|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
20th July 2015, 06:08 AM | #241 |
Ovis ex Machina
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sir Ddinbych
Posts: 7,001
|
|
__________________
I’d rather be a rising ape than a falling angel. - Sir Terry Pratchett |
|
20th July 2015, 06:30 AM | #242 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
|
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
20th July 2015, 06:42 AM | #243 |
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator, Russell's Antinomy Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
|
|
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest "The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David "Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze |
|
20th July 2015, 06:47 AM | #244 |
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator, Russell's Antinomy Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
|
|
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest "The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David "Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze |
|
20th July 2015, 07:06 AM | #245 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: hic.
Posts: 8,035
|
|
__________________
|
|
20th July 2015, 07:12 AM | #246 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 3,377
|
I am sorry, but the thread title says "A new argument pro NDE" and this involves playing day-care "imagination land" games? Marten is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
|
__________________
I've got to get to a library...fast Robert Langdon |
|
20th July 2015, 07:16 AM | #247 |
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 38,373
|
|
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield "The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky |
|
20th July 2015, 07:18 AM | #248 |
Ovis ex Machina
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sir Ddinbych
Posts: 7,001
|
|
__________________
I’d rather be a rising ape than a falling angel. - Sir Terry Pratchett |
|
20th July 2015, 07:22 AM | #249 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
Into the barrel.
|
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
20th July 2015, 07:22 AM | #250 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,413
|
That is not true. The neural system of human beings have homologous patterns that express themselves as common patterns of brightness and shape in our ‘hallucinations’. The patterns seen in phosphenes are homologous in human beings, reflecting a common ancestry rather than an environmental analogy. By environmental analogy, I am including the possibility of supernatural manifestations.
Phosphenes have commonalities between human beings that are occasionally misinterpreted as supernatural occurrences. http://psychedelic-information-theor...-Hallucination ‘Entoptic hallucination, geometric hallucinations, or phosphenes, are one of the most commonly reported visual effects of psychedelics. Phosphenes are a sensation of light caused by excitation of the retina by mechanical or electrical means. Pressure phosphenes can be created by applying pressure to the eyeballs through closed eyelids; flicker phosphenes are created in response to stroboscopic pulses of light; kinetic phosphenes are created in response to physical impact to the head, sometimes referred to as "seeing stars". (Fig. 1) Entoptic hallucinations are differentiated from eidetic (photographic) hallucinations in that they originate within the neural connections between the eye and cortex, as opposed to emerging within the cortex or midbrain. There is evidence that entoptic phosphene patterns have influenced human cultural and religious archetypes since 10,000 BCE.’ https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=phosphenes ‘A phosphene is a phenomenon characterized by the experience of seeing light without light actually entering the eye. The word phosphene comes from the Greek words phos (light) and phainein (to show). Phosphenes that are induced by movement or sound are often associated with optic neuritis.’ http://www.math.uh.edu/~dynamics/reprints/papers/nc.pdf ‘What geometric visual hallucinations tell us about the visual cortex … One possible location for their origin is provided by fMRI studies of visual imagery which suggest that V1 is activated when human subjects are instructed to inspect the fine details of an imagined visual object (Miyashita, 1995). In 1928 Klu ̈ver (1966) organized such images into four groups called form constants: (I) tunnels and funnels, (II) spirals, (III) lattices, including honeycombs and triangles, and (IV) cobwebs, all of which contain repeated geometric structures. Figure 1 shows their appearance in the visual field. In 1979 Ermentrout & Cowan provided a first account of a theory of the generation of such form constants (Ermentrout & Cowan, 1979). Here we develop and elaborate this theory in light of the anatomical and physiological data which has accumulated since then.’ http://www.todayifoundout.com/index....em-are-called/ ‘A phosphene is characterized by perceiving some form of light when there is little or no light actually entering the eye, making it an entopic phenomenon (meaning the source of the phenomenon is within the eye itself). *Phosphenes are most commonly introduced by simply closing your eyes and rubbing them or*squeezing*them shut, tightly; *generally the harder you rub or squeeze, the more phosphenes you’ll see. *This pressure stimulates the cells of the retina and, thus, makes your brain think you are seeing light. *Specifically, Grüsser et al. demonstrated that pressure in the eye results in activation of retinal ganglion cells in a very similar way to how they activate as a response to light. There are also several other ways phosphenes can be generated. *These include through: electrical stimulation; intense magnetic fields; hallucinogenic drugs (phosphenes not to be confused with*hallucinations, which are generated in the brain, not the eye); a blow to the head or a particularly severe sneeze where extra pressure is created in the eye on the retina and possible stimulation of*the visual cortex; low blood pressure, which can be experienced if you stand up really fast after you’ve been relaxing; exposure to radiation; meditation or extended visual sensory deprivation; various side effects from medical drugs; and certain diseases of the retina and nerves.’ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091790 ‘…Phosphene perception was associated with a differential pattern of TMS-evoked brain potentials that started 160-200 ms after stimulation and encompassed a wide array of posterior areas. This pattern was differentiated from the TMS-evoked potential after stimulation of a control site. These findings suggest that conscious phosphene perception is not a local phenomenon, but arises only after extensive recurrent processing.’ Of course, there are common patterns generated by physical processes in the eyes themselves. These are called entropic patterns. These are not always the same as phosphenes but they have commonalities in all human beings. Thus, they also get misinterpreted. Take for example entropic patterns (phosphenes). If you squeeze your eyes shut, you will see all sorts of geometric shapes and flashes of light which are similar to what other people see when they squeeze their eyes shut. You will see many of the phenomena that OBE patients experience, yet they are internal signals. Many disturbances make us see ‘phosphenes’. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entoptic_phenomenon ‘Entoptic phenomena (from Greek ἐντός "within" and ὀπτικός "visual") are visual effects whose source is within the eye itself. (Occasionally, these are called entopic phenomena, which is probably a typographical mistake.) In Helmholtz's words; "Under suitable conditions light falling on the eye may render visible certain objects within the eye itself. These perceptions are called entoptical.” … Yet, there is enough commonality between the main entoptic phenomena that their physical origin is now well-understood.’ Phosphenes has been shown by many experimental studies to have commonalities in human beings. Correlation with physical neural patterns have been demonstrated. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that commonalities between hallucinations in improbable. Factual information has been presented in this posts. The chances are rather high that the sequence of electric activity in the brain of hundreds of people are almost exactly the same in such a way that they have the same sort of experiences. This has been shown by many experimental studies. Perhaps you want to refute any of the links I have posted. I hope you address the fact that you are wrong rather than simply repeat the same false claim over and over again. Or ignoring the factual information that I have collected. Rebutting the factual information with more facts would be alright. However, your intuition is not very reliable. I can not accept your opinions on the relative 'chances' as fact. |
20th July 2015, 07:31 AM | #251 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
|
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
20th July 2015, 07:44 AM | #252 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,259
|
|
__________________
Steen -- Jack of all trades - master of none! |
|
20th July 2015, 08:20 AM | #253 |
Springy Goddess
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,513
|
I disagree vehemently with Maartenn100's assertion that an eternal soul is more reasonable than the lack thereof.
For starters, science has yet to find even a whiff of a clue that such things as souls actually exist. Secondly, eternity is a long, long time. Hypothetically it would extend an indeterminate distance in space-time, past both the Big Bang and the heat death of the universe (and, in theory at least, transcend the problem of time supposedly starting at the Big Bang). As such, it would be statistically extraordinarily unlikely that the lot of us here on this planet would be "new souls." After aeons wandering around the universe/multiverse, a significant number of us should have access to mass quantities of useful knowledge that would make Newton, Einstein and Hawking look like preschoolers fighting over a toy truck in a sandbox. Instead we have infestations of inanity and disrespect such as religiously-motivated violence, an unwillingness to solve no-brainers such as keeping us all adequately fed, clothed, housed and healthy, and the current slate of candidates attempting a run for POTUS. One would think that a bunch of clever old souls stuffed into meat suits would not be so susceptible to indoctrination and flawed thinking, yet here we are -- Regularly getting ourselves and others killed for unfathomably stupid reasons, including getting trampled to death in big box store stampedes on Black Friday. If there actually are such things as souls they don't seem to be particularly useful things to have, and I wouldn't expect them to be any more useful the next time around. Or the time after that. Or the time after that... |
__________________
Reality is a theory, not a hypothesis. |
|
20th July 2015, 08:31 AM | #254 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 17,646
|
The "new" argument appears to be a very old one in fact: Maarteen believes that there must be a soul. Science can't find any evidence of such a thing. So Maarteen concludes that science is wrong, or simply is not able to analyze these metaphysical things. I need hardly point out that this conclusion has been at the core of most religious dogmas for thousands of years.
|
3rd August 2015, 09:17 PM | #255 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,231
|
I think for most things the scientific method works wonderfully but I'm not sure how you can definitively say that it is the last word on whether something exists or doesn't exist. There are ranges of light we couldn't see, or didn't know existed, until equipment was developed that could see that extra range. How would this be any different? We have a very finite range of perception.
|
4th August 2015, 04:09 AM | #256 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
Applying your argument to a "soul" —
No one has perceived such a thing with fidelity enough to shift it into scientific terms. It's all emotion, imagination and culture. To say there are things we can't sense out there is true enough, but the tools of science have reach our senses lack. The entire EM-spectrum is known. The sub sub divisions of atoms are known. The weird Higgs and other fields are known. There's no room, in scientific and mathematical principle, for a mustard seed. The bottom line is our finite perception has magnified under science to illuminate so much of the unknown realm, that there remains no shade for faith's phantoms to haunt. (I don't have the education to argue this point; I accept it on consensus, while I seek better understanding.) What I see, as an amateur and a fool, is the repeating of empty phrases dipped in rich history, imposed into serious discussions about a world that is dangerous and to which we, the species, are dangerous in turn. These empty phrases count "soul" and "God" and "spirit" and numberless xeroxes more; marshmallow armour in the dull battle for submission to predictably mundane powers. We do not have time any more to rebuff these cloying vapours. Serious work is ahead: survival. It is time to leave childish notions behind. |
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
4th August 2015, 06:27 AM | #257 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,146
|
There is at least proof that we can come out of nothing (our birth).
So, when we are billion of years 'nothing' after we died, chances are that we will be born again, out of nothing. Our birth, out of nothing, can happen again. Why not? In our experience it will be as if we reïncarnate the next moment, because we were unaware of these billions of years being nothing. |
__________________
'Where' is the image in the mind? What 'space' is the image in your mind in? Where is the dream? Where is your inner voice? It's not the same spacetime then where the electrical and chemical pulses are in the brain, causing this image or the dream. The image you see in your mind's eye is in a completely different dimension than where the chemistry in the brain is. (Maarten Vergucht) |
|
4th August 2015, 06:45 AM | #258 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
|
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
4th August 2015, 09:09 AM | #259 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,259
|
Nope, we do not come out of nothing. We come out of some cells that multiply through intake of nutrition.
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
Steen -- Jack of all trades - master of none! |
|
4th August 2015, 09:12 AM | #260 |
a carbon based life-form
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
|
Lovecraft beat you to that story
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Colour_Out_of_Space You will note that the physical effects could be felt. Adding invisibility to footie doesn't help. ETA: Ambrose Bierce:http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/1323/ |
4th August 2015, 09:20 AM | #261 |
a carbon based life-form
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
|
|
4th August 2015, 09:31 AM | #262 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
Excellent! From there:
"There are sounds that we cannot hear. At either end of the scale are notes that stir no chord of that imperfect instrument, the human ear. They are too high or too grave. … The faces change, but the words stay the same. |
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
4th August 2015, 09:56 AM | #263 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: hic.
Posts: 8,035
|
|
__________________
|
|
4th August 2015, 10:50 PM | #264 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,231
|
|
4th August 2015, 11:36 PM | #265 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
|
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
5th August 2015, 02:00 AM | #266 |
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator, Russell's Antinomy Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
|
|
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest "The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David "Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze |
|
5th August 2015, 02:36 AM | #267 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
|
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
5th August 2015, 03:08 AM | #268 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
|
5th August 2015, 03:47 AM | #269 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
Old hat:
Now being dead is either of two things. For either it is like being nothing and the dead man has no perception of anything, or else, in accordance with the things that are said, it happens to be a sort of change and migration of the soul from the place here to another place. |
5th August 2015, 04:00 AM | #270 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,950
|
|
5th August 2015, 04:11 AM | #271 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,576
|
We didn't came out of nothing. Our mothers ate food. Part of this food was used to help development of fetuses that came to be us. Your claim that pregnancy break laws od thermodynamic is pretty hilarious and complete nonsense.
Let's be most charitable and assume you meant not our bodies, but ourself (minds). Well, I have bad news for you. Mind didn't came out of nothing; it is product of brain. No brain, no mind. There was nothing before brain was created and there will be nothing when brain ceases to function. |
5th August 2015, 09:05 AM | #272 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,146
|
with 'we' I mean: our conciousness. Not our bodies. We are not our bodies. We are our minds.
When your arm is numb, because it was lying in an akward position and the blood flow is interrupted, you are not 'in your arm' anymore. You don't feel anything in your arm = you are gone in that part of your body. You are not your body. The numbness of an arm shows us the difference between 'being there' or 'not being there'. Your arm is still there, but you are gone in that part of the body. (my English is not my native language, so I don't know wether this is a good sentence). |
__________________
'Where' is the image in the mind? What 'space' is the image in your mind in? Where is the dream? Where is your inner voice? It's not the same spacetime then where the electrical and chemical pulses are in the brain, causing this image or the dream. The image you see in your mind's eye is in a completely different dimension than where the chemistry in the brain is. (Maarten Vergucht) |
|
5th August 2015, 09:18 AM | #273 |
Troublesome Passenger
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 21,844
|
|
__________________
Like as the waves make towards the pebbled shore, So do our minutes hasten to their end . . . WS |
|
5th August 2015, 09:24 AM | #274 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
And minds are what brains (in bodies) do — He says; again.
Quote:
But I spend effort into a hostile void; do I not?
Quote:
Your English is good enough for you to insult us with this stubborn display of disinterest. Your English is good enough to reveal your true motives. They shine through. |
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
5th August 2015, 09:28 AM | #275 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: hic.
Posts: 8,035
|
|
__________________
|
|
5th August 2015, 09:31 AM | #276 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,146
|
Your awareness, your feelings: that's you. You are not your body. That's not so difficult to understand, isn't it?
|
__________________
'Where' is the image in the mind? What 'space' is the image in your mind in? Where is the dream? Where is your inner voice? It's not the same spacetime then where the electrical and chemical pulses are in the brain, causing this image or the dream. The image you see in your mind's eye is in a completely different dimension than where the chemistry in the brain is. (Maarten Vergucht) |
|
5th August 2015, 09:37 AM | #277 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,950
|
If this mind is not physical, then how can it be 'blocked' from your arm by pinching some nerves? Wouldn't a transcendent awareness be able to overcome such limits and keep feeling the arm when you're sitting on it?
|
5th August 2015, 09:45 AM | #278 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In my head.
Posts: 7,758
|
|
__________________
"If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat |
|
5th August 2015, 09:47 AM | #279 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: hic.
Posts: 8,035
|
|
__________________
|
|
5th August 2015, 09:56 AM | #280 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,146
|
That's a good question. In my opinion: you are the flow of electrons. Maybe 'electromagnetic radiation'. I don't have all the answers of course.
Susan pocket wrote a book about it. https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/ps...Hypothesis.pdf |
__________________
'Where' is the image in the mind? What 'space' is the image in your mind in? Where is the dream? Where is your inner voice? It's not the same spacetime then where the electrical and chemical pulses are in the brain, causing this image or the dream. The image you see in your mind's eye is in a completely different dimension than where the chemistry in the brain is. (Maarten Vergucht) |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|