ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags no plane theory , no planers

Reply
Old 22nd July 2016, 05:58 AM   #3121
thedopefishlives
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,696
Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop View Post
You misunderstand me.
One of his claims is that columns were cut by the impact of the missile, not by explosives in the missile warhead.
Apparently a missile flew in to the tower at a shallow angle ehich cut the part of the hole where the aircraft wing went through the front if the building.
Oh, you're right, I do remember that now. Well, in that case, wouldn't the missile be made out of steel, and not that namby-pamby soft aluminum stuff?
__________________
Truthers only insist that there must have been some sinister purpose behind [WTC7] because they already think there's a sinister purpose behind everything. -Horatius
thedopefishlives is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 06:14 AM   #3122
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,599
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Same podcast with some video, animations and images added to key areas for flavor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buSrjVvue8g
No matter what condiments you put on a **** sandwich, it's still a **** sandwich.
__________________
"When a man who is honestly mistaken, hears the truth, he will either cease being mistaken or cease being honest." - Anonymous

"Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus
BStrong is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 07:15 AM   #3123
yankee451
Master Poster
 
yankee451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,124
Originally Posted by Craig4 View Post
Why do you persist in this when your own evidence shows that two planes impacted the buildings?
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.
yankee451 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 07:23 AM   #3124
Captain_Swoop
Penultimate Amazing
 
Captain_Swoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 17,776
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.
Apart from all those people who saw the aircraft and filmed them, and photographed them. Not to mention all the people who failed to see any missiles.
Plus that you haven't seen any missiles, or parts from missiles.
Captain_Swoop is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 07:31 AM   #3125
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,189
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.
Just for clarity: that 'evidence' consists of one photograph of metal cladding bent inwards which you insist on misinterpreting as being bent to the right. Yes?
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 08:26 AM   #3126
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 25,081
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.
You have no evidence for multiple projectiles, a silly claim mocking the deaths of Passengers on Flight 11, and Flight 175 which caused the massive damage due to kinetic energy equal to 1300 and 2000 pounds of TNT. You ignore physics and push idiotic claims of missiles; failure to comprehend physics has you making up wild claims.

You have contacted the FBI right? lol
__________________
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein
"... education as the means of developing our greatest abilities" - JFK
https://folding.stanford.edu/ fold with your computer - join team 13232
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 09:23 AM   #3127
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,347
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.

Apparently, you've fabricated that tall-tale and to prove my point ask American Airlines what happened to American 11 and United Airlines what happened to United 175.

Just to let you know that the aircraft in the following photo is not a cruise missile.


http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/gall...1/09/wtc26.jpg
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 09:26 AM   #3128
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.

LOL

Keep on keepin' on. Who knows? One day you people might get an ear in the Oval Office. Trump is a purveyor of all things impossible. So you never know.

While we're waiting on him, could you give a detailed account of 9/11 that includes ALL the events of the day and ties them better than reality?
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd July 2016, 10:09 AM   #3129
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,347
Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop View Post
What are the missiles that supposedly cut through the columns made from?

Aluminum.


Quote:
Why would a huge, heavy, fast aircraft be any less capable than the little missiles?

Because a large aircraft can cause much more destruction to the steel structure of a building than warheads from bombs and missiles.

The cruise missile attack on the al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, produced this result. 13 cruise missiles were used in the attack.

Photo

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...66_634x433.jpg


Multiple bomb strikes produced this result on the Chinese embassy.

http://www.paulmidler.com/wp-content.../2009/05/a.jpg


Notice the steel structure standing within a huge bomb crater after the 1993 bombing of WTC 1?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...TF_Commons.jpg
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd July 2016, 11:23 PM   #3130
yankee451
Master Poster
 
yankee451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,124
Originally Posted by beachnut View Post
You have no evidence for multiple projectiles, a silly claim mocking the deaths of Passengers on Flight 11, and Flight 175 which caused the massive damage due to kinetic energy equal to 1300 and 2000 pounds of TNT. You ignore physics and push idiotic claims of missiles; failure to comprehend physics has you making up wild claims.

You have contacted the FBI right? lol
Contacted the FBI, lol!

You crack me up.

The evidence of missile use is there for anyone to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiLa_CyFAIM
yankee451 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd July 2016, 11:51 PM   #3131
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alexandria, VA Home to the Deep State.
Posts: 17,305
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Contacted the FBI, lol!

You crack me up.

The evidence of missile use is there for anyone to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiLa_CyFAIM
Now, maybe, if you have one, you should show a video without a plane flying into the building. It's odd that you keep showin videos of planes flying into buildings to prove a plane didn't fly into a building.
Craig4 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 12:14 AM   #3132
threadworm
Graduate Poster
 
threadworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,541
Originally Posted by Craig4 View Post
Now, maybe, if you have one, you should show a video without a plane flying into the building. It's odd that you keep showin videos of planes flying into buildings to prove a plane didn't fly into a building.
One of his fanboys there seems to be claiming that it can't have been a plane, because there was no plane shaped outline for a pilot to fly through. The logic is undeniable.

Quote:
There is no apparent outline in the shape of a 767 jet that is visible from the exterior of the Towers. It follows then that a pilot would have to not only hit the towers with a razor thin margin of error, but he had to do so flying hundreds of mph through an outline he could not even see, and do it twice on the first try.
__________________
Facts are simple and facts are straight, facts are lazy and facts are late, facts don't come with points of view, facts don't do what I want them to.

**************************

Apollo Hoax Debunked
threadworm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 08:47 AM   #3133
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,189
Originally Posted by threadworm View Post
One of his fanboys there seems to be claiming that it can't have been a plane, because there was no plane shaped outline for a pilot to fly through. The logic is undeniable.
Gosh. Yes. In order for the planes to hit exactly where they did, they would need to have been flown so as to hit exactly where they did.

Quite remarkable.
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 08:53 AM   #3134
Jrrarglblarg
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,673
Finite


Element


Analysis
Jrrarglblarg is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 09:07 AM   #3135
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 25,081
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
Contacted the FBI, lol!

You crack me up.

The evidence of missile use is there for anyone to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiLa_CyFAIM
That is evidence for an insane claim based on anti-science BS. A video mocking the murder of the Passengers on Flight 11 and Flight 175. The missile fantasy is sick, a product of hate and ignornace of science. There is dumber stuff than your missile theory; it is the people who believe your missile theory. wow
__________________
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein
"... education as the means of developing our greatest abilities" - JFK
https://folding.stanford.edu/ fold with your computer - join team 13232

Last edited by beachnut; 24th July 2016 at 09:13 AM.
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 10:31 AM   #3136
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,347
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.

No one saw multiple projectiles strike the WTC buildings from multiple trajectories, which is evident. You have proven to us that you accept disinformation and misinformation without doing homework to understand that what you have been presenting is false.


I see that you took the bait on that obviously flawed video as well. This aircraft is difinitely not a cruise missile.


United 175

https://mypinkhalfofthedrainpipe.fil...wtc2-ua175.jpg


This is what cruise missiles look like.


Cruise Missiles

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...sile_-crop.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...iseMissile.JPG


And this is an example how easy it is to dupe a Truther.


Hoaxed cruise missile photo

https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMi...625_135045.jpg


Actual cruise missile photo

https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMi...625_135239.jpg


The clincher. The photos that made the Truth movement a laughing stock.


Global Hawk Photos

https://kendoc911.files.wordpress.co...k-aa.jpg?w=604


Just a few examples how Truthers have made a mockery of themselves over the years and what you have done was to post another silly video that underlined my case about Truthers.

Last edited by skyeagle409; 24th July 2016 at 11:23 AM.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 11:10 AM   #3137
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,347
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
The evidence of missile use is there for anyone to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiLa_CyFAIM

Are you serious?!

United 175 just happened to strike the EXACT same location where bolts were removed and done so in a crowded building without direct access to the steel structure???

No wonder the Truth movement is a joke.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 02:37 PM   #3138
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18,142
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
Are you serious?!

United 175 just happened to strike the EXACT same location where bolts were removed and done so in a crowded building without direct access to the steel structure???

No wonder the Truth movement is a joke.
Yup. He is absolutely serious. His claim is that missiles were fired and impacted the WTC such that the created the pattern of a 757/767 on purpose. How this level of precision could be achieved? Yankee is evasive on that. How this swarm of missiles arrived without anyone noticing a missile swarm? Yankee is shy on that too. Concurrent with all of that, the planes must perforce have been holograms. Projected from somewhere by unknown entities.

Having thus bamboozled everyone, "they" set off the invisible mini-nukes to demolish the WTC. These "mini-nukes" were built into the WTC structure at the construction stage decades ago in anticipation of 911.

Now, When one lists the mad claims, it becomes apparent that said claims are flat out bonkers.

I put it to you that the only recourse at this point is flat out mockery of the proponent of such abject nonsense.
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 02:42 PM   #3139
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18,142
And I further put to you that one must be cautious.

Stay within the MA at all cost. Else infractions will fly.

It may be tempting to go at the wingnut of your choice. Do not do it.
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th July 2016, 08:06 PM   #3140
cantonear1968
Graduate Poster
 
cantonear1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,605
Originally Posted by abaddon View Post
Yup. He is absolutely serious. His claim is that missiles were fired and impacted the WTC such that the created the pattern of a 757/767 on purpose. How this level of precision could be achieved? Yankee is evasive on that. How this swarm of missiles arrived without anyone noticing a missile swarm? Yankee is shy on that too. Concurrent with all of that, the planes must perforce have been holograms. Projected from somewhere by unknown entities.

Having thus bamboozled everyone, "they" set off the invisible mini-nukes to demolish the WTC. These "mini-nukes" were built into the WTC structure at the construction stage decades ago in anticipation of 911.

Now, When one lists the mad claims, it becomes apparent that said claims are flat out bonkers.

I put it to you that the only recourse at this point is flat out mockery of the proponent of such abject nonsense.

What a minute.

What?

He claims multiple missiles were fired to.....create a plane outline?

You.....sorry....he can't be serious!?
__________________
Can you people please stop not thinking? - Gorgonian

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
-Good luck America with President Trump
cantonear1968 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 03:36 AM   #3141
Captain_Swoop
Penultimate Amazing
 
Captain_Swoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 17,776
Don't forget that the buildings were hollow, no floors at all, no walls, no occupants and that the dust and paper seen flying around had been pre packed in to the hollow columns at the time of construction.

Last edited by Captain_Swoop; 25th July 2016 at 04:15 AM.
Captain_Swoop is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 03:52 AM   #3142
Kid Eager
Philosopher
 
Kid Eager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,664
I'm now convinced that the OP and Kyoon are the same person.
__________________
What do Narwhals, Magnets and Apollo 13 have in common? Think about it....
Kid Eager is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 04:59 AM   #3143
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18,142
Originally Posted by cantonear1968 View Post
What a minute.

What?

He claims multiple missiles were fired to.....create a plane outline?

You.....sorry....he can't be serious!?
That's his claim. A fleet of missiles hit the two towers and were so precisely targeted as to create the shape of a jet impact.
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 03:24 PM   #3144
thedopefishlives
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,696
Originally Posted by abaddon View Post
Yup. He is absolutely serious. His claim is that missiles were fired and impacted the WTC such that the created the pattern of a 757/767 on purpose. How this level of precision could be achieved? Yankee is evasive on that. How this swarm of missiles arrived without anyone noticing a missile swarm? Yankee is shy on that too. Concurrent with all of that, the planes must perforce have been holograms. Projected from somewhere by unknown entities.

Having thus bamboozled everyone, "they" set off the invisible mini-nukes to demolish the WTC. These "mini-nukes" were built into the WTC structure at the construction stage decades ago in anticipation of 911.

Now, When one lists the mad claims, it becomes apparent that said claims are flat out bonkers.

I put it to you that the only recourse at this point is flat out mockery of the proponent of such abject nonsense.
Actually, the bolded isn't quite true. Yankee has made no secret of his preferred method of bamboozlement. Namely, vis-a-vis his thread on the plane debris that was "obviously" planted by policemen and beaten with hammers on-site to give the appearance of being from a wreck, his belief is that some people with snazzy uniforms basically just told everyone, "You saw two planes collide with the towers," and no one at all argued to the contrary. TV (or to use his derogatory term, "teevee") streams were edited live, and all recordings edited after-the-fact - including ones that were forgotten even by those who recorded them.
__________________
Truthers only insist that there must have been some sinister purpose behind [WTC7] because they already think there's a sinister purpose behind everything. -Horatius
thedopefishlives is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 06:50 PM   #3145
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,347
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.

Post photos and videos that depict multiple projectile strikes prior to the impact of United 175. Failure to do so will be a clear indication to all that you deliberately fabricated that tall tale.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 08:32 PM   #3146
cantonear1968
Graduate Poster
 
cantonear1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,605
Originally Posted by abaddon View Post
That's his claim. A fleet of missiles hit the two towers and were so precisely targeted as to create the shape of a jet impact.
That's utterly flabergasting.

I've read Yankee's posts and knew them to be out there but I didn't know he was looking to enter Pluto's orbit.

I would never have imagined anyone would think up such a thing let alone think it a viable plan.
__________________
Can you people please stop not thinking? - Gorgonian

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
-Good luck America with President Trump
cantonear1968 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th July 2016, 11:10 PM   #3147
threadworm
Graduate Poster
 
threadworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,541
Originally Posted by cantonear1968 View Post
That's utterly flabergasting.

I've read Yankee's posts and knew them to be out there but I didn't know he was looking to enter Pluto's orbit.

I would never have imagined anyone would think up such a thing let alone think it a viable plan.
You can add to the delusion by pointing out his abuse of people who witnessed the event in any fashion as it unfolded, not only on TV but actually with their own eyes, whilst at the same time not witnessing it himself at all.
__________________
Facts are simple and facts are straight, facts are lazy and facts are late, facts don't come with points of view, facts don't do what I want them to.

**************************

Apollo Hoax Debunked
threadworm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th July 2016, 06:44 AM   #3148
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,189
Originally Posted by cantonear1968 View Post
That's utterly flabergasting.

I've read Yankee's posts and knew them to be out there but I didn't know he was looking to enter Pluto's orbit.

I would never have imagined anyone would think up such a thing let alone think it a viable plan.
He would have us believe the same basic technique was also used to gouge another plane-shaped hole in the ground at the Shanksville crash site: Two cruise missiles flew in from opposite directions and, with pinpoint accuracy, gouged trenches exactly the length of 757 wings before exploding right where the fuselage should have struck. Not quite clear how one of the missiles managed to weave between the treetops as it flew though a forest on its run in but I'm sure there's a simple explanation.
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th July 2016, 01:19 AM   #3149
Dash80
Rave on, Not Fade Away
 
Dash80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,186
Originally Posted by cantonear1968 View Post
That's utterly flabergasting.

I've read Yankee's posts and knew them to be out there but I didn't know he was looking to enter Pluto's orbit.

I would never have imagined anyone would think up such a thing let alone think it a viable plan.
It's even more flabergasting when you consider the missile type he proposes was used:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

Quote:
In 1999, powered flight tests of the missile began. These were successful, and production of the JASSM began in December 2001. The weapon began operational testing and evaluation in 2002. Late that year, two missiles failed tests and the project was delayed for three months before completing development in April 2003. Two more launches failed, this time as a result of launcher and engine problems. In July 2007, a $68 million program to improve JASSM reliability and recertify the missile was approved by the Pentagon.[4] A decision on whether to continue with the program was deferred until Spring 2008.[5] Lockheed agreed to fix the missiles at its own cost and has tightened up its manufacturing processes.
Yet, on September 11, 2001... they performed perfectly.

MAGIC!
__________________
I see that the No-Planers still travel Air Elastic-Band with their fleet of innovative rubber Boeings.

Last edited by Dash80; 27th July 2016 at 01:20 AM.
Dash80 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th July 2016, 01:30 AM   #3150
Dash80
Rave on, Not Fade Away
 
Dash80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,186
Originally Posted by Jack by the hedge View Post
He would have us believe the same basic technique was also used to gouge another plane-shaped hole in the ground at the Shanksville crash site: Two cruise missiles flew in from opposite directions and, with pinpoint accuracy, gouged trenches exactly the length of 757 wings before exploding right where the fuselage should have struck. Not quite clear how one of the missiles managed to weave between the treetops as it flew though a forest on its run in but I'm sure there's a simple explanation.
Then there's the amazing third "rogue" missile that managed to just set fire to some trees without extensively damaging them.
__________________
I see that the No-Planers still travel Air Elastic-Band with their fleet of innovative rubber Boeings.
Dash80 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th July 2016, 04:38 AM   #3151
threadworm
Graduate Poster
 
threadworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,541
Originally Posted by Dash80 View Post
Then there's the amazing third "rogue" missile that managed to just set fire to some trees without extensively damaging them.
Those trees were obviously plants.
__________________
Facts are simple and facts are straight, facts are lazy and facts are late, facts don't come with points of view, facts don't do what I want them to.

**************************

Apollo Hoax Debunked
threadworm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th July 2016, 04:52 AM   #3152
Dash80
Rave on, Not Fade Away
 
Dash80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,186
Originally Posted by threadworm View Post
Those trees were obviously plants.
__________________
I see that the No-Planers still travel Air Elastic-Band with their fleet of innovative rubber Boeings.
Dash80 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th July 2016, 07:45 PM   #3153
cantonear1968
Graduate Poster
 
cantonear1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,605
Thank you all for your responses. I was simply stunned by this thought process. Though maybe not appropriately applicable I was reminded of Ryan Mackey's Irreducible Delusion. I honestly don't know where one goes with something like thinking missiles could be used to make the outline of a plane. Maybe more appropriate is a JREFer's sig line that you cannot reason someone out of something they weren't reasoned into in the first place.

Amazing
__________________
Can you people please stop not thinking? - Gorgonian

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
-Good luck America with President Trump
cantonear1968 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th July 2016, 12:03 AM   #3154
HotRodDeluxe
Muse
 
HotRodDeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 688
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.
So, was this dream drug induced?
HotRodDeluxe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th July 2016, 12:04 AM   #3155
HotRodDeluxe
Muse
 
HotRodDeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 688
Originally Posted by threadworm View Post
Those trees were obviously plants.
Well played.
HotRodDeluxe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th August 2016, 12:01 AM   #3156
Airfix
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 380
Originally Posted by yankee451 View Post
It's not "my" evidence, it is THE evidence and it certainly does NOT show that two planes impacted the buildings, it indicates multiple projectiles struck from multiple trajectories, eliminating a plane of any kind.
Evidently it was a cloaked Klingon Bird of Prey with a holoprojector and photon torpedos, because....
Nobody saw it.

Evidently they had travelled back in time using the same method as Captain Kirk in Star Trek IV and intended to prevent the establishment of the United Federation of Planets.
It's all in a five and three quarter hour internet documentary about how the Klingons did it.

But seriously now, it was hijacked airliners. Flying is not difficult.
Three basic principles to flight are: Aviate. Navigate. Communicate.
They certainly could aviate and navigate and they didn't need to communicate.

Landing requires skill, crashing doesn't.
Airfix is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2016, 10:44 PM   #3157
Tinfoil Hater
Graduate Poster
 
Tinfoil Hater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,436
Originally Posted by Airfix View Post
Evidently it was a cloaked Klingon Bird of Prey with a holoprojector and photon torpedos, because....
Nobody saw it.

Evidently they had travelled back in time using the same method as Captain Kirk in Star Trek IV and intended to prevent the establishment of the United Federation of Planets.
It's all in a five and three quarter hour internet documentary about how the Klingons did it.

But seriously now, it was hijacked airliners. Flying is not difficult.
Three basic principles to flight are: Aviate. Navigate. Communicate.
They certainly could aviate and navigate and they didn't need to communicate.

Landing requires skill, crashing doesn't.


Well, Truthers do seem to think that future tech such as Star Tek tech that does not exist in the real world was somehow used on 9/11 (cloaked missiles, holographic projections). They also seem to feel the quickest way between two points is a circle
__________________
Formerly known as Titanic Explorer

Last edited by Tinfoil Hater; 18th October 2016 at 10:47 PM.
Tinfoil Hater is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:29 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.