|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
1st November 2010, 04:58 PM | #41 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,811
|
Then why did you hold it up as a bad thing that they were against Wall Street Reform. I really don't know their reasons I really don't know what was in it but I have not claimed it is good or bad. But if you do not know what is in it other than it is called a reform bill how do you know they were wrong to be against it.
But they did call it reform so it must be good. |
1st November 2010, 05:30 PM | #42 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,811
|
|
3rd November 2010, 02:36 AM | #43 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 32,635
|
|
__________________
1. He'd never do that. 2. Okay but he's not currently doing it. 3. Okay but he's not currently technically doing it. 4. Okay but everyone does it. 5. He's doing it, we can't stop him, no point in complaining about it. 6. We all knew he was going to do it which... makes it okay somehow. 7. It's perfectly fine that's he's doing it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|