IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Religion and Philosophy
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 14th November 2022, 12:21 AM   #1
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,997
Intelligence is an Evolutionary Dead End

I started a thread with this subject at Dawkins' forum many years ago.

Dawfins' fan club lost their **** over it at the time, but nothing convinced me I was wrong.

Now, I see NASA largely agrees: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2210/2210.10582.pdf

Quote:
We postulate that an existential disaster may lay in wait as our society advances exponentially towards space exploration, acting as the Great Filter: a phenomenon that wipes out civilizations before they can encounter each other, which may explain the cosmic silence.
Climate change is the obvious Great Filter we're charging towards.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 12:58 AM   #2
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
 
The Great Zaganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,557
an old and not very clever argument.

I agree that intelligence, and in particular Written Language, circumvents Evolution by giving people a Peer Group that can be very different from their familiar group, both in space and time.

But there is no evidence that intelligence leads to extinction. And no reason to believe that humanity won't get to a new post-Climate Change equilibrium that will include Space Exploration.
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.”
The Great Zaganza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 02:30 AM   #3
Dutchman
Scholar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 65
Quote:
We postulate that an existential disaster may lay in wait....
But then again, it may not, of course.
Dutchman is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 02:41 AM   #4
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,982
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
I started a thread with this subject at Dawkins' forum many years ago.

Dawfins' fan club lost their **** over it at the time, but nothing convinced me I was wrong.

Now, I see NASA largely agrees: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2210/2210.10582.pdf



Climate change is the obvious Great Filter we're charging towards.
Not a very original science fiction short story - and I don't like the dry academic style as it clashes with its moralising, reminds me of Campbell's influences.
__________________
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 02:45 AM   #5
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,982
Looks like they've published a sequel: https://www.researchgate.net/publica...Human_Survival
__________________
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 04:05 AM   #6
rjh01
Gentleman of leisure
Tagger
 
rjh01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flying around in the sky
Posts: 28,092
If humans were a slightly more aggressive species then we would have wiped out ourselves using nuclear weapons. If we were less aggressive we would not have evolved so far.
__________________
This signature is for rent.
rjh01 is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 07:08 AM   #7
Dr.Sid
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,754
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
Climate change is the obvious Great Filter we're charging towards.
I totally agree. It's not the climate change though. Not just it. Any global problem increases severity of all other global problems. And we're in the end game. Covid was the last drop, and now it's all out of anyone's hands. I was saying before we won't see 2050. Today 2030 seems quite optimistic.
AI was supposed to be part of the problem. But also it could be the sole survivor of the collapse. Not if it happens this fast though. AI won't play any role.
Dr.Sid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 08:16 AM   #8
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Where the Arrantly Roam
Posts: 26,169
The trick with The Great Filter would hinge on whether a civilization could create a self-replicating mechanical or semi-organic AI that would supersede the civilization before it destroys itself. I guess weapons are easier to create, though, and would logically go to their crude extreme before the complexities of creating 'life' got nailed down.
__________________
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" -Mark Twain
"Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 08:19 AM   #9
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
Blindsight, by Peter Watts
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 08:39 AM   #10
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
 
The Great Zaganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,557
Accelerando, by Charles Stross
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.”
The Great Zaganza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 09:28 AM   #11
Myriad
The Clarity Is Devastating
 
Myriad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Betwixt
Posts: 20,891
The underlying premise here appears to be that there are only two possibilities for the history of a sentient species. They either colonize the galaxy, or they destroy themselves. Since we estimate that it's likely that there have been other sentient species, but we don't detect them colonizing the galaxy, we should conclude they've all destroyed themselves.

I wonder why people at a space agency would promote cultural narratives that make colonizing the galaxy seem like the only alternative to extinction? You'd think people smart enough to work at a publicly funded space agency would have the imagination to apprehend a much greater variety of possibilities. What a mystery.
__________________
"*Except Myriad. Even Cthulhu would give him a pat on the head and an ice cream and send him to the movies while he ended the rest of the world." - Foster Zygote
Myriad is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 09:44 AM   #12
Dr.Sid
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,754
Originally Posted by Myriad View Post
The underlying premise here appears to be that there are only two possibilities for the history of a sentient species. They either colonize the galaxy, or they destroy themselves. Since we estimate that it's likely that there have been other sentient species, but we don't detect them colonizing the galaxy, we should conclude they've all destroyed themselves.

I wonder why people at a space agency would promote cultural narratives that make colonizing the galaxy seem like the only alternative to extinction? You'd think people smart enough to work at a publicly funded space agency would have the imagination to apprehend a much greater variety of possibilities. What a mystery.
What other possibilities are there ?
Dr.Sid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 09:59 AM   #13
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Where the Arrantly Roam
Posts: 26,169
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
What other possibilities are there ?
Exploring locally, but not attaining exponentially beyond ight speed travel to reach other inhabitable planets?
__________________
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" -Mark Twain
"Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 10:23 AM   #14
Myriad
The Clarity Is Devastating
 
Myriad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Betwixt
Posts: 20,891
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
What other possibilities are there ?

Survive and adapt. Invent a sustainable civilization. Or don't, and continue with history as we know it, collapsing and recovering countless thousands more times over hundreds of millions of years.

If you're concerned with deep time "Earth will eventually become uninhabitable or the sun go nova" scenarios... when it gets to that point, gracefully die out. Or, if "we" must (the scare quotes are because on that time scale it's unlikely that our eventual descendants would resemble ourselves very much), migrate or colonize. The Fermi paradox doesn't arise from one migration per half billion years.
__________________
"*Except Myriad. Even Cthulhu would give him a pat on the head and an ice cream and send him to the movies while he ended the rest of the world." - Foster Zygote
Myriad is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 10:40 AM   #15
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
Exploring locally is about all you can do, without getting into deep time projects and some form of technology indistinguishable from magic (whether it's FTL, immortality, hibernation, or generation ships).
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 11:21 AM   #16
Cat Not Included
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
What other possibilities are there ?
It may simply be that long distance space travel is just not reasonably feasible, ever.

Of course, while I personally find it unlikely, if a civilization did send out scouts or something, if they'd gone past Earth anytime other than in the last two hundred years or so we'd never know.

There could be dozens of solar powered micro-satellites going by on a regular basis and we wouldn't know about them.

Not that I think either of these things are particularly likely, but they are within the realm of possibility.
Cat Not Included is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 11:42 AM   #17
p0lka
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: near trees, houses and a lake.
Posts: 3,229
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
What other possibilities are there ?
Hiding your signals,
because there's something out there?
p0lka is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 11:48 AM   #18
Lithrael
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,596
VS Fermi Paradox there’s also the idea that if the universe is pretty young (for a universe) that we might be among the first and that’s a factor in why there’s no advanced civ’s whizzing around where we can see them.

Anyway 2050 is ridiculously pessimistic. Short of major nuclear fuckups we are simply not making the entire planet literally uninhabitable. In for a ****** time, sure.
Lithrael is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 11:55 AM   #19
lobosrul5
Philosopher
 
lobosrul5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 7,349
Originally Posted by Lithrael View Post
VS Fermi Paradox there’s also the idea that if the universe is pretty young (for a universe) that we might be among the first and that’s a factor in why there’s no advanced civ’s whizzing around where we can see them.

Anyway 2050 is ridiculously pessimistic. Short of major nuclear fuckups we are simply not making the entire planet literally uninhabitable. In for a ****** time, sure.
I think that given the vastness of time and the vastness of the universe, there were, or will be, myriad advanced species/societies. But at any given time in the relatively small corner of one galaxy that we would likely receive signals from or be able to travel to, we're totally alone. And with as many galaxies as there are, there probably will be, or probably once was, a society very much like The Federation in Star Trek. If FTL travel is indeed possible. But 99.9999999999999% of galaxies will never have that.

As bad as climate change can make things I can't possibly seeing it killing more than ohh, about 80% of us.

Last edited by lobosrul5; 14th November 2022 at 12:02 PM.
lobosrul5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 11:59 AM   #20
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
Originally Posted by p0lka View Post
Hiding your signals,
because there's something out there?
I figure by the time we have a signal actually worth hiding, from someone actually worth worrying about, we'll either have noticed them already, or they aren't there, or we'll be peers anyway.
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 12:34 PM   #21
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,982
Originally Posted by p0lka View Post
Hiding your signals,
because there's something out there?
Probably happens already, after a brief explosion of high powered analogue broadcasts digital, directed signals will take over which are less powerful in terms of broadcasting.

Probably the thing we couldn’t hide would be the change in our atmosphere caused by industrialisation, but I don’t know what the theoretical limits in terms of distance would be for detecting such a change.
__________________
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 05:57 PM   #22
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,997
Originally Posted by Dutchman View Post
But then again, it may not, of course.
Quite right!

Long time, few posts, I see, nice to see you joining in.

Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
I totally agree. It's not the climate change though. Not just it. Any global problem increases severity of all other global problems. And we're in the end game. Covid was the last drop, and now it's all out of anyone's hands. I was saying before we won't see 2050. Today 2030 seems quite optimistic.
I think that's quite pessimistic, but your premise is right - everything gets amplified. CO2 gets higher and people get dumber.

Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
The trick with The Great Filter would hinge on whether a civilization could create a self-replicating mechanical or semi-organic AI that would supersede the civilization before it destroys itself. I guess weapons are easier to create, though, and would logically go to their crude extreme before the complexities of creating 'life' got nailed down.
Sex robots already exist. We're saved!

Originally Posted by lobosrul5 View Post
As bad as climate change can make things I can't possibly seeing it killing more than ohh, about 80% of us.
Which would be way more than enough. Without infrastructure, probably 99% of the remainder would die out.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 06:08 PM   #23
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
ETA: never mind. Factual error, caught too late.
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours.

Three Word Story Wisdom
arthwollipot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 07:21 PM   #24
jrhowell
Muse
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 816
Originally Posted by p0lka View Post
Hiding your signals,
because there's something out there?
They may be hiding in plain sight. It turns out that as photon based communication becomes more efficient it also becomes indistinguishable from random noise.
jrhowell is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 07:29 PM   #25
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
I've long been of the opinion that intelligence is an evolutionary dead end, but for a different reason. Intelligence means that we are modifying our environment to suit ourselves, rather than evolving to suit our environment. Evolution is more or less stable when you don't have to adapt to a changing environment, and it is by technology, rather than by biological adaptation, that humans have occupied all kinds of terrain and climate.
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours.

Three Word Story Wisdom
arthwollipot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 08:25 PM   #26
rjh01
Gentleman of leisure
Tagger
 
rjh01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flying around in the sky
Posts: 28,092
There is another possibility. Intelligent life does exist elsewhere. The problem is that going from one star to another in this region is impossible. Radio communication is also impossible as it is not designed to travel several light years and still be heard above background levels.
__________________
This signature is for rent.
rjh01 is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 08:42 PM   #27
Dr.Sid
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,754
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I've long been of the opinion that intelligence is an evolutionary dead end, but for a different reason. Intelligence means that we are modifying our environment to suit ourselves, rather than evolving to suit our environment. Evolution is more or less stable when you don't have to adapt to a changing environment, and it is by technology, rather than by biological adaptation, that humans have occupied all kinds of terrain and climate.
That's very limiting view of evolution. Evolution of genome ? True. Evolution of mankind ? No ! For us the culture (ie. memes in the original sense) is more important. Medicine evolves today .. not genes. We move toward AI .. and if it kills us .. is it failure of mankind or just a next step ? IMHO the later.
Dr.Sid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 10:24 PM   #28
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,997
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I've long been of the opinion that intelligence is an evolutionary dead end, but for a different reason. Intelligence means that we are modifying our environment to suit ourselves, rather than evolving to suit our environment.
Looks like the same reason to me.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 10:25 PM   #29
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
Looks like the same reason to me.
Really? Seems to me that most of the rest of the thread is about intelligence being a dead end because it is pushing us towards a Great Filter.
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours.

Three Word Story Wisdom
arthwollipot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 14th November 2022, 11:45 PM   #30
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,997
I think what you described is a good precis of what form the event/filter will take.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 12:10 AM   #31
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
I think what you described is a good precis of what form the event/filter will take.
I'm not following you. What I'm describing is not any kind of event or filter, just the idea that evolution would stop affecting the human species.
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours.

Three Word Story Wisdom
arthwollipot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 01:42 AM   #32
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,997
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
I'm not following you. What I'm describing is not any kind of event or filter, just the idea that evolution would stop affecting the human species.
Ok, I'll try to explain.

My premise was always that intelligence inevitably leads to outcomes that are bad for survival as a species. We extend life expectancy by 30 years and create over-population. We get lazy and create pollution and carbon emissions. We want to grow food by the easiest method and contaminate the tiny layer of soil we rely on. We use pesticides and kill pollinators.

The selfish gene in action is how I see it. I don't think there's a specific event as such, but there's a tipping point, which is probably a combination of many factors and it feels to like we're charging towards it as fast as possible.

It just looked like what you're saying fits that scenario, because the fastest way to stop evolving is to die off.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 05:51 PM   #33
Thor 2
Philosopher
 
Thor 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tiny town west of Brisbane.
Posts: 7,174
On another tack, it occurs to me that our intelligent application of science, to medicine and surgical intervention, ensures that weaker people survive, thus ensuring the survival of these weaknesses.
__________________
Thinking is a faith hazard.
Thor 2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 05:55 PM   #34
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
Okay, but I think it's possible for there to be an equilibrium that can be reached. We're starting to realise how much we're changing the climate, and starting to do some things to mitigate that. Population will reach a maximum and plateau out.

I think that if the human race is going to die off, it'll take a very long time. Intelligence is causing us problems, yes, but it is the application of that intelligence that will solve those problems.
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours.

Three Word Story Wisdom
arthwollipot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 06:06 PM   #35
Dr.Sid
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,754
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
On another tack, it occurs to me that our intelligent application of science, to medicine and surgical intervention, ensures that weaker people survive, thus ensuring the survival of these weaknesses.
Only weaknesses that are no issue. So it's actually the same as without medicine. We are increasingly dependent on the medicine though, which might be an issue.
Dr.Sid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 08:23 PM   #36
The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
 
The Atheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,997
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
Only weaknesses that are no issue. So it's actually the same as without medicine. We are increasingly dependent on the medicine though, which might be an issue.
I think it's very clear that antibiotic resistance is going to cause major trouble during this century.
__________________
The point of equilibrium has passed; satire and current events are now indistinguishable.
The Atheist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th November 2022, 11:14 PM   #37
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
 
The Great Zaganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,557
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
On another tack, it occurs to me that our intelligent application of science, to medicine and surgical intervention, ensures that weaker people survive, thus ensuring the survival of these weaknesses.
Or, to put it another way, genetic diversity.
I believe that most medical progress in the 21st century will be identifying and transferring Natural resistances to diseases from one population to another.
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.”
The Great Zaganza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th November 2022, 03:36 PM   #38
Cat Not Included
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by The Atheist View Post
Ok, I'll try to explain.

My premise was always that intelligence inevitably leads to outcomes that are bad for survival as a species. We extend life expectancy by 30 years and create over-population. We get lazy and create pollution and carbon emissions. We want to grow food by the easiest method and contaminate the tiny layer of soil we rely on. We use pesticides and kill pollinators.

The selfish gene in action is how I see it. I don't think there's a specific event as such, but there's a tipping point, which is probably a combination of many factors and it feels to like we're charging towards it as fast as possible.

It just looked like what you're saying fits that scenario, because the fastest way to stop evolving is to die off.
Outside of humans, what species that appear to be reasonably intelligent (for example, crows) have caused outcomes that have been bad for them as a species?

Lots of species go extinct. We humans have made it way worse (perhaps if those other species were more intelligent they might be surviving the problems we're causing better?), but from what I can find, scientists estimate the "typical" extinction rate pre-human was about 1 species going extinct per 1 million existing species per year. There are currently around 8 million species, so we can expect about 8 going extinct per year. Do "intelligent" species do any worse than that?

We haven't found evidence of any other intelligent life in the universe so far...but we haven't found evidence of any non-intelligent life either.
Cat Not Included is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th November 2022, 03:40 PM   #39
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
LOL "overpopulation". We have not even begun to overpopulate.
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th November 2022, 03:46 PM   #40
Cat Not Included
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by Thor 2 View Post
On another tack, it occurs to me that our intelligent application of science, to medicine and surgical intervention, ensures that weaker people survive, thus ensuring the survival of these weaknesses.
"weaker" is an extremely relative term. More variety gives more genetic diversity. "Strength" is only relative to a specific environment, and overspecialization can be devastating to a species when something changes the environment.
Cat Not Included is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Religion and Philosophy

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.