|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
22nd July 2011, 11:14 AM | #1 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 254
|
What wall?
From The Eleventh Day by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan:
Quote:
|
22nd July 2011, 11:20 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
working on his own
Think that might slow the process? |
22nd July 2011, 11:27 AM | #3 |
Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 212
|
Which of the operatives were known by U.S. intelligence to be in the U.S. and were known by U.S. intelligence to have links to the Embassy and Cole bombings? I haven't spent as much time researching what the U.S. intelligence agencies knew about the 19 hijackers before 9/11 and when they knew it, but if what I remember is correct, the CIA or FBI only knew before 9/11 that two of the 19 hijackers had POSSIBLE links to al-Qaeda. However, in the U.S. someone can't be arrested just for being suspected of having possible links to a criminal organization. I dunno if you're a truther or not but the truthers, anyway, always talk about civil rights and liberties and the constitution and say how the U.S. is becoming a police state, but when it comes to this particular case, the attitude seems to be, "The U.S. should have ignored the constitution and civil liberties and arrested these men!"
|
__________________
"It's amazing, amazing, that with all the access to accurate information, that people could be so pathetically uninformed." -CNN's Jack Cafferty |
|
22nd July 2011, 11:50 AM | #4 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
No sir, Al-Mihdhar's family ran the communications center for AQ in Yemen. It was under NSA surveillance since at least 1998 (Embassy bombings) and definitely to a limited degree by the CIA by late-1999. Al-Mihdhar called the center from San Diego on multiple occassions shortly after his arrival in San Diego. I think the assertion by Fenton in his Disconnecting the Dots, and in this new book (which I am still awaiting its arrival so have not read it yet) is that it strains credibility (based on multiple primary document sources) that the NSA and CIA did not know of Al-Mihdhar's presence in the US, his participation in an active plot (their excuse was that it was non-US so they did not alert the FBI) and had direct links to other AQ associates later implicated in the Cole bombing. So to pick him up on his later departure from the US, or later return would not have been a violation of anyone's constitutional rights because by then (his return in 2001) he was solidly connected to a terrorist act (the Cole).
Or at least that is my understanding of the thesis Here is a link to Miles Kara's review. |
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
22nd July 2011, 12:08 PM | #5 |
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 51
|
|
22nd July 2011, 12:33 PM | #6 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
All of this stuff is connected fer sure. The Saudi's (and Iran too by the way), ran our support for Bosnia with OBL acting as the money man from 92 - 95 (the Sudan base of operations). That relationship began to fall apart when Clinton started the renditions of Egyptian Islamists on behalf of Mubarak in 1995. By 1998, Clinton alledgedly had a change of heart and paid Zawahiri (who had been the operational commander in Bosnia for the Islamists) a significant amount of money and promised not to interfere in Zawahiri's efforts to overthrow Mubarak. On his part, he promised not to launch operations against US forces participating in UN operations in Bosnia. Whether the later is true or not, Mubarak certainly thought so and began undermining Clinton's efforts against Saddam's Iraq. We may never know the extent of all of the off-the-books operations, but definitely by 1998 our relationship with the Islamists soured significantly. OBL may never have had a direct relationship with the CIA, but he was definitely a Saudi GID asset until 1998. Whether he remained so after that is certainly anyone's guess.
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
22nd July 2011, 06:52 PM | #7 |
lorcutus.tolere
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 25,327
|
Al-Mihdhar wasn't put on a CIA watchlist until 21 August, 2001, almost two months after he'd returned to the USA. As late as March 2001 the CIA still had no conclusive evidence that Al Qaeda had carried out the USS Cole bombing.
I think Lawrence Wright is mostly right in his conclusions as to why the CIA waited so long before notifying the FBI that he was in the USA: 1) Due to the different way in which the two agencies approach counter-terrorism. 2) Due to personal issues between Alec Station staff and John O'Neill at the FBI. It's also worth pointing out that he was only on a watchlist. The Terrorist Exclusion List (which prevents listed individuals from entering or leaving the USA) was only introduced after 9/11 as part of the Patriot Act. |
__________________
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi. A fan of fantasy? Check out Project Dreamforge. |
|
22nd July 2011, 08:20 PM | #8 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 254
|
Corsi is the same person who falsely claimed the wall prevented the criminal side agents from being involved in the investigation. She has never had to defend this conduct to the public. The media has given her a pass. Evidently deference to government secrecy is more important than getting answers as to why al Qaeda operatives were able to freely wander around the US in preparation for 9/11.
Cole investigator Ali Soufan has a book coming out on 9/12. Maybe he will finally explain why the UBLU obstructed the Cole investigation. |
22nd July 2011, 08:41 PM | #9 |
Penguilicious Spodmaster.
Tagger Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables).
Posts: 45,218
|
|
23rd July 2011, 03:36 AM | #10 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,278
|
Actually, Lawrence Wright got a lot of it wrong in his Looming Tower. I am glad you qualified it as 'I think', because the primary documents (emails, memo's, etc) point in another direction. I understand many people are bias towards the version of events disseminated to the public 'explain' away the failures, but the primary documents simply do not support those conclusions.
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
23rd July 2011, 06:51 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
|
|
23rd July 2011, 06:03 PM | #12 |
lorcutus.tolere
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 25,327
|
|
__________________
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi. A fan of fantasy? Check out Project Dreamforge. |
|
24th July 2011, 06:47 PM | #13 |
Muse
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 632
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|