|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
18th December 2018, 01:45 PM | #1 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
Religious? Are you mad!?
There has been some discussion in other threads regarding whether having religious belief can be described as a mental disorder. A number of prominent atheists have suggested it is and I tend to agree with them. I suggest that most here would agree too but possibly only in extreme cases:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-...eveal/10630648
Quote:
Few would disagree with the suggestion this guy* was insane I would think, but would balk at the suggestion that all people of religious faith are thus afflicted. It's all a matter of degree I suppose and most will draw a line somewhere. If you are one of the above where do you draw the line? I have a nephew who thinks homosexuality is the result of a demon possession. Is he a sufferer of mental disorder? * One thing I forgot to add. The mother also thought the baby was evil. |
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 01:49 PM | #2 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
Listen one of the most common demonizations of atheist/skeptics/whatnot is that we stereotype religious people as either crazy or stupid.
Let me be blunt here. I wish I could do that. Do you have any idea how much easier my life with be if I could just write off religion as crazy and/or stupid? No what I have to do is create a worldview were demonstratively not crazy or stupid people believe objectively crazy or stupid things. And that kind of compartmentalization is a lot harder to wrap your head around than a simple "Well they're a crazy/stupid, case close" *wipes hands.* So no. I don't think religious people in general are crazy or stupid. |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
18th December 2018, 01:52 PM | #3 |
Maledictorian
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,556
|
When trying to diagnose a patient with schizophrenia, it is vitally important to know before if that person is religious or not - the devout can do and say much more insane stuff before it rises to the level of clinical disorder than rational atheists.
|
__________________
Dont blame me. I voted for Kodos. |
|
18th December 2018, 01:57 PM | #4 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
|
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 02:04 PM | #5 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
Richard Dawkins expressed the view that he was sympathetic to Robert Pirsig's statement in Lila (1991) that "when one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion."
|
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 02:13 PM | #6 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
I will argue that, ironically and this is actually something I butt heads with my fellow atheist/skeptics/whatevers on occasion, that this whole mentality has created this weird dichotomy where we as a society and (usually) as individual have sort of adopted the rule that we embrace religious beliefs until they become "extreme" and while that sounds good on the surface (and certain versions of that mentality 100% do have their place) I do sort wish we would take a step back and realize how often that (good intentioned) mentality leads to on a functional level society putting on religious people the rule that they be religious... right up until the point where you are acting like someone who honestly believed what they are saying was true.
And, despite my long seated problem with religion, I will not do my fellow humans the disservice of telling them "You can honestly believe there's an powerful creator controlling and judging our lives... but you can't act like somebody who honestly thought that was true would logically act." That's too much of a tightrope to expect someone to walk. Ironically that's probably why I'm seen as so "dogmatic" of an atheist, because I don't think it's fair for me to pretend I'm okay with the bedrock of a belief structure I know I'm not going to be okay with any practical real world application of. It's not fair to them. |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
18th December 2018, 02:19 PM | #7 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,332
|
Religion fills holes in understanding of people who need an answer but will not seek answers actively. It can explain all without any proof at all.
Those who cannot accept "I don't know but it really does not affect me not knowing." Deep questions like why do humans have so much more capability than other species despite being anatomically similar. Why can we override instinct and do sports like boxing. Or possibly be so cruel to other humans and write them off as having no value. These are not questions the average person can answer because most are not even vaguely understanding how a brain works. I certainly cannot say why but I can accept I do not know and may never find an answer. |
18th December 2018, 02:24 PM | #8 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 334
|
most people are mad. blunt believing in anything is.
|
18th December 2018, 02:33 PM | #9 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
|
18th December 2018, 02:36 PM | #10 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
|
18th December 2018, 02:37 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,324
|
Does this apply to other things or only religion?
I mean you could argue that someone who thinks they talk to Winston Churchill on a giant invisible telephone is not crazy but just believing a crazy thing. At what point does someone switch from 'believing a crazy thing' to being 'crazy'? |
18th December 2018, 02:40 PM | #12 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
|
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
18th December 2018, 02:47 PM | #13 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
|
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
18th December 2018, 02:50 PM | #14 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 17,646
|
Clinical insanity is often defined as a mental disorder severe enough to significantly impact on the ability of the person to function in life and in society. Most (certainly not all) people with religious beliefs are still able to function in society as it is currently organized (because society is organized in a religion-friendly structure by people who share the same or analogous beliefs). So believing in invisible gods, even to the point of running much of one's life on the basis of imagined pronouncements by the same, is not generally considered clinical insanity. Although I do think we cut much more slack for religious beliefs than we should when they impact others.
Believing in unicorns falls under the same rubric: exceedingly odd but not insane if it does not keep the believer from having a job, eating, and having a place to live. Personally I view all religions as incredible suspensions of logic and believing in them as, um, unbelievable. But I can buy into the clinical definition that keeps believers from being viewed as truly insane. Also I find religions do help soothe many people, and in addition to being sources of evil in many cases, can alternatively inspire some to do very good things for others and for society. Even fake things can be useful, like Bokononism in Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle. |
18th December 2018, 02:57 PM | #15 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,332
|
Boxing goes against common instinct. Some dude starts hitting you and you can choose to hit him back or easily get away from him. Most will get away and avoid further contact. The boxers know real permanent bodily injury will occur and possibly debilitating at an early age. But the prize is good enough to risk it.
Fighting for a cause or because it is the only option is different. You get past the danger and if one survived hope you never have to do it again. Meanwhile the boxer signs on another fight after a hospital stay for a concussion. |
18th December 2018, 03:04 PM | #16 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
Boxing is just one form of ritualised fighting, from wrestling to sumo to martial arts. Sports like (US) football and rugby are not far behind. People (mostly men) like fighting each other on an instinctual level.
|
18th December 2018, 03:46 PM | #17 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,754
|
Stupid .. what does it even mean ? Well religious people are less skeptical then I am, that's for sure. I even consider it as 'less intelligent' in a special way. Doesn't mean they can't beat me in chess. It's just that I think their opinions are ridiculous.
But what would calling them 'stupid' even be good for. Or 'crazy'. You want to remove voting rights from them ? Take their children ? |
18th December 2018, 04:14 PM | #18 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
|
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 04:54 PM | #19 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
|
"Ridiculous" . . . what does that even mean? Do you mean perhaps their religious beliefs (aka opinions) are . . . like . . . stupid (in modern times)?
Are their opinions about chess ridiculous, even those that can beat you? But what would calling them 'ridiculous' even be good for. Or 'crazy'. You want to remove voting rights from them ? Take their children ? |
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos. Rumours of a gods existence have been greatly exaggerated. Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths. |
|
18th December 2018, 05:58 PM | #20 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
|
When will the white van be coming to pick me up?
|
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown |
|
18th December 2018, 06:08 PM | #21 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
It's not in the DSM.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
18th December 2018, 07:02 PM | #22 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
|
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 07:42 PM | #23 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 13,087
|
Anyone with the belief that their religious belief entitles them to commit violent acts against other humans may be insane, but are certainly ********.
Anyone with the belief that their religious belief obligates them to help other people may be insane in some manner, but as long as they don't injure or otherwise harm another person they're OK with me. |
__________________
Music is what feelings sound like "Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus |
|
18th December 2018, 07:43 PM | #24 |
Scholar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 73
|
It is delusional, if the religious person is unwilling to consider they might be wrong. A person suffering from schizophrenia is also unlikely to accept they are delusional.
Either person might find themselves in a position to make a decision that would affect my life, and it is unreasonable to have this happen if the delusion could be the deciding factor. |
18th December 2018, 07:58 PM | #25 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
A mental illness is defined as a condition that causes significant distress or impairment of personal function. I'm sure you can find some examples of religion causing significant distress or personal function, but it is certainly not a common factor in all religious people.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
18th December 2018, 09:26 PM | #26 |
Muse
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 820
|
Not sure where to start with this one my friend, but I'll give it a try. Perhaps the most fundamental problem with the premise of the thread is the expected pace of societal change and the extreme disdain of those who "lag" by those that perceive/proclaim themselves to be the modern-day "enlightened cadre". The same groups/people that appear tremendously well-versed in psychology and neurochemistry for the purposes of debunking religious claims seem to skip the studies that describe and demonstrate how difficult it is for groups/people to change their thinking and beliefs. It's an example of choosing cynicism over empathy, which frankly (forgive my strong language) is an ugly, arrogant, childish indulgence that is a major impediment to positive dialogue and social change.
Also, if the metric for "sane" is "logical" we're all "mad" to some degree. |
18th December 2018, 09:52 PM | #27 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
Also, I'd like to add this. It's true that several prominent atheists have claimed that religion is a mental illness, but how many of them have been mental health care professionals? How many of them have studied abnormal psychology? How many of them are speaking outside their field of authority?
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
18th December 2018, 10:09 PM | #28 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
|
|
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown |
|
18th December 2018, 10:14 PM | #29 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically not to accept uncritically whatever were told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
18th December 2018, 10:18 PM | #30 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
|
|
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown |
|
18th December 2018, 10:22 PM | #31 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
|
|
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown |
|
18th December 2018, 10:29 PM | #32 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
That's not what is proposed in the OP. "A number of prominent atheists have suggested it is" is the exact quote. And you know as well as I do that atheists refer to religious people as "delusional" and refer to religion as "insanity". They're not saying that it's like a mental illness, they're saying that it is a mental illness. By the definition of mental illness, it is not.
ETA: In the case of the example provided, I would say that the person is mentally ill and religious. But their mental illness is likely schizophrenia, not religion. |
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
18th December 2018, 10:53 PM | #33 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
|
If just one person ever claimed that an invisible, magical, super sky fairy (aka daddy ) that created everything actually exists, along with all the other paranormal/supernatural claims made by religions, I wonder how that person would be diagnosed by mental health professionals?
|
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos. Rumours of a gods existence have been greatly exaggerated. Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths. |
|
18th December 2018, 11:07 PM | #34 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
Hello again attempt5001. It's good to see you being prepared to engage in conversation on this thread, most of the faithful tend to shy away from discussions of this kind. I don't feel distain but empathy for those afflicted with beliefs that cloud their reasoning. I was once so afflicted, (as we so many others on this forum), and experienced tremendous relief when I was fortunate enough to leave it behind. Social change has been most rapid in the West and one of the results of this has been the dramatic decline in religious observance, in Europe in particular. Don't know if those "groups/people that appear tremendously well-versed in psychology and neurochemistry" become that way with the purpose of "debunking religious claims" or if it is the other way around. Atheists like Richard Dawkins claim considerable success in relieving people of their faith with his rather confrontational approach, which I don't think he does with malice. Perhaps he feels he's doing good with his approach. As kellyb says above ^ the claim that religion is like mental illness has been suggested by some. The way it is passed on, from parents to children, is an illustration of this. Interesting the way so many of the faithful, aren't bothered by the fact that they just happened to embrace the faith of their parents, and it was the right one. |
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 11:10 PM | #35 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
|
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 11:19 PM | #36 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
|
|
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard. |
|
18th December 2018, 11:39 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
|
18th December 2018, 11:52 PM | #38 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
19th December 2018, 03:36 AM | #39 |
Lackey
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,982
|
I've always thought that definition is nothing but a tarting up of "in Britain if you are upper-class you are eccentric, if lower class you are mad".
What that definition does is say that a mental illness depends on whether you have the means via influence, power, social status, money and so on to force society to enable your illness or not. I'd rather a definition that doesn't depend on a person's or organisation's influence to decide if something is a mental illness or not but on some form of objective criteria. Let me give you an example, many homosexual people - even today in slightly more tolerant countries like the UK or Australia - will experience anguish at times or even lifelong because their sexuality "causes significant distress or impairment of personal function", by your definition homosexuality should again be classified as a mental illness. |
__________________
If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart? Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago |
|
19th December 2018, 06:03 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,324
|
Indeed. I kind of understand why its there but it does seem rather woolly.
Equally someone who talks to Churchill on the big invisible telephone is not mentally ill provided it doesn't impact their lives in some terrible way? Someone seeing people who aren't there that tell them 'just get on with your business as normal' isn't mentally ill? Equally you could probably make an argument that a nun or a priest has significantly impaired their personal function with their belief in God but because that is an acceptable lifestyle it gets a pass. It seems to basically boil down some things are 'acceptable' to society and some things aren't. Which doesn't seem like a very good clinical definition. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|