ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 29th July 2019, 04:57 PM   #4361
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
oh deary me, reality check lost the plot.

Can you see your contridiction here rc, jd11, lukrak?

Quote:
Big Red Ball is a three-meter-wide hollow sphere, with a strong magnet at its center and various probes inside. The researchers pump helium gas in, ionize it to create a plasma, and then apply an electric current that, along with the magnetic field, stirs the plasma, creating a near-perfect mimic of the spinning plasma and electromagnetic fields of the sun
Just saying SAFIRE was bagged out for doing basically the same thing. Should have seen you mob spit the dummy.

__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th July 2019, 05:59 PM   #4362
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
oh deary me, reality check lost the plot.

Can you see your contridiction here rc, jd11, lukrak?

Quote:
Big Red Ball is a three-meter-wide hollow sphere, with a strong magnet at its center and various probes inside. The researchers pump helium gas in, ionize it to create a plasma, and then apply an electric current that, along with the magnetic field, stirs the plasma, creating a near-perfect mimic of the spinning plasma and electromagnetic fields of the sun
Just saying SAFIRE was bagged out for doing basically the same thing. Should have seen you mob spit the dummy.

__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th July 2019, 08:09 PM   #4363
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity of citing mainstream science irrelevant to his demented cult's electric comet and Sun.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the research he linked to is part of the mainstream explaining solar activity!
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment has a metal ball for the Sun and has nothing to do with the real Sun or this science which has no metal ball. Over 5 years running now and the demented SAFIRE experiment has no published results about the Sun.

Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment having electric currents does not make it science.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment is not "doing basically the same thing" - it is a deluded fantasy about the surface features of the Sun.

This is a rational scientific experiment to model the solar environment outside of the Sun. A laboratory model for the Parker spiral and magnetized stellar winds my emphasis added.
The Parker spiral is the shape of the interplanetary magnetic field from the Sun.

Last edited by Reality Check; 29th July 2019 at 08:26 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th July 2019, 08:13 PM   #4364
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity of citing mainstream science irrelevant to his demented cult's electric comet and Sun.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the research he linked to is part of the mainstream explaining solar activity!
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment has a metal ball for the Sun and has nothing to do with the real Sun or this science which has no metal ball. Over 5 years running now and the demented SAFIRE experiment has no published results about the Sun.

Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment having electric currents does not make it science.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment is not "doing basically the same thing" - it is a deluded fantasy about the surface features of the Sun.

This is a rational scientific experiment to model the solar environment outside of the Sun. A laboratory model for the Parker spiral and magnetized stellar winds my emphasis added.
The Parker spiral is the shape of the interplanetary magnetic field from the Sun.

Last edited by Reality Check; 29th July 2019 at 08:26 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th July 2019, 09:51 PM   #4365
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Oh poor deluded reality check.



How do they power this thing?

Back in your hole champ.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2019, 05:49 AM   #4366
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,500
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Oh poor deluded reality check.



How do they power this thing?

Back in your hole champ.
They are modelling the solar wind. Not the Sun. I thought that was quite obvious. There are reasons why it is difficult to form a star in a lab. And all this is nothing to do with the complete failure of the asinine ec woo. If you want to resurrect the electric sun woo thread, then do so. Just make sure that you've figured out where all the neutrinos come from, and can explain the energy spectrum of said neutrinos, that show it to match p-p chain fusion. As predicted by real scientists, and as not predicted by electric universe idiots.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2019, 11:51 AM   #4367
Lukraak_Sisser
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,433
Why are you still posting?

You've admitted that you do not have any way of fitting observed data with your 'model' and that you are purely acting on faith in the hope that eventually nature will behave opposite of the way it does now.

Even if, and that is a very big if given your cherry picking and misinterpretation of scientific papers, there are gaps in the mainstream model, your completely wrong model will not replace it.
Lukraak_Sisser is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th July 2019, 02:07 PM   #4368
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
....
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's utter insanity that just because two experiments are powered by electricity that they are the same. So in his brain, the Large Hadron Collider should be the same experiment as the demented SAFIRE experiment !

Last edited by Reality Check; 30th July 2019 at 02:09 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st August 2019, 06:02 PM   #4369
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Whilst waiting for the raft of new papers, i thought id throw this in here for context.

The comet Ceres.

Search for water outgassing of (1) Ceres near perihelion

Quote:
The two main mechanisms believed to produce such amounts of water molecules are sublimation of water ice recently exposed by impacts or landslides, and sputtering from SEP events. The first mechanism does not seem to be confirmed by this work, because it would imply a correlation between the heliocentric distance and the observations of water molecules, which is contradictory to our non-detection performed just before perihelion.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st August 2019, 06:08 PM   #4370
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Usual insane lies from Sol88 - Ceres is a dwarf planet and this is a thread on comets !

Search for water outgassing of Ceres near perihelion was a search for the cause of sublimating water ices on the dwarf planet Ceres and comes to a rational, scientific conclusion:
Quote:
Conclusions. Our observations support the idea that heliocentric distance (i.e., the sublimation of water ice) does not play a major role in the water emission from Ceres. This production rate could be either related to SEP events or to other mechanisms, possibly of endogenic origin.
...
The lack of any clear correlation between Ceres’ heliocentric distance and observed water vapor production rates does not favor the hypothesis of a water vapor emission created by sublimation of water ice analogous to comets (or, at least, if water vapor is emitted by this process, which is probable to some extent, then it is below the detection level).
This paper shows that Cere's activity is not analogous to cometary activity because there is no evidence of variation with Cere's orbit. That leaves solar energetic particles (SEP) or other rational, scientific mechanisms.

None of Sol88's demented cult's dogma about comets, imaginary enormous solar electric fields and electric discharge machining insanity here.

Last edited by Reality Check; 21st August 2019 at 06:20 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st August 2019, 06:37 PM   #4371
Little 10 Toes
Master Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Whilst waiting for the raft of new papers, i thought id throw this in here for context.

The comet Ceres.

Search for water outgassing of (1) Ceres near perihelion
Second sentence in the abstract:

Ceres was the target of NASA’s Dawn spacecraft for 3.5 yr, which achieved a detailed characterization of the dwarf planet.
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st August 2019, 07:27 PM   #4372
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Originally Posted by Little 10 Toes View Post
Second sentence in the abstract:

Ceres was the target of NASA’s Dawn spacecraft for 3.5 yr, which achieved a detailed characterization of the dwarf planet.
Sol88's cult already have the insanity that main-belt comets are electric comets where the insanity is that the hundreds of thousands of asteroids with similarly eccentric orbits have to be comets - and they are not !

Sol88 wants to make this even more insane by making a dwarf planet in the asteroid belt with really low eccentricity one of his cult's electric comets. I suspect that may push up the number of asteroids that must be comets in their fantasy into the millions!

And what about Pluto - a dwarf plant with no cometary activity and higher eccentricity than Ceres that Sol88's cult would expect to be comet in his new fantasy. Ditto for Eris, Haumea, and Makemake?
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st August 2019, 07:37 PM   #4373
ferd burfle
Graduate Poster
 
ferd burfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Just short of Zeta II Reticuli
Posts: 1,436
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Whilst waiting for the raft of new papers, i thought id throw this in here for context.

The comet Ceres.

Calvin, presenting his science report to his grade school class:

"Dusk! With a creepy, tingling sensation, you hear the fluttering of leathery wings! Bats! With glowing red eyes and glistening fangs, these unspeakable giant bugs drop onto..."

Entire grade school class, in unison:

"BATS AREN'T BUGS!!"
__________________
"You do not know anyone as stupid as Donald Trump. You just don’t.”-Fran Lebowitz
ferd burfle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st August 2019, 08:11 PM   #4374
JeanTate
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,739
You’re missing the point.

Sol88 has been silent for a while because he’s been busy doing sophisticated calculations and making estimates.

I think he’s on the cusp of being able to show that a giant lightning bolt blasted rock, forming the Grand Canyon (or maybe the Rift Valley). The blasted rock was sent into solar orbit, coalescing to form Ceres. Sol88’s calculations show that the relative abundance of various mineral species, and water, for Ceres closely matches that of the blasted rock, once you take account of the solar wind and changes wrought by the bolts. Better: the total mass is consistent! And the cosmic event was witnessed by native Americans, and Australian Aborigines, about 20,000 years ago.

Sol88 is working on writing a paper to report these remarkable results, planning to submit it Icarus, hoping for a nice Xmas pressie.
JeanTate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:00 AM   #4375
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593


dichotomy??

From the paper

Quote:
Conclusions. Our observations support the idea that heliocentric distance (i.e., the sublimation of water ice) does not play a major role in the water emission from Ceres. This production rate could be either related to SEP events or to other mechanisms, possibly of endogenic origin.
so...

Is Ceres mostly rock or mostly ice?

__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:10 AM   #4376
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Originally Posted by JeanTate View Post
You’re missing the point.

Sol88 has been silent for a while because he’s been busy doing sophisticated calculations and making estimates.

I think he’s on the cusp of being able to show that a giant lightning bolt blasted rock, forming the Grand Canyon (or maybe the Rift Valley). The blasted rock was sent into solar orbit, coalescing to form Ceres. Sol88’s calculations show that the relative abundance of various mineral species, and water, for Ceres closely matches that of the blasted rock, once you take account of the solar wind and changes wrought by the bolts. Better: the total mass is consistent! And the cosmic event was witnessed by native Americans, and Australian Aborigines, about 20,000 years ago.

Sol88 is working on writing a paper to report these remarkable results, planning to submit it Icarus, hoping for a nice Xmas pressie.


Lets discuss

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons



Keen?


Perhaps you could tell this eejit who's been banging on for quite some time on comets having double layers in operation, on what a sheath is?

Go ahead, bet you wont/cant though.

Tusenfem's too scared to even discuss Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase


And I have no idea why he's too scared?

Is this new to cometary scientist?

Expected if comets are plasma phenomenon.

Anywhoo, so looking forward to the new papers.

Anyone here have any idea on when they will released?
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; Yesterday at 01:22 AM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:38 AM   #4377
Lukraak_Sisser
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,433
Once again here you are posting about a theory that fails to predict even the simplest parts of the observed universe while focusing on obscure and minor effects as if that makes the total failure in some way something you can gloss over.

We see electrons and protons moving trough space.
We see them moving in the same direction with the same force accelerating them.

Your 'theory' predicts that the opposite of what we observer to happen should happen.
Therefore your theory is wrong and until you somehow manage to come up with a model that would explain this glaring error there is no need to discuss anything else.

You are here again, so do you have that model?
Lukraak_Sisser is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 06:00 AM   #4378
JeanTate
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,739
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post


Lets discuss

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons



Keen?


Perhaps you could tell this eejit who's been banging on for quite some time on comets having double layers in operation, on what a sheath is?

Go ahead, bet you wont/cant though.

Tusenfem's too scared to even discuss Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase


And I have no idea why he's too scared?

Is this new to cometary scientist?

Expected if comets are plasma phenomenon.

Anywhoo, so looking forward to the new papers.

Anyone here have any idea on when they will released?
I’ve just one word for you, Sol88: EDM.

In the Electric Comet Theory (or model), EDM is central.

If you think “a sheath and two populations of electrons”and “unusually high magnetic fields” are consistent with EDM, quantitatively, go ahead and show us. Then write a paper on this, and get it published. Await a call from Stockholm
JeanTate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 07:00 AM   #4379
tusenfem
Master Poster
 
tusenfem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,468
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Tusenfem's
stone dead tired of EC nonsense.

but if you want to know, the unusual high magnetic field is the result of a CME and CIR interacting with the induced magnetosphere of 67P
__________________
20 minutes into the future
This message is bra-bra-brought to you by z-z-z-zik zak
And-And-And I'm going to be back with you - on Network 23 after these real-real-real-really exciting messages

(Max Headroom)
follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC

Last edited by tusenfem; Yesterday at 07:01 AM.
tusenfem is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 07:02 AM   #4380
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 83,920
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Whilst waiting for the raft of new papers, i thought id throw this in here for context.

The comet Ceres.
Brought to you by the people of comet Earth.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:24 PM   #4381
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
stone dead tired of EC nonsense.

but if you want to know, the unusual high magnetic field is the result of a CME and CIR interacting with the induced magnetosphere of 67P
So all plasma...

Where’s the electric current?
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:30 PM   #4382
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
stone dead tired of EC nonsense.

but if you want to know, the unusual high magnetic field is the result of a CME and CIR interacting with the induced magnetosphere of 67P
So you are still comets are mostly ice then still?



And

you still hang your hat on Solar insolation as the ONLY driver of cometary activity? Where the energy come from subsurface, as Argawal was trying to figure out.

that’s what happens though when YOU are a part of the system.

How’d the water production rate correlate with the impact of CME?

Considering the post above on Ceres...




Asteroid comet continuum...seems we can add dwarf planets now to the list of continuum objects.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; Yesterday at 01:32 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:37 PM   #4383
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
stone dead tired of EC nonsense.

but if you want to know, the unusual high magnetic field is the result of a CME and CIR interacting with the induced magnetosphere of 67P
Why unusualy high?

Stock standard plasma stuff. You make it sound like some sorta big deal. It seems the general consensus here is your wasting your time. These effects are minuscule and really not worthy of discussion.

You know the old adage “there is electricity in space, it just does not do anything”

You need to find how the jets work using the only tool you have... can’t even do that.

Mission failed the model dismally.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 02:43 PM   #4384
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,500
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post

Mission failed the model dismally.
Your 'model'? Most certainly. Still a science and evidence-free zone. As it always will be.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:04 PM   #4385
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,500
Quote:
Lets discuss

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons
Go on then; quote the relevant passage/s that you think is/ are germane to the electric comet woo.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin

Last edited by jonesdave116; Yesterday at 03:05 PM.
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:09 PM   #4386
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,500
Quote:
Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase
Please quote the part that you are having trouble understanding.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:26 PM   #4387
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

More insanity about Ceres (a dwarf planet) in a thread about Sol8''s cult's electric comet insanity.

The dwarf planet Ceres is observed to be mostly rock with evidence of some water ice.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:30 PM   #4388
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual insanity of derailing from his cult's demented electric comet dogma.

No mainstream paper on comets made of ices and dust is relevant to a demented delusion of comets made of rock blasted from planets in recent times, etc.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:35 PM   #4389
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Perhaps you could tell this eejit who's been banging on for quite some time on comets having double layers in operation, on what a sheath is?
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's persistent inanity of lying about his cult's demented electric comet dogma.
That dogma has no double layers - that is his personal idiocy. Double layers are physically impossible in the turbulent environment of comet coma.
Double layer is not spelt "sheath" !
This "eejit" confirming over a decade of abysmal ignorance about what he is writing about!

Last edited by Reality Check; Yesterday at 03:39 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:45 PM   #4390
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Tusenfem's too scared to even discuss Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

tusenfem knows that is it a waste of time discussing anything with a person so ignorant and deluded that they have supported the demented electric comet dogma for over a decade despite the real world facts about comets and physics being explained to them time and time again.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:47 PM   #4391
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Usual insanity of derailing from Sol88's cult's demented electric comet dogma.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:53 PM   #4392
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual insanity of lies, insults and derailing from his cult's demented electric comet dogma.

The physical evidence from the last 70 or more years is that comets in general are mostly ices. Tempel 1 may be as little as 50% ices. 67P may be as little as 17% ices.

Sol88's insanity that Ceres (a dwarf plant) is a comet.

Last edited by Reality Check; Yesterday at 03:55 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:58 PM   #4393
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Why unusualy high?....
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual insanity of derailing from his cult's demented electric comet dogma.

Sol88's insane lie that astronomy says electric current in space does nothing.

Sol88's usual insane lie that the Rosetta mission to 67P showed that mainstream model of comets failed.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 08:38 PM   #4394
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual insanity of derailing from his cult's demented electric comet dogma.

Sol88's insane lie that astronomy says electric current in space does nothing.

Sol88's usual insane lie that the Rosetta mission to 67P showed that mainstream model of comets failed.
No, the data from Rosetta showed the complete failure of the dirtysnowball, the ONLY model mainstream have.

after all the main man, Michael F. A’Hearn once said
Quote:
(c) What are comets made of? At the simplest level, a very basic question is whether comets are mostly ice or mostly rock/dirt/refractory material. Whipple’s [2] model of the dirty snowball, the first quantitative model, envisioned cometary nuclei as mostly ice, although our understanding has been evolving more toward mostly rock, particularly for 67P/C-G for which refractory/volatile ratios as high as 6 have been cited [3,4]. Nevertheless, there is still considerable uncertainty about even this basic parameter, not least of which is that most measurements are subject to selection effects in removing refractories from the nucleus to the coma, where they are observed as dust.

Such a pity old mate hit the nail on the head!

Where the hell did the old coot get comets are mostly rock when EVERY one knows comet are mostly ice/s, as this is what the ONLY model one has.

Still, I'm glad we've got the best and brightest working on this BASIC PARAMETER... Homogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by CONSERT: implication on composition and formation
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; Yesterday at 08:45 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 08:44 PM   #4395
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Originally Posted by Lukraak_Sisser View Post
Once again here you are posting about a theory that fails to predict even the simplest parts of the observed universe while focusing on obscure and minor effects as if that makes the total failure in some way something you can gloss over.

We see electrons and protons moving trough space.
We see them moving in the same direction with the same force accelerating them.

Your 'theory' predicts that the opposite of what we observer to happen should happen.
Therefore your theory is wrong and until you somehow manage to come up with a model that would explain this glaring error there is no need to discuss anything else.

You are here again, so do you have that model?
???

Electron acceleration at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Flow pattern of accelerated cometary ions inside and outside the diamagnetic cavity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Cool, lets see how we put all this acceleration together...
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 09:10 PM   #4396
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual lies about the Rosetta mission to 67P which confirmed yet again that comets are made of ices and ices and derailing from his demented cult's electric comet dogma

Last edited by Reality Check; Yesterday at 09:12 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 09:12 PM   #4397
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual insanity of derailing from his demented cult's electric comet dogma.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 09:19 PM   #4398
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,880
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Homogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by CONSERT: implication on composition and formation
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's usual insanity of citing papers irrelevant to his demented cult's electric comet dogma.
Homogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by CONSERT: implication on composition and formation is an ices and dust comet paper.
Quote:
ABSTRACT Context. After the landing of Philae, CONSERT probed the nucleus of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P) and observed no heterogeneities at metric scale within the probed part of the small lobe of 67P. Further studies have then quantified the observed homogeneity in terms of maximum permittivity contrast versus the typical size of heterogeneities. Aims. The aim of this article is to interpret the sensitivity limits of CONSERT measurements in terms of composition, and to provide constraints on the maximum variability in composition, porosity, and local dust-to-ice ratio. Methods. The sensitivity of CONSERT measurements to local variations in density, dust-to-ice ratio, and composition was analyzed using permittivity modeling of mixtures. Results. We interpret the maximum detectable heterogeneity size and contrast in terms of composition and porosity of the nucleus. The sensitivity to porosity is �10 percent points for heterogeneities with a characteristic length scale of a few meters; the sensitivity to local variations in the composition is limited. Conclusions. In terms of accretion, our results are compatible only with scenarios generating porosity heterogeneities at scales lower than one meter, or with porosity variations smaller than �10 percent points. This is clearly compatible with an accretion model of a gentle gravitational collapse of a pebble cloud
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:19 PM   #4399
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,593
Quote:
This is clearly compatible with an accretion model of a gentle gravitational collapse of a pebble cloud
Great, where did the pebbles come from?

Glad mainstream have made another confirmation of the ELECTRIC COMET!
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; Yesterday at 11:23 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:29 PM   #4400
tusenfem
Master Poster
 
tusenfem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,468
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
So you are still comets are mostly ice then still?



And

you still hang your hat on Solar insolation as the ONLY driver of cometary activity? Where the energy come from subsurface, as Argawal was trying to figure out.

that’s what happens though when YOU are a part of the system.

How’d the water production rate correlate with the impact of CME?

Considering the post above on Ceres...




Asteroid comet continuum...seems we can add dwarf planets now to the list of continuum objects.
These are your claims, do not put those on "you".
__________________
20 minutes into the future
This message is bra-bra-brought to you by z-z-z-zik zak
And-And-And I'm going to be back with you - on Network 23 after these real-real-real-really exciting messages

(Max Headroom)
follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC
tusenfem is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.