ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 6th September 2019, 01:03 PM   #1
Checkmite
Skepticifimisticalationist
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 24,163
DoJ launches antitrust investigation against car companies who defied Trump

The Trump administration recently announced that it would remove or weaken air-pollution-limiting standards for new automobiles. In response, auto companies Ford, Honda, Volkswagen, and BMW, announced an agreement with the state of California in which they would continue to make vehicles by the existing Obama-era standards, which include continuing reduction of emissions thresholds over time.

As a result, the Trump administration has launched an antitrust investigation against those four automakers, as it challenges California's right to set higher emissions standards than the federal executive dictates.

This is fascism.
__________________
"¿WHAT KIND OF BIRD?
¿A PARANORMAL BIRD?"
--- Carlos S., 2002
Checkmite is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th September 2019, 01:08 PM   #2
Dr. Keith
Not a doctor.
 
Dr. Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,934
So pro-business that sometimes, just to show his love, he has to hurt them.

But they have to understand that it truly hurts them more than it hurts him.
__________________
Suffering is not a punishment not a fruit of sin, it is a gift of God.
He allows us to share in His suffering and to make up for the sins of the world. -Mother Teresa

If I had a pet panda I would name it Snowflake.
Dr. Keith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th September 2019, 01:16 PM   #3
Thermal
Philosopher
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Currently Dismembered
Posts: 8,122
Aren't Republicans supposed to be big on state's rights?
__________________
"Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th September 2019, 02:09 PM   #4
Dr. Keith
Not a doctor.
 
Dr. Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,934
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Aren't Republicans supposed to be big on state's rights?
Even they know that "state's rights" is just fig leaf for slavery and racial discrimination.
__________________
Suffering is not a punishment not a fruit of sin, it is a gift of God.
He allows us to share in His suffering and to make up for the sins of the world. -Mother Teresa

If I had a pet panda I would name it Snowflake.
Dr. Keith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th September 2019, 05:14 PM   #5
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Would it be antitrust if they did discuss it?
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th September 2019, 05:29 PM   #6
Checkmite
Skepticifimisticalationist
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 24,163
I don't think so.

I might be wrong about my analysis, but the Trump administration appears to be wanting to argue that if California sets higher anti-pollution standards than the rest of the country, it would be anti-competitive for companies to choose to make automobiles meeting that standard, since they will be able to sell their vehicles in California and other automakers who don't meet the standard will not. But this is incredibly absurd, it essentially argues any company that follows any government manufacturing regulation is being anti-competitive against other companies that would like to make a product but don't want to follow regulatory standards to do it.
__________________
"¿WHAT KIND OF BIRD?
¿A PARANORMAL BIRD?"
--- Carlos S., 2002

Last edited by Checkmite; 6th September 2019 at 05:31 PM.
Checkmite is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th September 2019, 05:44 PM   #7
Stacyhs
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 8,813
By all means, Donald, this air is just getting too damn clean! And we all know we just can't trust what we can't see with our own eyes! How I long for the days when I could walk outside and see what I was breathing. Make America Smoggy Again!
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 01:49 AM   #8
Squeegee Beckenheim
Penultimate Amazing
 
Squeegee Beckenheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 25,298
Small government.
__________________
I don't trust atoms. They make up everything.
Squeegee Beckenheim is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 03:54 AM   #9
Norman Alexander
Philosopher
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,055
He can say what he likes, he's now irrelevant. They are ignoring him now and will still ignore him afterwards.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 10:17 AM   #10
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,161
Originally Posted by Dr. Keith View Post
So pro-business that sometimes, just to show his love, he has to hurt them.

But they have to understand that it truly hurts them more than it hurts him.
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Aren't Republicans supposed to be big on state's rights?
Originally Posted by Squeegee Beckenheim View Post
Small government.
Can anyone come up with a principle of the Republican Party that the Republican Party hasn’t completely abandoned?

Because I’m drawing a blank.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 10:26 AM   #11
Thermal
Philosopher
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Currently Dismembered
Posts: 8,122
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Can anyone come up with a principle of the Republican Party that the Republican Party hasn’t completely abandoned?

Because I’m drawing a blank.
Tax breaks for the wealthy
__________________
"Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 10:39 AM   #12
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Originally Posted by Checkmite View Post
I don't think so.

I might be wrong about my analysis, but the Trump administration appears to be wanting to argue that if California sets higher anti-pollution standards than the rest of the country, it would be anti-competitive for companies to choose to make automobiles meeting that standard, since they will be able to sell their vehicles in California and other automakers who don't meet the standard will not. But this is incredibly absurd, it essentially argues any company that follows any government manufacturing regulation is being anti-competitive against other companies that would like to make a product but don't want to follow regulatory standards to do it.
From the guardian I am reading this

Quote:
In July, four automakers — Ford Motor Company, Volkswagen of America, Honda and BMW — announced that they had reached an agreement in principle with California on emissions standards stricter than those being sought by the White House.
On the surface, four automakers discussed and agreed to a strategy to all make more expensive cars and that the others will not cheat on the deal and sell a cheaper one.

That is a surface description of an anti trust violation.
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 02:01 PM   #13
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,395
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
From the guardian I am reading this



On the surface, four automakers discussed and agreed to a strategy to all make more expensive cars and that the others will not cheat on the deal and sell a cheaper one.

That is a surface description of an anti trust violation.
No, it isn't. An anti trust violation is when a group of businesses team up or form a monopoly in order to dictate pricing in a particular market. For example, if the four companies were to make identical or near identical cars and agree to sell them all for the same price in, say California, but then sold them in Florida at a substantially cheaper price in order to undercut a fifth car maker who was not part of the group, then that would be a breach of anti-trust.

Another example would be where a "Widget Franchise" was selling widgets for a certain price nationwide, but then set up shop across the road from a Mom & Pop Widget Store (who are selling the same widgets), and sold them at a substantially lower price only in that shop and not in the rest of the country in order to undercut Mom & Pop and put them out of business.

NONE of this is happening here. These car makers are teaming up to make a better, more environmentally sound car.
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 02:06 PM   #14
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
No, it isn't. An anti trust violation is when a group of businesses team up or form a monopoly in order to dictate pricing in a particular market. For example, if the four companies were to make identical or near identical cars and agree to sell them all for the same price in, say California, but then sold them in Florida at a substantially cheaper price in order to undercut a fifth car maker who was not part of the group, then that would be a breach of anti-trust.

Another example would be where a "Widget Franchise" was selling widgets for a certain price nationwide, but then set up shop across the road from a Mom & Pop Widget Store (who are selling the same widgets), and sold them at a substantially lower price only in that shop and not in the rest of the country in order to undercut Mom & Pop and put them out of business.

NONE of this is happening here. These car makers are teaming up to make a better, more environmentally sound car.
Sounds like they teamed up to make a worse car.than what consumers would want.

4 different competitors meeting to coordinate their products sounds anti competitive. Like a cartel.
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 02:19 PM   #15
Whip
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,464
Originally Posted by Checkmite View Post
I don't think so.

I might be wrong about my analysis, but the Trump administration appears to be wanting to argue that if California sets higher anti-pollution standards than the rest of the country, it would be anti-competitive for companies to choose to make automobiles meeting that standard, since they will be able to sell their vehicles in California and other automakers who don't meet the standard will not. But this is incredibly absurd, it essentially argues any company that follows any government manufacturing regulation is being anti-competitive against other companies that would like to make a product but don't want to follow regulatory standards to do it.
This happens already. Even with power equipment. There are mower engines, for example, that can be sold in 49 states but not California.
Whip is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 02:23 PM   #16
Whip
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,464
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
Sounds like they teamed up to make a worse car.than what consumers would want.

4 different competitors meeting to coordinate their products sounds anti competitive. Like a cartel.
Car performance with tighter emission controls now perform leaps and bounds better than anything from the 70s. And that's what consumers wanted.
Whip is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 02:50 PM   #17
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Originally Posted by Whip View Post
Car performance with tighter emission controls now perform leaps and bounds better than anything from the 70s. And that's what consumers wanted.
And that could be the conclusion of the DoJ.

But that does address that they conspired together.

Last edited by BobTheCoward; 7th September 2019 at 02:51 PM.
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 02:55 PM   #18
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,932
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Can anyone come up with a principle of the Republican Party that the Republican Party hasn’t completely abandoned?

Because I’m drawing a blank.
Trolling the Democratic Party. It's been their only principle since roughly the late 90s.
__________________
- "Ernest Hemingway once wrote that the world is a fine place and worth fighting for. I agree with the second part." - Detective Sommerset
- "Stupidity does not cancel out stupidity to yield genius. It breeds like a bucket-full of coked out hamsters." - The Oatmeal
- "To the best of my knowledge the only thing philosophy has ever proven is that Descartes could think." - SMBC
JoeMorgue is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 06:23 PM   #19
Armitage72
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,180
Originally Posted by Whip View Post
This happens already. Even with power equipment. There are mower engines, for example, that can be sold in 49 states but not California.

The company that I work for has products that we don't sell in California because we don't want to put the Proposition 65 warning on our labels or create one label for California and another label for everywhere else.
Armitage72 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 07:57 PM   #20
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,395
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
And that could be the conclusion of the DoJ.

But that does address that they conspired together.
co-operating to make a better car is not "conspiring"
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th September 2019, 09:42 PM   #21
Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
 
Puppycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 23,757
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
Would it be antitrust if they did discuss it?
If they're only discussing emissions standards and not prices, I don't see how.
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
Puppycow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 05:26 AM   #22
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Originally Posted by Puppycow View Post
If they're only discussing emissions standards and not prices, I don't see how.
Is anti competition law restricted to price?
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 12:45 PM   #23
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,395
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
Is anti competition law restricted to price?
No its not, but the fact is that what these car companies are doing does not breach any of the three anti trust laws.

The Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 USC § 1) is intended to prevent unreasonable "contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade," and "monopolization attempted monopolization or conspiracy or combination to monopolize." Violations against the Sherman Anti-Trust Act can have severe consequences, with fines of up to $100 million for corporations and $1 million for individuals, as well as prison terms up to 10 years.

The Clayton Antitrust Act (15 USC § 12) addresses specific practices that the Sherman Anti-Trust Act may not address. According to the FTC, these include preventing mergers and acquisitions that may "substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly," preventing discriminatory prices, services and allowances in dealings between merchants, requiring large firms to notify the government of possible mergers and acquisitions, and imbuing private parties with the right to sue for triple damages when they have been harmed by conduct that violates the Sherman and Clayton acts, as well as allowing the victims to obtain court orders to prohibit further future transgressions..

The Federal Trade Commission Act (15 USC § 41) bans "unfair methods of competition" and "unfair or deceptive acts or practices." According to the Supreme Court, violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act also violate the Federal Trade Commission Act. Therefore, even though the FTC cannot technically enforce the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, it can bring cases under the FTC Act against violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/ans...antitrust-laws

The car companies concerned have agreed between them to manufacture cars to a higher emissions standard than the Federal Government requires - i.e. to make more environmentally sound cars. They have agreed not to undercut each other by making cheap, environmentally unsound cars. That is well within the bounds of the Law and within their legal rights. What they can't to is act as a group to prevent other car manufacturers from making and selling cheap cars, and they have not done that.

Trump has ordered his lap dog, Bill Barr, to start an investigation because he has got his panties in a bunch over California defying his anti-ecology, climate change-denying policies.
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !

Last edited by smartcooky; 8th September 2019 at 12:54 PM.
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 01:02 PM   #24
Norman Alexander
Philosopher
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,055
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Trump has ordered his lap dog, Bill Barr, to start an investigation because he has got his panties in a bunch over California defying his anti-ecology, climate change-denying policies.
<trumpbrain>
Trump has his (amazing, generous) panties in a bunch because these car companies have defied the express wishes of the King of the USA, and they must be punished with evil punishments. So Sir Brutus the villainous Sheriff has been told to make a cunning plan to make them unpopular on TV, the ultimate threat.
</trumpbrain>
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 01:21 PM   #25
Minoosh
Philosopher
 
Minoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,654
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
And that could be the conclusion of the DoJ.

But that does address that they conspired together.
If that is the case, how could there ever be such a thing as an "industry standard"?

This is bogus. The four carmakers are simply taking advantage of their private property rights. They want to be able to sell cars in California. They don't have anything like a monopoly going on. Are they supposed to retool? Write off California as a customer?

If one company made this business decision independently and others followed suit there doesn't have to be any collusion involved.

This is pure harassment.

ETA: But I'm happy to see this DoJ wasting resources on stupid investigations.

Last edited by Minoosh; 8th September 2019 at 01:25 PM.
Minoosh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 01:27 PM   #26
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Originally Posted by Minoosh View Post
If that is the case, how could there ever be such a thing as an "industry standard"?

.
Maybe we find out there can't be
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 01:36 PM   #27
Minoosh
Philosopher
 
Minoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,654
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
Maybe we find out there can't be
I doubt if there's going to be an investigation at all. Trump just like to announce things, after which he loses interest.

And there's no doubt in my mind this directive came from Trump. He'll do anything just to stick it to California.
Minoosh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 01:47 PM   #28
Cavemonster
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,633
Originally Posted by Dr. Keith View Post
Even they know that "state's rights" is just fig leaf for slavery and racial discrimination.
That is horrendously unfair.

It also covers oppressing gay people, and squashing women's reproductive choices.
__________________
The weakness of all Utopias is this, ... They first assume that no man will want more than his share, and then are very ingenious in explaining whether his share will be delivered by motorcar or balloon.
-G.K. CHESTERTON
Cavemonster is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 05:30 PM   #29
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,395
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
Maybe we find out there can't be
Right.

At first, I gave you the benefit of the doubt. I thought you were (for once) entering into a genuine debate. Silly me.

This post makes it clear that you are not, and that you are simply trying to "Bob" yet another thread.

I am no longer going to engage with you in this thread.
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 05:39 PM   #30
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,516
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Right.

At first, I gave you the benefit of the doubt. I thought you were (for once) entering into a genuine debate. Silly me.

This post makes it clear that you are not, and that you are simply trying to "Bob" yet another thread.

I am no longer going to engage with you in this thread.
It was sarcasm
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 06:11 PM   #31
Whip
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,464
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Right.

At first, I gave you the benefit of the doubt. I thought you were (for once) entering into a genuine debate. Silly me.

This post makes it clear that you are not, and that you are simply trying to "Bob" yet another thread.

I am no longer going to engage with you in this thread.
lol. yeah.....I was right there next to you.
Whip is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th September 2019, 06:12 PM   #32
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,932
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
It was sarcasm
Oh sod off at high speed in any possible direction.
__________________
- "Ernest Hemingway once wrote that the world is a fine place and worth fighting for. I agree with the second part." - Detective Sommerset
- "Stupidity does not cancel out stupidity to yield genius. It breeds like a bucket-full of coked out hamsters." - The Oatmeal
- "To the best of my knowledge the only thing philosophy has ever proven is that Descartes could think." - SMBC
JoeMorgue is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2019, 03:53 PM   #33
Dr. Keith
Not a doctor.
 
Dr. Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,934
Originally Posted by Armitage72 View Post
The company that I work for has products that we don't sell in California because we don't want to put the Proposition 65 warning on our labels or create one label for California and another label for everywhere else.
There are distribution centers that will add the additional labels for a pittance. Over labeling is quite common for Prop 65, though the new safe harbor makes it a bit harder.
__________________
Suffering is not a punishment not a fruit of sin, it is a gift of God.
He allows us to share in His suffering and to make up for the sins of the world. -Mother Teresa

If I had a pet panda I would name it Snowflake.
Dr. Keith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2019, 03:54 PM   #34
Dr. Keith
Not a doctor.
 
Dr. Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,934
Originally Posted by Cavemonster View Post
That is horrendously unfair.

It also covers oppressing gay people, and squashing women's reproductive choices.
Mea culpa. Thank you for the appropriate correction.
__________________
Suffering is not a punishment not a fruit of sin, it is a gift of God.
He allows us to share in His suffering and to make up for the sins of the world. -Mother Teresa

If I had a pet panda I would name it Snowflake.
Dr. Keith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2019, 03:55 PM   #35
Dr. Keith
Not a doctor.
 
Dr. Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,934
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
At first, I gave you the benefit of the doubt. I thought you were (for once) entering into a genuine debate.
If you keep that up my list gets longer, that's all I'm saying.
__________________
Suffering is not a punishment not a fruit of sin, it is a gift of God.
He allows us to share in His suffering and to make up for the sins of the world. -Mother Teresa

If I had a pet panda I would name it Snowflake.
Dr. Keith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2019, 04:01 PM   #36
Dr. Keith
Not a doctor.
 
Dr. Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,934
Originally Posted by Checkmite View Post
I don't think so.

I might be wrong about my analysis, but the Trump administration appears to be wanting to argue that if California sets higher anti-pollution standards than the rest of the country, it would be anti-competitive for companies to choose to make automobiles meeting that standard, since they will be able to sell their vehicles in California and other automakers who don't meet the standard will not. But this is incredibly absurd, it essentially argues any company that follows any government manufacturing regulation is being anti-competitive against other companies that would like to make a product but don't want to follow regulatory standards to do it.
He is mad about that, but I don't think that is the anti-trust claim they are making. The anti-trust claims is that they are colluding by all agreeing to meet the California standards thus depriving the market of products that the market wants and therefore . . . sorry, I can't even ******** this. I have no idea how an attorney works for Trump.

Two problems:

1. The carmakers want the stricter standards in the US because that makes it easier to platform share with products they develop for the rest of the world.

2. There are several states that follow the California standards, so it isn't like they could just have a 49 state car and a Cali version as they once did. This isn't Prop65 where the rest of the country is like "nope don't want that BS." This is a set of rules other states have adopted.
__________________
Suffering is not a punishment not a fruit of sin, it is a gift of God.
He allows us to share in His suffering and to make up for the sins of the world. -Mother Teresa

If I had a pet panda I would name it Snowflake.
Dr. Keith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th September 2019, 04:59 PM   #37
Stacyhs
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 8,813
All of you are forgetting on thing: Trump is an environmentalist. People don't know that.
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th September 2019, 03:40 AM   #38
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 18,639
Originally Posted by Stacyhs View Post
All of you are forgetting on thing: Trump is an environmentalist. People don't know that.
He's the best environmentalist ever, he knows so much move about the environment that all of the environmental scientists, just like he knows more about the weather than any meteorologist!
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)

PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th September 2019, 04:25 AM   #39
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 84,559
Originally Posted by Checkmite View Post
I don't think so.

I might be wrong about my analysis, but the Trump administration appears to be wanting to argue that if California sets higher anti-pollution standards than the rest of the country, it would be anti-competitive for companies to choose to make automobiles meeting that standard, since they will be able to sell their vehicles in California and other automakers who don't meet the standard will not. But this is incredibly absurd, it essentially argues any company that follows any government manufacturing regulation is being anti-competitive against other companies that would like to make a product but don't want to follow regulatory standards to do it.
Yeah, let's just say that the GOP have been pretty clear that the rules only apply when it's beneficial to them.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th September 2019, 04:28 AM   #40
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 84,559
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
Trolling the Democratic Party. It's been their only principle since roughly the late 90s.
In that case the GOP no longer serves any purpose.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.