|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
4th July 2011, 12:02 PM | #161 |
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,847
|
Originally Posted by Childlike Empress
So you don't believe that the poles would have fallen over, but you believe that a little team of monkeys went out and planted a bunch of broken poles, before flying a plane over the pentagon in the wrong direction in broad daylight during morning rush hour while simultaneously planting plane parts a damaged cab and dead bodies and setting off bombs INSIDE the building which fired holes through 5 rings, after which they confiscated all the cameras of surrounding businesses AND ANY ERRANT TOURISTS/ NEWS PERSONS/ETC. and threatened/brainwashed all the first responders and witnesses into silence. Ok, then. |
__________________
DoYouEverWonder - Engineers and architects don't have to design steel buildings not to collapse from gravity. They already conquered gravity when they built it. - Professional Wastrel |
|
4th July 2011, 12:04 PM | #162 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
Yes they did. Did you miss the broken sections and shattered glass? Nothing gentle about their fall at all. No, they remained pretty close to the base because that is what they are designed to do ... once again, refer to the photo series beachnut posted earlier. All you are doing here is demonstrating your complete ignorance of the phenomenon under discussion.
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
4th July 2011, 12:06 PM | #163 |
Skeptic not Atheist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,748
|
|
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley "How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41 |
|
4th July 2011, 12:08 PM | #164 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,392
|
In what way would you expect them to look different if they had hit the ground violently? They were hit violently by a large aircraft - I think we agree on that point. So if they then also whacked the ground hard, what extra damage would you expect to see that you do not see?
|
4th July 2011, 12:27 PM | #165 |
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 29,742
|
Lulz, the newsest and bestest CIT fan jumps in a light pole thread.
How da thunk? CE thinks that a super secret team of agents "planted" the light poles, and that the cab driver (who was kind enough to let the *********** mutts in his home) was the lead agent. Yes, I am dead serious. Hey CE, when are your boys going to release their raw video "evidence"? |
4th July 2011, 12:32 PM | #166 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 20,632
|
If you are able to visualize in your minds eye the situation with the cab coming down the road, Flight 77 approaching, hitting the poles at official speed, one hitting the cab with the results we see, hood, backseats and Lloyde untouched, and the other poles "fallen over" like we see, and keep a straight face ... well, then you have an immense capability of self-deception. Meep meep. But you already accept that the plane continued to approach the Pentagon without the engines touching the lawn, and then disintegrated with leaving only a few shrapnels of wreckage, while at the same time punching a hole into the C-Ring. And additionally are able to explain away everything CIT has found out and the early news reports and testimonies from people at the Pentagon. So i'm confident you'll make it. |
4th July 2011, 12:38 PM | #167 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
You are so very wrong. There were tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of pieces of "shrapnel' both inside and outside the Pentagon. The DT camera footage shows it falling in its parking lot. Reports at Reagan National of debris falling there. Enough small metal chaff even created a debris cloud in the air above the Pentagon which could be seen on the Reagan ASR radar for several minutes before it all settled. You really need to get your facts straight CE.
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
4th July 2011, 12:41 PM | #168 |
Skeptic not Atheist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,748
|
How do you consider the backseat "untouched". CIT's pictures show the lower seat-back support damage.
The pole most likely hit the ground and bounced. It really doesn't matter. The plane was found inside the building. Unless you claim is the poles should have stopped the plane, you're nowhere (and even at that.....) |
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley "How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41 |
|
4th July 2011, 12:57 PM | #169 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
4th July 2011, 12:58 PM | #170 |
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
|
Blatant lie. Your link connects to a thread at the LC forum rather than any specific "address" of yours of the issue. An issue discussed - with actual science - here and elsewhere.
Care to address the minimum bank angle required for the minimum NoC turn and how many witnesses observed it? Ah, no, I thought not. |
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury |
|
4th July 2011, 01:11 PM | #171 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 20,632
|
Hahaha, really? Looks to me like the backseat of a very used cab with a small hole in the coating, which stood with broken windshield on Lloydes property for some years and had some people with dirty shoes treating on it. Sure, BCR, if you say so it must be true. But then, how did it cause the hole in the C-Ring at the same time? Depleted Uranium in the nose of that Boeing? You can't have it both ways. But let's stop that nonsense. You know that I know that you know that they fed you bogus data. I'm not interested in taking this further, having said what I wanted to say. Have fun with your YT guy. |
4th July 2011, 01:12 PM | #172 |
Skeptic not Atheist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,748
|
|
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley "How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41 |
|
4th July 2011, 01:12 PM | #173 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 20,632
|
|
4th July 2011, 01:13 PM | #174 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
Everythings bogus apart from the liars at CIT?
Too funny. Logic is not CE friend. |
__________________
Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
4th July 2011, 01:14 PM | #175 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
4th July 2011, 01:23 PM | #176 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 20,632
|
I said backseat. You delivered the evidence. I have linked to that video several times. As you know. |
4th July 2011, 01:25 PM | #177 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
4th July 2011, 01:25 PM | #178 |
Skeptic not Atheist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,748
|
|
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley "How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41 |
|
4th July 2011, 01:31 PM | #179 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 26,122
|
Your lack of knowledge in physics steps in and ignores E=mv2. Got physics?
Time for Einstein? Why do you use CIT drug induced nonsense as your "evidence"? |
4th July 2011, 03:41 PM | #180 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 7,032
|
Argument from your own colossal ignorance. I can stick my whole arm between the seat back and seat of most full size cars without leaving any evidence, The two are not connected, In fact you can remove the lower seat of that very car by pushing the metal spring frame to the rear and unlatching it from the hook. The pole doesnt even need to tear the fabric. But you can remain in your ignorance as it suits you and fill the void in your brain with fantastic fantasies about staged scenes. Like some sort of set change during an opera only outdoors amongst tens of thousands of commuters.
|
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude. |
|
4th July 2011, 08:29 PM | #181 |
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 29,742
|
|
5th July 2011, 12:01 AM | #182 |
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
|
A paragraph of meaningless ranting that contains not one iota of science. And that old LC thread that supposedly debunks Reheat's position goes on for some pages, all devoted to avoiding any requirement to propose a curve/speed that would allow the bank angle to be calculated. CIT were as afraid of this issue as you are. Keep running, CE.
Oh, and here's some more debris: |
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury |
|
5th July 2011, 01:58 AM | #183 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 18,667
|
|
5th July 2011, 07:43 AM | #184 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,706
|
Late to this discussion but wanted to add a couple of points.
At least one of the poles had the top section sheared off (The one that hit the cab for instance which may change the calcs a bit) and as mentioned they were hit at the top, well above the C of G of a tapering post, this would tend to make them rotate around the C of G and not fly any great distance. It is also possible the some of the posts were not physically hit at all but were blown down by the slipstream of the aircraft or the jet exhaust, so indeed were felled like trees in a storm. this would explain minimal damage to some of the posts. I'm guessing that the air speeds caused by the passing jet were well above the design limits for the posts And finally in the original post the claim was that the plane was flying at 555Km/hour when it should be Miles per hour. Childlike empress still can't even face up to the fact that Mr Morin was a SOC witness so we shouldn't be too surprised that she cannot grasp the physics of the poles and the taxi. |
5th July 2011, 07:51 AM | #185 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 35,398
|
|
5th July 2011, 07:53 AM | #186 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 18,667
|
Hehehe yes, you are right. I never even bothered to check the numbers for that moron's assumptions. Lamp pole 150kg? I have not the slightest idea, but sounds about right. Plane is 100,000kg or 80,000kg? I don't care. Ballpark seems to be okay though. Same with 555mph or km/h - that's merely a factor 1.6, other assumptions are less precise than that.
|
5th July 2011, 08:41 AM | #187 |
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,847
|
|
__________________
DoYouEverWonder - Engineers and architects don't have to design steel buildings not to collapse from gravity. They already conquered gravity when they built it. - Professional Wastrel |
|
5th July 2011, 09:36 AM | #188 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,438
|
|
__________________
"Hello. My name is Inigo Skywalker. You are my father. Prepare to die." |
|
5th July 2011, 11:17 AM | #189 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
|
__________________
Vive la liberté! |
|
5th July 2011, 11:20 AM | #190 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
Neither can you or the CiT. How does an explosive manage to blow out 100 feet of only the ground floor exterior wall and not cause a more hemispherical damage pattern CE?
However a large heavy object coming apart as it travels through a structure will see some of the denser materials travel further carrying greater momentum than lighter pieces. Some parts will also hit more substantial intervening materials inside than other will and will thus travel through the structure farther losing less of their momentum to collissions. Simple 1st year physics CE. All of this will result in a damage pattern generally along the line of travel, exactly as seen to have occured in the Pentagon. |
5th July 2011, 11:22 AM | #191 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
I forget, is Lloyd England ;
-an 'agent' himself -threatened into agreeing to be part of a vast conspiracy -paid off to be part of a vast conspiracy and what is the evidence of any of the above other than the CiT's personal speculation? |
5th July 2011, 12:22 PM | #192 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,706
|
|
5th July 2011, 01:33 PM | #193 |
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,847
|
|
__________________
DoYouEverWonder - Engineers and architects don't have to design steel buildings not to collapse from gravity. They already conquered gravity when they built it. - Professional Wastrel |
|
5th July 2011, 01:39 PM | #194 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
You think they use those Men In Black flashy light things?
|
5th July 2011, 03:06 PM | #195 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
Aaawww you guys aren't taking this seriously.
Since Lloyd England's complicity is a subject in the CiT scenario of the events surrounding the Pentagon on Sept 11/01, and since CE is the resident adherent and thus most expert in the CiT take on things , perhaps CE would address my above post. Specifically what evidence there is of Lloyd's complicity other than the unsupported speculations of the CiT. |
5th July 2011, 03:50 PM | #196 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
5th July 2011, 04:21 PM | #197 |
Muse
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
|
Well i started with the intention of finding out if the claims of me mate that physics prove the 9/11 official story to be a lie . How can i tell who has the correct maths now? The debate on youtube stands with the fknnewz claiming victory and no jrefer seems to have been able to prove him wrong. Am i wrong in thinking this? If so what is it i'm wrong about.
|
5th July 2011, 04:33 PM | #198 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
Well, go several pages back. I clearly demonstrated him wrong using sound math and physics. Oystein did the numbers and I was able to confirm his results as the same order of magnitude as the spec.
Otherwise, all I've seen out of your guy is lies and a complete lack of knowledge of physics who's answer to everything was ***** off! I don't call that much of a win for him. |
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
5th July 2011, 04:50 PM | #199 |
Muse
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
|
|
5th July 2011, 04:56 PM | #200 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
Is he typing in a manner that allows others to see what he writes?
That's his flaw. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|