IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Capitol riot , Congressional hearings

Reply
Old 31st July 2021, 02:58 PM   #321
kookbreaker
Evil Fokker
 
kookbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,647
Apparently “ambushing” means you give multiple warnings that you will shoot.
__________________
www.spectrum-scientifics.com <- My store of science toys, instruments and general fun!

Thanks for helping me win Best Toys in Philly Voter in 2011,2012, and 2014! We won' be discussing the disappointment that was 2013.
kookbreaker is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 03:04 PM   #322
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 52,848
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
Think your typos have obscured your meaning. You seem to be saying the appropriate thing for Ghomert to have done is to accuse the Capitol Police of ambushing Babett. That doesn't seem to make sense.
Yeah, i meant New Accusations . Gohmert is a total nutjob.
WAPO did an article today about how Ashli has beomce that Horst Wessel for the Trump movement.
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 03:09 PM   #323
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 52,848
I made a mistake. It was Gosart, not Gohmert who made the accusation about an ambush.

From the WAPO:

Quote:
Who executed Ashli Babbitt?” Gosar, a Trump ally, asked acting U.S. attorney general Jeffrey Rosen at a hearing in May. A month later, while questioning FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, Gosar said the officer “appeared to be hiding, lying in wait and then gave no warning before killing her.”
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 03:38 PM   #324
Trebuchet
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trebuchet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Port Townsend, Washington
Posts: 32,433
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
I made a mistake. It was Gosart, not Gohmert who made the accusation about an ambush.

From the WAPO:
Gohmert is the stupidest man in Congress, but not the only stupid man in Congress. And if you make it "stupidest person", Greene and Boebert give him a run for his money.
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Trebuchet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 03:43 PM   #325
Resume
Troublesome Passenger
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 20,165
Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
Gohmert is the stupidest man in Congress, but not the only stupid man in Congress. And if you make it "stupidest person", Greene and Boebert give him a run for his money.
They don't have to be smart, they just need the ability to gull and grift their base. Which they are doing, for time being.
__________________
“One of the last things they do before they’re intubated is beg me for the vaccine. I hold their hand and tell them that I’m sorry, but it’s too late.”

Dr. Brytney Cobia
Resume is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 03:49 PM   #326
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 52,848
it's getting hard to tell these rfght wing GOP morons apart, frankly.
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 04:19 PM   #327
Stacyhs
Penultimate Amazing
 
Stacyhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 21,877
Gosart's own siblings say he's nuts and want nothing to do with him:
Quote:
Quote:
Three of Rep. Paul Gosar's (R-Ariz.) siblings have called on him to be expelled from Congress, The Arizona Republic reported, placing blame on the congressman for helping incite the violent riot that took place at the Capitol on Wednesday.

Gosar’s siblings sent a letter to Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) asking for his help in removing their brother from Congress, the newspaper reported.

It's the third time in three years that members of Gosar's family have publicly voiced their disapproval of the representative.


"We know him to be an extremist and we took that very seriously," Jennifer Gosar told the newspaper. "I believe that my brother has been a constant perpetrator of misinformation. ... I've been incredulous at the lack of accountability thus far. I would think Wednesday would be certainly a line."
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5...r-capitol-riot
"When you talk about what happened the other day, you're talking about treason. You're talking about overthrowing the government. That's what this is. If that doesn't rise to the level of expulsion, what does?" said Tim Gosar.
It's as if GOP Congressmembers are vying to be crowned King and Queen of the Stupid Prom.
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st July 2021, 05:45 PM   #328
Lurch
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,822
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
Yeah, i meant New Accusations . Gohmert is a total nutjob.
WAPO did an article today about how Ashli has beomce that Horst Wessel for the Trump movement.
WAPO is slow on the uptake. I recognized this new role of Babbitt's some weeks back. Next up; the sacred Blood Banner ritual. Someone's gonna come up with some purported blood-stained scrap of material attributed to her attire.
Lurch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2021, 06:10 AM   #329
catsmate
No longer the 1
 
catsmate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 25,760
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
Listen who among doesn't grab the first pair of restraints we see lying about, just on the off chance we'll need them later?
I have a couple of pairs of handcuffs in my backpack, part os my standard kit.
__________________
As human right is always something given, it always in reality reduces to the right which men give, "concede," to each other. If the right to existence is conceded to new-born children, then they have the right; if it is not conceded to them, as was the case among the Spartans and ancient Romans, then they do not have it. For only society can give or concede it to them; they themselves cannot take it, or give it to themselves.
catsmate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2021, 12:42 PM   #330
Stacyhs
Penultimate Amazing
 
Stacyhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 21,877
Originally Posted by catsmate View Post
I have a couple of pairs of handcuffs in my backpack, part os my standard kit.
Kinky! But, who am I to judge?
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2021, 12:50 PM   #331
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 53,839
I'm sorry if this has already been asked and answered. What questions, exactly, is this investigation investigating?
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2021, 01:19 PM   #332
Dragon
Graduate Poster
 
Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,604
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
I'm sorry if this has already been asked and answered.
I very much doubt that you are.
Quote:
What questions, exactly, is this investigation investigating?
It took me about 30 seconds to find the relevant House resolution establishing the select committee. I come here to learn a bit about US politics and I find the sort of jaq-ing off you indulge in really, really tiresome. It adds absolutely nothing to the discussion.
__________________
"We must favour verifiable evidence over private feeling. Otherwise we leave ourselves vulnerable to those who would obscure the truth."
Richard Dawkins - The Enemies of Reason
Dragon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2021, 02:10 PM   #333
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,107
Originally Posted by catsmate View Post
I have a couple of pairs of handcuffs in my backpack, part os my standard kit.
You mean like these?

__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2021, 02:11 PM   #334
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,107
Originally Posted by Dragon View Post
I very much doubt that you are.


It took me about 30 seconds to find the relevant House resolution establishing the select committee. I come here to learn a bit about US politics and I find the sort of jaq-ing off you indulge in really, really tiresome. It adds absolutely nothing to the discussion.
That's not a bug, its a feature!
__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 01:52 AM   #335
Parsman
Muse
 
Parsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 779
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
I'm sorry if this has already been asked and answered. What questions, exactly, is this investigation investigating?
Have you checked the thesaurus for a word you prefer to "coup" yet?
__________________
I was not; I have been; I am not; I am content - Epicurus

When you're dead you don't know that you're dead, all the pain is felt by others....................the same thing happens when you're stupid.
Parsman is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 04:24 AM   #336
SuburbanTurkey
Penultimate Amazing
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 11,263
Originally Posted by Stacyhs View Post
Is there such a thing as a "professional" insurrectionist? Several of those charged have military and/or law enforcement experience, especially the Oath Keepers.




https://www.npr.org/2021/04/10/98542...tol-riot-probe
Plenty of the people involved with the more serious crimes like conspiracy or attacking the police had previous experience with street violence at smaller actions throughout the country over the last few years.

The Jan6 attack was not a one-off phenomena, but merely the capstone of a long running series of right wing violent street rallies. Like the Capitol attack, police inaction, if not explicit cooperation, played a big role in allowing these attacks to occur without meaningful resistance or criminal consequences for those involved.

Many of these Proud Boys were routinely jetting around the country to take part in street brawls and violent anti-government rallies and would have been easy targets for local or federal law enforcement should they had the desire to do their duty.

The Jan6 attack was only the most extreme example showing the danger that comes when police willfully turn a blind eye to fascist violence.

For example: Ethan Nordean, a Proud Boy leader currently facing conspiracy charges, became a meme for beating a counter protestor unconscious at a fascist rally turned riot in Portland in 2018. Police inaction against organized fascist violence is a long standing problem in this country. Proud Boys getting away with broad daylight crimes again and again was a huge factor in their rise of popularity and increasing boldness.
__________________
Gobble gobble

Last edited by SuburbanTurkey; 2nd August 2021 at 04:44 AM.
SuburbanTurkey is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 04:55 AM   #337
Mongrel
Begging for Scraps
 
Mongrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK, suburbia. 20 minutes in the future
Posts: 2,100
Originally Posted by Lurch View Post
Someone's gonna come up with some purported blood-stained scrap of material attributed to her attire.
Teddy bear?
YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
__________________
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.” - Charles Darwin

...like so many contemporary philosophers he especially enjoyed giving helpful advice to people who were happier than he was. - Tom Lehrer
Mongrel is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:14 AM   #338
plague311
Great minds think...
 
plague311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 10,101
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
I'm sorry if this has already been asked and answered. What questions, exactly, is this investigation investigating?
None. It's all just showboating for politics. There are no questions, no facts in dispute, and they have no meaningful objective. It's purely to waste taxpayer money by keeping people busy and for soundbites for the next election cycle.

There, I said it for you so we don't have to go through this coy ******** of you trying to con others into saying what you want to say.

None of what I posted up there is true though. If you're confused what it's investigating, maybe you should start with some basic googling, and then come back with actual questions.
__________________
"Circumcision and death threats go together like milk and cookies." - William Parcher

“There are times when the mind is dealt such a blow it hides itself in insanity. While this may not seem beneficial, it is. There are times when reality is nothing but pain, and to escape that pain the mind must leave reality behind.” - Patrick Rothfuss

Last edited by plague311; 2nd August 2021 at 11:23 AM.
plague311 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:19 AM   #339
SuburbanTurkey
Penultimate Amazing
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 11,263
Originally Posted by plague311 View Post
None. It's all just a showboating for politics. There are no questions, no facts in dispute, and they have no meaningful objective. It's purely to waste taxpayer money by keeping people busy and for soundbites for the next election cycle.

There, I said it for you so we don't have to go through this coy ******** of you trying to con others into saying what you want to say.

None of what I posted up there is true though. If you're confused what it's investigating, maybe you should start with same basic googling, and then come back with actual questions.
A large portion of this investigation is largely going to be political showboating.

That's not a criticism though. This attack is part of a larger political crisis being drummed up by the fascist right, and fighting back against it will be inherently political as well. Staking out a firm position about the very basics of the attack: who was there, what happened, why it happened, and to what political purpose it served, is an important piece of political communication.

The attack is a direct result of the brand of fascist politics popular among the American right wing these days, and it's worthwhile goal to extract a political cost by publicly and painfully exploring the gritty details. If it galvanizes liberals and makes squishy right wingers (if there are any left at this point) waver in their support for an increasingly fascist Republican party, that's a good outcome.

I have to give Pelosi credit for being shrewd enough to realize this and deny Republicans a position to muddy the waters and go on tedious tangents meant to blunt the right wing's responsibility for the attack.

There is some real stuff to investigate though. I am hoping that they really sink their teeth into Capitol police leadership and get to the bottom of why the cops were so woefully underprepared for the obviously telegraphed right wing threat. It remains to be seen if this happens.

TL;DR: It's a good thing if Democrats are waving the bloody shirt.
__________________
Gobble gobble

Last edited by SuburbanTurkey; 2nd August 2021 at 11:23 AM.
SuburbanTurkey is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:23 AM   #340
Paul2
Philosopher
 
Paul2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,942
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
A large portion of this investigation is largely going to be political showboating.

That's not a criticism though. This attack is part of a larger political crisis being drummed up by the fascist right, and fighting back against it will be inherently political as well. Staking out a firm position about the very basics of the attack: who was there, what happened, why it happened, and to what political purpose it served, is an important piece of political communication.

The attack is a direct result of the brand of fascist politics popular among the American right wing these days, and it's worthwhile goal to extract a political cost by publicly and painfully exploring the gritty details.

I have to give Pelosi credit for being shrewd enough to realize this and deny Republicans a position to muddy the waters and go on tedious tangents meant to blunt the right wing's responsibility for the attack. If it galvanizes liberals and makes squishy right wingers (if there are any left at this point) waver in their support for an increasingly fascist Republican party, that's a good outcome.

There is some real stuff to investigate though. I am hoping that they really sink their teeth into Capitol police leadership and get to the bottom of why the cops were so woefully underprepared for the obviously telegraphed right wing threat. It remains to be seen if this happens.
Yes, it's possible to score political points as part of a substantive investigation. The two are not mutually exclusive.
__________________
It's nice to be nice to the nice.

Aristotle, so far as I know, was the first man to proclaim explicitly that man is a rational animal. His reason for this view was one which does not now seem very impressive: it was, that some people can do sums. - Bertrand Russell
Paul2 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:31 AM   #341
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 90,560
While most/all of these Congressional hearings include showboating for individual legislators (Jim Jordan being one of the worst barely beating out Cruz and Rubio), it's simply not true that nothing new is uncovered and that the hearings serve no other purpose.

There is a lot here already I didn't know about such as Jordan's call(s) to Dump on the 6th.

The testimony of Vindman and Hill for example, was completely new stuff for me in the impeachment hearing.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 2nd August 2021 at 11:32 AM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:34 AM   #342
SuburbanTurkey
Penultimate Amazing
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 11,263
My only complaint is that they waited too damn long. The right wing machine has already run history through their revisionism machine.

In the immediate aftermath there was more chaos on the right and how they should respond. I fear they are far less vulnerable to getting their feet held to fire at this late date.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:38 AM   #343
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 90,560
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
My only complaint is that they waited too damn long. The right wing machine has already run history through their revisionism machine.

In the immediate aftermath there was more chaos on the right and how they should respond. I fear they are far less vulnerable to getting their feet held to fire at this late date.
There's another argument to be made here. What does "feet to the fire" accomplish? Is the DoJ going to indict these people?

Probably not. But closer to the 2022 election, now that might be the place we want all this to boil up around.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 11:45 AM   #344
SuburbanTurkey
Penultimate Amazing
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 11,263
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
There's another argument to be made here. What does "feet to the fire" accomplish? Is the DoJ going to indict these people?

Probably not. But closer to the 2022 election, now that might be the place we want all this to boil up around.
There might have been an opportunity to sow division among the broader right if some were willing to repudiate Trump or the Jan6 attackers in the immediate aftermath. Now everybody on the right is pretty much marching to the beat of the same drum, minimizing the seriousness of the legitimacy crisis they ginned up and valorizing those that took action to "stop the steal".

I predict there's almost no chance of any indictments coming from the investigation unless someone perjures themselves, and that strikes me as unlikely.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 12:31 PM   #345
Stacyhs
Penultimate Amazing
 
Stacyhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 21,877
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
Plenty of the people involved with the more serious crimes like conspiracy or attacking the police had previous experience with street violence at smaller actions throughout the country over the last few years.

The Jan6 attack was not a one-off phenomena, but merely the capstone of a long running series of right wing violent street rallies. Like the Capitol attack, police inaction, if not explicit cooperation, played a big role in allowing these attacks to occur without meaningful resistance or criminal consequences for those involved.

Many of these Proud Boys were routinely jetting around the country to take part in street brawls and violent anti-government rallies and would have been easy targets for local or federal law enforcement should they had the desire to do their duty.

The Jan6 attack was only the most extreme example showing the danger that comes when police willfully turn a blind eye to fascist violence.

For example: Ethan Nordean, a Proud Boy leader currently facing conspiracy charges, became a meme for beating a counter protestor unconscious at a fascist rally turned riot in Portland in 2018. Police inaction against organized fascist violence is a long standing problem in this country. Proud Boys getting away with broad daylight crimes again and again was a huge factor in their rise of popularity and increasing boldness.
Yes, lots of them have a history of this kind of behavior, but that doesn't make them "professional" insurrectionists. It makes them repeat offenders.
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 12:33 PM   #346
SuburbanTurkey
Penultimate Amazing
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 11,263
Originally Posted by Stacyhs View Post
Yes, lots of them have a history of this kind of behavior, but that doesn't make them "professional" insurrectionists. It makes them repeat offenders.
Their experience of engaging in this exact kind of behavior is probably more relevant than any tangential training they received through police and military jobs.

The closest thing to a "professional" insurrectionist are the grifter leaders, like Fedrico Tarrio or Stewart Rhodes, who manage to generate profit through trading on the name recognition of these fascist groups.
__________________
Gobble gobble

Last edited by SuburbanTurkey; 2nd August 2021 at 12:35 PM.
SuburbanTurkey is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2021, 12:41 PM   #347
Stacyhs
Penultimate Amazing
 
Stacyhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 21,877
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
Their experience of engaging in this exact kind of behavior is probably more relevant than any tangential training they received through police and military jobs.

The closest thing to a "professional" insurrectionist are the grifter leaders, like Fedrico Tarrio or Stewart Rhodes, who manage to generate profit through trading on the name recognition of these fascist groups.
Speaking of Steward Rhodes, it's likely that he will also be charged with conspiracy considering the emails and phone conversations the Feds have.
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 12:02 AM   #348
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,203
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
There might have been an opportunity to sow division among the broader right if some were willing to repudiate Trump or the Jan6 attackers in the immediate aftermath. Now everybody on the right is pretty much marching to the beat of the same drum, minimizing the seriousness of the legitimacy crisis they ginned up and valorizing those that took action to "stop the steal".

I predict there's almost no chance of any indictments coming from the investigation unless someone perjures themselves, and that strikes me as unlikely.
If the Right are all "pretty much marching to the beat of the same drum" and are "minimizing the seriousness of the legitimacy crisis they ginned up" and "valorizing those that took action" and they say these untrue things in front of the Committee, then isn't that exactly what "perjur(ing) themselves" would be?
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)

PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 04:19 AM   #349
SuburbanTurkey
Penultimate Amazing
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 11,263
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
If the Right are all "pretty much marching to the beat of the same drum" and are "minimizing the seriousness of the legitimacy crisis they ginned up" and "valorizing those that took action" and they say these untrue things in front of the Committee, then isn't that exactly what "perjur(ing) themselves" would be?
Opinions are not perjury. Saying that Babbitt is a martyr and a patriot is not perjury, for example.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 04:27 AM   #350
jimbob
Uncritical "thinker"
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 23,366
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
Opinions are not perjury. Saying that Babbitt is a martyr and a patriot is not perjury, for example.
Exactly, and if one lies under oath but there's no proof - "I don't recall", it's also not something that will get a conviction.
__________________
OECD healthcare spending
Public/Compulsory Expenditure on healthcare
https://data.oecd.org/chart/60Tt

Every year since 1990 the US Public healthcare spending has been greater than the UK as a proportion of GDP. More US Tax goes to healthcare than the UK
jimbob is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 07:45 AM   #351
crescent
Illuminator
 
crescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,207
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
If the Right are all "pretty much marching to the beat of the same drum" and are "minimizing the seriousness of the legitimacy crisis they ginned up" and "valorizing those that took action" and they say these untrue things in front of the Committee, then isn't that exactly what "perjur(ing) themselves" would be?
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
Opinions are not perjury. Saying that Babbitt is a martyr and a patriot is not perjury, for example.
Originally Posted by jimbob View Post
Exactly, and if one lies under oath but there's no proof - "I don't recall", it's also not something that will get a conviction.
That, and it is hard to prove a negative. You can't prove that there were no organized Antifa groups in that crowd. So it would not be perjury to say that you're convinced there were Antifa plants organizing the whole thing, and that failure to identify them just proves something nefarious about a grand liberal coverup.

The fact that there is absolutely no evidence supporting accusations of Antifa activity at the Capitol on January 6 would not be enough for perjury charges against those who claim otherwise. (Unless they made much more specific charges, which any experienced political person would know how to avoid.)
crescent is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 08:56 AM   #352
acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
 
acbytesla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 29,394
Originally Posted by crescent View Post
That, and it is hard to prove a negative. You can't prove that there were no organized Antifa groups in that crowd. So it would not be perjury to say that you're convinced there were Antifa plants organizing the whole thing, and that failure to identify them just proves something nefarious about a grand liberal coverup.

The fact that there is absolutely no evidence supporting accusations of Antifa activity at the Capitol on January 6 would not be enough for perjury charges against those who claim otherwise. (Unless they made much more specific charges, which any experienced political person would know how to avoid.)
I understand your point and excuse me for saying this, but it is naive and ridiculous. Determining guilt does not require a finding of beyond all doubt, but beyond reasonable doubt.

So the question is, "Is it reasonable to believe that January 6th was the result of ANTIFA?"

The answer is an obvious no.
__________________
Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get to me.
.

Last edited by acbytesla; 3rd August 2021 at 09:11 AM.
acbytesla is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 09:15 AM   #353
crescent
Illuminator
 
crescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,207
Originally Posted by acbytesla View Post
I understand your point and excuse me for saying this but it is naive and ridiculous. Determining guilt does not require a determination of beyond all doubt but beyond reasonable doubt.

So the question is, "Is it reasonable to believe that January 6th was the result of ANTIFA?"

The answer is an obvious no.
I agree. Except....

But the I was responding to a post that was focusing on the potential for charges of perjury. If a witness gets up there at the hearing and swears that Antifa was there, he won't get charged with perjury.

Getting a conviction for perjury seems to be a pretty high bar to cross. A judge and jury may not believe what a witness claims, and may convict in spite of that witness's testimony - but does not mean that the witness is likely to be charged with perjury.

And at any rate, this is just a committee before congress. Nobody gets convicted of anything in these hearings. At best, they can daylight some hypocrisy, which supporters of the former President don't care about anyway.
crescent is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 09:38 AM   #354
acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
 
acbytesla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 29,394
Originally Posted by crescent View Post
I agree. Except....

But the I was responding to a post that was focusing on the potential for charges of perjury. If a witness gets up there at the hearing and swears that Antifa was there, he won't get charged with perjury.

Getting a conviction for perjury seems to be a pretty high bar to cross. A judge and jury may not believe what a witness claims, and may convict in spite of that witness's testimony - but does not mean that the witness is likely to be charged with perjury.

And at any rate, this is just a committee before congress. Nobody gets convicted of anything in these hearings. At best, they can daylight some hypocrisy, which supporters of the former President don't care about anyway.
I agree and disagree. it depends a great deal on the other evidence. If Congress believes you're perjuring yourself, they don't issue a charge, they make a recommendation to the DOJ that you should be investigated for committing perjury or making false claims to Congress. It is up to the DOJ to charge or not charge. They might charge you just to squeeze you.

BTW, both Roger Stone and Michael Cohen were convicted of lying to Congress as well as a few Nixon aides off the top of my head.
__________________
Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get to me.
.
acbytesla is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 10:44 AM   #355
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 90,560
Originally Posted by crescent View Post
That, and it is hard to prove a negative. [/b]You can'tprove that there were no organized Antifa groups in that crowd.[/b] So it would not be perjury to say that you're convinced there were Antifa plants organizing the whole thing, and that failure to identify them just proves something nefarious about a grand liberal coverup.

The fact that there is absolutely no evidence supporting accusations of Antifa activity at the Capitol on January 6 would not be enough for perjury charges against those who claim otherwise. (Unless they made much more specific charges, which any experienced political person would know how to avoid.)
I'm not sure where 'false beliefs' falls in the perjury law but ignorance is considered not an excuse so it should apply to perjury as well. It would be up to the sentencing judge to take those kinds of circumstances into account. If you think about it, a lot of these weekend revolutionary wannabes are claiming they believed the POTUS sent them. Will those guys get off?

On the subject of proving the negative, there were a limited number of people in the melee. So it's not like one needs to prove some kind of infinite negative.


Getting to legislators who are are going to be found complicit, it will be interesting to see how believing 'the big lie' is going to play out on the perjury before Congress stage.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 3rd August 2021 at 10:48 AM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 11:28 AM   #356
varwoche
Penultimate Amazing
 
varwoche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 15,626
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
I'm sorry if this has already been asked and answered. What questions, exactly, is this investigation investigating?
I don't recall ever seeing such a finely distilled example of JAQing.
__________________
To survive election season on a skeptics forum, one must understand Hymie-the-Robot.
varwoche is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 11:34 AM   #357
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 52,848
Originally Posted by varwoche View Post
I don't recall ever seeing such a finely distilled example of JAQing.
THIS.
The right wingers attempt to hand wave away 1/6 is becoming more desperate.
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 02:30 PM   #358
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,107
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
THIS.
The right wingers attempt to hand wave away 1/6 is becoming more desperate.
The more the facade crumbles, the more the cover up is exposed, the more desperate they will become!
__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2021, 02:36 PM   #359
Stacyhs
Penultimate Amazing
 
Stacyhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 21,877
Another officer who responded to the Jan. 6 insurrection has died by suicide. So that's three by suicide, and one from a stroke.
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th August 2021, 02:02 PM   #360
Stacyhs
Penultimate Amazing
 
Stacyhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 21,877
A DOJ official between the election and Jan. 6 tried to get acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue to sign a letter saying the DOJ had found irregularities in the election which was a lie. Both Rosen and Donoghue refused. The letter was sent on Dec. 28, 2020

Quote:
A draft letter reportedly circulated late last year by a Donald Trump-loyalist at the Justice Department shows the lengths his allies were willing to go to overturn the presidential election.

The draft December 28 letter, published by ABC News, urged top Georgia officials to convene the state legislature in a special session to evaluate supposed “irregularities” in the 2020 election.

The letter said, falsely, that Justice Department had identified “significant concerns that may have impacted of the outcome of the election in multiple States, including the State of Georgia.”

According to internal Justice Department emails also obtained by ABC News, the letter was circulated by Jeffrey Clark, a top department official who was working with the then-President to get the department more directly involved in the Trump election reversal crusade. Clark was acting attorney general of the civil division at the time.

He sent the draft letter, according to the emails, to acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue. Though the letter was directed to Georgia, Clark’s email indicated that he wanted to send similar versions to “each relevant state.”

“I set it up for signature by the three of us. I think we should get it out as soon as possible,” Clark told Rosen and Donoghue, according to the emails obtained by ABC News.
Quote:
The draft letter was one of several examples of how Trump tried to weaponize the Justice Department in his efforts to reverse his electoral defeat. Trump himself demanded that DOJ officials declare the election “illegal” and “corrupt,” according to notes of a December 27 call Trump had with Rosen and Donoghue released by the House committee last week. Internal DOJ documents previously released by the committee showed that Trump allies had also pressured the department to get involved in the legal fight to disrupt the election results.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/04/polit...sal/index.html

Clark later tried to get Trump to appointment him acting Attorney General but Rosen and Donoghue stopped it according to ABC News.
Stacyhs is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.