ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags general discussion , holocaust , holocaust denial , World War II history

Reply
Old Today, 12:19 PM   #281
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
I don't want to debate anything with you ! However, you're practically the only non-zero content poster among the hoaxers, so, I gotta live with it, otherwise I'd be talking to myself !

But, there is no more hoax at Majdanek, the numbers for the museum and the 'revisionists' are about the same. What do you know, they used the camp records and came up with comparable numbers. Nothing to debate unless you want to come with a few idiotic lies out of pure habit.

The only bad news for the deniers is that we can't point out the absurdity of the hoax gas chamber at Majdanek. Another gas chamber with a window, not to mention openings for the DeGesch(?) fumigation equipment, not to mentions a gas chamber withing a gas chamber. Totally dissected by Hunt in his Majdanek vid.

There is way too much data at Auschwitz too, and the records are now public, so the hoax there is on its last legs.

All you got left is Wiernik and the Reinhard camps ......
Clearly you don't want to debate, or even discuss, with anyone here.

You didn't answer my question about Hilberg. Noted.

There is no gas chamber with a window at Majdanek.
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:20 PM   #282
Elagabalus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,589
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
The degenerate absurdity of the hoax is well illustrated by Hoess's torture and 'confession'.

Hoess was by his own account the grand architect of the hoax, working with Eichmann to find a method of killing the Jews, etc. Yet he was not tried at Nuremberg, he testified as a defense witness ! How freaking absurd can it get?

At the trial his affidavit was read into the record in which he 'confessed' to gassing 2 million Jews and killing another .5 mill by other means.

Here is what he wrote about the affidavit after the trial ...

"I was treated terribly by the [British] Field Security Police. I was dragged to Heide and, of all places, to the same military barracks from which I had been released eight months before by the British. I do not know what was in the transcript, or what I said, even though I signed it, because they gave me liquor and beat me with a whip. It was too much even for me to bear. The whip was my own. By chance it had found its way into my wife's luggage. My horse had hardly ever been touched by it, much less the prisoners. Somehow one of the interrogators probably thought that I had constantly used it to whip the prisoners."

The fact that Hoess's 'testimony' is still cited as evidence of the hoax indicates the chutzpah and total depravity of the hoax establishment. These people are liars the likes of which the world has never seen.



^
This!

Is all wrong!
Elagabalus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:34 PM   #283
Jeffk 1970
Thinker
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 201
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
I don't want to debate anything with you !
Then WTF are you here?


Quote:
However, you're practically the only non-zero content poster among the hoaxers, so, I gotta live with it, otherwise I'd be talking to myself !
You are talking to yourself.

Saggy, I'm perfectly willing to have a conversation with you.....but you need to respond instead of posting more goofy pictures.
Jeffk 1970 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:43 PM   #284
Dash80
Rave on, Not Fade Away
 
Dash80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,169
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
The degenerate absurdity of the hoax is well illustrated by Hoess's torture and 'confession'.

Hoess was by his own account the grand architect of the hoax, working with Eichmann to find a method of killing the Jews, etc. Yet he was not tried at Nuremberg, he testified as a defense witness ! How freaking absurd can it get?

At the trial his affidavit was read into the record in which he 'confessed' to gassing 2 million Jews and killing another .5 mill by other means.

Here is what he wrote about the affidavit after the trial ...

"I was treated terribly by the [British] Field Security Police. I was dragged to Heide and, of all places, to the same military barracks from which I had been released eight months before by the British. I do not know what was in the transcript, or what I said, even though I signed it, because they gave me liquor and beat me with a whip. It was too much even for me to bear. The whip was my own. By chance it had found its way into my wife's luggage. My horse had hardly ever been touched by it, much less the prisoners. Somehow one of the interrogators probably thought that I had constantly used it to whip the prisoners."

The fact that Hoess's 'testimony' is still cited as evidence of the hoax indicates the chutzpah and total depravity of the hoax establishment. These people are liars the likes of which the world has never seen.
His testimony matches other testimony, also he was apparently comfortable enough to discuss his treatment by the British quite freely. Does not sound like someone who was forced to tell lies to me.
__________________
I see that the No-Planers still travel Air Elastic-Band with their fleet of innovative rubber Boeings.
Dash80 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 02:57 PM   #285
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
The Höss almost-discussion reminds me that Saggy owes us an account of the torture of the Einsatzgruppen trial defendants.
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 03:24 PM   #286
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
Which, of course, is why my challenge to name one credible Jewish eyewitness and summarize/discuss their testimony, along with any corroborating testimony, and and physical or documentary evidence that supports the testimony, goes unanswered (except for link farms of course).
Done. Weeks ago.
Indeed there was a link to something I wrote for HC blog. Yes, you'd have to be willing to know about Krzepicki and Rabinwoicz - or to read that piece - to have anything to say about their testimonies. No, you don't want to hear which witnesses people posting here find valuable and why - which must be why you refuse to discuss Krzepicki and Rabinowicz or even read what I've said about them.
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft

Last edited by LemmyCaution; Today at 03:26 PM.
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 03:32 PM   #287
Saggy
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,772
Originally Posted by LemmyCaution View Post
Done. Weeks ago.
Indeed there was a link to something I wrote for HC blog. Yes, you'd have to be willing to know about Krzepicki and Rabinwoicz - or to read that piece - to have anything to say about their testimonies. No, you don't want to hear which witnesses people posting here find valuable and why - which must be why you refuse to discuss Krzepicki and Rabinowicz or even read what I've said about them.
Chutzpah.
__________________
"The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid."
Saggy is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 04:22 PM   #288
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
Chutzpah.
Meaningless snark - you're still dodging the challenge, and not just about Krzepicki and Rabinowiciz, but also about Sacowicz, Schmid, Szmajzner et al.
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 04:41 PM   #289
Hans
Philosopher
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,430
Originally Posted by LemmyCaution View Post
Meaningless snark - you're still dodging the challenge, and not just about Krzepicki and Rabinowiciz, but also about Sacowicz, Schmid, Szmajzner et al.
He lost the argument months ago, he's just trolling now.
Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 04:58 PM   #290
Loss Leader
Would Be Ringing (if a bell)
Moderator
 
Loss Leader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 23,286
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
Provide one shred of physical or documentary evidence that anyone was murdered at Auschwitz. You cannot do it.

What would you consider evidence?
__________________
I have the honor to be
Your Obdt. St

L. Leader
Loss Leader is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:08 PM   #291
Hans
Philosopher
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,430
Originally Posted by Loss Leader View Post
What would you consider evidence?
His position is that anything that is evidence of genocide are lies. So basically he demanding information he has already pre-dismissed, so he can deny it again.

Pretty much just trolling now.
Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:19 PM   #292
Saggy
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,772
Originally Posted by Loss Leader View Post
What would you consider evidence?
Evidence: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
__________________
"The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid."
Saggy is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:35 PM   #293
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
Evidence: the available body of facts or information which, when presented, Saggy persistently refuses to acknowledge, let alone discuss
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:46 PM   #294
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
Originally Posted by Jeffk 1970 View Post
Then WTF are you here?
A question that also arises is WTF we are here.
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:53 PM   #295
LemmyCaution
Master Poster
 
LemmyCaution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,767
Punchlines from above:

First, the Majdanek gas chamber window:
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
. . . the absurdity of the hoax gas chamber at Majdanek. Another gas chamber with a window . . .
Thanks to Denying History, who posts at SSF for this one:
Quote:
And just one more laugh from Holohoax101.

Quote:
This is a picture of the 'gas chamber' at Majdanek, and yes, that is an unbarred window
And just to show the good old window from the inside of the gas chamber.



And here is the link if you want to see the inside of the gas chamber here.


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...amber_Pano.jpg
I adjusted the size of the photo with the red arrow from what D-H posted at SSF so it'd fit here; the words inside the red arrow read, "This is the so-called window of the Majdanek Gas cham[b]er… in reality its a light"

D-H also has posted this photo of the same chamber "with the light off":



Second: Hilberg's estimated Majdanek Jewish death toll
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
. . . it's a little suprising that you'd bring up my prior comments on Majdanek, the one camp I've visited, by chance before I was a denier, since the hoax has completely collapsed there . . .

I asked Saggy for Hilberg's 1961 estimate for the Jewish death toll at Majdanek. Saggy didn't answer - Hilberg's estimate ruins the misleading story he tried to tell with a graph which omitted Hilberg's estimate - or any estimates of Jewish deaths. So what did Hilberg calculate in 1961 as the number of Jewish deaths at Majdanek? minimum 50,000.

Similar to the estimate of Scheffler (1985) 50-60,000.

But a little lower than what the museum today estimates as the Jewish death toll: rounded to 60,000 (T. Kranz estimate, Majdanek State Museum)

(Kranz's estimate for the total number of deaths at Majdanek is 79,000. I do not know that Hilberg made an estimate of the total number of deaths at the camp. Marszalek 1994, who badly overestimated the total death toll in the camp, estimated 80,000 Jewish deaths.)

There's no doubt that there has been disagreement over the death toll at Majdanek, including the number of Jewish deaths; there is also no doubt, however, that there has not been a steady progression of lower estimates of the latter - rather, there have been disagreement and research to resolve that disagreement. The museum's current estimate of 60,000 Jewish death includes gassing and shooting killings described in Kranz's book, The Extermination of Jews at Majdanek Concentration Camp.

Finally, Saggy's "revisionist" number is universally rejected, with Kranz estimating about double that number of total deaths at Majdanek.
__________________
. . . all this would be absurd if it weren't happening, now let's go and eat.
- Jose Saramago, The Stone Raft

Last edited by LemmyCaution; Today at 07:20 PM.
LemmyCaution is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 07:05 PM   #296
Loss Leader
Would Be Ringing (if a bell)
Moderator
 
Loss Leader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 23,286
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
Evidence: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

What evidence would cause you to believe the proposition was true and valid?
__________________
I have the honor to be
Your Obdt. St

L. Leader
Loss Leader is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 07:13 PM   #297
Dash80
Rave on, Not Fade Away
 
Dash80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,169
Originally Posted by Saggy View Post
Evidence: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
Why don't you address this?

Index of Published Evidence on Mass Extermination in Auschwitz and Auschwitz-Birkenau:


http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...ce-on.html?m=1
__________________
I see that the No-Planers still travel Air Elastic-Band with their fleet of innovative rubber Boeings.
Dash80 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:43 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.