IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 20th January 2023, 10:06 AM   #401
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,392
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
It has occurred because I used the notation 35" for thirty-five minutes. A queue of people who claim never to have heard of it in respect of time are browbeating me into admitting I 'lied' about having always used this, that I should 'admit your error' and to apologise. I have been 'told off' by about half a dozen people.
You're still wrong.

I very strongly suspect the person you were conversing with didn't spot that you said hours and minutes instead of minutes and seconds. You made no attempt to draw their attention to the point in contention*.

If you had asked them specifically instead of just hoping they wouldn't spot it I have no doubt you'd have received a different response.

* It's not really in contention, you're just wrong and won't admit it.
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 10:11 AM   #402
Matthew Best
Penultimate Amazing
 
Matthew Best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Leicester Square, London
Posts: 10,281
"David Crosby died of the Byrds"?

And you expect us to take the person who wrote that seriously?
Matthew Best is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 10:15 AM   #403
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,392
Originally Posted by Matthew Best View Post
"David Crosby died of the Byrds"?
Thrush?
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 11:10 AM   #404
P.J. Denyer
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,215
Originally Posted by Matthew Best View Post
"David Crosby died of the Byrds"?

And you expect us to take the person who wrote that seriously?

In my school in the 70's it was acceptable to use "David Crosby" to refer to Tippi Hedren.
__________________
"I know my brain cannot tell me what to think." - Scorpion

"Nebulous means Nebulous" - Adam Hills
P.J. Denyer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 12:15 PM   #405
MarkCorrigan
Penultimate Amazing
 
MarkCorrigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,895
Why should we care what some rando says about how they use prime notations, exactly?
MarkCorrigan is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 12:21 PM   #406
GlennB
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
 
GlennB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
Originally Posted by MarkCorrigan View Post
Why should we care what some rando says about how they use prime notations, exactly?
It wouldn't surprise me if it's a second account set up by Vixen.

eta: Can't help but notice that the reply came within a minute.
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury

Last edited by GlennB; 20th January 2023 at 12:26 PM.
GlennB is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 12:23 PM   #407
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Jack by the hedge View Post
You're still wrong.
Without question.

Quote:
I very strongly suspect the person you were conversing with didn't spot that you said hours and minutes instead of minutes and seconds.
I very strongly suspect the person she is conversing with is a sock on her hand. You are correct in that the question is being asked of this purported expert in a way that seems to perpetuate ongoing ambiguity. The question is whether, by any established convention, ″ can mean either minutes or seconds depending on context. It is not whether any person once used ″ to mean seconds.

But the real tell is the first (purported) message from this person.
Originally Posted by A very confused 'expert'
"I may be able to help. Primes use apostrophes to represent different units such as ‘ and “ and ‘“ and “” (without spaces in between) used for hours, minutes, seconds and so on…"
Let's leave aside that the "apostrophes" that appear in the message use the wrong conventions for approximating ′, ″, ‴, and ⁗. The most troubling error is that this purported expert—without any prompting—went right to the one point that Vixen thought needed confirmation. Without being told that the controversy was over whether the symbols could rightly "shift" and represent the next subdivision up the ladder, or (just plain wrongly) the canonical base unit, this person confirmed that the sequence of multiple primes could represent "hours, minutes, seconds, and so on."

Vixen landed (finally) on the explanation that ′ for either hours or minutes, and ″ for either minutes or seconds, was something you wouldn't use where an examiner would see it, and therefore isn't an appropriately recognized practice. But à propos of nothing, this purported expert immediately confirms this admittedly non-standard vernacular as the thing to do. Vixen doesn't seem to dispute the standard usage: ′ for minutes and ″ for seconds. And we have documentary evidence for this usage. Why didn't the purported expert confirm the standard usage with no other prompting? Why did they immediately and exclusively confirm the allegedly backwoods vernacular that Vixen wanted to confirm? Doesn't that seem a little suspicious?

Worse, now this purported expert is saying they still use the vernacular notation. In order to become the expert, they would have had those confusing and wrong vernaculars beaten out of them. This really is non-negotiable. We don't separate our informal lives from our professional lives along these lines. Once you have to start using standard notations for work, you just keep using them everywhere because it's easier than trying to keep two different notations in your head.

I already covered the controversy over hours. The canonical base unit for time is hours. It's never been anything but hours. It cannot be anything but hours. This whole shifting of symbols to the next unit upward is purely Vixen's invention, which she tried to justify with a lot of technobabble she ignorantly stole from differential calculus. The only controversy has been over how to notate the base unit. ° was considered for hours of time, based on how the nomenclature gave rise to this whole system of notation.

We call this the "degree symbol," but it's really just part of a different way of notating abbreviations in general. In Italian, some uses of Latin, and other modern languages, abbreviations are formed by superscripting the last portion of a word to the first letter. In contrast, in English, we're more apt to first few significant letters of the word and then a period: ft. for feet, for example.[1] So the Italian word octava gets abbreviated in musical notation by 8va. Note how the real semantic portion of the word—the oct- meaning eight—has also been abbreviated using the numeral. This convenience generally also applies to all the ordinals. The Italian primo ("first") is abbreviated 1°. Secondo and terzo get 2° and 3°, while in French deuxième and troisième are 2me and 3me. It wasn't so much a special symbol as it was just a superscript o.

As Wikipedia explains (mostly correctly), the expression 29 °C should be read (facetiously) in old Italian as il ventinovesimo (29°) grado di temperatura, "the twenty-ninth grade of temperature." The superscript has completely transitioned into being a pure symbol and not just the last letter of ventinovesimo. We have to add C or F now, to be scrupulous, but that wasn't always the case. The only remaining example of 45° to indicate il quarantaquinto grado of something not explicitly mentioned is il quarantaquinto grado del circolo, or "the forty-fifth degree of the circle."

But we're talking about hours, minutes, and seconds, and the important thing to remember is that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

You'll find a number of sources including Wikipedia who say that ° was once used also to indicate hours. And also some sources that say it still is, in medicine. I have yet to find a single one of my colleagues in medicine, including medical-school professors, who concur. But yes, ° once was used to mean hours. But since it's really just a shorthand to indicate any ordinal and doesn't actually call out any units, there was considerable discussion about whether it should continue to be used that way. Does 0° 4′ 33″ indicate an angle, a time duration, or a very cold temperature to be outside in?

Part of the discussion was about dropping ° altogether as an anachronism and not using it to mean anything. d was proposed for angles, still meaning 1/360 of a circle. And retaining the original gradus or "degree" (spelled out) for temperature was proposed. The only thing that stuck was using h to mean hours. ° by itself would continue to mean degrees of arc, and °C and °F would be new symbols to represent temperature.

But to understand why this was useful, you have to understand why ° identifying an ordinal grade of anything meant something.

3° meaning the third degree of a circle works because the circle is a natural unit. It's the third degree, or gradus, of a natural object. You can subdivide a circle any which way: by radians, gradians, or septuagesimal degrees. But you can't meaningfully multiply the natural thing like a circle to get some sort of other thing. You can have a multiplicity of circles, which isn't the same thing.

Similarly, 3° meaning the third degree of a day works because a day is a natural phenomenon defined by the movement of the earth. You can subdivide it it any which way, such as into vigiliae etc. the way the Romans did, or into six watches and then further into half-hour "bells" (eight to the watch) as the Royal Navy did.[2] 4° 3′ could easily (albeit hypothetically) notate, "three bells into the fourth watch," or 5:30 AM, or 5h 30′ if you're measuring time passed since midnight.

The bedrock of the system is that ° (where used, or once used) always indicates the canonical base unit. In that case, that unit always the first division of a natural object or phenomenon. This is how we anchor the notation to the actual amounts we want to measure. When ° is used by itself, the natural object is a circle.

So what's the natural object, phenomenon, or whatever for degrees of temperature? That's where the headache starts. Fahrenheit divides a physical phenomenon into 100 first-order degrees, but that phenomenon has been variously described, the most hilarious of which is the range of temperatures experienced in Helsinki or Stockholm or some city. Celsius was originally defined by the physical phenomenon of the liquid material phase of water—an observable phenomenon considered reasonably stable at the time. The range of temperature, from coldest to warmest, that water could exist under nominal conditions as a liquid was the natural phenomenon that anchored the system, and the first subdivision is 100 grades, indicated by °C (to indicate which physical basis is used).

And because the basis of the system is that one step broader than ° is a natural unit or behavior, that's why the proposal of reverse primes as multiples was rejected. ‵ would mean, "The first multiple of days." What is that, the week? The month? If ‶ means, "The second multiplication of days," is that 4 weeks to the month? 52 weeks to the year? Once you realize there aren't an even number of weeks in month or days in a year, you see that it's not a good idea. And if ′ can mean hours, what would ° mean (as in how it used to indicate hours)? If ° in the ′-for-hours system means days, then what natural thing is a day the first subdivision of?

Further, if the natural basis for temperature is the liquid phase of water, how can you even think of that arithmetically?

As I said before, these days we stop using primes after arcminutes and arcsecond, although the system did define angular subdivisions notated by ‴ and ⁗. But since geographers and navigators defined them variously and differently, they quickly fell out of use and were replaced by decimalizing the arcseconds if not by decimalizing the degree of arc itself.

The purported expert goes all the way to quadruple prime and says the primes symbols represent "hours, minutes, seconds and so on…" So we have,

′ = hour
″ = minute
‴ = second (never stated, but deduced)
⁗ = ?

What unit of time does our purported expert think a quadruple prime stands for? The time measurement to which this system and these units apply stops at the second in all cases. There is no septagesimal division of a second of time that has ever been used, unless you want to consider the U.S. alternating current frequency.

There never was an "and so on..." for time notated with prime symbols beyond ″. And we long ago stopped using more than a double prime for bits of a circle.

This purported expert is profoundly ignorant of how the system works; how it was invented, revised, and formulated; and why it works. That's a whole lot more egregious than merely not knowing how to approximate primes on a keyboard or in chat the way we've all done it for decades.

No. There is no expert advising Vixen. There is only Vixen's increasingly dishonest attempts at saving face.
_____________________
[1] This is informal. The abbrevation for feet in American engineering is ft without the period.
[2] I know about dog watches. Don't @ me.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 12:28 PM   #408
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by MarkCorrigan View Post
Why should we care what some rando says about how they use prime notations, exactly?
Because she tell us they're no "rando," but instead a person with a doctorate in mathematics and extensive experience in physics and other science. She's proffering him as an expert who confirms her idiomatic usage of ″ to mean either minutes or seconds of time, depending on context.

She has not qualified this expert, nor permitted voir dire. She has not bothered to explain how this purported expert keeps making beginner's mistakes and displaying other suspicious behavior. She has not explained how the usage this purported expert endorses runs contrary to the unambiguous and well-understood rules by which the system operates, and to the philosophy of measurement and notation in general.

Worst of all, she has not provided a single verifiable example of her idiom used by anyone outside this forum. She just keeps lying.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 12:53 PM   #409
MarkCorrigan
Penultimate Amazing
 
MarkCorrigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,895
Oh absolutely. The fact that this person, if they indeed exist, has not been identified in any way that would enable us to confirm their reported credentials is the biggest hint to me that they are in fact some rando.

If I were to say that my father, who has a maths degree, argues that primes cannot be used the way Vixen is claiming I could provide you with his name and the dates of his study at Southampton University and you could look him up and confirm that he does indeed hold the requisite degree. I haven't mentioned the subject to him, although I suspect he would not be agreeing with Vixen, but my point still stands that I could provide evidence of his study in the relevant field. Likewise, if the discussion were on international politics I could provide my own name, and dates of study, and even a photo of my degree in international relations to confirm that yes, I have studied the topic at hand. I'm not claiming to be an expert by any means, but I would argue that I have more knowledge in the area than some random person off the street. If I had just claimed that "someone I know" has a maths degree and said X you could quite rightly tell me you didn't believe me because I had not evidenced any of what I had claimed.

So the point still stands, why should we accept what some rando says about prime notations, especially when it contradicts reality?
MarkCorrigan is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 12:59 PM   #410
JimOfAllTrades
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,307
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
(respectful snip of much information)

But we're talking about hours, minutes, and seconds, and the important thing to remember is that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.
I admit it, I snorted.
JimOfAllTrades is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th January 2023, 07:58 PM   #411
I Am The Scum
Philosopher
 
I Am The Scum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,108
I used to wonder how a thread on this forum could possibly be on its 32nd iteration. My experience in this thread has been very informative.
__________________
Please temper your expectations if you are going to argue with a nazi sympathizer
I Am The Scum is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2023, 04:04 AM   #412
lionking
In the Peanut Gallery
 
lionking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 54,892
I’ve just read this whole derail. It is everything about what is good and bad about this whole forum. The bad centres on only one member.

Other regular participants in this thread have far greater forbearance than I could have possibly managed. Well done.
__________________
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.

Sir Winston Churchill
lionking is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2023, 11:30 AM   #413
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
FWIW, our science teacher in Third Form (what you would call 9th grade in the US) had us using ° ' and " for hours, minutes seconds. That is a convention I stuck with for many years, right through my engineering training in the Air Force (they used the same units at Technical Training School) until I started programming Apple ][ computers in the mid-1980s, at which point I quickly switched to using H:M:S (or rather HH:MM:SS because time on the computer programs I was writing was always designated with leading zeros for 24 hour format).

I have never, ever seen " used for minutes in any context (whether related to time or angular distance), and would certainly consider that to be incorrect if I saw it being used that way.
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.

Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2023, 12:20 PM   #414
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by MarkCorrigan View Post
my point still stands that I could provide evidence of his study in the relevant field.
I'm in a profession that requires proof of credentials for regulatory purposes. But in lesser contexts, sometimes all you need is a conversation with someone to know if they're really an expert. There are certain things you can't fake unless you were there and went through it. For example,

Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Apple ][ computers...
* JayUtah smiles knowingly.


That's how you show someone that you know the proper notation because you lived it.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2023, 07:54 PM   #415
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
I'm in a profession that requires proof of credentials for regulatory purposes. But in lesser contexts, sometimes all you need is a conversation with someone to know if they're really an expert. There are certain things you can't fake unless you were there and went through it. For example,



* JayUtah;13992237 smiles knowingly.

That's how you show someone that you know the proper notation because you lived it.
6502 programming!! Those were the days
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.

Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2023, 10:59 PM   #416
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Those were the days
Or hours, or minutes, depending on context.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2023, 11:51 PM   #417
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
Or hours, or minutes, depending on context.
Amen to that!
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.

Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 08:15 AM   #418
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by MarkCorrigan View Post
So the point still stands, why should we accept what some rando says about prime notations, especially when it contradicts reality?
So how about it, Vixen? Do I get to converse with your "expert" directly without your interference? Or is your obvious sock puppet going to continue to spew his unqualified, uninformed ignorance from the shadows?

Can you provide a verifiable example of others using ″ to mean minutes or seconds according to context? Or are you just going to keep making up stuff?

Last edited by JayUtah; 23rd January 2023 at 08:22 AM.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 09:21 AM   #419
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
So how about it, Vixen? Do I get to converse with your "expert" directly without your interference? Or is your obvious sock puppet going to continue to spew his unqualified, uninformed ignorance from the shadows?

Can you provide a verifiable example of others using ″ to mean minutes or seconds according to context? Or are you just going to keep making up stuff?
The attached is the only sense I could get out of him.

Sorry, I am now out.

__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 09:30 AM   #420
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
The attached is the only sense I could get out of him.
Funny how this guy deflects and evades in exactly the same idiomatic way you do. And in any case he has failed to confirm your claim that ″ can be used to indicate minutes of time, despite his earlier claim that he used it that way commonly.

Quote:
Sorry, I am now out.
Meaning exactly what?

You have no consistent story for your misuse of ″ to indicate minutes of time.
You have no example of or evidence for any such usage beyond yourself.
Your anonymous "expert" has been exposed as uninformed and suspiciously similar to you.

Are you simply no longer willing to defend your claim?
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 09:37 AM   #421
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
Funny how this guy deflects and evades in exactly the same idiomatic way you do. And in any case he has failed to confirm your claim that ″ can be used to indicate minutes of time, despite his earlier claim that he used it that way commonly.



Meaning exactly what?

You have no consistent story for your misuse of ″ to indicate minutes of time.
You have no example of or evidence for any such usage beyond yourself.
Your anonymous "expert" has been exposed as uninformed and suspiciously similar to you.

Are you simply no longer willing to defend your claim?
I don't see why I should have to put up with unwarranted abuse.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 09:48 AM   #422
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I don't see why I should have to put up with unwarranted abuse.

1) It's not "abuse". It's a pushback against your false claims.

2) It's not "unwarranted". Your claims are false, and thus they warrant challenging.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 09:50 AM   #423
LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,637
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
The attached is the only sense I could get out of him.

Sorry, I am now out.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...f43e46dc_w.jpg

So you see, your "expert source" (whoever he or she might be...) explicitly states that ' denotes minutes and '' denotes seconds.

How are you doing with your search for a reliable source showing that '' can be used for minutes "in certain contexts"?

And if by "out" you mean "out to lunch", I completely understand and commiserate.
LondonJohn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 09:51 AM   #424
MarkCorrigan
Penultimate Amazing
 
MarkCorrigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,895
It's not abuse and it certainly isn't unwarranted. You keep claiming that people are being mean and abusing you but it only ever happens when you're being pressed to support your arguments. That you have no problem denigrating others makes the ploy all the more obvious.
MarkCorrigan is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2023, 10:09 AM   #425
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I don't see why I should have to put up with unwarranted abuse.
If you think you are being abused, report the post for moderation. Otherwise quit whining.

You are not being abused. You are being held accountable for inconsistent and factually disprovable claims you have made. Asking you to supply evidence for those claims, and pointing out your inability and unwillingness to do so, is not abuse. It is, in fact, how unsupported claims are detected and rejected. Doing so is the stated goal of skeptics and the major objective of this forum. By continuing to post in this forum for thousands of posts, you are effectively consenting to the process.

You have claimed ″ can be properly used to indicate either seconds or minutes of time, depending on "context." You have claimed that this is something your critics should have known, and something that others besides you have done historically.

Do you have any verifiable evidence for your claim? If so provide it, or admit that your usage is incorrect, and was incorrect when you first undertook it in this forum.

This thread exists in the larger context of your proposal to judge the work of others in fields in which you cannot demonstrate even minimal competence. Your willingness to concede the relevant errors when challenged speaks to the degree to which you can expect to command attention for that judgment. Your conduct during the examination of your factual allegations—which includes your willingness to change your story, invent clearly fradulent "experts," and complain wrongly of "abuse"—speaks to your motives for judging the work of your betters. It cannot be, as you state, merely to raise questions or to legitimately challenge work that you argue is not acceptable in the relevant expert fields.

Do you concede that ″ cannot correctly be used to indicate minutes of time? Do you concede that you are unqualified to question the work of experts in the fields of physics and forensic engineering? Do you concede that your behavior in this and other threads questions your integrity to do so with unbiased motives? If the answers to each of these questions is no, then supply evidence to support your claims and quit whining that skeptics are properly asking for it.

Last edited by JayUtah; 23rd January 2023 at 10:17 AM.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th April 2023, 11:45 PM   #426
jeremyp
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 3,937
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post

I have never, ever seen " used for minutes in any context (whether related to time or angular distance), and would certainly consider that to be incorrect if I saw it being used that way.
I’ve seen it used for feet in precisely one context and it caused hilarity to ensue later. Had it been an accepted thing that you can shift the ‘ and the “, the set maker would have queried the measurement and no hilarity would have ensued.
jeremyp is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 03:56 AM   #427
Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
 
Vixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 34,989
I am not really sure why this has been singled out for a thread of its own. It arose because someone across the pond had never heard of primes being used to signify duration of time. At least JayUtah was honest enough to admit to having heard of it. Whether correct or erroneous, I am unsure why people didn't just move on. Today, of course the US-led generation are now forced to spell the thing out almost in full as people have no idea of convention, so one has to write 'hr' and 'min' when in the old days of writing stuff by hand shorthand notation was the friend of scholars, although, thankfully, I don't go so far back as to have had to use the slide rule, as some of my accountancy tutors had had to prove proficiency in same in exams. There was a moment of horror when near long-forgotten logarithms turned up, in having to demonstrate proficiency in calculating learning curves. I have to say, it was actually nice to put maths into everyday practice.
__________________
who claims the soulless
Who speaks for the forgotten dead

~ Danzig

Vixen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 04:32 AM   #428
zooterkin
Nitpicking dilettante
Administrator
 
zooterkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 57,668
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I am not really sure why this has been singled out for a thread of its own. It arose because someone across the pond had never heard of primes being used to signify duration of time.
Simply not true, as anyone reading the OP and the first few posts can see for themselves.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell
Zooterkin is correct Darat
Nerd! Hokulele
Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232
Ezekiel 23:20
zooterkin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 08:53 AM   #429
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I am not really sure why this has been singled out for a thread of its own.
Singled out solely because a moderator made it so. The length of this thread has been due entirely to your unwillingness to admit a simple, otherwise inconsequential mistake.

Quote:
It arose because someone across the pond had never heard of primes being used to signify duration of time.
No, that's not what happened. You used an outdated notation incorrectly while trying to be clever. Consequently, some were amused. Many were confused. Whichever the case, it's because you were wrong. Rather than admit one simple mistake, you thought you could turn it into yet another Vixen Knows Best episode. You remain oblivious to the prospect that the confusion you engendered was not because everyone except you is ignorant, but because you were wrong.

Quote:
At least JayUtah was honest enough to admit to having heard of it.
Blatantly untrue.

Quote:
Whether correct or erroneous, I am unsure why people didn't just move on.
Because you didn't. Rather than say, "Oops, I meant to write the symbol for minutes," you doubled down. At first you tried to make everyone else seem ignorant for not knowing that ″ could indicate minutes of time. Then you tried to explain away your error with a string of ever more obviously fictitious claims, for which you refuse to provide the slightest evidence and which you're still perpetuating. Insisting that we should just all overlook your comical attempts to flex at our expense is itself pretty funny.

It persists because many seem to consider this incident an indication of your overall annoying behavior at this forum. We've lost count of the number of topics you're ignorant of, yet insist on pontificating about in the apparent desire to appear smart and superior. You've chosen to do so amidst skeptics, who are both motivated and equipped to test dubious claims. Then you play the victim whenever you're questioned or exposed. It's not everyone else's fault that some believe such immature behavior should not pass unchallenged in a skeptics forum.

If you're now—at long last—willing to admit that ″ does not mean minutes of time and never has—anywhere at any time—then maybe we can get somewhere. But since you still seem to be trying to prove your own superiority by selectively recalling the facts, you're still going to meet with proper resistance.

[Blah blah slide rules blah blah]

Last edited by JayUtah; 10th April 2023 at 09:00 AM.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 09:14 AM   #430
wollery
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
 
wollery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,267
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
I am not really sure why this has been singled out for a thread of its own. It arose because someone across the pond had never heard of primes being used to signify duration of time. At least JayUtah was honest enough to admit to having heard of it. Whether correct or erroneous, I am unsure why people didn't just move on. Today, of course the US-led generation are now forced to spell the thing out almost in full as people have no idea of convention, so one has to write 'hr' and 'min' when in the old days of writing stuff by hand shorthand notation was the friend of scholars, although, thankfully, I don't go so far back as to have had to use the slide rule, as some of my accountancy tutors had had to prove proficiency in same in exams. There was a moment of horror when near long-forgotten logarithms turned up, in having to demonstrate proficiency in calculating learning curves. I have to say, it was actually nice to put maths into everyday practice.
Complete and utter cobblers from start to finish.

Why lie about things that are documented right here in this very thread for all to check and see?
__________________
"You're a sick SOB. You know that, Wollery?" - Roadtoad

"Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!" --George Carlin
wollery is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 04:19 PM   #431
MarkCorrigan
Penultimate Amazing
 
MarkCorrigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,895
Vixen, why are you lying yet again?
MarkCorrigan is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 05:12 PM   #432
BazBear
Possible Suspect
 
BazBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Stowe VT USA
Posts: 3,018
Originally Posted by jeremyp View Post
I’ve seen it used for feet in precisely one context and it caused hilarity to ensue later. Had it been an accepted thing that you can shift the ‘ and the “, the set maker would have queried the measurement and no hilarity would have ensued.
Spinal Tap's Stonehenge?
__________________
I don't see how an article of clothing can be indecent. A person, yes. - Robert A. Heinlein
If Christ died for our sins, dare we make his martyrdom meaningless by not committing them? - Jules Feiffer
If you are going through hell, keep going - Winston Churchill
BazBear is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 05:43 PM   #433
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
Singled out solely because a moderator made it so. The length of this thread has been due entirely to your unwillingness to admit a simple, otherwise inconsequential mistake.



No, that's not what happened. You used an outdated notation incorrectly while trying to be clever. Consequently, some were amused. Many were confused. Whichever the case, it's because you were wrong. Rather than admit one simple mistake, you thought you could turn it into yet another Vixen Knows Best episode. You remain oblivious to the prospect that the confusion you engendered was not because everyone except you is ignorant, but because you were wrong.



Blatantly untrue.



Because you didn't. Rather than say, "Oops, I meant to write the symbol for minutes," you doubled down. At first you tried to make everyone else seem ignorant for not knowing that ″ could indicate minutes of time. Then you tried to explain away your error with a string of ever more obviously fictitious claims, for which you refuse to provide the slightest evidence and which you're still perpetuating. Insisting that we should just all overlook your comical attempts to flex at our expense is itself pretty funny.

It persists because many seem to consider this incident an indication of your overall annoying behavior at this forum. We've lost count of the number of topics you're ignorant of, yet insist on pontificating about in the apparent desire to appear smart and superior. You've chosen to do so amidst skeptics, who are both motivated and equipped to test dubious claims. Then you play the victim whenever you're questioned or exposed. It's not everyone else's fault that some believe such immature behavior should not pass unchallenged in a skeptics forum.

If you're now—at long last—willing to admit that ″ does not mean minutes of time and never has—anywhere at any time—then maybe we can get somewhere. But since you still seem to be trying to prove your own superiority by selectively recalling the facts, you're still going to meet with proper resistance.

[Blah blah slide rules blah blah]
Indeed!

Vixen forgets that there are actual, real-world qualified and licensed engineers on this forum, some of whom have degrees in their specialist fields.... we deal with things like Standard Form, SI units, and scientific and engineering notation in our work on a daily basis... WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE ******* WELL TALKING ABOUT!!!

This argument reminds me of Dara OBriain's quip about dentists;

"A bloke who's a professor of dentistry for forty years does not have a debate with some eejit who removes his teeth with string and a door"

When a lay person such as Vixen is told by several licensed engineers that she is wrong on some aspect of engineering, THEN SHE IS WRONG! End of story!
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.

Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th April 2023, 09:36 PM   #434
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
It's not really an engineering question, since no one has used primes notation for timekeeping for 50 years. But for some applications—like preparing students to take the FE exam—the history and practice of notation becomes important.

Vixen tried to be clever by using an outdated notation. She used it wrong, confused a bunch of people by doing so, and has never stopped smugly insisting she's the one trying to teach people something they didn't know. I'm just amazed at how effortlessly someone can lie and still claim to hold the high moral ground.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2023, 12:35 AM   #435
Mashuna
Ovis ex Machina
 
Mashuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sir Ddinbych
Posts: 7,001
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
I'm just amazed at how effortlessly someone can lie and still claim to hold the high moral ground.
You're fortunate to not have to deal with politicians.
__________________
I’d rather be a rising ape than a falling angel. - Sir Terry Pratchett
Mashuna is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2023, 03:46 AM   #436
Nowhere Man
Critical Thinker
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 294
Our Subaru Forester displays the time it has been in "gas saver" mode (I.e., engine stopped while not moving) in Xh Y' Z" format. It's the only thing I've seen lately that does it this way.

Fred
__________________
Hey, you! "It's" with an apostrophe means "it is" or "it has." "Its" without an apostrophe means "belongs to it."

"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Nowhere Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2023, 05:09 AM   #437
jimbob
Uncritical "thinker"
Moderator
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 31,644
Originally Posted by Nowhere Man View Post
Our Subaru Forester displays the time it has been in "gas saver" mode (I.e., engine stopped while not moving) in Xh Y' Z" format. It's the only thing I've seen lately that does it this way.

Fred
And unsurprisingly, it still uses what was the old convention. Not one where double primes meant minutes instead of seconds.

And this subject could have been avoided simply by Vixen admitting that the initial use of double primes to denote minutes had been a typo (face it, most people have brainfarts or typos sometimes). But the doubling down, as well as frankly laughable claims about everyone else's ignorance was telling.
__________________
OECD healthcare spending
Public/Compulsory Expenditure on healthcare
https://data.oecd.org/chart/60Tt

Every year since 1990 the US Public healthcare spending has been greater than the UK as a proportion of GDP. More US Tax goes to healthcare than the UK
jimbob is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2023, 07:42 AM   #438
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
Originally Posted by Nowhere Man View Post
Our Subaru Forester displays the time it has been in "gas saver" mode (I.e., engine stopped while not moving) in Xh Y' Z" format. It's the only thing I've seen lately that does it this way.
Congratulations! You may have found a rare modern example of that notation.

Originally Posted by jimbob View Post
And unsurprisingly, it still uses what was the old convention. Not one where double primes meant minutes instead of seconds.
You can see for yourself in this instructional video posted on Subaru's YouTube channel.

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE


At around 1:33 you can see the time interval in primes notation at the top of the multifunction display in the center of the binnacle. It's counting seconds upward. Hour and minute are zero in this example, but 0h is not displayed at all and instead you see 00′ for minutes.

Then at 1:41 you see the driver cycling through menu options and a trip duration is briefly displayed as 00h 01′. Don't blink, or you'll miss it. This isn't the engine-off duration, as nearly as I can tell, but rather the ongoing trip duration shown briefly as the driver goes to bring up the auto-start controls.

This would have been the perfect time to use Vixen's purported, "It depends on context." In the previous display, seconds are counting upward as they pass. They're clearly seconds. In the second display, hours and minutes would have been the natural units for a trip duration, and could have reused ′ and ″ in that capacity if it were kosher to do so. But in this case—and as is appropriate for all cases—the designers have kept the proper units and the proper notation. That way there's little potential for misunderstanding, as people have realized for centuries while using this notation.

Quote:
And this subject could have been avoided simply by Vixen admitting that the initial use of double primes to denote minutes had been a typo [...]. But the doubling down, as well as frankly laughable claims about everyone else's ignorance was telling.
Indeed, Vixen's latest backpedal seems to be that it doesn't matter whether she was right or wrong, her critics have improperly made a big deal out of it and should have just moved on. The issue is not—and never has been—simply that she made a mistake. The issue is that she went to absurd lengths to insist she hadn't, all the while calling into question the knowledge and skill of others. The larger issue is that she argues the same way when it does count.

Vixen, like so many other useless armchair detectives, seems to want to pretend she's ferreting out a hidden truth and holding powerful interests accountable to it. Certainly we neither cannot nor should not prevent people from taking an interest in and commenting upon things that happen in our world. But for a select and annoying few, this exercise seems to take the form of pontificating from a position of abject ignorance and going to extraordinary and childish lengths to make it stick, at the expense of people who genuinely do know what they're talking about. It becomes more about aggrandizing the self-appointed detective than about finding out what really happened. It's more about a person's fanatical desire to seem to get the right answer, no matter what the facts say. Dragging out her crackpot notions of how properly to use primes notation and who knew it first is just an example of such self-centered behavior.

And if you behave that way in a skeptics forum, you'll be criticized for it. Behaving that way, knowing what criticism is likely to follow, and then complaining about being "abused" by such criticism... Well, there's a word for that.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:53 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.