|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
9th April 2009, 12:23 PM | #1281 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,316
|
|
__________________
"My father would womanize, he would drink, he would make outrageous claims, like he invented the question mark. Sometimes, he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy - the sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament." - Dr. Evil |
|
9th April 2009, 12:23 PM | #1282 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:24 PM | #1283 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 26,122
|
... dirt dumb idea believers who visit will agree you are right. So; it is everyone’s right to be wrong like you and repeat lies on 911 without evidence? You can’t stay on topic as you spew delusional ideas on 911 like Jones does. Jones found rust and aluminum and declares super thermite, you repeat and then post off topic.
Yes, you are right the delusion seekers will pronounce you the winner of the dumb idea award and make a place for you in the 911Truth hall of experts on 911 who spew lies, hearsay and insane delusions. Can you be more anti-Galileo like as you ignore gravity, which Galileo understood, and you mock gravity? Visitors will have to use just a tiny bit of a little logic to see you are spreading false information and being anti-Galileo like. Got super thermite ideas on 911? Then you have drank the kool-aid of Jones; must be in the name. |
9th April 2009, 12:24 PM | #1284 | |||||||||
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
|||||||||
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
||||||||||
9th April 2009, 12:24 PM | #1285 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:25 PM | #1286 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia
Posts: 7,617
|
As far as I am aware the only columns bits which went that far were about 8 outliers from the spread of the columns which fell as you described.
They were only just outside the main "lozenge" patterns of the bulk of the columns. Only two of them looked "suspicious" - the two upper left on the Verizon Building. The rest are only just outside the bulk of material - the orange coloured lozenge shapes. (Base image from FEMA) |
9th April 2009, 12:26 PM | #1287 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
|
9th April 2009, 12:26 PM | #1288 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:26 PM | #1289 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,408
|
|
__________________
*Think WTC7 - You cannot make the four corners of a table fall together unless you cut the four legs together *A kitchen table judgement on a world scale is enough * To Citizens: 'There comes a time when silence is betrayal' |
|
9th April 2009, 12:28 PM | #1290 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,863
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:28 PM | #1291 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:28 PM | #1292 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
|
9th April 2009, 12:30 PM | #1293 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
|
9th April 2009, 12:30 PM | #1294 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,335
|
We have gone from military explosives packed into aircraft................to
Shaped/cutting charges.........................to Thermite........................to NanoThermite...........................? The mass and density is becoming less and less as your cronies run out of theories...........Next week it will be INVISIBLETHERMITE. |
9th April 2009, 12:30 PM | #1295 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:31 PM | #1296 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,128
|
OK we'll take your definition - how the hell do they determine that from SEM photo? How the hell is light going to pass through an metal oxide or a flake of steel? How do they manage to tell that using an SEM photo? How an SEM Works.
|
9th April 2009, 12:32 PM | #1297 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,863
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:32 PM | #1298 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
|
9th April 2009, 12:35 PM | #1299 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,128
|
A very kind JREF poster has given me a link to another person who has analysed chips obtained from Jones. More on that later but here is a nice photograph I'd like people to see. Can you tell why? Recognise anything? Anyone care to describe the individual layers and what conclusions they may lead to. This should be good. click on image.
|
9th April 2009, 12:36 PM | #1300 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
over 1000 comments posted here.
and as of two days ago: There were over 600 comments posted as of yesterday on www.dailykos.com over 50 on opednews (plus two new articles today) over 700 on www.dailypaul.com a few hundred on www.ronpaulforums,com www.rawstory.com had over 200 and over 100 on www.spurstalk.com several hundred at www.digg.com over 200 on www.infowars.com a few hundred on screw loose change. Never challenge Galileo on the evidence. I am the father of modern experimentation. |
9th April 2009, 12:42 PM | #1301 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,128
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:42 PM | #1302 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 401
|
|
__________________
"There's this thing about being so "open minded" your brain falls out". --Unknown |
|
9th April 2009, 12:42 PM | #1303 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia
Posts: 7,617
|
Two errors there
1) the false claim that explosives have been found with inference that they were used. 2) And it is a quite simple assignment to show: a) Explosives not needed; AND b) Explosives not used. So if you ever want to seriously discuss it let me know - but I am not interested in feeding trolling behaviour. Hint/Clue there were only three points of the collapse mechanisms where explosives and/or incendiaries could conceivably have been used. 1) At the __________________. Wasn't because visual evidence shows it wasn't. 2) To cut the ................ therefore precipitating the initial collapse. Would have needed a big team of fire suited suicide volunteers to place devices after the aircraft crash and fires raging. 3) To somehow assist the global collapse. Wasn't needed - "global collapse was inevitable" And no evidence of it being tried. |
9th April 2009, 12:45 PM | #1304 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
|
9th April 2009, 12:45 PM | #1305 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
What does this mean? I really don't know. I suppose it means that the radiative intensity at the surface of a burning thermite chip is more than the intensity of solar radiation that hits an eyeball, here on earth.
But intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. From, say, 200 m away, the intensity of your 2 mm thermite chip has dropped off by a factor of 4,000. So, if the intensity of solar radiation entering into our eyeballs is less than the intensity of a chip at it's surface by a factor of 10, it's still 400x weaker by the time it hits our eyes. I would not expect that our eyeballs can pick out specs far too small to see if they weren't luminous, just because they now radiate such that they are 400x weaker than sunshine. Besides which, if they ignite ambient kerosene, their luminous output is going to be obscured not just by kerosene, but the smoke and dust that the burning kerosene creates. If you look at the flame rate data, nanothermites weigh in at 700-900 m/second. Meanwhile, from the nanofoil people tell us that while the foil can reach 1500 deg C, it starts to cool and can be handled in "seconds". I think I recall reading that it cools at 1,000 deg /sec, but I'm not sure. Basically, they would hit their peak temperature 'long' before they exited the building (I'm assuming that they move the same velocity as the jet debris), and only glow at all for what I'll guesstimate is a fraction of a second. If you want to make an argument that ignited specs, en masse, would register on our eyeballs, go ahead. You'll have to take into consideration obscuring, ignited kerosene and their luminosity profile as a function of time. Since you don't normally stare into the sun, you need to calculate reflected solar intensity entering your eyes. I'd guesstimate that a lower limit for this is 1/24 th the intensity of staring directly at the sun at high noon (based on eyeballing the power vs. angle of incidence graph here). You should also look into the relationship between luminosity and radiation, sensitivity of human eyeballs, etc. Have fun. Maybe you can publish your work in a Bentham Open Journal. |
9th April 2009, 12:50 PM | #1306 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 26,122
|
You are the anti-Galileo spewing lies, hearsay, and delusions as fast as you can post the tripe made up for you by others about super thermite destroying the WTC.
Your super thermite was not at the WTC on 911, it is in the mind of a fired delusional physicist who has to pay money to be published because his work is based on the same lies, hearsay, and delusions you believe. It is funny how many delusion believers are ranting on how great this failed smoking gun is for 911Truth. How anti-Galileo like can you get super thermite boom man. How did those people survive in the core without being boomed to death by the super thermite? Why is there no evidence of super thermite blast effects on any of the WTC steel? lol You failed to present evidence on 911, you presented your failed fantasy. Did you forget to bring the evidence? |
9th April 2009, 12:50 PM | #1307 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:50 PM | #1308 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia
Posts: 7,617
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:52 PM | #1309 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:52 PM | #1310 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:52 PM | #1311 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,128
|
READ POST 1299 - That SEM Photo clarifies once and for all that Jones' samples a-d are paint attached to hematite. No mistakes, no ifs, no buts, it clearly shows a crystalline metallic substrate called steel with an oxidised layer and then paint attached.
Stop with the BS, the spamming the insinuation etc - that photo sinks Jones et al. |
9th April 2009, 12:53 PM | #1312 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,374
|
I'm having trouble with the father of modern experimentation not being able to see it (or the lack of it) if it bit him in the face.
|
__________________
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison |
|
9th April 2009, 12:54 PM | #1313 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
|
|
9th April 2009, 12:56 PM | #1314 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,717
|
|
__________________
They take their paranoia, mix in a healthy dose of mistrust in anything "gubmint", and then bake it in that big ole EZ Bake oven of ignorance, and come to the delusional conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. - Seymour Butz |
|
9th April 2009, 01:00 PM | #1315 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 01:00 PM | #1316 |
Guest
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,986
|
|
9th April 2009, 01:01 PM | #1317 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 824
|
Not true. This peer reviewed scientific paper says their was. Until a scientific paper is published to scientifically undermine it( as yet such ISNT the case), gill plate flapping and jumping up and down and screaming carries zero cerebral weight. None. Zilch. Nada. Especially from you 19.99 Wal-mart starter kit teenage chemists around here |
9th April 2009, 01:01 PM | #1318 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
9th April 2009, 01:04 PM | #1319 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
|
|
9th April 2009, 01:07 PM | #1320 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,368
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|