ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags 9/11 , aa77 , ae911truth , Craig McKee , pentagon

Reply
Old 20th November 2017, 05:31 PM   #41
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
 
DGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,376
Originally Posted by Fonebone View Post
Strange --
The link to your video appears to be corrupted because the forum video
viewbox expands with empty content.
The video may be viewed by the curious by inserting the alphanumeric string youtube v=_HlUmmPBoLg into your browser. Fonebone
Works fine for me...............
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

"How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41
DGM is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th November 2017, 05:48 PM   #42
Captain_Swoop
Penultimate Amazing
 
Captain_Swoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,638
No plane at the Pentagon, again?

Surely this is the last twitching of the 9/11 conspiracy.
Captain_Swoop is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th November 2017, 06:36 PM   #43
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,404
Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop View Post
No plane at the Pentagon, again?

Surely this is the last twitching of the 9/11 conspiracy.
Lately, this has been its major twitching.
Most of the fools for which there was hope have seen the light.
Only the hopeless remain.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th November 2017, 06:46 PM   #44
JSanderO
Master Poster
 
JSanderO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: nyc
Posts: 2,689
This is less about fact and science / physics / engineering.. but about not accepting ANYTHING coming thru official channels... the government, the mainstream media, corporations... As far as truthers are concerned this cabal is pulling one over on the people and anything they say or report is to be read as a boldface lie.

Some truthers attempt to sound "scientific" to pull the wool over the eyes of "journalists" like Craig McKee or Barry Zwicker and assorted "activists" and concerned people of all sorts of backgrounds. None of their "arguments" hold any water... but that won't stop them from going on and on and never admitting they were/are wrong. They simply pop up with another point to drive the "they lied to us" them home.

Of course official channels DO spin... but the truthers see this on a whole other level.

It's sad and amusing... but it's hardly worth the time people have devoted to trying to show that these people are nutts.
__________________
So many idiots and so little time.
JSanderO is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th November 2017, 07:15 PM   #45
LSSBB
Devilish Dictionarian
 
LSSBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: An elusive house at Bachelors Grove Cemetery
Posts: 15,801
Originally Posted by pgimeno View Post
Isn't that twice the same link?
Oops
__________________
"Realize deeply that the present moment is all you ever have." (Eckhart Tolle, 2004)
LSSBB is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th November 2017, 07:19 PM   #46
Norman Alexander
Master Poster
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,121
They have 200 names out of 250 million who say they are true believers? That's significant numbers right there!
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornetsí nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th November 2017, 07:21 PM   #47
Fonebone
persona non grata
 
Fonebone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 481
Originally Posted by DGM View Post
Works fine for me...............
Yes - I just tested the link and the link malady has been corrected.
__________________
Truth, like the sun, allows itself to be obscured;
but, like the sun, only for a time __Bovee

Truth once elicited never dies -Bancroft

twoofers versus twidiots , twaitors , twusters and boil-thuckers
Fonebone is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2017, 04:35 PM   #48
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,404
They are all sooo very excited about this new group and its message!


One guy created a poll:
"What caused the damage at the Pentagon?"
A) A missile? (27 voted yes)
B) Explosives within the Pentagon? (14)
C) something else? (0)

Hehe wonderful, 2/3 of the morons say "missile", yet Craig McKee himself thinks that is not supported by evidence:
One guy names Patrick Gainor posted "Thanks for the add... PS it was a cruise missle", to which McKee responded: "Patrick, I am very surprised so many people believe it was a missile with no evidence to support this. But the purpose of this group is for us to agree that a 757 didn't hit the building rather than debating the missile theory. If we agree that this has been established, then the official story is shown to be false."

Craig, you believe plenty of stupid stuff without actual evidence yourself, you cannot be surprised!?

One Robin Galunić-Farizi opines: "If you look the videos released, and the post-crash pictures, looks like Global Hawk drone hit it"
McKee: "The point of this group is to agree that no 757 hit the Pentagon. We don't need a theory. And there is no evidence for a cruise missile."

That is the mantra, the strategy that McKee has been pursuing for at least a few months now: Please, Truthers, No Theories! He had blogged on May 1st: "Truthers must focus on destroying the official story, not splintering over dozens of Theories"

He realizes full well that NO Truther theory survives any test.


ETA:
Group link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/388111014962530/
It was created on Nov 16 10:38 pm (my time zone: CET)
AE911T posted their piece about the radio debate on November 17 at 4:11am
Kelly David was made admin on November 17 at 5:45am
On November 18 at 1:17am McKee commented at AE: "For those interested in this subject, I've just created a new group called No 757 hit the Pentagon." That was more than a day after he created the group.
I spotted it towards the end of November 18. It had 110 members then
End ofMembersDiff.
Nov 18110+110
Nov 19168+58
Nov 20205+37
Nov 21225+20
Nov 22239+14

Typical pattern for any new group.
McKee intends to use the number of people of the list to 'show that the majority of the movement isn't buying the government claim of a "crash."'. Well fine! He will fizzle out under 500. If that is the majority of the Truth Movement: Thanks for proving my point that your Movement is tiny!
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)

Last edited by Oystein; 22nd November 2017 at 05:20 PM.
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2017, 05:14 PM   #49
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
 
DGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,376
So, the purpose of the group is to believe not support the belief.

Sounds about right for this group............
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

"How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41
DGM is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2017, 06:00 PM   #50
JSanderO
Master Poster
 
JSanderO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: nyc
Posts: 2,689
I have been saying this for ages... truthers simply don't believe anything from official sources... anything from the mainstream media or from a corporate PR release. It's all about DISBELIEF....

Since they don't believe then they conclude what we were told was FALSE and that's all that matters... They lied to us... Why did they lie to us? Because liars lie to cover up / avoid the truth.... Ergo gov knows the truth but they ain't sayin' and what they do say is a pack of lies... including NIST. You don't need to know much more than this.
__________________
So many idiots and so little time.
JSanderO is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2017, 07:43 PM   #51
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 24,814
https://www.facebook.com/groups/388111014962530/about/

242 idiots - and they have no clue they are nuts
__________________
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein
"... education as the means of developing our greatest abilities" - JFK
https://folding.stanford.edu/ fold with your computer - join team 13232
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2017, 10:06 AM   #52
FFTR
Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by JSanderO View Post
I have been saying this for ages... truthers simply don't believe anything from official sources... anything from the mainstream media or from a corporate PR release. It's all about DISBELIEF....

Since they don't believe then they conclude what we were told was FALSE and that's all that matters... They lied to us... Why did they lie to us? Because liars lie to cover up / avoid the truth.... Ergo gov knows the truth but they ain't sayin' and what they do say is a pack of lies... including NIST. You don't need to know much more than this.
I agree with most of what you stated. It has been my experience that "truthers" accept information/data from MSM when it fits their belief.
ex: news reporter stating WTC7 collapsed before it did.

Groups like CIT, AE911T strive to cherry pick data, misrepresent statements, etc, since they have no hard evidence to back up the explanation they want the supporters to believe.
FFTR is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2017, 12:14 PM   #53
JSanderO
Master Poster
 
JSanderO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: nyc
Posts: 2,689
They never explain how the collapses were made to happen... how it was set up undetected... and of course... WHY were the towers destroyed? Were the hijackers faked? What was that about? The whole scenario they outline... when they do is way beyond belief.

And the motive for all this? steal gold? start wars? take away rights?
__________________
So many idiots and so little time.
JSanderO is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2017, 12:48 PM   #54
Captain_Swoop
Penultimate Amazing
 
Captain_Swoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,638
There are as many conspiracy theories as there are theorists.

Trying to get them all on the same page is like herding cats.
Captain_Swoop is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2017, 01:19 PM   #55
bknight
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 422
Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop View Post
There are as many conspiracy theories as there are theorists.

Trying to get them all on the same page is like herding cats.
This does not count the multiplicity effect, however.
bknight is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th November 2017, 07:18 AM   #56
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,404
Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop View Post
There are as many conspiracy theories as there are theorists.

Trying to get them all on the same page is like herding cats.
You are correct - there are (to a first approximation anyway) zero 9/11 CTs, and zero 9/11 CTists.

Because if you pay careful attention, you will notice that practically none of them ever commit to a conspiracy theory to explain the events of 9/11, which at a minimum ought to
  • include all three crime scenes,
  • be internally consistent
  • have a bare minimum amount of detail on the what, the how, the who and the why
Ask any 9/11 Truther to summarize concisely and comprehensively in a couple of paragraphs "what happend on 9/11", and you will run into silence, evasions, wild goose chases, and confused minds running into random details. Ask the same of a sane student of 9/11 ("debunker"), and you are highly likely to get, in about two paragraphs, a consise, comprehensive, coherent and consisten summary of who did what how and why at the WTC, the Pentagon and in Shanksville.
The latter qualifies as theory.
The former practically never. And Craig McKee actively advises his fellow Truthers NOT to have any theories.

We should rename this subforum "9/11 Conspiracy Non-Theories".
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th November 2017, 02:22 AM   #57
Cosmic Yak
Graduate Poster
 
Cosmic Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Where there's never a road broader than the back of your hand.
Posts: 1,879
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
You are correct - there are (to a first approximation anyway) zero 9/11 CTs, and zero 9/11 CTists.

Because if you pay careful attention, you will notice that practically none of them ever commit to a conspiracy theory to explain the events of 9/11, which at a minimum ought to
  • include all three crime scenes,
  • be internally consistent
  • have a bare minimum amount of detail on the what, the how, the who and the why
Ask any 9/11 Truther to summarize concisely and comprehensively in a couple of paragraphs "what happend on 9/11", and you will run into silence, evasions, wild goose chases, and confused minds running into random details. Ask the same of a sane student of 9/11 ("debunker"), and you are highly likely to get, in about two paragraphs, a consise, comprehensive, coherent and consisten summary of who did what how and why at the WTC, the Pentagon and in Shanksville.
The latter qualifies as theory.
The former practically never. And Craig McKee actively advises his fellow Truthers NOT to have any theories.

We should rename this subforum "9/11 Conspiracy Non-Theories".
Do you have a cite for the highlighted? Should be interesting reading.
__________________
Fortuna Faveat Fatuis
Cosmic Yak is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th November 2017, 03:24 AM   #58
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,404
Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak View Post
Do you have a cite for the highlighted? Should be interesting reading.
Two days ago in my post #48 I linked McKee's blog.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th November 2017, 07:07 AM   #59
Captain_Swoop
Penultimate Amazing
 
Captain_Swoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,638
Because if they do give a narrative or any detail as to the events they can be pinned down and addressed. Like Apollohaxers it is to their advantage to be vague.
Captain_Swoop is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th November 2017, 08:25 AM   #60
JSanderO
Master Poster
 
JSanderO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: nyc
Posts: 2,689
I know this has been said before... You don't need to be a rocket science to have an interest in the collapses at the trade center... or the destruction of the pentagon. But to engage in intelligent discussion and have INFORMED opinions on the matters, you should have some technical background... Again you needn't be a PhD in physics nor hold engineering licenses... but at least college level training in science or engineering would seem to qualify one as a credible person on the subject.

Politics and media critique is another matter. I find it amazing/incredible/mind boggling that people like David Griffin, Graham MacQueen. Adam Syed or Zwicker, or Craig McKee,Ted Walters, Sander Hicks, and several others... and the list goes on and on re 911 Truth Activists have no technical background whatsoever. And DRG had the gall to publish a book about the collapse of 7wtc! His background is in theology.

Then you have some truth activists who do have technical background... Dwain Deets, Gage, Gerry, Tony... Barnum, Judy Woods and this list goes on too, who seem to be in denial of science and engineering because of their political agenda...

It's fine to demand transparency and accountability from the gov re the investigation... and that they "get it right" and not fudge their findings.

Delusion and denial will never end...
__________________
So many idiots and so little time.
JSanderO is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th November 2017, 02:11 PM   #61
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,404
After more than 10 days, Craig's new Facebook group has 321 members. That's a pretty bad start actually.

Some of the latest new members that I recognize are Fran Shure (the wanna-by psychologist featured by AE911T), Ronald F. Avery (architect, AE signer), Susan Serpa (many years an activist for da Twoof) and Barrie Zwicker, who is also an admin now. Oh, and Pernille Grumme - isn't she Niels Harrit's wife?
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th November 2017, 02:50 PM   #62
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,404
Oh, haha, nice little exchange in Craig's group - the schisms are showing:

Fran Shure posted this yesterday - remember, her thing is psychology, and she is promoted by Richard Gage:
Originally Posted by Fran Shure
Sorry to say, Craig, that this attempt itself is divisive of our movement, not unifying. Dispassionate discussion of facts and evidence is the hallmark of truth-seeking, not jumping on a bandwagon.
The members of our movement who, after meticulous study, believe that a large airliner created the observable damage at the Pentagon certainly do not believe the official story, just as we who believe large airliners hit the twin towers do not believe the official story. To say otherwise is misunderstanding their message, at best.
These researchers have a right to be carefully heard and responded to with respectful and thoughtful questions, not this sort of attempt.
What damaged the Pentagon is a very emotional issue within our community, and we always have the choice to agree to disagree about it. I hope my good friends on this list will always discuss with me, not triangulate!
Craig responded a bit later:
Originally Posted by Craig McKee
It seems that if you stand up to the small minority who focus on showing us all that is RIGHT about the Pentagon official story instead of what is WRONG with it, you will be called divisive. Apparently, if you stand up for what the evidence shows and seek common ground with the majority of truth activists, you are splintering the movement. Itís an upside down world we live in.
Yes, Twoofies, that's the sad truth: The "Truth Movement" has neither truth nor movement, for the moment someone dares to move and say something true, he is labeled a heretic, a shill, an infiltrator. So all you guys do is sit still with the nonsense from 2006, and do nothing.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th November 2017, 12:58 AM   #63
Ape of Good Hope
Graduate Poster
 
Ape of Good Hope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,480
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
Oh, and Pernille Grumme - isn't she Niels Harrit's wife?

Indeed she is:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=262
Ape of Good Hope is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th November 2017, 11:14 AM   #64
Josarhus
Thinker
 
Josarhus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 213
I Count some 33 danes on the list, including Grumme. Pretty good for a small country like Denmark, to account for 10 percent of the members

Most were added after the Danish truth movement promoted Craigs ideas 10 days ago.

Among the 33 danes are many long time and well known truthers.
__________________
Niels Harrit: "I do not actually understand why they fire insulates steel structures. It just slows the heating of the steel by one hour. There must be money in it."
Josarhus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.