IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 6th April 2009, 04:27 AM   #1
Cuddles
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,774
Motlen Steel - Continuation

Mod Warninghttp://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=117236
This thread had been growing rather long and so has been closed to avoid causing problems with the forum database. This thread has been started to continue the discussion.

However, I also note that several off-topic subjects were being discussed towards the end. Please avoid bring those subjects here - discussions about things like explosives and the reliability of eyewitnesses should take place in their own threads.
Responding to this modbox in thread will be off topic Posted By:Cuddles

Last edited by Cuddles; 6th April 2009 at 04:31 AM.
Cuddles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 04:36 AM   #2
Sunstealer
Illuminator
 
Sunstealer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,128
Please just let this one die - all the points have been discussed at least 20 times in the original thread.
Sunstealer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 04:44 AM   #3
ozeco41
Philosopher
 
ozeco41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia
Posts: 7,617
Originally Posted by Sunstealer View Post
Please just let this one die - all the points have been discussed at least 20 times in the original thread.
...except for "Motlen Steel"
ozeco41 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 05:11 AM   #4
Christopher7
Philosopher
 
Christopher7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,538
Did I mention the witnesses?
[please don't answer]

I agree with Sunstealer, [will wonders never cease] we've pretty well covered it the required 20 times now.

Last edited by Christopher7; 6th April 2009 at 05:13 AM.
Christopher7 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 05:20 AM   #5
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
 
ElMondoHummus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere north of the South Pole
Posts: 12,282
Originally Posted by ozeco41 View Post
...except for "Motlen Steel"
__________________
"AND ZEPPELINS!!! We haven't even begun to talk about Zeppelins yet! Marauding inflatable Teutonic johnsons waggling their way across the sky! Indecent and flammable all at once."
ElMondoHummus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 07:48 AM   #6
Jackanory
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,335
Is C7 still throwing his teddy bears out of his pram. I can almost hear him stamping his feet because he cant get his own way. With icecream and chocolate dribbling down his face

Us Bush lovers really know how to rock that cradle - specifically those of us from the UK, with no USA government affiliation
Jackanory is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 08:12 AM   #7
TheRedWorm
I AM the Red Worm!
 
TheRedWorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,452
C7: Your question is stupid and deserves an answer in kind.
If you have a point, make it. Don't ask stupid questions.


Me: I'll agree that the question is stupid, and that is intentional. What I want you to realize is that you are using the same stupid logic for your claims. Do you recognize this?
__________________
I'll be the best Congressman money can buy!

As usual, he doesn't understand the relevant sciences, can't Google for the right thing, and appears to rely on the notion that a word salad liberally sprinkled with Google Croutons will make his argument seem coherent. -JayUtah
TheRedWorm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 08:29 AM   #8
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
 
twinstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,374
Originally Posted by TheRedWorm View Post
Me: I'll agree that the question is stupid, and that is intentional. What I want you to realize is that you are using the same stupid logic for your claims. Do you recognize this?
Is C7 the only one who DOESN'T get this?
__________________
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison
twinstead is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 08:32 AM   #9
TheRedWorm
I AM the Red Worm!
 
TheRedWorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,452
Originally Posted by twinstead View Post
Is C7 the only one who DOESN'T get this?

I think he very well may get it, he just doesn't want to admit it.
__________________
I'll be the best Congressman money can buy!

As usual, he doesn't understand the relevant sciences, can't Google for the right thing, and appears to rely on the notion that a word salad liberally sprinkled with Google Croutons will make his argument seem coherent. -JayUtah
TheRedWorm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th April 2009, 08:35 AM   #10
lapman
Graduate Poster
 
lapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
Quote:
At 1:22 there is an explosion, everyone starts screaming, the camera pans to the south tower, and then you hear the continuous rumble of the collapsing building.
The explosion is a separate sound and could not be part of a continuous bunch of floors collapsing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OQWz...eature=related

Since explosions are very low frequency, it is necessary to listen on a good stereo and crank up the bass. There is a 2 second separation between the initial explosion and the rumble of the building collapsing.
What a bunch of crap. The sound of explosives covers a wide range, even from that distance.
YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz
lapman is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2009, 11:11 AM   #11
Bluesky
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 164
There were more explosions reported in NY a couple of nights ago, see article in NY Post

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04102009...use_163790.htm

These explosions were caused by someone falling to their death from an 11 story building. The reports of explosions are not malicious just inaccurate; same as WTC.

Sorry I agree, molten steel has been done
Bluesky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2009, 02:44 PM   #12
Baylor
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,394
Originally Posted by Bluesky View Post
There were more explosions reported in NY a couple of nights ago, see article in NY Post

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04102009...use_163790.htm

These explosions were caused by someone falling to their death from an 11 story building. The reports of explosions are not malicious just inaccurate; same as WTC.

Sorry I agree, molten steel has been done
Thanks bluesky. There are many truthers who absolutely love the "sounds of explosions" trutherism. It's seems to be the truthers' number one trutherism, other than "first time in history." I tend to argue that the "sounds of explosions" were falling parts of the buildings. It's a little less macabre.
Baylor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:58 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.