ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 

Notices


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 25th April 2013, 11:09 AM   #841
Jono
Graduate Poster
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,896
Originally Posted by WTC Dust View Post
In your estimation, was there any large amount of fuel that wasn't office furnishings? If so, what do you think it was?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=809

Most of the stuff I listed were material known to have been in the offices and stores in the Towers. This should not be surprising, since the buildings were office-buildings afterall. So, we had enormous amounts of such material, and wood, and various chemicals, and oil, and fuel etc. Yet you still handwave it away as a minor/trivial thing?
__________________
"I don't believe I ever saw an Oklahoman who wouldn't fight at the drop of a hat -- and frequently drop the hat himself." - Robert E. Howard

Last edited by Jono; 25th April 2013 at 11:11 AM.
Jono is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2013, 11:59 AM   #842
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 21,852
Originally Posted by WTC Dust View Post
In your estimation, was there any large amount of fuel that wasn't office furnishings? If so, what do you think it was?
Really? And who makes the claim they are a scientist and acts like a grade school asking questions a scientist can answer? Who is the scientist?

Plastic burning has 7 to 14 times more energy than TNT.
Wood more energy than TNT.
Paper has more energy, etc..
What is stuff you find in the office? The office materials are vast, and had the heat energy of over 15,000 TONS of TNT.

Over 15,000 TONS of TNT in heat energy - who needs large amounts of fuel that was not office furnishing when the office furnishing had the heat energy of 15,000 TONS of TNT.
Anyone do the math? But if you need some fuel, then cars are parked at the WTC complex - did you think before you asked a silly question a scientist could answer? Any scientist out there?

Gasoline 10 times. The cars parked in the WTC complex... oops, scientist.

Ignore reality and fire, bring out the no plane lies and other fantasy. Unable to comprehend 220 acres of office space contents burning for months. Sure, make up wild and crazy claims, hallucinations about a terrorist event.

Ignoring the energy in an office on fire; desks, paper, wood, plastic, etc, is silly. Your claims offer zero insight on 911 issues. Who is the scientist?

The OP is about yankee451's rant against police and fire fighters. He claims the police and fire fighters made up lies. He has failed; like your no plane claims.
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2013, 06:26 PM   #843
LashL
Goddess of Legaltainment™
Administrator
 
LashL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 34,017
Mod WarningKindly get back to the topic of the thread, please. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
Posted By:LashL
LashL is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th April 2013, 06:22 PM   #844
LashL
Goddess of Legaltainment™
Administrator
 
LashL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 34,017
Mod WarningWell, initially, I left all of the off topic stuff in place and asked nicely that folks return to the topic of the thread but it appears that more is required to get some of the participants in this thread back on topic. Therefore, this thread is being closed until such time as a Moderator has the time to clean it up and issue infractions and such, as required.
Posted By:LashL

Last edited by LashL; 26th April 2013 at 08:14 PM.
LashL is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th May 2013, 05:30 PM   #845
Locknar
Sum of all evils tm
Administrator
 
Locknar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 25.8333° N, 77.9000° W
Posts: 18,492
Mod InfoPosts that were either not civil/polite, off-topic or attacking the arguer vs addressing the argument (ie. rule 0, rule 11, rule 12) have been moved to here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=258201
Thread re-opened, on Moderated status for now...how long, time will tell.
Posted By:Locknar
__________________
Member Simpson 15 and Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al. | StopSylvia.com | Capes (Optional)

Last edited by LashL; 6th May 2013 at 09:25 PM. Reason: Link
Locknar is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.