ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Brilliant Light Power , free energy , Randell Mills

Reply
Old Today, 04:56 PM   #2921
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,127
Thumbs down The shell theorem is basic physics that Mills does not address

Originally Posted by markie View Post
In other words, the shell theorem applies to a shell with no interior motion. The orbitsphere is different; it is in motion and there is no force transmitted between points on the orbitsphere.
14 December 2018 markie: In actual words, the shell theorem is basic physics that you and Mills do not address.

Spewing fantasies about what Mills delusions might do does not remove the delusions.

This Mils delusion is an infinitely thin sphere with no "interior". Mills imagines infinitely thin current loops on that sphere and textbook electromagnetism says there will be forces between them. Points on the sphere are charged negatively ! The sphere should explode unless it is mechanically rigid.
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:04 PM   #2922
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,127
Thumbs down Lies about the shell theorem which applies to a body inside a rigid sphere

Originally Posted by markie View Post
That applies to an empty, static sphere.
14 December 2018 markie: Lies about the shell theorem which applies to a body inside a rigid sphere.
The sphere is not empty, it has a body inside it as we have been stating for months.
The sphere is not "static". It can move. It is the movement that is a small part of what shows Mills orbitsphere to be delusional.
The sphere is rigid which means that it keeps it shape as a sphere and what does Mills have - an orbitsphere !
Mills hydrogen atom is physically impossible because Mills has a proton inside a rigid charged sphere, as in the shell theorem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem

Last edited by Reality Check; Today at 05:07 PM.
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:26 PM   #2923
markie
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,331
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
14 December 2018 markie: In actual words, the shell theorem is basic physics that you and Mills do not address.

Spewing fantasies about what Mills delusions might do does not remove the delusions.

This Mils delusion is an infinitely thin sphere with no "interior". Mills imagines infinitely thin current loops on that sphere and textbook electromagnetism says there will be forces between them. Points on the sphere are charged negatively ! The sphere should explode unless it is mechanically rigid.
'Interior' motion should be understood as inherent motion comprising the orbitsphere surface. There are no electrostatic forces between points on a 2D surface continuum of (negative) charge, whether or not it is moving. This is well known. The electric field is perpendicular to the surface and discontinuous at the surface. The field ends at the surface. Also, the surface is superconducting. It is known there is no field inside a superconductor. No electric field, no coulombic repulsive forces along the surface.
markie is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:47 PM   #2924
Red Baron Farms
Illuminator
 
Red Baron Farms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,199
Originally Posted by markie View Post
Central mass.
Well in that case it is inherently unstable.

The best analogy I can think of is Lagrange points. While there are 5 points of equilibrium, only L4 and L5 are stable.

In your example an actual central mass would will tend to fall out of center, and the farther out of center the more forces fall out of equilibrium, much like L1 L2 and L3 are in equilibrium, but as objects are unstable there, they tend to fall away from those positions without active station keeping in order to maintain their position.

What you are proposing couldn't possibly be related to either hydrinos or any other matter for that matter. (sorry couldn't resist)

With what you suppose is happening the whole Universe would pop out of existence in a fraction of a second.(edit to add as we know it) Almost instantly. Unless you also can point to some sort of active station keeping here too?
__________________
Scott
"Permaculture is a philosophy of working with, rather than against nature; of protracted & thoughtful observation rather than protracted & thoughtless labour; & of looking at plants & animals in all their functions, rather than treating any area as a single-product system." Bill Mollison
Biome Carbon Cycle Management

Last edited by Red Baron Farms; Today at 06:39 PM.
Red Baron Farms is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:17 PM   #2925
Hans
Philosopher
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,678
Originally Posted by AlaskaBushPilot View Post
Thank you, Hans.

For putting into elegant form the idea that Mills is serving a P.T. Barnum dictum.

If you view BLP from a power production standard, it is zero, literally. If you view them from a woo-market service provider standard, they're top of the charts.

Just look at those slick futuristic gizmos that do nothing but draw in millions per year in suckers, as Barnum called them.

The right thing to marvel at is how well this con man has played his targets. It isn't a study area of mine so I can't really say what he is doing that others fail at.
If you look at how markie tries to make BLP's wild claims "possible". All he does, over and over again is to constantly bring up anything not related to that one key point - nothing is every produced. Instead he prances about trying to make obscure points in areas that have no value in that one area - producing a product.
Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:22 PM   #2926
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,127
Originally Posted by markie View Post
'Interior' ....
Usual lies as we should expect from a supporter of the ignorant, deluded and lying Mills. Mills does not have a "2D surface continuum of (negative) charge". Mills delusion is current loops magically shaped into a rigid sphere.
Electromagnetism 101: Magnetic Force Between Wires (currents!). Electromagnets exist (a current loop with a magnetic field).

14 December 2018 markie: In actual words, the shell theorem is basic physics that you and Mills do not address.

Last edited by Reality Check; Today at 06:27 PM.
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.