|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
14th March 2013, 11:18 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,358
|
Why does the JREF sponsor this conference?
The JREF's official position is that it's not an atheist organization, and some leading members of it have made pronouncements distancing themselves from atheism.
Given this, I'm a bit surprised the JREF sponsors this conference, which is clearly an atheist and antitheist conference and doesn't sugar-coat it in any way. How come? Don't get me wrong, I don't at all oppose the JREF sponsoring it, being an atheist and antitheist myself (I'm not a funder in anyway for the JREF, so my opinion probably doesn't really matter in any way). I just wonder about the reasoning behind it. |
18th March 2013, 09:44 AM | #2 |
So far, so good...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: On the outskirts of Nowhere; the middle was too crowded
Posts: 4,047
|
Theism requires belief in an unsupported assertion: that there is a Supreme Being.
Each religion then requires belief that their version of the Supreme Being is the only one and all the others are fake, or don't exist. Would that be enough reason for a skeptical organization to sponsor such a conference? Disclaimer: I do not speak for the JREF; I have never met Randi; I am not a magician; and I don't own a TV, let alone play any role on any television program. |
__________________
Over we go.... |
|
18th March 2013, 12:18 PM | #3 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,333
|
I think there are two major areas of cross-over where the JREF and an atheist group can and should work together.
First, if a religion makes testable claims. Second, the creep of religion into government, like into science textbooks. Ward |
__________________
~~Na eth'er aa, ammre' en ank'aar'eith, d'emner'aa-, asd'reng'aather, em'n'err-aae...~ - Alenara Al'Kher'aat, aged 347 |
|
20th March 2013, 10:59 PM | #4 |
Chief Solipsistic
Autosycophant Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 13,414
|
The purpose of the JREF is not to explicitly promote atheism, it is to promote skepticism. As such, it is entirely consistent for the JREF to support/sponsor events which, in their opinion, likewise promote skepticism. This conference arguably promotes skepticism specifically in the area of religious belief (or lack thereof), a more targeted focus than the broader focus taken by the JREf in general.
If the JREF were to support a conference debunking 9/11 conspiracists, it wouldn't mean that the JREF's mission was to debunk conspiracy theories; it would mean that they were likewise helping another group that was promoting skepticism in a more targeted manner. I guess you could look at it like this. The JREF seeks to promote skepticism across a wide variety of fields -- religion, science, paranormal, conspiracy theories, etc. It is not focused on or created to address any particular one of those issues. But that doesn't mean that it won't support or endorse other organizations that do have a more specific focus. Of course, I do not represent the JREF, but that's the way I'd see it. |
__________________
Please check out my business, The Language of Culture |
|
21st March 2013, 12:23 AM | #5 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,382
|
|
21st March 2013, 12:57 AM | #6 |
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 41,468
|
Or DJ and Randi have worked out a plan to announce at the next TAM that the JREF is going to become the Bright Panthers.
|
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable. |
|
23rd March 2013, 12:54 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,358
|
|
23rd March 2013, 12:57 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,358
|
|
10th April 2013, 12:04 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,189
|
hmmm...
I would attend but I would be intensely bored -_-
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|