IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 24th December 2022, 05:15 AM   #1
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,833
Conspiracy theories about unconventional usage of notation

Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
A bit like:
  • a ship can float on its side once it lists over its centre of buoyance: just like Herald of Free Enterprise! (Actually, resting on a bank!)
  • A ship's cannonball in Nelson's day 'cannot have travelled at 900mph'!
  • an EPIRB has to be switched on by one of the Captain's mates before it works!
  • You can't use base sixty notation for hours, minutes and seconds!
  • a bow visor will fall off if hit by a strong wave!
  • a ship 155m long will sink with no trace within 0.35' because all of the windows on the listed side will have smashed thus letting in water rapidly!
  • 80m is too deep to recover a wreck or the bodies!
  • there were no telephone or radio signals between 01:00 and 02:02 because of the 'storm' (only Beaufort 7)!
  • It takes over two hours for a rescue helicopter to fly from either Helsinki or Visby, or Stockholm after an official mayday call from an MRCC!!!
  • Eleven crew listed as rescued on rescuers lists suddenly are not rescued after all!
  • Helicopter Y64 went to pick up a nurse and a doctor from Stockholm via Visby first before going to the rescue!!!
Gets more ludicrous every time you try, doesn't it! 0.35 feet? or 0.35 minutes of time? or 0.35 minutes of arc? or 0.35 of something else that exists only inside your head?


__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"

Last edited by jimbob; 28th December 2022 at 04:48 AM.
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 05:39 AM   #2
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Gets more ludicrous every time you try, doesn't it! 0.35 feet? or 0.35 minutes of time? or 0.35 minutes of arc? or 0.35 of something else that exists only inside your head?
35' for feet is quite normal convention.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 06:52 AM   #3
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,833
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
35' for feet is quite normal convention.


Your post does not read "35" anything. Try reading the hilite in your own post.



(hint, because you will likely never see it otherwise - zero point 35)
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 06:56 AM   #4
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
35' for feet is quite normal convention.

Yes. However, 35 min(s) or 35 minutes for 35 minutes of time is quite normal convention.

And 35' for 35 minutes of time is exceptionally unconventional. So don't use it. It looks ridiculous - and even more so, of course, when you keep getting it wrong.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 08:08 AM   #5
JesseCuster
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,903
Originally Posted by MarkCorrigan View Post
But obviously not to 200oC because you can't obtain those temperatures outside a lab.
Did Vixen really say that?
JesseCuster is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 08:26 AM   #6
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 38,373
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
35' for feet is quite normal convention.

Do you mean that you were saying that it sank in 35 feet?
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 08:26 AM   #7
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,833
Originally Posted by JesseCuster View Post
Did Vixen really say that?
Given all the other claims Vixen has made in this thread, why would that confuse (or surprise) you?
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 08:28 AM   #8
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,833
Originally Posted by Mojo View Post
Do you mean that you were saying that it sank in 35 feet?
Vixen's more recent claim is 0.35 feet. Or perhaps 0.35 minutes.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 08:30 AM   #9
GlennB
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
 
GlennB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
Originally Posted by JesseCuster View Post
Did Vixen really say that?
It was a higher figure, but still cooler than even a candle flame.
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury
GlennB is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 08:30 AM   #10
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 38,373
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Gets more ludicrous every time you try, doesn't it! 0.35 feet? or 0.35 minutes of time? or 0.35 minutes of arc? or 0.35 of something else that exists only inside your head?

It's getting faster. It used to be 35 seconds, but now it's down to about 21.
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 09:48 AM   #11
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Vixen's more recent claim is 0.35 feet. Or perhaps 0.35 minutes.
I am aware that different posters went to different schools in different countries. People educated in England not all that long ago had £.s.d to contend with (I caught the tail end): 20 shillings to a pound, 12 pence to a shilling, 24d. to a florin, or four sixpences, and don't even mention a guinea...!

All of this base-12 and base-20 stuff, including when height and measurements were in inches, feet and yards, are all subsets of base-60, so there is really no problem in understanding there are 4 thrupences (3d) to a shilling (1/-) and eight half crowns (2/6 or 2s.6d.)to a pound (£1). Ten shillings is ten bob.

Likewise, feet and inches are very simple. As are the hours, minutes and seconds of a clock (base-60) were 30' is half an hour and 15' quarter of an hour (I do normally write it as 30" and 15" as per schooldays but am happy to defer to the logic of the hour being the zero designation).

The coordinates for M/S Estonia are (you are not going to like this): 59° 23′ 0″ N, 21° 41′ 0″ E*. Oh dear, does 23' and 41' refer to 23 feet, 41 feet, or 23 minutes (time), 41 minutes (time), or 23 minutes due North or 41 minutes due East? Is it time, length or location/direction?

Context answers your question.

*Perhaps you prefer the decimalised version: 59.383333, 21.683333. My sixpence says probably.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig


Last edited by Vixen; 24th December 2022 at 09:59 AM.
Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 09:53 AM   #12
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I am aware that different posters went to different schools in different countries.

*Perhaps you prefer the decimalised version: 59.383333, 21.683333. My sixpence says probably.
The point is that your long irrelevant rant still doesn’t excuse your errors or make you competent. Whether you decimalize or use primes for units, you still can’t get simple figures right. And yet you want to lecture us all on ship physics and other technical subjects. You don’t know what you’re talking about, full stop.
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 09:58 AM   #13
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Jack by the hedge View Post
Blimey. It's the straw cavalry arriving at the Gish gallop.

Yes, a full fringe reset of all the topics on which Vixen has confirmed her ignorance and on which she has proven to be entirely uneducable. But woe betide any who question her, for they are morally bankrupt.
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 10:08 AM   #14
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
Yes, a full fringe reset of all the topics on which Vixen has confirmed her ignorance and on which she has proven to be entirely uneducable. But woe betide any who question her, for they are morally bankrupt.
I was quoting other posters. Was it not clear? That list doesn't refer to my ignorance. However, the howlers have given me a jolly good laugh.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 10:16 AM   #15
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
The Sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part V

Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I was quoting other posters. Was it not clear? That list doesn't refer to my ignorance. However, the howlers have given me a jolly good laugh.

Those are all points you’ve raised previously, and on which you’ve expressed unremitting and arrogant ignorance. Was I not clear? You have demonstrated zero competence in any of the topics you’ve raised here, extreme disrespect for your betters, and a moral smugness that cements it all together.
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.

Last edited by JayUtah; 24th December 2022 at 10:17 AM.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 10:45 AM   #16
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I am aware that different posters went to different schools in different countries. People educated in England not all that long ago had £.s.d to contend with (I caught the tail end): 20 shillings to a pound, 12 pence to a shilling, 24d. to a florin, or four sixpences, and don't even mention a guinea...!

All of this base-12 and base-20 stuff, including when height and measurements were in inches, feet and yards, are all subsets of base-60, so there is really no problem in understanding there are 4 thrupences (3d) to a shilling (1/-) and eight half crowns (2/6 or 2s.6d.)to a pound (£1). Ten shillings is ten bob.

Likewise, feet and inches are very simple. As are the hours, minutes and seconds of a clock (base-60) were 30' is half an hour and 15' quarter of an hour (I do normally write it as 30" and 15" as per schooldays but am happy to defer to the logic of the hour being the zero designation).

The coordinates for M/S Estonia are (you are not going to like this): 59° 23′ 0″ N, 21° 41′ 0″ E*. Oh dear, does 23' and 41' refer to 23 feet, 41 feet, or 23 minutes (time), 41 minutes (time), or 23 minutes due North or 41 minutes due East? Is it time, length or location/direction?

Context answers your question.

*Perhaps you prefer the decimalised version: 59.383333, 21.683333. My sixpence says probably.

No, you're confusing a) the number base system with b) the notation marks used within that system.

We.... do all know that time (at the level of minutes and seconds only) is in base 60.

We also know that the overriding convention for the notation marks of minutes & seconds of time is m/min/mins for minutes and s for seconds. Virtually nobody uses single/double prime notation ('/'') for notating minutes and seconds of time. That notation system is solely and specifically used for notating degrees, minutes and seconds of latitude/longitude. In fact, it's even know as the "DMS notation system" (where DMS stands for "Degrees, Minutes, Seconds"). It's worth noting that single/double prime notation is also used for the imperial measurement of feet and inches, but of course feet are in base 3 (3 feet to the yard) and inches are in base 12 (12 inches to the foot), and are of a totally different provenance to the use of single/double prime notation for base 60 systems.

You're utterly in the wrong when you attempt to use DMS notation for minutes (or, in your failed case, seconds...) of time. And I don't believe for one moment that it's what you were taught at school (though I suppose there's a chance you were taught it by an incompetent, mendacious or sly teacher), because I can guarantee from direct first-hand experience that it was never the notation taught in British schools. And you're double-wrong/mistaken/lying if you claim you were taught to use double prime for minutes of time.

So please, please, just give it up. It doesn't look clever. Quite the opposite. Moreso when you get it embarrassingly wrong. Write "min" or "minutes" for minutes of time. That way, a) everyone will actually know what you mean, and b) you'll stand no chance of messing it up again.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 11:17 AM   #17
GlennB
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
 
GlennB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
Likewise, feet and inches are very simple. As are the hours, minutes and seconds of a clock (base-60) were 30' is half an hour and 15' quarter of an hour (I do normally write it as 30" and 15" as per schooldays but am happy to defer to the logic of the hour being the zero designation).
I did 7 years of physics at school - in the 60's - and we never used ' and " as indicators of time. Your claim is pure b/s.
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury
GlennB is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 11:29 AM   #18
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by LondonJohn View Post
No, you're confusing a) the number base system with b) the notation marks used within that system.

We.... do all know that time (at the level of minutes and seconds only) is in base 60.

We also know that the overriding convention for the notation marks of minutes & seconds of time is m/min/mins for minutes and s for seconds. Virtually nobody uses single/double prime notation ('/'') for notating minutes and seconds of time. That notation system is solely and specifically used for notating degrees, minutes and seconds of latitude/longitude. In fact, it's even know as the "DMS notation system" (where DMS stands for "Degrees, Minutes, Seconds"). It's worth noting that single/double prime notation is also used for the imperial measurement of feet and inches, but of course feet are in base 3 (3 feet to the yard) and inches are in base 12 (12 inches to the foot), and are of a totally different provenance to the use of single/double prime notation for base 60 systems.

You're utterly in the wrong when you attempt to use DMS notation for minutes (or, in your failed case, seconds...) of time. And I don't believe for one moment that it's what you were taught at school (though I suppose there's a chance you were taught it by an incompetent, mendacious or sly teacher), because I can guarantee from direct first-hand experience that it was never the notation taught in British schools. And you're double-wrong/mistaken/lying if you claim you were taught to use double prime for minutes of time.

So please, please, just give it up. It doesn't look clever. Quite the opposite. Moreso when you get it embarrassingly wrong. Write "min" or "minutes" for minutes of time. That way, a) everyone will actually know what you mean, and b) you'll stand no chance of messing it up again.
I am dreadfully sorry, I obviously wasn't clear. The point I was making was (a) to explain the rationale for those who claim to be puzzled and (b) to make it clear that I have no intention of 'dumbing down' as it were, even if it doesn't conform with the US ways of doing things (actually making things more complicated than necessary IMV). I am with that piece of music cited by zooterkin '4'33"'. This refers to the length of the piece as well as its title. I hope that it will NEVER become '4min 33 secs'. I am with Jacob Rees-Mogg in this. (I will not be using Oxford commas, either.)

So please can we now draw a line under this issue.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 11:53 AM   #19
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,833
Originally Posted by Mojo View Post
It's getting faster. It used to be 35 seconds, but now it's down to about 21.
I think Vixen completely blind to the fact that she that she wrote 0.35". Completely unable to comprehend that fact.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 12:20 PM   #20
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
I think Vixen completely blind to the fact that she that she wrote 0.35". Completely unable to comprehend that fact.

That’s my point. For all her huffing and puffing, she is simply incompetent, beyond using symbols for units in a questionable way. There is a deep lack of understanding whenever she tries to present a topic that’s even remotely technical.
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 12:32 PM   #21
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
The Sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part V

Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I have no intention of 'dumbing down' as it were, even if it doesn't conform with the US ways of doing things… (actually making things more complicated than necessary IMV).
No, this isn’t a U.S. problem. We use the international standard for specifying durations of time. I work all the time with scientists and engineers from the U.K. and Europe. None of them uses primes for temporal minutes and seconds. We all use SI units.

Now if you want to argue that primes are still common in lay usage, or older, traditional usage, you can. But that’s not a difference in standards or education. That’s you being a lay person instead of a scientist if any kind — and even then you can’t get the values or units right. This is a “Vixen is wrong” problem, not a “The world is varied” problem.
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 03:22 PM   #22
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
No, this isn’t a U.S. problem. We use the international standard for specifying durations of time. I work all the time with scientists and engineers from the U.K. and Europe. None of them uses primes for temporal minutes and seconds. We all use SI units.

Now if you want to argue that primes are still common in lay usage, or older, traditional usage, you can. But that’s not a difference in standards or education. That’s you being a lay person instead of a scientist if any kind — and even then you can’t get the values or units right. This is a “Vixen is wrong” problem, not a “The world is varied” problem.

Exactly. I'm British. I had a science-skewed secondary education in a very good school, followed by a first degree and then a masters in electronic/comms engineering from a very good university. And I've worked in finance related to the telecoms/internet industry pretty much all my working life. And I have NEVER, EVER, IN MY ENTIRE HISTORY OF EDUCATION AND WORK, encountered anyone using prime notation for units of time.

What's more, my education and experience has given me sufficient grounding in the scientific method to enable me to assimilate and assess most scientific evidence and carry out a decent level of scientific analysis. Further, I know what I don't know, and happily defer to those who have expertise/experience/knowledge that's over & above my own. In fact, I relish learning from such people. Oh, and I am also entirely ready to hold my hand up and apologise if I ever turn out to be wrong in any given piece of analysis/opinion. I find that these qualities are not only desirable in the quest for well-reasoned scientific debate - they're actually essential.

And that's why I can be extremely highly confident that the Estonia sank because its poorly-designed, poorly-constructed and (very) poorly-maintained bow visor detached under heavy load in high seas in the midst of a storm, causing a huge influx of seawater into the open vehicle deck (with the bow taking in enormous "gulps" of water every time it dug into an oncoming wave) which in turn caused the ship to become terminally unstable and capsize in very short time. After that, the sinking was inevitable. No sabotage. No attempts to push vehicles over the side into the raging seas. No submarines. No torpedoes.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 03:52 PM   #23
zooterkin
Nitpicking dilettante
Administrator
 
zooterkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 57,668
Originally Posted by LondonJohn View Post
. And I have NEVER, EVER, IN MY ENTIRE HISTORY OF EDUCATION AND WORK, encountered anyone using prime notation for units of time.
Then you've had a pretty sheltered life. The notation is used (see my earlier reference to John Cage) by many. The salient point is that most people who do use it are actually familiar enough with it to get it right, and honest enough to admit when they get it wrong.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell
Zooterkin is correct Darat
Nerd! Hokulele
Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232
Ezekiel 23:20
zooterkin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:20 PM   #24
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by zooterkin View Post
Then you've had a pretty sheltered life. The notation is used (see my earlier reference to John Cage) by many. The salient point is that most people who do use it are actually familiar enough with it to get it right, and honest enough to admit when they get it wrong.

I said that in my entire history of education and work, I've never seen it used. And that is true. Of course I know of occasions when it has been used, but it's not used - to my knowledge and extensive experience - in anything related to science and engineering (including any analysis and debate which is founded on scientific principles).

Your last sentence remains entirely salient, of course.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:23 PM   #25
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
By the way, has anyone ever seen, written in any publication, a sentence such as "The train was running 20' late"?

Thought not.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:41 PM   #26
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
I think Vixen completely blind to the fact that she that she wrote 0.35". Completely unable to comprehend that fact.
I was trying to put it into context to help you understand. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:43 PM   #27
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by LondonJohn View Post
By the way, has anyone ever seen, written in any publication, a sentence such as "The train was running 20' late"?

Thought not.
I read that as twenty hours late.


If you mean twenty minutes, I would put 20".
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:45 PM   #28
zooterkin
Nitpicking dilettante
Administrator
 
zooterkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 57,668
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I was trying to put it into context to help you understand. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Putting it into context = getting it completely wrong? How does getting it wrong help anyone?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell
Zooterkin is correct Darat
Nerd! Hokulele
Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232
Ezekiel 23:20
zooterkin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:45 PM   #29
zooterkin
Nitpicking dilettante
Administrator
 
zooterkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 57,668
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I read that as twenty hours late.


If you mean twenty minutes, I would put 20".
You’d be wrong again,then.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell
Zooterkin is correct Darat
Nerd! Hokulele
Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232
Ezekiel 23:20
zooterkin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 04:46 PM   #30
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I read that as twenty hours late.


If you mean twenty minutes, I would put 20".

Then you'd be wrong. Some other wrong person might choose to put 20'''' to represent 20 minutes. They'd be wrong too. 20'' has never, in the history of time notation, been used to represent 20 minutes.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 05:12 PM   #31
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by zooterkin View Post
You’d be wrong again,then.
Quote:
Why base 60? The Babylonians divided the day into 24 hours, each hour into 60 minutes, each minute into 60 seconds. This has survived for 4000 years! – Notations for sexagesimal numbers, e.g., 5 hours, 25 minutes, 30 seconds include 5h 25' 30" the ‘sexagesimal fraction’ 5 25 / 60 30 / 3600 5; 25, 30. – the number 5; 25, 30 - in sexagesimal form - can be expressed as a base 10 fraction: 5 4 / 10 2 / 100 5 / 1000 – i.e. 5.425 in decimal notation.
https://slideplayer.com/slide/7348086/

ETA: Obviously, the sexagesimal system can be used for anything with a base-60, so not just an hour (= 60 minutes) but also a minute (= 60 seconds).
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig


Last edited by Vixen; 24th December 2022 at 05:20 PM.
Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 05:23 PM   #32
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by LondonJohn View Post
Then you'd be wrong. Some other wrong person might choose to put 20'''' to represent 20 minutes. They'd be wrong too. 20'' has never, in the history of time notation, been used to represent 20 minutes.
From wiki:

Quote:
Modern uses for the sexagesimal system include measuring angles, geographic coordinates, electronic navigation, and time.
Quote:
By the 17th century it became common to denote the integer part of sexagesimal numbers by a superscripted zero, and the various fractional parts by one or more accent marks.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 05:38 PM   #33
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,833
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I was trying to put it into context to help you understand. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
In what context is "a ship 155m long will sink with no trace within 0.35' " correct? Or even marginally believable?
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 06:55 PM   #34
junkshop
Graduate Poster
 
junkshop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Behind you
Posts: 1,991
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
From wiki:
Quote:
By the 17th century it became common to denote the integer part of sexagesimal numbers by a superscripted zero, and the various fractional parts by one or more accent marks.
Ma'am, this is a Wendy's the 21st century.



Oh, and here's the wikipedia link Vixen alluded to, but omitted
__________________
Hobbyist receipt-keeper, fake cockney Dick Van Dyke cosplayer, and forum boss
junkshop is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 07:06 PM   #35
lobosrul5
Philosopher
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 7,349
Here we are on this thread like tangent/mistake by Vixen number .38e(carrot)' 48"to the 87nth degree. What that number is in base 10? I dunno somewhere between a whole frickin lot and infinity.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 07:51 PM   #36
Axxman300
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 6,863
And none of this has anything to do with the MS Estonia, a ship never designed for open ocean transit, sailing into a storm at flank speed resulting in large waves knocking the bow visor loose, and then off. This resulted in the ship flooding, capsizing, and sinking.

That's what happened. That is what the evidence then and now shows happened.
__________________
Disingenuous Piranha
Axxman300 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 09:55 PM   #37
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I read that as twenty hours late.


If you mean twenty minutes, I would put 20".

No, two primes is 20 seconds. You’re really bad at this.
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th December 2022, 10:02 PM   #38
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
https://slideplayer.com/slide/7348086/

ETA: Obviously, the sexagesimal system can be used for anything with a base-60, so not just an hour (= 60 minutes) but also a minute (= 60 seconds).

“This can be divided by 60” is not the same thing as “I’m using the symbols correctly.”
__________________
‣“Facts are stubborn things.” —John Adams
‣IANAL, but I do have a white wig.
JayUtah is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th December 2022, 03:07 AM   #39
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
No, two primes is 20 seconds. You’re really bad at this.
It can be 20 seconds. Think of it this way (hopefully, we'll get there in the end!)

Feet = '

Inches= "

Minutes = '

Seconds = "

OR, alternatively:

Hours = '

Minutes = "

As long as the context is clear I don't see the problem. We know M/S Estonia sank within 35". Hard to see how that can be seen as depth of water or seconds.

Happy Christmas, All. Keep smiling!
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th December 2022, 03:50 AM   #40
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 38,373
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
It can be 20 seconds. Think of it this way (hopefully, we'll get there in the end!)

Feet = '

Inches= "

Minutes = '

Seconds = "

OR, alternatively:

Hours = '

Minutes = "

As long as the context is clear I don't see the problem. We know M/S Estonia sank within 35". Hard to see how that can be seen as depth of water or seconds.

It's hard to see how it can be minutes, given that 35 minutes is expressed as 35', not 35".

Have you ever asked anyone to make a model of Sonehenge?
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.