IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Religion and Philosophy
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 14th February 2019, 01:38 PM   #801
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
Talking about "eras" and "load" screw ups . . .

Ok, Ok, loud it is. God has his finger in my spell check.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th February 2019, 01:40 PM   #802
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Ok, Ok, loud it is. God has his finger in my spell check.
What about errors as well?
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th February 2019, 02:00 PM   #803
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
What about errors as well?

No eras was right. Responding to Apathia who spoke of same.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th February 2019, 02:40 PM   #804
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
No eras was right. Responding to Apathia who spoke of same.
So neither of us is perfect then? Bugger.
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th February 2019, 02:51 PM   #805
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
On the Catholic in free fall thread I posted:

Quote:
Only just over 2 months until Easter and in the Philippines they will be dusting off the crosses and sharpening the nails soon, in preparation for the crucifixions. It would impress me no end to see Francis stepping up to the plate and trying to stop this barbarism.

Mind you it's a good money spinner as the ghoulish flock to see the spectacle. This could in no small part, be the reason the practice has not been stopped long ago, by any authority.

To which arthwollipot replied:

Quote:
For the record (since I know you're curious), I consider that particular event to be a level of self-harm that borders on the pathological.

So if arth agrees this is pathological (well bordering on) how about those who practice self flagellation?

We can progress down the scale of self harm and even into the field of self denial. Where is the dividing line then when we are not over the pathological threshold? Just above or below eating meat on Friday perhaps?
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th February 2019, 05:24 PM   #806
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by dann View Post
So if arth agrees this is pathological (well bordering on) how about those who practice self flagellation?

We can progress down the scale of self harm and even into the field of self denial. Where is the dividing line then when we are not over the pathological threshold? Just above or below eating meat on Friday perhaps?
Nice slippery slope you've got going there. What about pierced ears? After all, those practicing crucifixion in the Philippines are putting holes in themselves, why shouldn't we define piercing your earlobe, or lip, or tongue, to be self-harm as well?

Obviously there are always going to be serious problems with predefining a firm and exact cutoff between pathological and nonpathological. Each individual is going to be different and will receive a different diagnosis if examined by a mental health professional.

Personally, since I know you're curious, and I'd like to stress again that I am not a mental health professional, if you're deliberately damaging your body - by crucifixion or self-flagellation, since those are the methods you bring up - I think it's possible that it's pathological. Self-harm can be a symptom of several different mental disorders including bipolar disorder, body dysmorphic disorder and major depressive disorder. If the Philippine crucifees were to voluntarily undergo a mental health assessment, they might be diagnosed with one of these. But then again, they might not.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th February 2019, 06:20 PM   #807
kellyb
Penultimate Amazing
 
kellyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
Originally Posted by dann View Post
Why did they bring in the "cult specialists"?
I think it was part of the "Satanic Panic" stuff in the 80's and 90's. They were trying to immunize us (via information) against joining cults, satanic or otherwise.
See: http://weekinweird.com/2016/07/19/wa...occult-crimes/

Quote:
The Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults is one of these videos, and it’s a hell of a watch, if you’ll pardon the pun. Featuring “occult experts” with mullets that would put Billy Ray Cyrus to shame, interviews with alleged victims of satanic rituals, and dusty old men who dare to ponder how far America’s freedom of religion should extend, the 73-minute VHS tape is a glimpse into the Satanic Panic era that’s as frightening as it is hilarious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISvFGdfAplg

ETA:
They used to also bring in people who claimed to be experts on subliminal advertising..."apostates" from the ad industry who said they used to put subliminal sex messages in their ads. Also, they'd bring in people who claimed to be adult aborted fetuses who survived abortion and were rescued out of dumpsters outside of abortion clinics by prolifers. Seems in retrospect there was a whole circuit of people who made a living touring private Christian schools, "teaching" kids about the evils of the outside, non-christian world.
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan

Last edited by kellyb; 14th February 2019 at 06:31 PM.
kellyb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th February 2019, 06:06 AM   #808
Apathia
Philosopher
 
Apathia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Lots of eras.

The one thing that comes out load and clear is the God of Abraham is a master of screw ups.

1. He makes Adam and Eve perfect but they turn out flawed - their own fault of course.

2. He drowns the lot accept for Noah and family but this goes pear shaped as well.

3. He decides to have a special chosen people and screw the rest. Alas, no joy here either.

4. Sends down His son to take the wrap as a sacrifice but many will not buy into this because ..... well .... it's just plain silly.

5. The Islamists now tell us Muhammad tuned everything up and came up with the final word ....... sigh.

(Won't make any mention of Joh Smith and the Latter Day Sillies because the absurdity meter goes off the scale with this one.)
It ought to be apparent by now that Humans create Gods in their own image. We get the grand icons of our own stupidity.
Insane people, insane God. (Disclaimer: "Insane" in the popular usage meaning shy of rational potential.)
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections."
Justice William O. Douglas

"Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures."
Author Unknown

Last edited by Apathia; 15th February 2019 at 06:11 AM.
Apathia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th February 2019, 01:28 PM   #809
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Nice slippery slope you've got going there. What about pierced ears? After all, those practicing crucifixion in the Philippines are putting holes in themselves, why shouldn't we define piercing your earlobe, or lip, or tongue, to be self-harm as well?
Interesting bit of a screw up here. You show the post material you are responding to as coming from dann but it was my little gem.

Apart from this you are doing the same thing others have done before that I find tiresome and have responded to elsewhere. It's the "But look, these other guys are doing the same thing" line. They may well be but this thread is about examining whether religious observance is insane.

None the less there are many types of self harm that folk do from putting plates in their lips to extending necks. There can be a fuzzy line between religious and other cultural reasons for this but to me it is insanity all the same.


Quote:
Obviously there are always going to be serious problems with predefining a firm and exact cutoff between pathological and nonpathological. Each individual is going to be different and will receive a different diagnosis if examined by a mental health professional.
And even greater divergence of diagnosis if the diagnosing guy is non professional.

Quote:
Personally, since I know you're curious, and I'd like to stress again that I am not a mental health professional, if you're deliberately damaging your body - by crucifixion or self-flagellation, since those are the methods you bring up - I think it's possible that it's pathological. Self-harm can be a symptom of several different mental disorders including bipolar disorder, body dysmorphic disorder and major depressive disorder. If the Philippine crucifees were to voluntarily undergo a mental health assessment, they might be diagnosed with one of these. But then again, they might not.
Thanks.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th February 2019, 05:07 AM   #810
HansMustermann
Penultimate Amazing
 
HansMustermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,331
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Nice slippery slope you've got going there.
Actually, that's not a slippery slope at all, unless it is claimed or implied that one thing leads to another. The progression mentioned in Thor's message was about an observer going along the spectrum and deciding where they draw the line between ok and not ok, not some natural progression from doing one type of self harm to doing another.

This is a slippery slope argument: "For if once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination. Once begin upon this downward path, you never know where you are to stop. Many a man has dated his ruin from some murder or other that perhaps he thought little of at the time." -- Thomas De Quincey

(Chosen for explicitly mentioning that downward path and not knowing when you'll stop, though it would have been a slippery slope argument even if I ended that quote before that sentence.)

This is not: "Both murder and robbery are criminal acts."

Same for piercings, self-cutting, and whatnot. Unless there is an explicit or implicit claim that if you start with piercing your ears, you end up getting yourself nailed to a cross, then it's not a slippery slope argument at all.
__________________
Springfield Heights Institute of Technology poster child

Last edited by HansMustermann; 16th February 2019 at 05:18 AM.
HansMustermann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th February 2019, 01:32 PM   #811
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Thanks for the clarification Hans. Must be careful my verbal conflict with the faithful doesn't lead to the blowing up of churches.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th February 2019, 06:22 PM   #812
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Interesting bit of a screw up here. You show the post material you are responding to as coming from dann but it was my little gem.
I have no idea how I managed that. My apologies for the messup.

Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Apart from this you are doing the same thing others have done before that I find tiresome and have responded to elsewhere. It's the "But look, these other guys are doing the same thing" line. They may well be but this thread is about examining whether religious observance is insane.
My close friend (remember me mentioning her upthread) informs me that Australian law prevents religious observance from forming the basis of a mental health diagnosis. It is actually illegal to diagnose someone as mentally ill based on nothing more than a religious belief.

Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
None the less there are many types of self harm that folk do from putting plates in their lips to extending necks. There can be a fuzzy line between religious and other cultural reasons for this but to me it is insanity all the same.
I have a pierced ear and a tattoo. Would you say that I am insane?

Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
And even greater divergence of diagnosis if the diagnosing guy is non professional.
If the diagnosing guy is non professional, then the diagnosis is worthless. Worse than worthless, in fact, since it is likely to be directly counterproductive.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th February 2019, 06:23 PM   #813
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by HansMustermann View Post
Actually, that's not a slippery slope at all, unless it is claimed or implied that one thing leads to another. The progression mentioned in Thor's message was about an observer going along the spectrum and deciding where they draw the line between ok and not ok, not some natural progression from doing one type of self harm to doing another.
Okay, my use of the term was sloppy and not according to the formal definition. I accept the correction.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th February 2019, 02:21 PM   #814
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I have no idea how I managed that. My apologies for the messup.
No sweat.

Quote:
My close friend (remember me mentioning her upthread) informs me that Australian law prevents religious observance from forming the basis of a mental health diagnosis. It is actually illegal to diagnose someone as mentally ill based on nothing more than a religious belief.
Really?

Forgive my skepticism but if some shrink has a patient who is convinced his garage is overrun by dragons, (dragons in garages strikes a cord with some), said shrink is prevented by law from diagnosing insanity, if the dude says it's part of a religious belief?

Quote:
I have a pierced ear and a tattoo. Would you say that I am insane?
Well if you're reasons for afflicting this on yourself were religious then the question may be asked. You have conceded, (guardedly perhaps), that those cross hangers and flagellationalists are crazy so we are just trying to find a line of demarcation here.

Quote:
If the diagnosing guy is non professional, then the diagnosis is worthless. Worse than worthless, in fact, since it is likely to be directly counterproductive.
Heavy stuff. I will restrict myself to just asking questions then. You?
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th February 2019, 05:12 PM   #815
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Really?

Forgive my skepticism but if some shrink has a patient who is convinced his garage is overrun by dragons, (dragons in garages strikes a cord with some), said shrink is prevented by law from diagnosing insanity, if the dude says it's part of a religious belief?
I'm only reporting what my girlfriend - a recognised expert in the field who happens to be speaking at another mental health conference next week - is telling me. I'm qualified to judge neither mental health nor law, especially for random hypotheticals. It is illegal to base a mental health diagnosis on religious belief alone.

Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Well if you're reasons for afflicting this on yourself were religious then the question may be asked. You have conceded, (guardedly perhaps), that those cross hangers and flagellationalists are crazy so we are just trying to find a line of demarcation here.
Again, you appear to have completely failed to understand what I said. This is getting to be a pattern. Is anyone else failing to understand what I say? Is it me? Am I explaining things badly? I think I'm being pretty clear.

Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Heavy stuff. I will restrict myself to just asking questions then. You?
Again, I am not a mental health professional. I do not attempt diagnosis. Unless you are a mental health professional, you should not attempt diagnosis either.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st February 2019, 02:21 PM   #816
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I'm only reporting what my girlfriend - a recognised expert in the field who happens to be speaking at another mental health conference next week - is telling me. I'm qualified to judge neither mental health nor law, especially for random hypotheticals. It is illegal to base a mental health diagnosis on religious belief alone.
You can see how my example given does point at the silliness of the supposed legal constraint though ..... can't you?

Quote:
Again, you appear to have completely failed to understand what I said. This is getting to be a pattern. Is anyone else failing to understand what I say? Is it me? Am I explaining things badly? I think I'm being pretty clear.

Yes well perhaps it does illustrate a lack of clear expression. As I saw it your example was just another of those "Oh, these other guys (or me) are doing it too" thingy. This thread is about religious belief possibly being being madness and some illustrations demonstrating this.

Quote:
Again, I am not a mental health professional. I do not attempt diagnosis. Unless you are a mental health professional, you should not attempt diagnosis either.
Will try hard not to although you are an interesting case study.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st February 2019, 06:31 PM   #817
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
You can see how my example given does point at the silliness of the supposed legal constraint though ..... can't you?
Doesn't change the law. In Australia, you cannot use religious belief as the basis of a mental health diagnosis. It's illegal. If someone really is mentally ill, the diagnosis will be based on other criteria. And I repeat - it is entirely possible to be mentally ill and religious.

Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Yes well perhaps it does illustrate a lack of clear expression. As I saw it your example was just another of those "Oh, these other guys (or me) are doing it too" thingy. This thread is about religious belief possibly being being madness and some illustrations demonstrating this.
Okay, here's what I said:

Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Personally, since I know you're curious, and I'd like to stress again that I am not a mental health professional, if you're deliberately damaging your body - by crucifixion or self-flagellation, since those are the methods you bring up - I think it's possible that it's pathological. Self-harm can be a symptom of several different mental disorders including bipolar disorder, body dysmorphic disorder and major depressive disorder. If the Philippine crucifees were to voluntarily undergo a mental health assessment, they might be diagnosed with one of these. But then again, they might not.
Apparently you interpreted that as me "guardedly" saying that yes, they're crazy. Despite the fact that I said "they might be diagnosed" with one of a range of mental disorders, and "they might not". I said "I think it's possible that it's pathological". That doesn't mean that I think they're crazy, guardedly or otherwise. It very distinctly and explicitly means that they might be. Or they might not. And that they would have to voluntarily undergo a mental health assessment to find out. Is that a bit clearer?

Please indicate your understanding of what I am saying. I'll find it difficult to say "body dysmorphic disorder" if I have to use words of two syllables or less.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd February 2019, 02:01 PM   #818
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Doesn't change the law. In Australia, you cannot use religious belief as the basis of a mental health diagnosis. It's illegal. If someone really is mentally ill, the diagnosis will be based on other criteria. And I repeat - it is entirely possible to be mentally ill and religious.

Okay, here's what I said:

Apparently you interpreted that as me "guardedly" saying that yes, they're crazy. Despite the fact that I said "they might be diagnosed" with one of a range of mental disorders, and "they might not". I said "I think it's possible that it's pathological". That doesn't mean that I think they're crazy, guardedly or otherwise. It very distinctly and explicitly means that they might be. Or they might not. And that they would have to voluntarily undergo a mental health assessment to find out. Is that a bit clearer?

Please indicate your understanding of what I am saying. I'll find it difficult to say "body dysmorphic disorder" if I have to use words of two syllables or less.

This isn't getting any better or clearer arth, and you now resorting to personal insult shows you are struggling.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th February 2019, 04:32 PM   #819
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
This isn't getting any better or clearer arth, and you now resorting to personal insult shows you are struggling.
Please indicate your understanding of what I am saying. Perhaps by restating my argument in your own words. If I can't make myself clear to you I might need to use different words.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th February 2019, 05:15 PM   #820
Apathia
Philosopher
 
Apathia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Please indicate your understanding of what I am saying. Perhaps by restating my argument in your own words. If I can't make myself clear to you I might need to use different words.
I see what you did there.
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections."
Justice William O. Douglas

"Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures."
Author Unknown
Apathia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th February 2019, 11:36 PM   #821
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Please indicate your understanding of what I am saying. Perhaps by restating my argument in your own words. If I can't make myself clear to you I might need to use different words.
Originally Posted by Apathia View Post
I see what you did there.

Yes I see what he did there too, so I will reply with an appropriate response:

" ------------------- " You fill in the words arth as cannot. I am at a loss to know what your argument is.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 12:06 AM   #822
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Yes I see what he did there too, so I will reply with an appropriate response:

" ------------------- " You fill in the words arth as cannot. I am at a loss to know what your argument is.
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religion is not a mental illness. That's it. That's my entire argument in six words. The rest has been you challenging that position and me backing it up with facts.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 12:23 AM   #823
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religion is not a mental illness. That's it. That's my entire argument in six words. The rest has been you challenging that position and me backing it up with facts.
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religious belief is a form of mental illness. My eight words trump your six .
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 12:45 AM   #824
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religious belief is a form of mental illness. My eight words trump your six .
Oh, I never said I didn't understand your argument.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 10:03 AM   #825
Apathia
Philosopher
 
Apathia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 7,144
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religious belief is a form of mental illness. My eight words trump your six .
Can we get Medicare to cover it?
(I realize that major players in this thread are not Americans.)

You've qualified your position with more than eight words in this thread, so I know you aren't saying that people with religious beliefs are clinically insane and need social attention. I agree that beliefs in the existence of supernatural, mythological beings is an impairment to the total health of the psyche. (Especially fundamentalist beliefs)

Please qualify as well for people like me. When I was in the hospital three weeks back (Nasty kidney stone), I was asked what my religious preferences were. I could have said "none", but that wouldn't have been quite accurate. I said "Buddhist" not just that it would spare me the padre or pastor whoever coming round to wake me up for some unnecessary encouragement and salvation for my soul, but that I do derive a lot of purpose in my life from the Buddhist context. As a Secular Buddhist I don't believe in Reincarnation. I take the various Buddhas, bodhisattvas, wisdom kings, and what not of esoteric Buddhism as metaphorical only for use in the context of certain meditation practices and rituals. I emphasize that Classical Buddhism was a deconstruction of metaphysical beliefs, and that the later "Mahayana" reworking moves Buddhism closer to an affirmation of Human existence. But since the basic Buddhist philosophy of life and meditation practice inform how I live, one could say (and people do) that I'm religious about Buddhism.

I have a mystical side about me as well, and it's Buddhism that helped me understand how to ground that in empirical reality.

Also if location permitted, I would be weekly attending a Unitarian-Universalist Church.

One more thing I've demonstrated in this thread. If I get talking matters of life philosophy, it very soon gets religious (not in the sense of Bible thumping with do's and don'ts. A core thing with me is no dictating to others. I do not like being dictated unto me.)

Religion is a tad more than gods and after-life venues. Happily it's more than fundamental dogmas and adherence to legalistic perspectives. And one can be "spiritual" without the supernatural. (Please note that I put the word "spiritual" in quotes.) So I confess to being religious and holding some functional beliefs specific to the Buddhist tradition that aren't supernatural.

I would laugh if someone declared me mentally unfit for in anyway identifying with religion.

But have I been mentally unfit, especially in my youth when I was a Christian Theist?
Yes.
Here's the context: I'm not physically fit. The unhealthy drinking of sodas and colas was likely a contributing factor to my kidney stone. A not so healthy diet keeps acid reflux as an issue. In the same sense, beliefs can keep a person mentally unfit to varying degrees up to even clinical illness.

But belief can go both ways. As I said in a previous comment, one of my college friends is kept from going off the rails by his belief in Jesus Christ. Yes. He's substituted another type of addiction for drugs, alcohol, and negativity. But it's not as harmful an addiction for him. I don't think he'll ever be able to walk without his crutch or maybe it will become just a cane. But I have no reason to try to reform him.

Beliefs not rooted in empirical reality can keep a person psychologically unfit up to even, but not necessarily, a clinical illness

(1. I'm dammed long-winded. 2. I'm still drinking diet sodas.)
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections."
Justice William O. Douglas

"Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures."
Author Unknown
Apathia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 11:07 AM   #826
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religious belief is a form of mental illness. My eight words trump your six : p.
Religious belief in general, or theism in particular, is a mental illness?
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 01:44 PM   #827
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I honestly don't know how to state it any clearer. Religion is not a mental illness. That's it. That's my entire argument in six words. The rest has been you challenging that position and me backing it up with facts.

Looks like a statement given with authority to me rather than an argument.

Your argument to back up this statement consisted of references to a manual, (the authority of which was questioned by others), and references to the opinion of another who had some, not clearly specified, authority.

You also indicated non professionals should not be making diagnosis, while identifying yourself as being in that number, and simultaneously giving us the benefit of your knowledge, about the nature and identification of mental disorder.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 01:59 PM   #828
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
Religious belief in general, or theism in particular, is a mental illness?
Belief that an invisible, magical, all knowing, all seeing, all powerful, paranormal/supernatural super-wizard (aka - a god) actually exists when there isn’t a single piece of credible evidence that such a thing does, could or should exist, is a form of mental insanity (not a sane belief). No less a form of insanity than a mind that believes fantasy characters like Harry Potter or Merlin actually exist.
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.

Last edited by ynot; 26th February 2019 at 02:14 PM.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 02:16 PM   #829
Hlafordlaes
Disorder of Kilopi
 
Hlafordlaes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: State of Flux
Posts: 17,621
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
Belief that an invisible, magical, all knowing, all seeing, all powerful, paranormal/supernatural super-wizard actually exists when there isn’t a single piece of credible evidence that such a thing does, could or should exist, is a form of mental insanity (not a sane belief). No less a form of insanity than a mind that believes fantasy characters like Harry Potter or Merlin actually exist.
Well... if you take the narrative completely out of the natural world, evidence and faith are the same thing.

Which, come to think of it, explains Fox News.
__________________
"His real name is Count Douchenozzle von Stenchfahrter und Lichtendicks." - Da Joik
Hlafordlaes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 02:46 PM   #830
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by Hlafordlaes View Post
Well... if you take the narrative completely out of the natural world, evidence and faith are the same thing.

Which, come to think of it, explains Fox News.
If to make it true you have to believe, then your truth is mere make-believe.
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.

Last edited by ynot; 26th February 2019 at 04:09 PM.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2019, 05:25 PM   #831
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Looks like a statement given with authority to me rather than an argument.
Fine. Whatever. Do your own research. Teaching is impossible when you deny the authority of the teacher. I'm done.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th March 2019, 12:36 AM   #832
Tassman
Graduate Poster
 
Tassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,237
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
On the Catholic in free fall thread I posted:




To which arthwollipot replied:




So if arth agrees this is pathological (well bordering on) how about those who practice self flagellation?

We can progress down the scale of self harm and even into the field of self denial. Where is the dividing line then when we are not over the pathological threshold? Just above or below eating meat on Friday perhaps?
For the record, it's not just Christians who engage in such pathological, misdirected piety. During the nine-day Phuket Vegetarian Festival, some pious Buddhists torture themselves in order to redirect bad luck and misfortune away from their communities and ensure a year of prosperity.

https://www.phuket101.net/phuket-vegetarian-festival/
__________________
“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” ― Douglas Adams.
Tassman is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th March 2019, 06:38 PM   #833
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Religious self-harm is uncommon, but hardly unique to any specific region or sect.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 01:37 PM   #834
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by Tassman View Post
For the record, it's not just Christians who engage in such pathological, misdirected piety. During the nine-day Phuket Vegetarian Festival, some pious Buddhists torture themselves in order to redirect bad luck and misfortune away from their communities and ensure a year of prosperity.

https://www.phuket101.net/phuket-vegetarian-festival/

Certainly there are nutters in every religion.

Having lived in Thailand for over 6 years, I noticed that most people were not very serious, about reverent observation. Luck and merit do command the attention of most however. Bad luck to do or say this and good luck to be had, if this or that is said or done. Being high on merit will secure good luck, and doing things like giving food to the monks when they pass your door, gets you lots of merit.

Talking about road safety issues is sure to bring you bad luck, and most likely an accident will result from it. Road accidents are because of bad luck, which in turn is the result of the unfortunate being low in merit. The road toll in Thailand is horrendous.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 01:39 PM   #835
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Religious self-harm is uncommon, but hardly unique to any specific region or sect.

Harm to others is much more common.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 06:01 PM   #836
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
Harm to others is much more common.
Depending on the definition of what constitutes "harm", of course. I don't think very many people are nailing others to crosses against their will.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 06:29 PM   #837
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Depending on the definition of what constitutes "harm", of course. I don't think very many people are nailing others to crosses against their will.
Do you really think that nailing an immortal son of a God that can perform magic and miracles would actually cause that son/god any harm? Hell, the guy wasn’t even adversely affected by death. And given it was the will of this God to have his son sacrificed in the first place, then it couldn't have been “against their will” in the slightest. Exactly the opposite in fact.

If you believe the silly JC fantasy myth has any basis in reality, are you still claiming to be an atheist?
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.

Last edited by ynot; 11th March 2019 at 06:37 PM.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 06:39 PM   #838
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
Do you really think that nailing an immortal son of a God that can perform magic and miracles would actually cause that son/god any harm? Hell, the guy wasn’t even adversely affected by death. And given it was the will of this God to have his son sacrificed in the first place, then it couldn't have been “against their will” in the slightest. Exactly the opposite in fact.

If you believe the silly JC fantasy myth has any basis in reality, are you still claiming to be an atheist?
I am failing to understand the relevance of this to the previous posts.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 06:41 PM   #839
ynot
Philosopher
 
ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Present
Posts: 9,278
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I am failing to understand the relevance of this to the previous posts.
Your apparent cognitive dissonance isn't my problem.
__________________
Paranormal/supernatural beliefs are knowledge placebos.
Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated.
Make beliefs truths and you get make-believe truths.
ynot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th March 2019, 06:54 PM   #840
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
Originally Posted by ynot View Post
Your apparent cognitive dissonance isn't my problem.
And your bizarre non-sequitur isn't mine.
arthwollipot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Religion and Philosophy

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.