|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
28th July 2020, 01:15 PM | #161 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
The usual abysmal level of lies, delusions, insults, etc. addressed since 6 July 2009
The thousands of lies, delusions, insults, etc. since 6 July 2009 from Sol88 about his cult's electric comet and electric Sun dogma.
The abysmal insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn and all astronomers by Sol88 linking them with Sol88's dogma, etc. (no astronomer believes comets are actual rock) 447 items of lies, insults, etc. from Sol88 since ~10 March 2020
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 01:19 PM | #162 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
So far no inconsistencies have really popped up in the electric comet.
Rock, sheath, acceleration, charged dust, electric currents, electric fields, trapping, defelection. All from a charged rocky body. This is the driver that gets a comet “active” (dust release). As observered. |
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
28th July 2020, 01:28 PM | #163 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,001
|
That may be so. Or not.
However, the topic of this thread is The Electric Comet Theory, not “the electric comet” (that’s a brand of vacuum cleaners, isn’t it? Or cars?). And we now have a primary source (two actually), thanks to you. So, can we please return to discussing The Electric Comet Theory? Starting with you answering my questions (shall I repeat them?). |
28th July 2020, 01:41 PM | #164 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
28th July 2020, 01:42 PM | #165 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
Sol88 lies about A Fully Kinetic Perspective of Electron Acceleration around a Weakly Outgassing Comet is mainstream ice and dust cometary science mentioning that solar wind electrons are accelerated locally in a comet coma
Sol88 lies with "Seems the suprathermal electrons and the field aligned ambipolar electric field has quite a dominant role in charging the dust.". The the suprathermal electrons and the field aligned ambipolar electric field exist in comet coma. They have nothing to do with charging of surface dust by the solar wind when the coma dies not exist ! Sol88 lies with "as the charged patched model shows" which a theoretical model of dust charging on airless bodies. Comets have "air", i.e. coma, during the time that dust is observed to be ejected. Sol88 lies with "it maybe the dominant cause of the dust jets" when the paper he cited has no mention of comets or jets. It was about the ganeral lifting of dust from airless bodies. Sol88 lies with "it maybe the dominant cause of the dust jets" when they do not exist. Comet jets are gas + dust. Sol88 persistently lies with "rocky like cometary nucleus" when it is rocky like behavior of landslides on 67P. Sol88 persists with his lying "rocky like cometary nucleus" question that has been answered for years - a comet without a coma will "obtain a floating potential with respect to" the solar wind. A comet without a coma will have so far undetected even at 67P dust lofted from the surface. A comet with a coma ejects so much dust that it is easily detected even from Earth. Sol88 lies with "So far no inconsistencies have really popped up in the electric comet" when we have not discussed his cult's dead dogma for years. Sol88 lies with "RocK" when no rock has been detected on comets. Sol88 lies with "sheath, acceleration, charged dust, electric currents, electric fields, trapping, defelection" when that is not his cult's dead dogma. Sol88 lies with "charged rocky body". Comets are not rocks. Mainstream ice and dust cometary science predicts that comets with no coma can have dust electrostatically ejected by the solar wind. Sol88 lies with "This is the driver that gets a comet “active” (dust release)." An active comet has observed gas and dust release to from a coma, ion tail and sometimes a dust tail. The undetected "dust release" is mainstream ice and dust cometary science. His cult's dead dogma ignores this well established science . Sol88 lies with "as observered" as none of his cult's dogma has been observed, e.g. their delusion of physically impossible of "thunderbolts" at comets would produce distinctive radiation which has not been observed. Sol88 lies with "I see what’s going on here". JeanTate is clear that JeanTate wants to discuss the topic of this thread, The Electric Comet Theory, and hat answered to his quesions:Starting with you answering my questions (shall I repeat them?). Sol88 lies with "If, you choose to not look thru the telescope...." when JeanTate is asking for "The Electric Comet Theory" evidence from "thru the telescope" which has not been presented in the last 11 years ! Sol88 lies with "I think you maybe somewhat, intimidated, by this simple question" which is mainstream science and has been answered for years (a comet with no coma is predicted to be electrostatically charged by the solar wind). Sol88 lies with "wrt the Electric Comet (The topic of this thread)" as Sol88's cult ignores electrostatic charging of dust on comets by the solar wind. Just in case, I added this to my questions for him that he is still ignoring. Outstanding questions for Sol88 |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 01:44 PM | #166 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
28th July 2020, 02:15 PM | #167 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
More on Sol88's lying question on mainstream electrostatic cometary dust charging
Sol88 cited The electrostatic plasma environment of a small airless body under non-aligned plasma flow and UV conditions (PDF) recently. That paper only mentions comets indirectly by 1 citation of Whipple 1981 which in turn has a paragraph on possible surface charging of comets with no atmosphere and beyond 5 AU. That is the answer to his question that we have been stating for years in this thread. Comets without coma are predicted (but not observed) to eject dust through electrostatic charging of the dust by the solar wind.
Potentials of surfaces in space by EC Whipple - Reports on progress in Physics, 1981 (PDF)
Quote:
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 02:47 PM | #168 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Why Wal Thornhill's idea that a neutron is a proton and electron is a delusion
Wal Thornhill's recent The Electric Universe Heresy (includes the electric comet and sun) fantasies and lies includes a delusion that a neutron is a proton and an electron. The easily seen reason that this is deluded is that an electron bound to a proton is a hydrogen atom, not a neutron. A hydrogen atom is much larger then a neutron. A hydrogen atom has atomic energy states, not nuclear ones. A free hydrogen atom does not decay in 881.5(15) s.
A major reason that this is deluded is that Thornhill is denying the physics he learned in his physics degree !
Sol88 empathizes the comet lies and delusions of his cult prophet Wal Thornihill. Sol88 empathizes the comet lies and delusions of his cult prophet Wal Thornihill yet again. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 03:35 PM | #169 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,001
|
Again, the topic of this thread is The Electric Comet Theory.
Per your earlier post, there are two such, Benioff (1924) and Thornhill (2007); B24 and T07, respectively, for short. Your “simple question” is tied (inextricably?) to a paper you cited, Poppe et al. (2015), P15 for short (thanks to RC for the reminder). As far as I can tell, P15 is quite independent of either B24 or T07; maybe you can describe a citation chain which does link them? Content-wise, the foundations of P15 are incompatible with B24: there is no plasma flow in B24 (indeed, no plasma). The incompatibility of T07 with P15 is not so obvious. However given Thornhill’s disdain for quantitative analysis and the fact that his Electric Comet Theory violates textbook electromagnetism, I feel it’s likely he would be very angry to see you using the results of a very complicated set of mathematical models in support of his Theory. But perhaps I’m wrong. Can you show that P15’s models and methods are consistent with T07’s? |
28th July 2020, 03:39 PM | #170 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,001
|
|
28th July 2020, 03:39 PM | #171 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Wal Thornhill makes the electric sun and SAFIRE into delusions
Wal Thornhill's recent The Electric Universe Heresy article makes the electric sun and SAFIRE into delusions. Note that Thornhill has a physics degree so lying abut or denying textbook physics is part of what makes his fantasies deluded.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 03:52 PM | #172 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
11 years of misunderstanding and/or misrepresenting papers and continuing after they have ben explained to him is evidence of a wish to lie about the papers.
Sol88 would have to be unable to understand/interpret well known words like comet or Sun ! Sol88 cited "A Fully Kinetic Perspective of Electron Acceleration around a Weakly Outgassing Comet" as evidence for his cult's delusion of a radial electric field accelerating both electrons and ions which violates the law of electromagnetism. That paper is about electron acceleration around a weakly outgassing comet at several AU by the interaction of the solar wind with a comet coma. That is blatantly not the electron and proton acceleration of the solar wind that happens around the Sun within about 10 solar radii. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 04:03 PM | #173 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
28th July 2020, 04:18 PM | #174 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,001
|
|
28th July 2020, 04:43 PM | #175 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
Sol88 lies with "Tar baby arguments". Sol88 cited Benioff (1924). Sol88 must know and show its relevance to the electric comet theory (the topic of this thread).
The paper cannot and does not mention plasma because the term "plasma" was introduced as a description of ionised gas by Irving Langmuir in 1928.[16] The paper cannot and does not mention the solar wind because we did not know about it in 1924! There were suggestions that the Sun emitted particles (electrons and ions) dating from 1859. It was in 1957 that Eugene Parker discovered the supersonic solar wind by putting together a previous model and comet tails. It was Parker who named the solar wind. Benioff assumes that a comet nucleus is charged and says it is caused by solar radiation: "The outward radial motions in all directions of particles close to the nucleus are best explained as resulting from an electrical charge associated with the nucleus. This charge is generated as follows: A number of molecules in the nucleus are ionized by solar radiations." Who in this thread has the ignorant fantasy that an assumption of radial symmetry makes physics invalid? Sol88 ! |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 05:35 PM | #176 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
Irving Langmuir
Quote:
Around the same time as Benioff (1924) paper. So plasma is a fairly new concept. Seems it may be the case with yourself as well? You'll have to assume at this time that Benioff (1924) paper requires, the later discovered, solar plasma flow('50's)? Anyhoo, comets being rocky like objects MUST charge/discharge to a floating potential wrt the local solar wind conditions. Now, what would upset this situation? |
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
28th July 2020, 07:39 PM | #177 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
Sol88 lies with Irving Langmuir who is not the author of Benioff (1924)
Sol88 lies with "around the same time as Benioff (1924) paper". Langmuir named partially ionized gases as plasma in 1928, 4 years after Benioff (1924) Sol88 lies that Benioff (1924) knew about the solar wind wind that was not named until 1957. In 1924, there ware only speculation about particles being emitted by the Sun. Sol88 continues to lie about Benioff (1924) which explicitly states that solar radiations create his assumed charge. Sol88 persists with his "rocky like " lie (it is rocky like behavior of landslides on 67P). Sol88 lies with "MUST charge/discharge". There are no discharges at comets. His cult's dead dogma has none of the science Sol88 is citing. Mainstream ice and dust cometary science predicts that the solar wind will electrostatically charge dust on comets with no coma. Sol88 lies with "Now, what would upset this situation?" when Sol88 knows it is the formation of comet coma. Coma stop the solar wind from reaching the nucleus surface, the solar wind no longer electrostatically charges dust, the dust grabs charge and becomes neutral. The period of theoretical, undetected dust ejection ends. The period of observed, massive dust ejection by ices sublimating starts . |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
28th July 2020, 07:53 PM | #178 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
The thousands of lies, delusions, insults, etc. since 6 July 2009 from Sol88 about his cult's electric comet and electric Sun dogma.
The abysmal insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn and all astronomers by Sol88 linking them with Sol88's dogma, etc. (no astronomer believes comets are actual rock) 474 items of lies, insults, etc. from Sol88 since ~10 March 2020 The litany of lies, etc. continues.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
29th July 2020, 12:41 AM | #180 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
Quote:
I worry about you sometimes reality check, I really do. |
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
29th July 2020, 04:57 AM | #181 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,259
|
|
__________________
Steen -- Jack of all trades - master of none! |
|
29th July 2020, 07:40 AM | #182 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,001
|
Not so fast!
A historian may successfully reconstruct the framework within which a scientific theory was created/developed. However, in this thread we are discussing the science. That means understanding a paper as it is written (plus whatever clarity is added by those which it cites). And there is nothing in B24 which even hints at a solar wind like plasma. It thus follows, logically, that the B24 Electric Comet Theory is toast ...
Quote:
For example: “The jets and surface topography of comets are consistent with EDM erosion of a cathode surface.” But of course I could be wrong. Would you please show, in detail, how “comets must charge/discharge to a floating potential wrt the local solar wind conditions”, under T07? *at least as I understand it |
29th July 2020, 01:34 PM | #183 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
29th July 2020, 01:37 PM | #184 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
Sol88 lies with "So, it's expected that even an ices and dust comet" when there are only ice and dust comets. Sol88's cult have a delusion of rocks blasted from planets by imaginary electric discharges between them as they whiz about in violation of physics - except Earth which is magic and stays in the same orbit to sustain life and climate ! That blasting causes at least hundreds of mass extinction events on the Earth !
Sol88 lies about my post by quote mining one of his lies from it. The others are his blatant lies about Benioff (1924) and his constant lie behavior of landslides on 67P making comets "rock like". Sol88 lies about my post with "charge to the floating potential" when I did not write that as in what he quotes. Sol88 lies with "Like with maths and stuff?" when he was asked for his electric comet source. Not in T07, so what is Sol88's source for (electric) "comets must charge/discharge to a floating potential wrt the local solar wind conditions." It is more likely that Sol88 is constantly lying by constantly derailing into irrelevant mainstream ice and dust comets in a thread about his cult's dead dogma. Sol88 lies with "Ony?" when he knows and has cited the physical evidence saying comyes are made of ice and dust. Sol88 lies with "Where is all the “ice”?" when he knows that we have detected ice. Sol88 lies with "We now acknowledge Field aligned ambipolar electric fields" charge dust when that is only his ignorant fantasy. Sol88 lies with "You have already acknowledged..." when I have stated that the solar wind. Sol88 lies with "the electric comet model can accommodate that as a natural garden variety plasma process" when his cult completely ignores most physics. The density and composition measurements of comets. The physics and experiments that the detected ice ice must sublimate. The definition of their "thunderbolts" that needs a dielectric medium to breakdown . Then there are the lies and delusions of his cult's prophet Wal Thornhill (More about Sol88's cult, Sol88's lies and Sol88 emphasizing his cult's idiocy). Sol88 lies with "Well studied in low earth orbit actually." when we have no comets in low Earth orbit ! We have studied the charging of spacecraft by the solar wind possibly in low Earth orbit. We have never studied the charging of comets by the solar wind because it has no measurable effects from Earth and not even from the Rosetta mission which should have joined 67P during the last part of this phase (before ices sublimating took over dust ejection from the nucleus). |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
29th July 2020, 01:54 PM | #185 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
Only?
Where is all the “ice”? We see lots of dust, Very fine and fluffy charged dust. We now acknowledge Field aligned ambipolar electric fields having a role in charging said dust. You have already acknowledged an object immersed in a plasma flow will indeed do the above when it’s potential changes relative to the plasma flow. How fast that change is and how large are some of the variables for comets, the electric comet model can accommodate that as a natural garden variety plasma process. Well studied in low earth orbit actually. |
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
29th July 2020, 04:35 PM | #186 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,001
|
You are the only active ISF member in this thread who can present/explain/etc The Electric Comet Theory, and the only viable such you have cited* is T07, surely the burden to answer my simple, straightforward question is on you, right?
Take your time, it’s important that you get it right ... *since B24 is toast |
29th July 2020, 04:36 PM | #187 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
The usual abysmal level of lies, delusions, insults, etc. addressed since 6 July 2009
The thousands of lies, delusions, insults, etc. since 6 July 2009 from Sol88 about his cult's electric comet and electric Sun dogma.
The abysmal insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn and all astronomers by Sol88 linking them with Sol88's dogma, etc. (no astronomer believes comets are actual rock) 498 items of lies, insults, etc. from Sol88 since ~10 March 2020 The litany of lies, etc. continues.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
29th July 2020, 06:07 PM | #188 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
"THE SCIENCE OF THINGS THAT AREN’T SO”
Quote:
Quote:
The thin surface layer is were all the action is at! Ambipolar electric field (Plasma Double Layer)! |
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
29th July 2020, 06:56 PM | #189 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
Sol88 lies with an irrelevant link to a 1953 talk not on comets or the Sun. It is nothing to do with the mainstream ice and dust cometary science that is based on centuries of physics and empirical evidence.
Sol88 emphasizes that his cult's dogma is deluded with a "Pathological Science" talk almost matching Sol88's cult.
Quote:
Sol88 lies with "Ambipolar electric field" which is in comet coma where that plasma approximation above applies. Sol88 lies with "Plasma Double Layer" which are physically impossible at comets. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
30th July 2020, 10:23 PM | #190 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,265
|
|
30th July 2020, 11:13 PM | #191 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
1. would be more appropriate.
published 2020 January 29
Quote:
I'd say that's is new not 1. The maximum effect that is observed is produced by a causitive agent of barely detectable intensity is well and truly detectable just has NO place in the dirtysnowball.
Quote:
The effect is obviously very local for this situation, see But...“Actually, the problem to construct a smooth approximation that is uniformly valid both in the plasma and sheath regions,is more a problem of aesthetics than of practical necessity....For most applications, it is sufficient to know that the plasma approximation is valid except for a thin surface layer, and that the sheath solution is (by construction!)consistently adapted to the corresponding plasma solution...These characteristics follow...from the simple sheath model in textbooks!”(K.-U. Riemann,IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.32, 2265, 2004) |
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
30th July 2020, 11:15 PM | #192 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
31st July 2020, 12:01 AM | #193 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,265
|
Have you every answered anything about the actual EC model? Maybe give an overview? A set of predicted and extrapolated effects?
Oh wait, then you run into number 4 again, like when you claimed the sun was positive yet failed to explain how nothing that would happen is the sun WAS positive actually is observed. Hence your continuous evasions and inability to actually describe your model in detail which you try to hide by asking pointless questions. After all the one you are asking now is the equivalent of asking about what glass would be used in windows assuming we can build on clouds. By focusing on that detail you try ignore the fact that the main premise is false. |
31st July 2020, 01:02 AM | #194 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
31st July 2020, 03:58 AM | #195 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,265
|
|
31st July 2020, 04:38 AM | #196 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Years of lying about posts, posters and science continues
Sol88 lies with "1. would be more appropriate." when he quotes Divin et . al which is mainstream ice and dust cometary science referencing mainstream ice and dust cometary science
]Sol88 lies by quote mining and not citing Devin et al. Sol88 lies with "I'd say that's is new" when he quotes "(Gombosi et al. 2015)" and dust being charged in coma is textbook astronomy. The Rosetta mission, planned from 1993, had instruments deigned to detect charged dust ! Sol88 lies with "1. The maximum effect that is observed...." when it is his cult's dead dogma that is close to I. Langmuir's “Pathological Science,” talk. Sol88 lies with "2. The effect is of a magnitude that remains close to the limit of detectability." when it is his cult's dead dogma that is close to I. Langmuir's “Pathological Science,” talk. Sol88 lies with "kinetic mechanism that is responsible for the bulk electron energization..." when this is mainstream ice and dust cometary science. Sol88 lies with "The effect is obviously very local for this situation" when this is neutral dust being charged throughout the coma. Sol88 lies with "“Actually, the problem is .." which is textbook plasma physics irrelevant to his cult's dead dogma. Sol88 lies with his repeated answered, irrelevant and lying comet "charge/discharge" question. Sol88 lies yet again by blindly parroting his cult's dead dogma rather than answering questions. Sol88 lies about his cult's dead dogma yet again. Sol88's cult has a "comets are charged rocks with electric discharge and EDM" delusions. Sol88 lies with "You were giv'n a mechanism." when Sol88 cites and lies about mainstream ice and dust cometary mechanisms such as the solar wind theoretically ejecting undetected dust from temporarily before ejection from sublimating ices takes over and the coma shields the nucleus. The Thunderbolts cult lies and fantasies are not scientific mechanisms. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
31st July 2020, 04:45 AM | #197 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
The usual abysmal level of lies, delusions, insults, etc. addressed since 6 July 2009
The thousands of lies, delusions, insults, etc. since 6 July 2009 from Sol88 about his cult's electric comet and electric Sun dogma.
The abysmal insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn and all astronomers by Sol88 linking them with Sol88's dogma, etc. (no astronomer believes comets are actual rock) 508 items of lies, insults, etc. from Sol88 since ~10 March 2020 The litany of lies, etc. continues.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
31st July 2020, 05:06 AM | #198 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Sol88 lies every time he cites A Fully Kinetic Perspective of Electron ..."
Sol88 lies every time he cites A Fully Kinetic Perspective of Electron Acceleration around a Weakly Outgassing Comet by Devin, Deca, etc. (2020 January 29) which is mainstream ice and dust cometary science. This is not Sol88's fantasies and lies. This is not the Thunderbolts cult lies and delusions that make up their dead dogma.
More about Sol88's cult, Sol88's lies and Sol88 emphasizing his cult's idiocy. Sol88 constantly lies by quote mining this quote.
Quote:
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
31st July 2020, 05:39 AM | #199 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
How Sol88 and Wal Thornhill make the electric comet deluded with EDM
We have been thru this before over the 11 years of this thread but I have time to show again that Sol88 is making his cult dogma deluded by emphasizing their EDM delusion again and again.
Previously Sol88 empathizes the lies and delusions of his cult prophet Wal Thornihill. This is electric discharge machining (EDM). On of Thornill's delusions is the the EDM delusion.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
31st July 2020, 04:51 PM | #200 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,270
|
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116. “The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|