|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
15th May 2019, 03:01 PM | #201 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
There was.
The woman applied for food stamps and that triggered an automatic case to force the father to pay child support. Visitation went with that but the father wasn't seeking visitation. Bad thing was the court released the vic's address to the rapist. That did suck, plus the fact all this was triggered by automatic processes with no one using their head to consider the case realistically. The state needs a new law and so do a lot of other states I imagine. |
15th May 2019, 03:17 PM | #202 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Port Townsend, Washington
Posts: 39,057
|
|
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant. |
|
15th May 2019, 03:51 PM | #204 |
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,033
|
I was going to look it up, but I thought about it, and realized I didn't need to. Trying to verify it is about as interesting as that thread in conspiracy theories that I was in for a while where I and others were trying to convince someone rockets worked in space.
I know that the issue in question (sorry folks, you'll have to follow the links backwards to see what it was) is ok, and abortion would be legal in that situation, even under Alabama's new law. If anyone cares to look it up, feel free. I don't need to. And really, I don't need to look up much of anything on this. I checked out the Georgia law, and dug into it and all that. The legal situation in the US right now is fairly clear. As of today, abortion is legal everywhere. With the passage of laws in Ohio, Georgia, Alabama, and pending legislation elsewhere, it will be up to Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to decide whether it stays that way. If they vote no, it will be up to voters what happens next. There will be lots of fights among state legislators about which states will keep it legal. If one of them votes yes, then the next presidential and senate races will be all about whether Trump gets one more Supreme Court Justice, so we can try again. (ETA: "We can try again" as in "It will all start again. I didn't want to include myself in the group of people trying to outlaw abortion. It's just that we will all be caught up in the fight.) In the meantime, the situation with abortion will revert back to what it was in 1972, except that more states will have it legal, more places in the world will have it legal, and public opinion generally will have shifted to the left on the subject. (I don't know how many states it was legal in 1972, but I don't think it was many, and it was generally unpopular.) Abortion has been an ever present, but back burner, issue for all of my adult lifetime. It's being moved to the front burner very soon. Therefore, it's very important to shape up your persuasion skills if you care about this issue. What do you think will work best? Let's try out one argument: "The Republicans have been swamped by a Christian cabal that wants to execute sluts, and bring women back to property status! It's all in the bills they just passed in Georgia!" Run that one past the focus group. See how it flies. See if it changes once they actually get to read the bill, or hear from someone willing to explain the contents. |
15th May 2019, 03:58 PM | #205 |
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
|
Maybe Las Vegas will be the place to go to get an abortion. You can be an atheist there too. They have flights to Vegas around the clock.
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
15th May 2019, 04:22 PM | #206 |
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
|
The way to fight this is to double the number of abortions in other states. You fight it tooth and nail. When they duck, you go high. When they give birth, you abort. It's that simple.
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
15th May 2019, 04:25 PM | #207 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 28,964
|
As to the highlighted bit, I think that Stern addressed that adequately in his response. Here's the link again:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...-horrific.html Further, an assertion that vague carries little weight. Who are these "legal experts" and which "areas" of the penal code are they referring to? In the Stern article it says:
Quote:
|
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. William Shakespeare |
|
15th May 2019, 05:36 PM | #208 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
How do you know that? You are adding your bias when the people writing this law clearly want to threaten pregnant women under any circumstance.
First off, let's just drop this heartbeat charade. Scientists have successfully grown human heart tissue in a lab dish.
Quote:
Georgia law: "once a heartbeat is detected in the womb, which happens around six weeks." If the wording is, "once a heartbeat is detected", then all it will take is new technology to detect that heartbeat earlier. Gestational Age Week 6 (Fetal Age: 4 Weeks) Gestation starts at the end of the last menses. The fetal age starts with implantation. At this point the woman has not missed a period. So unless one is talking about the morning after pill, there is no opportunity for abortion because once the fetus is detected, it's too late for all practical purposes.
Quote:
Quote:
Precedent? You mean like Roe v Wade? Just what precedent are you referring to? There's a lot of speculation in this thread, defining the law and consequences in ways that fit people's beliefs about the humane courts balancing the women's needs, not at all oppressive of this slut that allowed herself to get pregnant. Yes, exactly. So why did you invent stuff in your post about how the law wouldn't be used to punish those sluts? Anti-abortionist want this law to make sense, just protecting life, whatever. So let's just describe it that way all white-washed and pretty. Let's not describe it as denying women the right to make their own medical decisions. Let's not describe it as forcing the woman to risk her life for the fetus while the man is not required to do any such thing. Let's make sure the woman bears the sole responsibility for the pregnancy even when incest and rape are involved. Are we back to the, "she shouldn't have worn that short skirt" mentality? BTW, guess which state has the highest maternal mortality?
Quote:
|
15th May 2019, 06:01 PM | #209 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
|
15th May 2019, 06:48 PM | #210 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
|
15th May 2019, 07:04 PM | #211 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
So glad to see that America's Dred-Scott 2.0 might actually go the way of justice!
|
15th May 2019, 07:04 PM | #212 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
Which brings up an important point, how many doctors are going to think twice about performing an abortion to save the life of the mother if said doctor fears potential prosecution?
In fact, it wouldn't be a surprise if some OBGYNs choose not to do surgery at all on some women. They might be a a position to risk a lawsuit if the woman dies and go to jail if some jury or judge decides the abortion was not necessary to save said woman. |
15th May 2019, 07:13 PM | #213 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the wet side of the mountains
Posts: 3,906
|
Here is a link to an actual (much larger than life-sized) photo of your 4-week embryo. It doesn't so much have a heart as it has cardiac cells that have begun to twitch. The brain has barely begun to develop from the neural tube. And as Ginger pointed out, it's about half the size of your thumbnail.
Yet we're saying that this has more rights than the woman it's currently inhabiting? |
15th May 2019, 07:16 PM | #214 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 13,384
|
Meadmaker has primarily been discussing the Georgia law. His recent post is an exception, but he clearly and appropriately mentioned his ignorance of the law.
I am even more ignorant, relying on information from the Washington Post and not taking the time to read any of the laws. |
15th May 2019, 07:18 PM | #215 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 13,384
|
|
15th May 2019, 07:22 PM | #216 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 13,384
|
Delete
|
15th May 2019, 07:22 PM | #217 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
|
15th May 2019, 07:28 PM | #218 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 13,384
|
Okay, I'll be satisfied with the conclusion that some experts disagree on whether women can be prosecuted under this law. I tend to weight the opinion of the Planned Parenthood spokesperson fairly high, but I don't know her position offhand.
I think that when there are controversies over the consequences of the law and the primary literal intention is bad enough, we should focus on how the primary literal intention is bad rather than on how much worse it might be if some people are right. |
15th May 2019, 07:30 PM | #219 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 13,384
|
Right.
The traditional argument is that a right to life outweighs a woman's right to choose what happens in her body, because life is more fundamental and valuable. It's not that the fetus has more rights, but that the right of the fetus under consideration is more significant than the right of the woman under consideration. Mind you, I'm not arguing that the fetus has a right to life. Just presenting the standard argument as it's usually understood. |
15th May 2019, 07:41 PM | #220 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
I don't want to speak for all pro-life people, but since this discussion frequently gets dominated by religious people against atheists I feel compelled to. I'm a gay, atheist, pro-life, man (judge me as you will).
It's not even that the "right(s) of the fetus under consideration is more significant than the right of the woman", rather that I'm judging the quality of one right to another. The right to life of one individual will always outweigh the right to convenience of another. The vast majority of abortions in the developed world are those of convenience. Those that aren't can be easily classified into those that involve biological necessity (i.e. woman's compromised health, deformity of birth, etc.), and those that involve psychological necessity ("I was raped!", "Dad is no longer in the picture!", "What will my family think!?", etc.) While I sympathize with those of the latter category, I cannot in good faith support their desire to murder their offspring. |
15th May 2019, 08:08 PM | #221 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,466
|
|
__________________
Don't feed the trolls. Just ignore them. |
|
15th May 2019, 08:43 PM | #222 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,511
|
I don't know how you can imprison doctors but not go after the person who put a hit on the fetus.
|
15th May 2019, 08:44 PM | #223 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
No I am not a vegan. Just because I don't believe in a god doesn't mean I believe that all animal species are worthy of moral consideration, or even the same moral consideration as individuals who moralize like me (a human). Call me a speciesist as you want but I firmly believe that H. Sapiens is in a category of moral consideration outside of all other species, and we must include all members of this species including those who are "developmentally challenged", be them fetuses or the mentally retarded.
|
15th May 2019, 08:46 PM | #224 |
Cowardly Lurking in the Shadows of Greatness
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,718
|
Isn't there also an argument path for ensuring that each human gets the best possible world we can give them? Being born unwanted, unloved and uncared for is better than not being born at all?
|
__________________
Normal is just a stereotype. |
|
15th May 2019, 08:47 PM | #225 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 28,964
|
You're right though: the hyperbole is a distraction from what we should really be focusing on, which is that this law will severely restrict access to abortion if allowed to stand. Even if it only applies to doctors. The scaremongering could actually be counterproductive here for opponents of the law, of which I count myself one.
|
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. William Shakespeare |
|
15th May 2019, 08:51 PM | #226 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 28,964
|
No one is asking you to support it. But you have no standing to make that choice for another person. Will you raise an unwanted child who is the result of rape at your own expense if its mother comes to your door and says "here, this child is your problem now"?
|
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. William Shakespeare |
|
15th May 2019, 08:53 PM | #227 |
Dark Lord of the JREF
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Else
Posts: 5,805
|
|
__________________
"The truth is out there. But the lies are inside your head." |
|
15th May 2019, 08:58 PM | #228 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
|
15th May 2019, 08:58 PM | #229 |
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,033
|
Yeah, the comment probably didn't make much sense to a lot of people, and it certainly isn't all that relevant to the discussion. I was just struck by the interesting idea that the riskiest element of having sex was that there might be a law against aborting the resulting offspring. Between pregnancy, death during childbirth, the possibility of marriage and children, and the inherent risk of being naked and alone with a man and no witnesses, sex sounds pretty risky even before you throw this law into the mix. (And I really had heard that song I mentioned for the first time in it must be about 25 years, so it was fresh in my memory. Kipling was an interesting fellow. I suppose he isn't studied as much now as when I was in school. Both racist and sexist, to be sure, and so homophobic that he never even mentioned the possibility. And yet, there's a certain realism to his poems.) But, to reiterate the main point, these laws really are a threat to the way we live today. If you believe a woman should have the right to abortion, now is the time to write your state legislator or do whatever other actions might help preserve that right. However, whether your audience is state senator, or your neighbor, you'll be taken more seriously if you don't sound like a raving lunatic when you talk about pending legislation. Just leave the "death penalty" talk out of it. Most of those legislators are lawyers. They can figure out what the laws actually say. |
15th May 2019, 08:59 PM | #230 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Port Townsend, Washington
Posts: 39,057
|
Birth. Her own.
|
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant. |
|
15th May 2019, 09:00 PM | #231 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
|
15th May 2019, 09:01 PM | #232 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Port Townsend, Washington
Posts: 39,057
|
|
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant. |
|
15th May 2019, 09:04 PM | #233 |
Dark Lord of the JREF
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Else
Posts: 5,805
|
|
__________________
"The truth is out there. But the lies are inside your head." |
|
15th May 2019, 09:09 PM | #234 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
|
15th May 2019, 09:15 PM | #235 |
Dark Lord of the JREF
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Else
Posts: 5,805
|
Which, until viable, is essentially a parasite, and a part of her body. You want to strip her rights, and freedoms.
Someone out there is in desperate need of a transplant that you could provide. They will die without a transplant. We'll take one of your organs. There are a couple you can spare. You wouldn't want to deny someone life, would you? |
__________________
"The truth is out there. But the lies are inside your head." |
|
15th May 2019, 09:29 PM | #236 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, California Republic
Posts: 835
|
Allow me to put the 'E' in the (former) JREF:
Parasites are organisms of one species that take advantage of the individual of another species in resource acquisition. Zygotes/fetuses/et.al. are not parasites since they are of the same species of the so-called "host". Indeed, they're not only the same species but they share 50% of the DNA as they're the... wait for it... OFFSPRING of the "host". There isn't a biologist worth her salt who would ever refer to the mitotic cell reproduction of a bacterium as a "parasite", nor would she say that of a germinated fruit developing into a new tree. Offspring =/= parasites. Ergo, human zygotes/fetuses are not parasites.
Quote:
|
15th May 2019, 09:38 PM | #237 |
Dark Lord of the JREF
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Else
Posts: 5,805
|
For a number of intents and purposes, it may as well be. Moreso if it is unwanted, or could cause active harm to the woman.
Quote:
There are many other ways to reduce the rate of abortions that do not strip rights and freedoms from a person. Which is why I'm pro-choice, personal feelings aside. It SHOULD only ever be a decision between the woman, and her doctor. |
__________________
"The truth is out there. But the lies are inside your head." |
|
15th May 2019, 09:38 PM | #238 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 28,964
|
|
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. William Shakespeare |
|
15th May 2019, 09:45 PM | #239 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,511
|
This. Babies have a right to be wanted. So if a woman wants to end a pregnancy, so be it. It's true that a fertilized egg contains the genetic blueprint of a unique individual (identical twins excepted), but that's a very inclusive definition of personhood.
A couple of years ago a caller to the Dave Ramsey Show asked about going into debt for IVF. A lot of people who listen to the show are evangelical Christians. Some have gone through a few hoops to justify creating more than one zygote. Someone quoted the Bible (OT, Jeremiah) which basically says, "I knew you in your mother's womb." (Translations vary.) Someone on a blog opined that because the zygotes were not formed in the womb, fertilizing extra eggs in a Petri dish or whatever was OK. I also think it's fairly common practice to implant more than one zygote in the uterus with the understanding that there will be an option to cull some embryos. I argued with a forum member here who claimed that there were plenty of loving, stable would-be parents to adopt every kid in need. He did not provide any evidence. I also find these laws very patronizing. Don't worry, little lady, we won't come after you. Just the mean doctor who forced you to get an abortion. |
15th May 2019, 10:13 PM | #240 |
Maledictorian
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,557
|
Every sperm is different.
Therefore, masturbation is murder. |
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.” |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|