7O5z.png

Ironically, you don't seem to know how a butt works, or how it's supposed to look and act in motion. If you did, you'd see Patty's butt for what it is, a load of arse.

jaydeehess · 30th December 2015, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by jaydeehess

Just checking in. Haven't perused this thread in awhile.
It hasn't been in the news but has anyone captured or killed a bigfoot and brought it out of the bush for scientific investigation yet?

Originally Posted by LTC8K6

Yes, "they" have.

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak

But the other "they" have taken it away, hidden all the evidence and silenced the witnesses.

Originally Posted by tsig

It's "they" vs "they".

Originally Posted by LTC8K6

They know who they are...

I am part of "they" but not the "they" or "they" referred to above.
<<need to re-phrase inquiry>>

Does a mainstream, recognized, expert person or organization in zoology/biology have a specimen under study?

OntarioSquatch · 30th December 2015, 06:42 PM

You'll likely see it in the news if it happens.

William Parcher · 30th December 2015, 07:57 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

You'll likely see it in the news if it happens.

But you said that the government covers up Bigfoot existence and confiscates the creature if captured. Won't ever be in the news, right?

OntarioSquatch · 31st December 2015, 06:09 AM

The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. Only an individual or a group like the NAWAC, which has its own protocol can avoid a potential cover-up.

Maurice Ledifficile · 31st December 2015, 06:10 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. Only an individual or a group like the NAWAC, which has its own protocol can avoid a potential cover-up.

Resume · 31st December 2015, 06:20 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. .

What happened to all the dead bodies, body parts, bones, skulls, fossils that folks came across in the roughly 14,760 years before there were "authorities?"

Do the "authorities" of both nations, Canada and the U.S. (Mexico seems footie-free) collaborate in this cover-up? If so, will you be offering any evidence for this claim?

OntarioSquatch · 31st December 2015, 07:06 AM

Originally Posted by Resume

What happened to all the dead bodies, body parts, bones, skulls, fossils that folks came across in the roughly 14,760 years before there were "authorities?"

It's possible that there were dead bodies recovered during that time, but we don't have any skeletons to confirm it. There's also no way to know if they were around for the last 15,000 years. My own research suggests that the Sasquatch phenomenon is more of a recent occurrence.

Originally Posted by Resume

Do the "authorities" of both nations, Canada and the U.S. (Mexico seems footie-free) collaborate in this cover-up? If so, will you be offering any evidence for this claim?

I don't know if Canada is in on it. I've heard of investigated UFO sightings being classified as secret here, but that's about it as far as cover-ups go.

Cervelo · 31st December 2015, 07:09 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. Only an individual or a group like the NAWAC, which has its own protocol can avoid a potential cover-up.

The NAWACKY's LOL?

Maurice Ledifficile · 31st December 2015, 07:13 AM

There are no Canadian UFO cover-ups. That's crazy talk. Imagine that.

Maurice Ledifficile · 31st December 2015, 07:17 AM

Originally Posted by Cervelo

The NAWACKY's LOL?
http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/y...54A0DE804F.jpg

Love that one. Looks like a tree hugger taking the relationship to the next level. Watch out for that chipmunk.

Resume · 31st December 2015, 07:21 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

It's possible that there were dead bodies recovered during that time, but we don't have any skeletons to confirm it.

So there's no reason to believe there were. Check.

Quote:

There's also no way to know if they were around for the last 15,000 years.

You have to be kidding.

Quote:

My own research suggests that the Sasquatch phenomenon is more of a recent occurrence*.

You have to be kidding.

Quote:

I don't know if Canada is in on it. I've heard of investigated UFO sightings being classified as secret here, but that's about it as far as cover-ups go.

Evidence-Free OS.

ETA: I will agree that the phenomenon is a more recent occurrence, but not for the reasons you imagine.

John Nowak · 31st December 2015, 07:26 AM

Originally Posted by Cervelo

The NAWACKY's LOL?

Do they have a protocol on how to use a tape measure?

dmaker · 31st December 2015, 07:27 AM

OS, please describe your "research".

Maurice Ledifficile · 31st December 2015, 07:32 AM

Originally Posted by dmaker

OS, please describe your "research".

He reads sighting reports and watches the PGF. He then believes (not really) in all of it. Makes no sense, but that is what he means by "research".

Resume · 31st December 2015, 07:37 AM

Originally Posted by dmaker

OS, please describe your "research".

Yes. I would very much like to know how a natural (according to OS) species, hybrid or not, evolved in less than 15,000 years. Holy punctuated equilibrium Batman!

Maurice Ledifficile · 31st December 2015, 07:47 AM

Originally Posted by Resume

Yes. I would very much like to know how a natural (according to OS) species, hybrid or not, evolved in less that 15,000 years. Holy punctuated equilibrium Batman!

Because ~~space~~ aliens.

Cervelo · 31st December 2015, 07:59 AM

Originally Posted by dmaker

OS, please describe your "research".

I think most bigfoot research is done like this...

1st December 2015, 12:33 PM	#283
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	By 1967, Patterson had already seen that no meaningful disadvantages come to those who tell Bigfoot lies. Instead he could see the reverse. They become cultural celebrities. Newspapers and other media wouldn't dare call them liars and instead say that they are "a man who says he saw Bigfoot" or even a "Bigfoot witness." As long as he did not confess, he had nothing to lose.
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

21st December 2015, 11:37 AM	#285
Drewbot Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 7,586	Pics or it didn't happen.
Drewbot Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 7,586	__________________ "I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic

24th December 2015, 09:06 AM	#289
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	^^^^^ Yawn....pretty sure everyone here has seen this lame stuff before.
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Last edited by Cervelo; 24th December 2015 at 09:25 AM.

24th December 2015, 09:10 AM	#290
Maurice Ledifficile Lost in translation Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,964	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch A frame that shows the separation between the individual glutes http://i.imgur.com/BwiPDJx.jpg A comparison that shows the difference in quality that exists between different copies of the film http://i.imgur.com/M4M7O5z.png
	__________________ "There is a plenty of proof, but unfortunately it is entirely unprovable." - Punshhh "There’s a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot." – Stephen Wright

24th December 2015, 01:50 PM	#291
Wolrab Illuminator Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 4,821	Patty's Pooper Perfectly Partitioned Pampers
Wolrab Illuminator Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 4,821	__________________ "Such reports are usually based on the sighting of something the sighters cannot explain and that they (or someone else on their behalf) explain as representing an interstellar spaceship-often by saying "But what else can it be?" as though thier own ignorance is a decisive factor." Isaac Asimov

1st December 2015, 10:31 AM	#281
tsig a carbon based life-form Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 39,049	Originally Posted by William Parcher Again, if you believe that Heironimus is telling the truth then the PGF was intended to be a hoax. I will give one example but there are many others. Patterson & Gimlin were already at Bluff Creek and had been camping there when Heironimus arrived to be filmed wearing the costume. He was instructed by P&G to hide his vehicle (his mother's car) with brush/branches and they did do that. This was obviously done so that anyone who might come by would only see Gimlin's truck and not notice that another person had come to the scene. Such a witness could destroy the hoax by later saying that they saw two vehicles at the camp instead of simply seeing Gimlin's truck. If the intent is to film a guy in a costume to show what a Bigfoot would look like for your documentary then the concealment of your actor's vehicle is entirely unnecessary. What's so hard about believing that a con man is pulling a hoax? What would be unbelievable is that he was doing anything straight. Con men gotta con, it's what they do.

1st December 2015, 11:36 AM	#282
The Shrike Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oklahoma, USA Posts: 5,147	"If you're Roger Patterson, you hoax bigfoot. It's what you do."

21st December 2015, 10:33 AM	#284
Nakani Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Acho Dene Koe Posts: 1,036	Topic of discussion: My boob strap theory. My apologies if this has been suggested already, I am thinking that the suit, regardless of what it was made from would be quite hot for the wearer. After a few practice walks and general preparation for the shoot, I surmise Bob got thirsty and because of his fake arm extentions couldn't hold the bottle. He needed someone else to give him a drink(which rarely works out well) and in the process spilled some on his right breast creating the "strap".

21st December 2015, 11:59 AM	#286
Nakani Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Acho Dene Koe Posts: 1,036	I'm afraid those pics and the infamous water fight reel are locked away in the Patterson vault.

21st December 2015, 06:26 PM	#287
The Shrike Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oklahoma, USA Posts: 5,147	?? I'm sure it was nice and warm inside the suit. So what? Whether Bob H. or not, all the guy in the suit had to do was "walk from here to over there." It's not like he was filming all day in Tunisia whilst dressed as a wookie. Guy gets dressed in bigfoot suit. Gets hot. Starts to sweat. Gets thirsty. No worries - filming is completed in a jiffy. Guy takes off sweaty suit, wipes his brow, and pounds an ice cold Old Milwaukee that Roger left for him* in the creek. *Roger had Bob Gimlin buy the beer - told him he would pay him back but never did.

24th December 2015, 08:35 AM	#288
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	A frame that shows the separation between the individual glutes A comparison that shows the difference in quality that exists between different copies of the film

24th December 2015, 03:26 PM	#292
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Just checking in. Haven't perused this thread in awhile. It hasn't been in the news but has anyone captured or killed a bigfoot and brought it out of the bush for scientific investigation yet?

24th December 2015, 07:44 PM	#293
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 21,423	Originally Posted by jaydeehess Just checking in. Haven't perused this thread in awhile. It hasn't been in the news but has anyone captured or killed a bigfoot and brought it out of the bush for scientific investigation yet? Yes, "they" have.
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

25th December 2015, 01:24 AM	#294
Cosmic Yak Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Where there's never a road broader than the back of your hand. Posts: 6,367	But the other "they" have taken it away, hidden all the evidence and silenced the witnesses.
	__________________ 'Of course it can be OK to mistreat people.'- shuttlt Cosmic Yak on this forum.

25th December 2015, 10:02 AM	#295
tsig a carbon based life-form Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 39,049	Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak But the other "they" have taken it away, hidden all the evidence and silenced the witnesses. It's "they" vs "they".

25th December 2015, 06:36 PM	#296
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 21,423	Originally Posted by tsig It's "they" vs "they". They know who they are...
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

25th December 2015, 08:00 PM	#297
Nakani Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Acho Dene Koe Posts: 1,036	Originally Posted by The Shrike ?? I'm sure it was nice and warm inside the suit. So what? Whether Bob H. or not, all the guy in the suit had to do was "walk from here to over there." It's not like he was filming all day in Tunisia whilst dressed as a wookie. Guy gets dressed in bigfoot suit. Gets hot. Starts to sweat. Gets thirsty. No worries - filming is completed in a jiffy. Guy takes off sweaty suit, wipes his brow, and pounds an ice cold Old Milwaukee that Roger left for him* in the creek. *Roger had Bob Gimlin buy the beer - told him he would pay him back but never did. Well yes, you could come up with any number of scenarios. You could suggest that Patty is an undocumented ape who was drinking from a creek and spilled water on her bullet shaped monkey breast causing a streak that we refer to as the strap. Since we weren't there all we can do is speculate as to what is the most plausible explanation. I think my suggestion is very plausible but I also think you might be on to something with the beer. If they were having a few beers on hoax day, maybe BobH (or whoever was in the suit) had a shot before his big scene and some spilled on the suit.

26th December 2015, 05:59 AM	#298
The Shrike Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oklahoma, USA Posts: 5,147	Could you provide us with a brief synopsis of this "strap", Nakani? This is a claim new to me. Bear in mind, however, that pariedolia resulting from anomaly hunting in that film suggests to me that Roger constructed the suit entirely out of red herrings.

26th December 2015, 11:20 AM	#299
Nakani Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Acho Dene Koe Posts: 1,036	Shrike, During the turn and look back part of the film, a vertical stripe is visible on the right breast. There was a lengthy discussion on the BFF but I'm not sure how to link to it. Drew, do you know what I'm talking about? Could you post a picture and/or possibly a link to that thread? I guess I should have first found out if this "strap" appears in more than one frame. If not, in all probability it's just a film anomaly and the result of pariedolia like you say.

26th December 2015, 12:26 PM	#300
The Shrike Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oklahoma, USA Posts: 5,147	Originally Posted by Nakani During the turn and look back part of the film, a vertical stripe is visible on the right breast. We can try OntarioSquatch's post #117 in this thread. I see no stripe.

26th December 2015, 04:19 PM	#301
Nakani Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Acho Dene Koe Posts: 1,036	Shrike, I went back to the BFF, to search for "the strap" and found that I wasn't remembering it very well. In my mind it was more pronounced. The picture OS posted shows what they were talking about, the little dark line coming from underneath and up the side. It looks to me like an artifact of the film and not worth discussing.

26th December 2015, 04:24 PM	#302
The Shrike Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oklahoma, USA Posts: 5,147	I'm confident that if there's a real smoking gun on the suit itself, it would have come to light in 1967. Even Ivan Marx's suit shows no zipper, however.

27th December 2015, 03:12 PM	#303
Gilbert Syndrome Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Liverpool, UK Posts: 7,301	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch A frame that shows the separation between the individual glutes http://i.imgur.com/BwiPDJx.jpg A comparison that shows the difference in quality that exists between different copies of the film http://i.imgur.com/M4M7O5z.png Ironically, you don't seem to know how a butt works, or how it's supposed to look and act in motion. If you did, you'd see Patty's butt for what it is, a load of arse.
	__________________ Generic proclamation of positivity: Scouse saying - Go 'ed, is right, nice one, boss, well in, sound, belter, made up. Usage: 'Go 'ed, lad, get us an ale in, nice one.'

30th December 2015, 03:19 PM	#304
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Originally Posted by jaydeehess Just checking in. Haven't perused this thread in awhile. It hasn't been in the news but has anyone captured or killed a bigfoot and brought it out of the bush for scientific investigation yet? Originally Posted by LTC8K6 Yes, "they" have. Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak But the other "they" have taken it away, hidden all the evidence and silenced the witnesses. Originally Posted by tsig It's "they" vs "they". Originally Posted by LTC8K6 They know who they are... I am part of "they" but not the "they" or "they" referred to above. <<need to re-phrase inquiry>> Does a mainstream, recognized, expert person or organization in zoology/biology have a specimen under study?
	Last edited by jaydeehess; 30th December 2015 at 03:20 PM.

30th December 2015, 06:42 PM	#305
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	You'll likely see it in the news if it happens.

30th December 2015, 07:57 PM	#306
William Parcher Show me the monkey! Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26,087	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch You'll likely see it in the news if it happens. But you said that the government covers up Bigfoot existence and confiscates the creature if captured. Won't ever be in the news, right?
	__________________ Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.

31st December 2015, 06:09 AM	#307
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. Only an individual or a group like the NAWAC, which has its own protocol can avoid a potential cover-up.

31st December 2015, 06:10 AM	#308
Maurice Ledifficile Lost in translation Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,964	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. Only an individual or a group like the NAWAC, which has its own protocol can avoid a potential cover-up.
	__________________ "There is a plenty of proof, but unfortunately it is entirely unprovable." - Punshhh "There’s a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot." – Stephen Wright

31st December 2015, 06:20 AM	#309
Resume Troublesome Passenger Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 21,549	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. . What happened to all the dead bodies, body parts, bones, skulls, fossils that folks came across in the roughly 14,760 years before there were "authorities?" Do the "authorities" of both nations, Canada and the U.S. (Mexico seems footie-free) collaborate in this cover-up? If so, will you be offering any evidence for this claim?
	__________________ " Glory to our Allies . . . Glory to Ukraine!" President Volodymyr Zelenskyy Last edited by Resume; 31st December 2015 at 06:49 AM.

31st December 2015, 07:06 AM	#310
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	Originally Posted by Resume What happened to all the dead bodies, body parts, bones, skulls, fossils that folks came across in the roughly 14,760 years before there were "authorities?" It's possible that there were dead bodies recovered during that time, but we don't have any skeletons to confirm it. There's also no way to know if they were around for the last 15,000 years. My own research suggests that the Sasquatch phenomenon is more of a recent occurrence. Originally Posted by Resume Do the "authorities" of both nations, Canada and the U.S. (Mexico seems footie-free) collaborate in this cover-up? If so, will you be offering any evidence for this claim? I don't know if Canada is in on it. I've heard of investigated UFO sightings being classified as secret here, but that's about it as far as cover-ups go.

31st December 2015, 07:09 AM	#311
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch The worst thing that someone can do if they come across the dead body of a Sasquatch is contact the authorities. Only an individual or a group like the NAWAC, which has its own protocol can avoid a potential cover-up. The NAWACKY's LOL?
Cervelo Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 1,528	Last edited by Cervelo; 31st December 2015 at 07:10 AM.

31st December 2015, 07:13 AM	#312
Maurice Ledifficile Lost in translation Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,964	There are no Canadian UFO cover-ups. That's crazy talk. Imagine that.
	__________________ "There is a plenty of proof, but unfortunately it is entirely unprovable." - Punshhh "There’s a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot." – Stephen Wright

31st December 2015, 07:17 AM	#313
Maurice Ledifficile Lost in translation Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,964	Originally Posted by Cervelo The NAWACKY's LOL? http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/y...54A0DE804F.jpg Love that one. Looks like a tree hugger taking the relationship to the next level. Watch out for that chipmunk.
	__________________ "There is a plenty of proof, but unfortunately it is entirely unprovable." - Punshhh "There’s a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot." – Stephen Wright

31st December 2015, 07:21 AM	#314
Resume Troublesome Passenger Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 21,549	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch It's possible that there were dead bodies recovered during that time, but we don't have any skeletons to confirm it. So there's no reason to believe there were. Check. Quote: There's also no way to know if they were around for the last 15,000 years. You have to be kidding. Quote: My own research suggests that the Sasquatch phenomenon is more of a recent occurrence*. You have to be kidding. Quote: I don't know if Canada is in on it. I've heard of investigated UFO sightings being classified as secret here, but that's about it as far as cover-ups go. Evidence-Free OS. ETA: I will agree that the phenomenon is a more recent occurrence, but not for the reasons you imagine.
	__________________ " Glory to our Allies . . . Glory to Ukraine!" President Volodymyr Zelenskyy Last edited by Resume; 31st December 2015 at 07:27 AM.

31st December 2015, 07:26 AM	#315
John Nowak Graduate Poster Join Date: May 2014 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 1,806	Originally Posted by Cervelo The NAWACKY's LOL? Do they have a protocol on how to use a tape measure?
	__________________ >Reason being is that you guys appear to have absolutely no field experience in listening for invisible people in the forest. I do. -historian