|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
1st February 2023, 05:03 AM | #41 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
This seeming fear of allowing anyone an "unnecessary advantage" makes you sound like you feel a bit embattled. A tactic of denying one's opponent the means to express their argument clearly for fear of losing the argument smacks of desperation. Language changes when people need ways to accurately express what they mean and if people find a neologism useful and helpful it will catch on. Otherwise it will disappear.
Quote:
|
1st February 2023, 05:11 AM | #42 |
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
|
Disagree strongly. A belief in gods inevitably implies some sort of effort to understand the nature, requirements and preferences of said gods, and the best way to retain their favour, which almost inevitably leads to the immense cultural baggage associated with religion. Relieving oneself of the burden, in time, resources and intellectual effort, of placating gods who don't exist, is a clear advantage in terms of personal resources.
Dave |
__________________
There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 |
|
1st February 2023, 05:25 AM | #43 |
BOFH
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Posts: 16,340
|
Yep, as someone said here long ago - the answer "GodDidIt" closes doors to further inquiry and takes you nowhere. Sweep that non-answer away and you have genetics, climate science, medicine, astronomy and on and on.
|
__________________
"Your deepest pools, like your deepest politicians and philosophers, often turn out more shallow than expected." Walter Scott. |
|
1st February 2023, 05:31 AM | #44 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
It's a balance. Conversely there's the advantage of social cohesion and control exerted by having people imagine that a divine authority is enforcing the rules. That social control advantage is possibly how a propensity toward religiosity evolved in the first place.
We're perhaps fortunate to live in comparatively peaceful and stable times when societies built with secular rather than theocratic control don't break down just because large numbers of people come round to the idea that there's nobody really in charge. |
1st February 2023, 05:56 AM | #45 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cork baaaiii
Posts: 3,322
|
|
1st February 2023, 06:00 AM | #46 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cork baaaiii
Posts: 3,322
|
My definition:
Belief is where you hold something true under the following conditions: 1) You have insuuficient evidence to make a knowledge judgement, 2) You have no evidence, or 3) The evidence says you're wrong. To illustrate, I'll tell people that I don't believe in the chair I'm sitting in. |
1st February 2023, 07:16 AM | #47 |
Dental Floss Tycoon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,371
|
That article is a facile fluff piece. But the more relevant fact is that nowhere does that article refer to "agnostic atheists". It consistently refers to "agnostics and atheists" as though they are two separate positions. The article has nothing to do with your claims regarding "agnostic atheists", because it never even acknowledges that there is such a thing.
If those referred to in the article who self-identified as "agnostic" define the term to mean "neutral", as you do, meaning that they are equally disposed toward the existence/nonexistence of gods, then it's no surprise that they would be more inclined toward superstitious beliefs than those identifying as "atheist". And it doesn't take a Ph.D. in evolutionary psychology to understand that belief in supernatural agencies is an artifact of our evolution as a social species whose survival is greatly dependent on being able to infer the needs/desires of others so that we can better coordinate our efforts at survival, and that this ability to form a theory of mind regarding others has been so heavily selected for in our evolution that we have a tendency to apply it even to things and phenomena without any agency of their own, but which affect our survival. Thus the tendency to approach, say, a drought as, "What do the rains want? How can we modify our behavior to motivate the rains to give us what we need?". This is how animism and gods came to be encoded in our genes. And this tendency toward irrationallity is why we have the scientific method, after all. But the article provides nothing to support any argument you might want to make against the people who self-identify as "agnostic atheist" here on this forum. |
__________________
Counterbalance in the little town of Ridgeview, Ohio. Two people permanently enslaved by the tyranny of fear and superstitution, facing the future with a kind of helpless dread. Two others facing the future with confidence - having escaped one of the darker places of the Twilight Zone. |
|
1st February 2023, 09:14 AM | #48 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,596
|
Navigator, I think I’m closer to understanding your point but I’m still not getting some of these basic ideas you are bringing up. Repeatedly you seem to think we have said or agreed that a person isn’t really an atheist if they beleive in ghosts. But when we say one hasn’t got anything to do with the other, we aren’t saying it’s exclusionary. They are both positions a person can hold at the same time without contradiction.
‘A person who believes in ghosts doesn’t do so because of their atheism’ means no more or less than ‘a person who believes in luck doesn’t do so because of their athleticism’ like… the situation might be that most serious athletes think results are about lots of hard work and dedication rather than luck, but believing in luck wouldn’t make you not a real athlete. Atheism doesn’t ‘really’ mean ‘lacking belief in all supernatural concepts’ it just and only means lacking belief in gods. And ‘gods’ doesn’t really mean ‘creators’ even though several gods are creation figures. |
2nd February 2023, 06:34 AM | #49 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
There's a quote about how when people stop believing in god they start believing in anything [googles: oh it was the Belgian playwright and poet Emile Cammaerts apparently: “The first effect of not believing in God is to believe in anything” (The Laughing Prophets, Page 211, 1937).] I'd say there's a grain of truth in it, in that people who lose their religion often seem to feel the need to fill the hole with something else they can still believe in. Hence the "I'm not religious but I'm very spiritual" type comments you often hear, and a willingness to "open their minds" (by which they usually mean look at the evidence for it whilst completely ignoring the evidence against it) to everything from ghosts to cosmic intelligences.
I guess for some people facing up to the knowledge that they're nothing special is just too much, they still want to believe their existence is more than a random accident even if they can no longer swallow the manifest pottiness of any of the major religions. In the immortal words of Holly: "As the days go by, we face the increasing inevitability that we are alone in a godless, uninhabited, hostile and meaningless universe. Still, you've got to laugh, haven't you?" |
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
2nd February 2023, 06:49 AM | #50 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,596
|
Still one of the cutest twists ever, in the book the setting turns out to be a closed paradox where Lister creates the universe.
Since Lister is certainly not a god (unless you’re a practicing Cat) he’s a great example of someone you could beleive created the universe while still being an atheist. |
2nd February 2023, 06:57 AM | #51 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 8,843
|
Some years ago, I read a statement,* "i hope I don't believe in anything."
That startled me, even shocked me a little, until I realized what "to believe" means in all but the most colloquial sense. To believe means to accept something as true in the absence of evidence. At once, I realized that I too hoped I didn't believe in anything. Who would or could want to be that daffy? *Wish i knew who said that. Googling it sure doesn't help. |
__________________
When I spoke out against the bullies, they called me woke. When I lashed them with a length of chain, they called me sir. |
|
2nd February 2023, 07:46 AM | #52 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
Based upon the definition of atheism [lacking belief in the existence of gods], whether they recognized or worshiped such gods which were proven to exist, such couldn't - strictly speaking - refer to themselves as atheists.
I think that they could still refer to as themselves anti-theists. |
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 08:02 AM | #53 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
Developing a lack of belief in gods appears to have no advantage or particular purpose.
For example, the baby grows out of its atheism and tries out a number of theist positions, and at some point decides that theism - the belief in god/gods - has no advantage over having a lack of belief in gods, and thus returns to lacking belief in gods...but wants to let the world know why he/she has reverted and has rejected theism and returned to atheism. And proceeds to do so... ...the doing so, is not in and of itself an expression of atheism. This is because the returnee has not returned to the lack of belief in gods, but has gone to the position of rejecting the belief in gods, which is not atheism, strictly speaking. Not sure how your comment addresses my own here Dave. A clear advantage in terms of personal resources has what to do with lacking belief in the existence of gods [atheism]? I see how it would have a practical use for those practicing anti-theism, but there are those who argue [example] that climate change will make a mockery out of any "clear advantage in terms of personal resources" which means any advantage one thinks they have in those, is illusionary - regardless of whether one is pro or anti theism. So exchanging one set of baggage for another, does nothing for either position. |
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 08:10 AM | #54 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
Some might be anti-theists.
We might want to be able to distinguish between those who are opposed to worshiping any God which was found to exist (those might be considered anti-theist) and those who are merely indifferent to such worship, considering it would serve no purpose. Surely they could be atheists pending the discovery of any Gods. If they're right and those Gods don't exist then that evidence will certainly never come. |
2nd February 2023, 08:10 AM | #55 |
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
|
I explained that in the passage you quoted. I suggest you read it again, as it's quite clearly stated. But to simplify it, believing that there are no gods means that one doesn't have to bother worshipping them, and can spend the time and resources on something more rewarding.
This is a non sequitur. Climate change is unrelated to atheism; additional obligations imposed by the need to maintain a steadier climate do not by themselves negate those assumed by the practice of religion. Put more simply, the religious need to insulate their houses and pray; I just need to insulate my house. Dave |
__________________
There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 |
|
2nd February 2023, 08:14 AM | #56 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
|
2nd February 2023, 08:17 AM | #57 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
|
2nd February 2023, 08:33 AM | #58 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
I agree. One doesn't have to read to far into it, to come to that conclusion.
Quote:
Quote:
As far as positions go, atheism is simply the lack of belief in gods. Agnosticism is something different from that, and anti-theism is also something different from that, as is Agnostic Neutralism. All these positions share the common 'lack belief in gods' but - are obviously not the same positions.
Quote:
Quote:
I may be misunderstanding you there, but if that is what you are arguing, you will need to support your argument in a way that makes it clear.
Quote:
Smartcooky has it somewhat right that the conflation is simply straw. [Post #5] but even so, still conflates being an atheist' with being - in his/her case - an anti-theist. Call a spade a shovel and it is still a shovel. Make a spade into a shovel, and it is no longer a spade. |
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 08:42 AM | #59 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
Okay...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 08:50 AM | #60 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
|
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 08:58 AM | #61 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
What I said, in context was:
Quote:
Some may even return to being atheists and simply lack belief in gods again, but most seem to prefer engaging in something else. For me it is engaging with Agnostic Neutralism - perhaps because it suits my nature - and for others it is Agnosticism, and for others it is Antitheism |
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 09:01 AM | #62 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
|
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 09:13 AM | #63 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
When folk think that agnosticism is a subset of atheism [or theism] the waters are muddied and confusion ensures.
In reality, the positions are stand alone and should be regarded as such. Atheism. Agnosticism [Neutrality] Antitheism and Theism. Conflating the positions is fallacy. Fallacy muddies the waters/causes confusion and has folk arguing that one can be an atheist AND believe in things beyond the natural world |
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 09:25 AM | #64 |
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
|
No, it doesn't become unrelated just because you say so. The religious need to devote time and effort to prayer. Atheists don't. Atheists can therefore devote more time and energy to other things than praying.
I'm not going to bother repeating that a third time. I've made my point and you're free to choose not to understand it. Another non sequitur you're propagating: in what sense does a baby "grow out of its atheism"? If nobody tries to persuade a child that gods exist, why would the child spontaneously acquire theism as a part of its biological development? I wasn't, and I didn't. Dave |
__________________
There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 |
|
2nd February 2023, 09:54 AM | #65 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: EU, IT
Posts: 444
|
|
2nd February 2023, 10:11 AM | #66 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
No. I addressed this already. What you think there, is a confusion caused by conflating positions.
Atheism is simply the lack of belief in gods, NOT the rejection of the belief in the existence of gods. Rejection of the belief in the existence of gods is mostly asserted by Antitheism, which is a position which stands alone, as the all really do. Conflating the positions as being sub-category's of each other, is the cause of the confusion, because to do so is fallacy. |
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 10:20 AM | #67 |
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
|
If someone rejects belief in the existence of gods, that person does not therefore believe in gods, and is therefore an atheist. Antitheism is therefore a subset of atheism.
Navigator, your grasp of elementary logic appears very poor from the fact that you are unable to draw these very obvious conclusions. Dave |
__________________
There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 |
|
2nd February 2023, 10:33 AM | #68 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
|
2nd February 2023, 10:38 AM | #69 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
|
2nd February 2023, 10:40 AM | #70 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
|
2nd February 2023, 10:43 AM | #71 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
Correct. It doesn't become unrelated at all, because it isn't related to any other position than its own. My 'saying so' is nothing more than pointing out the reality against the fallacy.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 10:47 AM | #72 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,808
|
|
__________________
Wild mingling with the howling gale, loud bursts of ghastly laughter rise high o’er the minstrels head they sail and die amid the northern skies ~ Scott There was I was where I ought - Examining my conscious thought ~ Navigator Atheism is not skepticism Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors. ~ ISF disclaimer |
|
2nd February 2023, 10:49 AM | #73 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
You seem a little fixated on antitheism.
Is my rejection of a belief in dragons usefully described as an assertion of my antidragonism? Sure I reject any belief in their really existing, but I don't have any antipathy to dragons, I just recognise they're only make-believe. |
2nd February 2023, 10:51 AM | #74 |
Safely Ignored
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,394
|
|
2nd February 2023, 11:25 AM | #75 |
Dental Floss Tycoon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,371
|
Navigator is only interested in participating in a scripted discussion that he's already rehearsed with the straw men in his head. Any attempts by atheists to describe what they actually think that don't fit into his desired responses will be ignored, and he will continue making things up as he goes along, like "agnostic neutralism", which doesn't describe anything that's been presented by the atheists he's not really interested in debating.
|
__________________
Counterbalance in the little town of Ridgeview, Ohio. Two people permanently enslaved by the tyranny of fear and superstitution, facing the future with a kind of helpless dread. Two others facing the future with confidence - having escaped one of the darker places of the Twilight Zone. |
|
2nd February 2023, 11:37 AM | #76 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Northumberland, UK
Posts: 4,339
|
|
2nd February 2023, 12:06 PM | #77 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,588
|
Agnosticism... i.e. lack of knowledge or impartial knowledge... is the source of all errors all along the spectrum of belief. Please read this post... |
2nd February 2023, 05:21 PM | #78 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
2nd February 2023, 05:42 PM | #79 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
2nd February 2023, 05:56 PM | #80 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,895
|
Yes.
Well that was easy. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|