IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 15th October 2017, 10:49 AM   #1
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Culture war and USA politics

The world I experience every day is a secular one. I watch nerdy youtube videos about science or debunking religious claims. I read HuffingtonPost, Slate and various other secular type publications.

I happened to be driving somebody else's car and the radio was tuned to a holy roller station and then I happened on another one. It really struck me how large the gap is between people like me and the religious true believers. It is hard to imagine how these people would ever vote for somebody that isn't pandering to their beliefs.

Michelle Bachman says that Trump is now a true Christian that prays to God for help. That strikes me as an incredible lie or incredible gullibility on her part and yet I suspect there are millions of people that believe this. I have thought for a long time that people are largely born skeptical or not. If that is so the coalition of racists and religious fundamentalists that got Trump elected seems almost unassailable. The religious fundamentalists are being skillfully manipulated by cynical people and I don't see how that will change.

It is conceivable, that the changing US population demographics and more enthusiasm for voting by the younger folks might help. It looks like the legal challenges to gerrymandering might succeed. It is also possible that the secular economic conservatives will continue to leave the Republican Party as it becomes increasingly a fundamentalist driven organization.

Before that happens I hope the US hasn't killed millions of people because it is led by a psychopathic buffoon. There is a reasonable chance now that if Trump succeeds in starting disastrous trade wars, and dismantling the social safety net that hundreds of thousands of people will suffer. Racism will certainly continue to expand as his racist rhetoric continues to enable racists and racist ideas.

When I was a kid I wondered why something like Hitler couldn't happen in the US. I think we are getting a real education now about how that could happen here.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 11:22 AM   #2
C_Felix
Master Poster
 
C_Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Just outside Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,953
You're dealing with people who believe there is legislation somewhere delineating the US as a Christian nation.
__________________
Eqinsu Ocha!
Eqinsu Ocha!
C_Felix is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 12:32 PM   #3
Lurch
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,530
While growing up and learning history, I used to marvel at and almost quake in fear over the kinds of intolerance that some societies would descend to. The Spanish Inquisition was one such. Another was the episode of the witch trials in early America. There was the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. Hitler and company. And the list goes on...

All it takes is just a small, critical mass of zealots to screw everything up. I hope the current crop of American fundies can have their grasping hands kept off the levers of power. But I despair of the continuing draining of reason and increase in ignorance amongst the populace, and the rapidly growing polarization in society.

Something must be done to nip this in the bud.

It would appear Trump sees as his opportunity to unify under his flag the fomenting of war abroad.
Lurch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 12:56 PM   #4
Darth Rotor
Salted Sith Cynic
 
Darth Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 38,527
Roger Williams, a founder of the colony that would become the state of Rhode Island, would probably find Lurch's post amusing for a different reason.
Quote:
Roger Williams (c. 21 December 1603 – between 27 January and 15 March 1683)[1] was a Puritan, an English Reformed theologian, and later a Reformed Baptist who was expelled by the Puritan leaders from the colony of Massachusetts because local officials thought that he was spreading "new and dangerous ideas" to his congregants. Williams fled the Massachusetts colony under the threat of impending arrest and shipment to an English prison; he began the settlement of Providence Plantation in 1636 as a refuge offering freedom of conscience.
When I was in elementary school, his dispute with the Puritans in Massachusetts, and his eventual decision to move elsewhere, was used as an illustration in why freedom of religion (which I suspect Williams would have termed freedom of conscience) is a core American belief/value...which lesson usually merged into First Amendment issues.

Once you take a particular position, it becomes easy to vilify anyone who is not in your camp, Lurch.

I am with davefoc on his concern about President Trump likely getting the US involved in ruinous trade wars. No good can come of that, as I see it.
__________________
Helicopters don't so much fly as beat the air into submission.
"Jesus wept, but did He laugh?"--F.H. Buckley____"There is one thing that was too great for God to show us when He walked upon our earth ... His mirth." --Chesterton__"If the barbarian in us is excised, so is our humanity."--D'rok__ "I only use my gun whenever kindness fails."-- Robert Earl Keen__"Sturgeon spares none.". -- The Marquis

Last edited by Darth Rotor; 15th October 2017 at 12:59 PM.
Darth Rotor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 01:10 PM   #5
sir drinks-a-lot
Philosopher
 
sir drinks-a-lot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cole Valley, CA
Posts: 5,335
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
The world I experience every day is a secular one. I watch nerdy youtube videos about science or debunking religious claims. I read HuffingtonPost, Slate and various other secular type publications.

I happened to be driving somebody else's car and the radio was tuned to a holy roller station and then I happened on another one. It really struck me how large the gap is between people like me and the religious true believers. It is hard to imagine how these people would ever vote for somebody that isn't pandering to their beliefs.

Michelle Bachman says that Trump is now a true Christian that prays to God for help. That strikes me as an incredible lie or incredible gullibility on her part and yet I suspect there are millions of people that believe this. I have thought for a long time that people are largely born skeptical or not. If that is so the coalition of racists and religious fundamentalists that got Trump elected seems almost unassailable. The religious fundamentalists are being skillfully manipulated by cynical people and I don't see how that will change.

It is conceivable, that the changing US population demographics and more enthusiasm for voting by the younger folks might help. It looks like the legal challenges to gerrymandering might succeed. It is also possible that the secular economic conservatives will continue to leave the Republican Party as it becomes increasingly a fundamentalist driven organization.

Before that happens I hope the US hasn't killed millions of people because it is led by a psychopathic buffoon. There is a reasonable chance now that if Trump succeeds in starting disastrous trade wars, and dismantling the social safety net that hundreds of thousands of people will suffer. Racism will certainly continue to expand as his racist rhetoric continues to enable racists and racist ideas.

When I was a kid I wondered why something like Hitler couldn't happen in the US. I think we are getting a real education now about how that could happen here.
I think you need to take a break from the MSM. It sounds like you've drank a pitcher full of kool-aid and are not thinking clearly.

The last couple of lines are especially untethered from reality.
__________________
So, if he's doing it by divine means, I can only tell him this: 'Mr. Geller, you're doing it the hard way.' --James Randi
sir drinks-a-lot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 01:18 PM   #6
mikado
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,932
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
The world I experience every day is a secular one. I watch nerdy youtube videos about science or debunking religious claims. I read HuffingtonPost, Slate and various other secular type publications.

I happened to be driving somebody else's car and the radio was tuned to a holy roller station and then I happened on another one. It really struck me how large the gap is between people like me and the religious true believers. It is hard to imagine how these people would ever vote for somebody that isn't pandering to their beliefs.

Michelle Bachman says that Trump is now a true Christian that prays to God for help. That strikes me as an incredible lie or incredible gullibility on her part and yet I suspect there are millions of people that believe this. I have thought for a long time that people are largely born skeptical or not. If that is so the coalition of racists and religious fundamentalists that got Trump elected seems almost unassailable. The religious fundamentalists are being skillfully manipulated by cynical people and I don't see how that will change.

It is conceivable, that the changing US population demographics and more enthusiasm for voting by the younger folks might help. It looks like the legal challenges to gerrymandering might succeed. It is also possible that the secular economic conservatives will continue to leave the Republican Party as it becomes increasingly a fundamentalist driven organization.

Before that happens I hope the US hasn't killed millions of people because it is led by a psychopathic buffoon. There is a reasonable chance now that if Trump succeeds in starting disastrous trade wars, and dismantling the social safety net that hundreds of thousands of people will suffer. Racism will certainly continue to expand as his racist rhetoric continues to enable racists and racist ideas.

When I was a kid I wondered why something like Hitler couldn't happen in the US. I think we are getting a real education now about how that could happen here.
Couldn't agree more, it could happen so so easily......
__________________
member formally known as Renmarkable.
mikado is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 01:20 PM   #7
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
When one speculates like I have here there is a kind of catch-22 conundrum that is hard to deal with. The same confirmation biases that drive the fundamentalists to listen to sources that support their beliefs are the same mechanisms that lead skeptics to listen to sources that support their beliefs.

It is almost by definition of one's humanness that one will be mislead by his confirmation biases and self interest biases. How is it even possible for people to make a reasonable stab at identifying truth when our brains reward us relentlessly when we hear stuff we agree with?

This is off the topic sort of, but I think it goes to the idea that we need to at least consider the possibility that we are doing something similar to what the true believers do. And just like them what we think of as logically arrived at views may really just be arrived at because on our biases.

Darth Rotor: Thanks for the comment about free trade. I thought Sanders ideas on this were just about as problematic as Trump's. So were Clinton's but I was sure she was lying. The difference may be that Sanders might have been more amenable to discussion and analysis. Trump's sudden imposition of timber tariffs really goes to what an ******* he is (I assume the preceding pejorative is going to be blanked with asterisks, isn't it time this forum stopped that stuff?) when he caused the cost of timber and thereby the cost of housing to take a sudden jump and at the same time he screwed the Canadians.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 01:23 PM   #8
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
When I was a kid I wondered why something like Hitler couldn't happen in the US. I think we are getting a real education now about how that could happen here.
Yeah, no. No we are not getting any such education. Trump doesn't resemble Hitler. And I don't just mean that he doesn't want to commit genocide. Trump has no actual ideology. That is in stark contrast to the actual mass-murdering dictators of history. Voters who supported Trump therefore did not do it because of an attraction to an ideology. Some of his supporters have their own ideologies which they might hope he will advance, but there is no real unification around any of them. This is far more a result of a repulsion to an ideology (namely, modern progressivism). That impulse is not coherent enough to do anything like produce a Hitler.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 01:26 PM   #9
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by sir drinks-a-lot View Post
I think you need to take a break from the MSM. It sounds like you've drank a pitcher full of kool-aid and are not thinking clearly.

The last couple of lines are especially untethered from reality.
Very possibly, but I find posts that contain arguments and facts more persuasive than posts that tell me I am wrong in some non-specific way.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 01:47 PM   #10
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Yeah, no. No we are not getting any such education. Trump doesn't resemble Hitler. And I don't just mean that he doesn't want to commit genocide. Trump has no actual ideology. That is in stark contrast to the actual mass-murdering dictators of history. Voters who supported Trump therefore did not do it because of an attraction to an ideology. Some of his supporters have their own ideologies which they might hope he will advance, but there is no real unification around any of them. This is far more a result of a repulsion to an ideology (namely, modern progressivism). That impulse is not coherent enough to do anything like produce a Hitler.
I'm glad to have some disagreement on this point. My general sense of the situation is that you are largely correct here. However, Trump's actions are almost entirely driven by what he thinks will appeal to his base and what will enhance his self interest. He likes to go to his rallies and listen to the cheering crowd. And a good portion of the people at them are either overt or subtle racists and he relentlessly panders to them by failing to criticize white supremacists and Nazis and by repeated dog whistles like his criticism of Mexicans and his recent racist BS about how Puerto Ricans aren't working to help themselves and how he's going to withdraw federal support.

It is interesting that Trump's administration seems to consider white Judaism and white Christianity as particularly good groups while everybody else that isn't in those groups are subject to criticism. But I'm not so sure how Jews would fare in a world dominated by Christian fundamentalists. Trump's use of memes from anti-Jewish hate groups and his failing to criticize Nazis makes me suspicious of Trumpism's inclusion of Jews in the especially good group in the long run.

One last comment on this: Trump does not have dictatorial powers. I think it is almost certain that free speech would be a thing of the past if he did. I think he would engage in torture and he would brutalize his political opponents. Trump is a man without empathy or ethics. The argument that a comparison of him to Hitler is not valid stems entirely on the fact that as I write this, Congress, the traditions of our military leaders and the Supreme court still stand. And it is certainly conceivable that some of those institutions could turn. Republicans are largely sitting silent while a nut job runs the country. How far beyond their silence and acquiescence are they prepared to go?

ETA: I should have acknowledged the comment that Trump would not engage in mass murder. I think he might. Mao Tse Tung didn't start out to kill of millions of his people with mass starvation, but when his policies led to this he stayed in power with brutality and murder. I think Trump would do exactly that. Would Trump engage in mass murder if he thought he could further win the hearts and minds of his base? I think he might. Right now I don't think most of his base would be up for it, but some part of it would figure out how to rationalize it.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb

Last edited by davefoc; 15th October 2017 at 01:56 PM.
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:15 PM   #11
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by sir drinks-a-lot View Post
I think you need to take a break from the MSM. It sounds like you've drank a pitcher full of kool-aid and are not thinking clearly.

The last couple of lines are especially untethered from reality.
You don't think a Hitler could happen here?
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:21 PM   #12
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
It is interesting that Trump's administration seems to consider white Judaism and white Christianity as particularly good groups while everybody else that isn't in those groups are subject to criticism. But I'm not so sure how Jews would fare in a world dominated by Christian fundamentalists.
Who actually represents a threat to Jews in the US? It isn't fundamentalist Christians, it's actually radical leftists. There are certainly some right-wing antisemites, but they're far more fringe, far more marginalized, far less influential than the left-wing antisemites.

Quote:
ETA: I should have acknowledged the comment that Trump would not engage in mass murder. I think he might. Mao Tse Tung didn't start out to kill of millions of his people with mass starvation, but when his policies led to this he stayed in power with brutality and murder.
The fact that Mao didn't start off with mass murder isn't relevant. From the very beginning, he subscribed to an ideology that explicitly endorsed and practiced it. Trump has made no similar identification.

Quote:
Would Trump engage in mass murder if he thought he could further win the hearts and minds of his base? I think he might.
Perhaps, but you don't have any actual evidence pointing to it. He is not the equivalent of Mao. Again, he has no ideology. And you need an ideology if you want to commit your followers to a path of such horrors, because nothing else can motivate people to commit atrocities on so vast a scale.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:22 PM   #13
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Yeah, no. No we are not getting any such education. Trump doesn't resemble Hitler. And I don't just mean that he doesn't want to commit genocide. Trump has no actual ideology. That is in stark contrast to the actual mass-murdering dictators of history. Voters who supported Trump therefore did not do it because of an attraction to an ideology. Some of his supporters have their own ideologies which they might hope he will advance, but there is no real unification around any of them. This is far more a result of a repulsion to an ideology (namely, modern progressivism). That impulse is not coherent enough to do anything like produce a Hitler.
when you're talking about a narcissist leader killing millions, does it matter if he's calculating like Hitler or a moron like trump?
I don't think the people who suffer under those types care either way.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:24 PM   #14
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
You don't think a Hitler could happen here?
Who knows what the future brings. But it won't happen with Trump.

"The dark night of fascism is always descending in the United States and yet lands only in Europe." Although that's wrong, it has also landed in Asia.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:26 PM   #15
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
when you're talking about a narcissist leader killing millions, does it matter if he's calculating like Hitler or a moron like trump?
It's not about calculations. It's about beliefs. Hitler didn't kill 6 million jews himself. He convinced other people to do it for him. And he did so through ideology. No matter how calculating or stupid Trump is, he cannot command similar loyalty, because (again) he has no ideology.

This is no minor detail. It is at the heart of the matter. And nobody advancing the silly notion that Trump could be another Hitler has ever come to terms with it.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:35 PM   #16
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Who knows what the future brings. But it won't happen with Trump.

"The dark night of fascism is always descending in the United States and yet lands only in Europe." Although that's wrong, it has also landed in Asia.
Yea, it'll never happen here till it does.

It's a different world. We don't have vast oceans protecting us from our enemies anymore. They don't matter.

Our biggest adversary just installed their president.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:38 PM   #17
novaphile
Quester of Doglets
 
novaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sunny South Australia
Posts: 6,799
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
... I have thought for a long time that people are largely born skeptical or not.
Sorry to dip into such a small part of your well thought out post.

The above, looks like a flat tautology, and therefore doesn't add much. If you mean that people are fixed into their initial state, I'd beg to differ.

I can tell you that I was utterly gullible as a small child, and have very clear memories of being "sucked in" by all kinds of ********.

My path to skepticism was long and painful.

At a fairly early age I realised that religious instruction was just bat poo crazy, but it took me a long time to reject all the other woo in the world.
__________________
We would be better, and braver, to engage in enquiry, rather than indulge in the idle fancy, that we already know -- Plato.
novaphile is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:45 PM   #18
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
It's not about calculations. It's about beliefs. Hitler didn't kill 6 million jews himself. He convinced other people to do it for him. And he did so through ideology. No matter how calculating or stupid Trump is, he cannot command similar loyalty, because (again) he has no ideology.

This is no minor detail. It is at the heart of the matter. And nobody advancing the silly notion that Trump could be another Hitler has ever come to terms with it.

Of course he can command loyalty. He's the *********** president!

There are a LOT of morons in this country it seems.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:48 PM   #19
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
Of course he can command loyalty. He's the *********** president!

There are a LOT of morons in this country it seems.
Have you paid ANY attention to the white house drama? The constant leaks? No. Trump cannot command much loyalty at all.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:49 PM   #20
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
Yea, it'll never happen here till it does.

It's a different world. We don't have vast oceans protecting us from our enemies anymore. They don't matter.

Our biggest adversary just installed their president.
The sky is falling!

Except it isn't.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:54 PM   #21
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Have you paid ANY attention to the white house drama? The constant leaks? No. Trump cannot command much loyalty at all.
All it'll take is one jihad loving twit killing a few in spectacular fashion and the coal rolling moron contingent will do whatever dear leader wants.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:55 PM   #22
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,383
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
When one speculates like I have here there is a kind of catch-22 conundrum that is hard to deal with. The same confirmation biases that drive the fundamentalists to listen to sources that support their beliefs are the same mechanisms that lead skeptics to listen to sources that support their beliefs....
Just to address this false equivalence, what would you suggest skeptics listen to to maintain a balanced POV?

It's like claiming science is just a different religion. I'm willing to change my POV when evidence is presented supporting an alternative. I do always keep it in the back of my mind that I, like everyone else, have flaws in how I perceive my reality. But evidence based conclusions are closer to reality than other-based conclusions.


On the 'it can happen here' note, the second Nazi rally in Charlottesville was very poorly attended. And trump is losing his base by slow attrition. It will be interesting to see if the Bannon/Breitbart movement grows much impact.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 15th October 2017 at 03:59 PM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 03:58 PM   #23
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
The sky is falling!

Except it isn't.
I believe we were attacked by Russia.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:15 PM   #24
The Big Dog
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 29,742
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Who actually represents a threat to Jews in the US? It isn't fundamentalist Christians, it's actually radical leftists. There are certainly some right-wing antisemites, but they're far more fringe, far more marginalized, far less influential than the left-wing antisemites.
Interestingly this summer, the radical left shut down the gay pride parade due to the participation of Jews carrying the Israel flag with the Star of David in rainbow colors.

Horseshoe theory of radicalism.
The Big Dog is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:15 PM   #25
William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
 
William Parcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
You don't think a Hitler could happen here?
Trains bringing millions to gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass burials in huge holes.

No.
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.
William Parcher is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:18 PM   #26
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Originally Posted by William Parcher View Post
Trains bringing millions to gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass burials in huge holes.

No.
Methods of harming people who can't defend themselves are irrelevant. Trump could easily kill more from the comfort of mar a lago.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:26 PM   #27
acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
 
acbytesla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 33,707
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Who actually represents a threat to Jews in the US? It isn't fundamentalist Christians, it's actually radical leftists. There are certainly some right-wing antisemites, but they're far more fringe, far more marginalized, far less influential than the left-wing antisemites.
I think your last post was spot on. This one, not so much. I don't know virtually any antisemitic leftists. That doesn't mean there aren't any but they are so inconsequential to barely register.

Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
The fact that Mao didn't start off with mass murder isn't relevant. From the very beginning, he subscribed to an ideology that explicitly endorsed and practiced it. Trump has made no similar identification.

Perhaps, but you don't have any actual evidence pointing to it. He is not the equivalent of Mao. Again, he has no ideology. And you need an ideology if you want to commit your followers to a path of such horrors, because nothing else can motivate people to commit atrocities on so vast a scale.
I agree with this part of your post. Trump scares me because he is such a destabilizing force. He's a bull in a china closet seemingly trying to wreck it all.
__________________
Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get to me.
.
acbytesla is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:27 PM   #28
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by novaphile View Post
Sorry to dip into such a small part of your well thought out post.

The above, looks like a flat tautology, and therefore doesn't add much. If you mean that people are fixed into their initial state, I'd beg to differ.

I can tell you that I was utterly gullible as a small child, and have very clear memories of being "sucked in" by all kinds of ********.

My path to skepticism was long and painful.

At a fairly early age I realised that religious instruction was just bat poo crazy, but it took me a long time to reject all the other woo in the world.
Hi novaphile,
It was this forum that moved my views on this. I am a life long skeptic, I have no memory of religious belief. I thought people either thought like that or they didn't. Your post and similar ones made me realize that my ideas on this were too absolute. None the less, it really seems like the brains of those I call true believers are very different than the people I categorize as skeptics. I occasionally read comments from people on religiously oriented videos and articles. It seems that truth is not something they seek aggressively. A lot is made around here about logical fallacies. I think skeptics would recognize most of them without formal categorization. I suspect religious people do not. And to some degree that is what I see when I read comments on pro-Trump articles. Truth avoidance is rampant and passionate. It is no accident that the largest part of his base are true believers. They are people that readily put aside skepticism if they hear things they like.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:30 PM   #29
William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
 
William Parcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
Methods of harming people who can't defend themselves are irrelevant. Trump could easily kill more from the comfort of mar a lago.
Are you talking about essentially a repeat of Nazi Germany complete with the Holocaust here in America?
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.
William Parcher is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:44 PM   #30
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by The Big Dog View Post
Interestingly this summer, the radical left shut down the gay pride parade due to the participation of Jews carrying the Israel flag with the Star of David in rainbow colors.

Horseshoe theory of radicalism.
This I think this is what Ziggurat was talking about when he said that the radical left was anti-Semitic.

By Ziggurat's standards I may be part of the radical left because I believe that US support for Israel should be eliminated while Israel continues to build settlements on the West Bank. I think the US support of Israel is against Israeli and American interests and causes massive suffering in the region. As to this specific incident, I wasn't aware of it. I don't know enough to know exactly what I would have done. I am not anti-Israeli, I am against Israel's policies with regard to the Palestinians. I might have argued that the flag should have been allowed in the parade since it represented Israeli's people more than it represented its policies but I am strongly opposed to the policies of Israel with respect to the Palestinians and I might have argued that flying the flag implied support for Israel's Palestinian policies and it therefor should not have been allowed.

Ziggurat disagrees with my views on the Israeli/Palestinian disputes, although he has never called me a leftist anti-Semite, I assume I would qualify to Ziggurat as a radical leftist. On most other issues Ziggurat and I have somewhat similar views. I also suspect that Ziggurat is one of the smartest people that I have ever directly communicated with, so if intelligence is a basis for trusting somebody's views I probably should always agree with him.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb

Last edited by davefoc; 15th October 2017 at 04:46 PM.
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:49 PM   #31
Giz
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,709
Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post

Our biggest adversary just installed their president.
You were warned but thought it wasn't real:

"When you were asked, what's the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said 'Russia.' Not Al-Qaeda; you said Russia,"*Obama charged. "And, the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because, the Cold War's been over for 20 years."

Now, for partisan reasons, you act concerned.
Giz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 04:53 PM   #32
CapelDodger
Penultimate Amazing
 
CapelDodger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cardiff, South Wales
Posts: 25,102
Originally Posted by Lurch View Post
While growing up and learning history, I used to marvel at and almost quake in fear over the kinds of intolerance that some societies would descend to. The Spanish Inquisition was one such. Another was the episode of the witch trials in early America. There was the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. Hitler and company. And the list goes on...

All it takes is just a small, critical mass of zealots to screw everything up.
It really doesn't. It takes screwed-up situations to enable zealots, and they never prosper. Consider the Spanish Empire under the Inquisition : they had it all in their hands, from Manila to Mexico City via India, and blew it in a few generations.
__________________
It's a poor sort of memory that only works backward - Lewis Carroll (1832-1898)

God can make a cow out of a tree, but has He ever done so? Therefore show some reason why a thing is so, or cease to hold that it is so - William of Conches, c1150
CapelDodger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:00 PM   #33
Giz
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,709
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
The world I experience every day is a secular one. I watch nerdy youtube videos about science or debunking religious claims. I read HuffingtonPost, Slate and various other secular type publications.

I happened to be driving somebody else's car and the radio was tuned to a holy roller station and then I happened on another one. It really struck me how large the gap is between people like me and the religious true believers. It is hard to imagine how these people would ever vote for somebody that isn't pandering to their beliefs.

Michelle Bachman says that Trump is now a true Christian that prays to God for help. That strikes me as an incredible lie or incredible gullibility on her part and yet I suspect there are millions of people that believe this. I have thought for a long time that people are largely born skeptical or not. If that is so the coalition of racists and religious fundamentalists that got Trump elected seems almost unassailable. The religious fundamentalists are being skillfully manipulated by cynical people and I don't see how that will change.

It is conceivable, that the changing US population demographics and more enthusiasm for voting by the younger folks might help. It looks like the legal challenges to gerrymandering might succeed. It is also possible that the secular economic conservatives will continue to leave the Republican Party as it becomes increasingly a fundamentalist driven organization.

Before that happens I hope the US hasn't killed millions of people because it is led by a psychopathic buffoon. There is a reasonable chance now that if Trump succeeds in starting disastrous trade wars, and dismantling the social safety net that hundreds of thousands of people will suffer. Racism will certainly continue to expand as his racist rhetoric continues to enable racists and racist ideas.

When I was a kid I wondered why something like Hitler couldn't happen in the US. I think we are getting a real education now about how that could happen here.
Precis: if the other side would just surrender, we wouldn't be as divided. Those meanies!
Giz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:04 PM   #34
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by William Parcher View Post
Are you talking about essentially a repeat of Nazi Germany complete with the Holocaust here in America?
I don't think anybody that is arguing here that Trump has the potential to do some very bad things would argue that he would do exactly the very bad things that Hitler did. As I mentioned, I believe he is a man without empathy or ethics. A man like that has the potential to do enormous damage when he obtains power.

Here's some thoughts:
Unnecessary war with North Korea.
Unnecessary war with Iran.
Savaging the US economy with his anti-free trade policies or his tax policies that would harm almost everybody except the wealthy and that would lead to massive deficits.
Brutalizing of his political opponents if he can get enough sycophants in positions of power.
Routine mistreatment of prisoners and minorities.

IMO, the American democracy is stronger than the German democracy was at the onset of WWII and per force Trump's ability to maneuver as a savage dictator are more limited than Hitler's were.

As somebody that has followed Trump over the last couple of years I am not aware of a single example of substantive empathy on his part. He has advocated torture, started numerous cons designed to exploit people far less off than he is, laughed at invalids, bragged about sexual assaults, on at least two occasions he engaged on what seems to have been attempted rape, cheated bond holders in his corporations, attempted to foment racist division by lying about Muslims cheering after 9/11, actively sought the death penalty for the Central Park five and lied after evidence exonerating them was found, and routinely lied about almost everything. I don't think anybody knows the limits of what Trump would do if he was unencumbered by the workings of the American Democracy.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:06 PM   #35
casebro
Penultimate Amazing
 
casebro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,788
And you see no potential for an extreme government from the left? The Ayatollah of Watts? Or the Social Justice Warrior Party? Or Antifada?

The real demon is the divisiveness, not the dividees. We should be going after the dividers.

Meantime the real problem is the same one Hitler had- It's the economy, stupid. Hitler blamed Da Jews, in America today half of us blame the other half, and vice versa. Because it's easier that way.

And last time I looked,there were plenty of Conservative Christian Democrats too.
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced idea is indistinguishable from idiocy to those who don't actually understanding the concept.
casebro is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:15 PM   #36
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by acbytesla View Post
I think your last post was spot on. This one, not so much. I don't know virtually any antisemitic leftists. That doesn't mean there aren't any but they are so inconsequential to barely register.
This is wrong. The entire BDS movement is a child of the left, not the right. They are extremely influential in academia, for example. And they pop up in funny places, too, like Valerie Plame. The antisemitic left is not at all inconsequential. It doesn't dominate the left, but it still matters.

Quote:
I agree with this part of your post. Trump scares me because he is such a destabilizing force. He's a bull in a china closet seemingly trying to wreck it all.
He is absolutely a disruptive force. Depending on your view of the establishment, that may be a good or a bad thing. But either way, it is a different thing than a totalitarian dictator.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:17 PM   #37
William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
 
William Parcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
Ok so nobody in this thread is saying it would be a big genocide and invasion of neighboring countries along with other Nazi-like stuff going on here in America all done by the government. Yes? Nobody in this thread is proposing that, right?
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.
William Parcher is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:18 PM   #38
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Just to address this false equivalence, what would you suggest skeptics listen to to maintain a balanced POV?

It's like claiming science is just a different religion. I'm willing to change my POV when evidence is presented supporting an alternative. I do always keep it in the back of my mind that I, like everyone else, have flaws in how I perceive my reality. But evidence based conclusions are closer to reality than other-based conclusions.


On the 'it can happen here' note, the second Nazi rally in Charlottesville was very poorly attended. And trump is losing his base by slow attrition. It will be interesting to see if the Bannon/Breitbart movement grows much impact.
Hi SG, this is roughly my view as well, but it is worrisome. I am a human (you will need to trust me on that) and how do I know that what seems like truth is just my brain working to fool me? Introspection and analysis seem like a possible answer but sometimes I disagree with people who seem to be introspective and analytical. So maybe I'm falling in to some sort of trap there but not at other times. Maybe I'm right most of the time except when I disagree with SG?

I hope you're right about Trump's support. I am friends with several true believers on Facebook and it doesn't seem like they are going to be swayed anytime soon. And listening to a holy roller on the radio argue that freedom of religion in the constitution means that government should be allowed to support Christianity over other religions, especially over the beady eyed atheists didn't fill me with confidence.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:25 PM   #39
davefoc
Philosopher
 
davefoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: orange country, california
Posts: 9,434
Originally Posted by William Parcher View Post
Ok so nobody in this thread is saying it would be a big genocide and invasion of neighboring countries along with other Nazi-like stuff going on here in America all done by the government. Yes? Nobody in this thread is proposing that, right?
To remove any confusion about my views on this:
1. A WWII disaster like Germany is unlikely
2. A disaster on the scale of what happened to China or what continues to happen in North Korea is unlikely
3. Even any kind of mass murder events enacted by the US government are unlikely
4. If Trump was a dictator and lost the restraints imposed on him by the rest of the US government, I think the consequences could be staggeringly bad for the US and the world. As I have mentioned twice previously I believe he is a man without empathy and without ethics and it is not possible to predict how bad things might become but I think it is a reasonable guess that things would be very bad.
__________________
The way of truth is along the path of intellectual sincerity. -- Henry S. Pritchett

Perfection is the enemy of good enough -- Russian proverb
davefoc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th October 2017, 05:26 PM   #40
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56,422
Originally Posted by davefoc View Post
By Ziggurat's standards I may be part of the radical left because I believe that US support for Israel should be eliminated while Israel continues to build settlements on the West Bank. I think the US support of Israel is against Israeli and American interests and causes massive suffering in the region.
This is certainly a hard-left position, but whether it qualifies as antisemitism in my view depends on a few other factors which you haven't specified here, such as your opinion of other players in the region and our relationship with them. But that's really a subject for another thread. Suffice to say for here, the threat to Jews doesn't come from fundamentalist Christians (of which Trump isn't one anyways).

Quote:
Ziggurat disagrees with my views on the Israeli/Palestinian disputes, although he has never called me a leftist anti-Semite, I assume I would qualify to Ziggurat as a radical leftist. On most other issues Ziggurat and I have somewhat similar views. I also suspect that Ziggurat is one of the smartest people that I have ever directly communicated with, so if intelligence is a basis for trusting somebody's views I probably should always agree with him.
You flatter me , but I'm also smart enough to know it not only doesn't work that way, it shouldn't work that way. Smart people may be more likely than dumb people to know what policies and actions will best advance their values, but fundamental values themselves don't correlate particularly with intelligence.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.