|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
19th February 2018, 11:15 PM | #1 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 382
|
The reason muslims (and maybe christians) assume that atheists have to be nihilists.
The claim that the "muslim (maybe even the christian?) god" is ultimately benevolent is very necessary for their belief in the afterlife, since it fixes all the deficiencies and injustices in this life in this universe, and leans on the assumption that to be in existence is better than not to be.
All the theology of the muslim comes down to this. In the famous Quranic key sentence that is at the head of chapters and which muslims utter on every permissible deed the first attribute of the muslim god is "the all compassionate" and muslim scholars use this to claim that this first attribute of mercy and compassion in contrast to the second one in the same sentence applies to all conscious-living beings, by "God" having endowed them with conscious existence. And this benevolence and compassion does not come to an end in Hell, since the "gift" of conscious existence is not taken back from the people of Hell. To prove the incompatibility of this claim with the Quranic messages is not so difficult. In the Quran there are verses that tells us that the people of Hell will be calling for death to escape from fire but it will be denied to them. It is obvious that they ask for their consciousness to be turned off. It is no different than not existing anymore. So the claims of muslim scholars on this issue don't agree with Allah's message in the Quran. According to muslims as an atheist I still benefit from God's gift (to be in existence) while in Hell (and that is as a result of his all-encompassing mercy), yet I am at the same time being punished for not having acknowledged this gift in a past life ! (And yet the Quran says I will be calling death to the rescue from Hell.) Now, what I would like to find out here is if the christian theology about existence and God's mercy is similar to the one of muslims ? Do they share the idea that to be in existence is better than not to be, so they can make an eternal Hell look like it's ultimately not the worst case scenario? If they do, isn't it better for the debating atheist to skip all other theological crop and cut to the chase? By first, showing that that claim contradicts their scriptures, and second, calling them to explain and prove that to be in conscious existence is better than not to be, for everyone, while many people do commit suicide and many Budists view eternal life as a curse, not as a benefit. So how do they come to that generalization? If this claim of theirs shatters so easily (at least for the audience) won't all the rest of them that depends strongly on this one fall also? Another question I have is, is this theology the reason that believers claim atheists to be nihilists ? And what's wrong if I am nihilistic if that's the feeling I am developing by watching the universe as objectively as I can ? (Not focusing only on the "good" stuff.) Do I have to make my worldview as an atheist an appealing and optimistic one to the religionist to prove his claims wrong? Why is it in debates that I watch atheists try to remove themselves from this philosophy? I want to add a side note about the believers' defense for Hell, or their claim of it being necessitated by the obvious injustices in "this life". According to the Quranic message the eternal Hell fire is prepared for the unbelievers and those who call other gods' names with Allah's. It scarcely mentions -if at all- that the Hell fire is waiting for the rapists, murderers, thieves etc. The main purpose of Hell is to punish the unbelievers. Anyone who read Quran knows this. So the modern muslim's usage of today's injustices for tomorrow's justice i.e. Hell, as proof, is a bogus one. Hell is for blasphemy. "Sins" can be forgiven, blasphemy "requires" Hell. |
20th February 2018, 09:30 AM | #2 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,800
|
You make a number of different points in your post; I'm going to split them apart individually.
I've only really seen it in apologetics. Stuff like "it's better to exist than not exist, and God is by definition the best at everything, so we can assume he exists, and since he exists..." Christian Hell is the theological equivalent of the dark basement an abusive father locks his kids in. "You gotta be good or Dad'll find out and he'll lock you in the basement!" kind of thing. Contrariwise, salvation doesn't rely on anything you do or don't do, but on whether God's been drinking long enough not to notice you sneaking past him into heaven.
Quote:
Quote:
Douglas Adams said it best: "Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Quote:
|
22nd February 2018, 04:36 AM | #3 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,020
|
You present a lot of theological food for thought, so to speak, and focus on differing beliefs regarding the now and hereafter. Online video shows Salman Rushdie explaining his understanding of the differences between the Christian concept of original sin and the Muslim concept of honor/dishonor.
|
2nd March 2018, 04:49 AM | #4 |
imperfecto del subjuntivo
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 9,521
|
|
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs and other addicts, be gone and get treated.These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out. If the horse reasons the Kentucky Derby is over |
|
2nd March 2018, 08:39 AM | #5 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 382
|
Thanks. It's encouraging.
|
6th March 2018, 03:44 AM | #6 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,020
|
"There is no original sin in Islam. There is no idea of original sin. So the question of sin and redemption doesn't exist. What exists instead at the opposite poles are honour and shame." Excerpt from the first 20 seconds of this video.
|
6th March 2018, 08:36 AM | #7 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 382
|
Islam is almost a combination of Judism and Christianity (plagiarized). You can find a lot of them in Islam. Muslims also believe in the fault of Eve as the cause of their fall from Heaven. But I don't remember being a sinner because of it when I was a devout muslim. In that sense Islam teaches differeantly.
The idea of sin and redemption consumes the muslim psyce every moment of their life. I don't know what you mean by saying it doesn't exists. |
6th March 2018, 05:51 PM | #8 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,020
|
|
7th March 2018, 02:48 AM | #9 |
imperfecto del subjuntivo
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 9,521
|
|
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs and other addicts, be gone and get treated.These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out. If the horse reasons the Kentucky Derby is over |
|
7th March 2018, 07:34 AM | #10 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,020
|
|
8th March 2018, 06:05 PM | #11 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 382
|
The reason i didn't respond to the video segment is that I didn't knot what to make of it. I am not sure of what he is saying. I am not able to compare islamic concepts to their christian counterparts. I just said what I knew about sin and redemption in islam. But when someone wants to speak of a religion they should really stick to the cannons of it and the earliest interpretations and applications of it. An Indian muslim can be very different than a European muslim in their understanding and application of islam.
|
9th March 2018, 06:51 AM | #12 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,800
|
|
9th March 2018, 09:17 AM | #13 |
imperfecto del subjuntivo
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 9,521
|
More patronizing? What winter salt said loud and clear is that the video (Rushdie) doesn't correspond with Islam as it is widely felt and practised today.
I've always doubted Rushdie knows "his" muslims well. |
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs and other addicts, be gone and get treated.These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out. If the horse reasons the Kentucky Derby is over |
|
9th March 2018, 12:35 PM | #14 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 382
|
i think it's at atmost importance to refer every religion to its primitive origins in debates and in trying to help someone who is deconverting from it.
Also it's quite necessary to be able to carry on a debate. You can't possibly know every denomination of every religion but you can find out tenets shared by all of them. Also the earliest practice of Islam contains slavery, internal political fights, savage conquests, death for apostasy, stoning of "adulterers" etc that no Muslim can deny. Why not bring them up right of the bat and show the modernist muslims how dishonestly they ignore them. It'll go against their claim that Allah gave them the "perfect and completed" system. I love to tell them every time that the people that thought them about the heavens didn't even know about the continent's of the world they lived in. But for this post, i wish people cared to get into the main topic I'm interested in discussing. |
9th March 2018, 01:01 PM | #15 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 382
|
i think it's at atmost importance to refer every religion to its primitive origins in debates and in trying to help someone who is deconverting from it.
Also it's quite necessary to be able to carry on a debate. You can't possibly know every denomination of every religion but you can find out tenets shared by all of them. Also the earliest practice of Islam contains slavery, internal fights, savage conquests, death for apostasy, stoning of "adulterers" etc that no Muslim can deny. Why not bring them up right of the bat and show the modernist muslims how dishonestly they ignore them. It'll go against their claim that Allah gave them the "perfect and completed" system. I love to tell them every time that the people that thought them about the heavens didn't even know about the continent's of the world they lived in. But for this post, i wish people cared to get into the main topic I'm interested in discussing. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|