ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags michael jackson , sex scandals

Reply
Old 24th June 2016, 03:03 AM   #1
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Official - Michael Jackson was scum

Forgive me if already posted

http://m.nzherald.co.nz/entertainmen...ectid=11661948
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 03:14 AM   #2
applecorped
Rotten to the Core
 
applecorped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19,373
beat it
__________________
All You Need Is Love.
applecorped is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 03:28 AM   #3
The Central Scrutinizer
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Central Scrutinizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 52,940
If I'm reading my Warrior Playbook correctly, I don't think you're allowed to judge people of color.

Reported.
__________________
If I see somebody with a gun on a plane? I'll kill him.

Lupus is Lupus tor central scrutineezer
The Central Scrutinizer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 04:21 AM   #4
Porpoise of Life
Illuminator
 
Porpoise of Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,770
A secret kiddie shrine? That's creepy. I mean, most things about MJ were creepy in his latter years, but this is really creepy.

Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer View Post
If I'm reading my Warrior Playbook correctly, I don't think you're allowed to judge people of color.

Reported.
Reading? That's ableist.
Porpoise of Life is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 04:24 AM   #5
devnull
Philosopher
 
devnull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 6,057
Originally Posted by applecorped View Post
beat it
Bad.
__________________
"Here we go again.... semantic and syntactic chicanery and sophistic sleight of tongue and pen.... the bedazzling magic of appearing to be saying something when in fact all that is happening is diverting attention from the attempts at shoving god through the trapdoor of illogic and wishful thinking." - Leumas
devnull is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 04:45 AM   #6
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 49,154
I can't help but remember how damning everything seemed at the time of the trial from the media coverage, and then years later to find out how much of that was completely made up and reported distortedly for ratings. The lesson I learned was to not trust media, particularly if they are reporting something "juicy".
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 05:01 AM   #7
Mumbles
Philosopher
 
Mumbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,944
If Jackson had actual child pornography, which is a crime against the state, and the prosecutor was eager to go after him...why wasn't he prosecuted for possessing child porn? More importantly, why wouldn't he have been charged at the federal level?

In truth, even the prosecutors stated that he had not child pornography, according to statement signed by the trial judge.

A lot of this is the same stuff that was available to the public back in 2003, so it's worth noting that the State's case basically collapsed when examined. For example, the article gives us this:

Quote:
This raid also revealed for the first time the King of Pop's secret closet, hidden in the back of his bedroom and kept closed with three deadlocks. It was in here that he kept memorabilia like a signed photograph of Macaulay Culkin, stuffed animals and games, and naked photos.

Culkin signed his photo with the message: 'Don't leave me alone in the house.'
Culkin also testified in court that Jackson had never attempted to touch him, leaving us to wonder why the Home Alone start would sign a photo of himself with a joke about being left home alone.

I have no doubt that the prosecution genuinely thought hat Jackson was a child molestor/rapist, and that they were doing the right thing by prosecuting him, and certainly any such allegation should be taken seriously. But as I said, their case fell apart completely.

Anyway, in this USA Today link with an obnoxious autoplay video so you can't say I didn't warn you, the police in charge of the investigation state that they had released everything they had over a decade ago, so you should be wary of anyone claiming that something is "new" or "newly released".
Mumbles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 05:29 AM   #8
NoahFence
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 22,131
Hey, the man was a smooth criminal.
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 05:46 AM   #9
Cleon
King of the Pod People
 
Cleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 25,662
Yeah, something doesn't smell right about this.

I can see him paying hush money to kids' parents, but I can't imagine the cops sweeing kiddie porn under the rug.
__________________
"People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz." - Newt Gingrich
Cleon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 06:55 AM   #10
Molinaro
Illuminator
 
Molinaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,383
They were in fact pictures of nude boys. But if I remember correctly the nude images where classified as art.
__________________
100% Cannuck!
Molinaro is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:26 AM   #11
Eddie Dane
Philosopher
 
Eddie Dane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,604
This seems like the media giving very lurid descriptions of the materials found.

Some of the materials were shown on a site I visited recently. As I recall the 'photo's of underage boys doing adult things', was actually a picture of a 17-year-old Keanu Reeves smoking a cigarette.

Which makes me wonder about the pictures of 'animal torture' etc.

There was a really shocking picture of a fully clothed woman holding a whip. Oh noes.

The suggestion that these pictures could be used to groom kids for abuse, seems also te be pulled from the rectum of a sensationalist journalist or attention-hungry official.

He seems to have liked some edgy art. The altar to kids may have been ironic.
I briefly had an altar to Charlie Sheen in my mancave. (when mister Sheen was going through his 'winning'-period and was living with two porno actresses).
__________________
Death to Videodrome! Long live the new flesh!

Last edited by Eddie Dane; 24th June 2016 at 07:28 AM.
Eddie Dane is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:38 AM   #12
Denver
Penultimate Amazing
 
Denver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 10,015
Yeah this has been going around for about a week, and does have a lot of red flags around it.

Quote:
...secret closet, hidden in the back of his bedroom and kept closed with three deadlocks.
Sounds like overdone sensationalism, even National Enquirer-esqe. My first impression is it will turn out to be false. If not, it will be interesting to hear why it was not more of a focus in the trial.
__________________
Dreams inevitably lead to hideous implosions -- Invader Zim

Last edited by Denver; 24th June 2016 at 09:14 AM.
Denver is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:52 AM   #13
Dr.Sid
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,902
Wait ? Is there more ? Linked articles says there were 'naked photos' .. nothing about what kind of naked photos it were. Child pornography is not mentioned. No new facts to old molestation cases are presented. So what's the fuzz ?
Dr.Sid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 08:02 AM   #14
Tale
Scholar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 116
Originally Posted by Eddie Dane View Post
This seems like the media giving very lurid descriptions of the materials found.

Some of the materials were shown on a site I visited recently. As I recall the 'photo's of underage boys doing adult things', was actually a picture of a 17-year-old Keanu Reeves smoking a cigarette.

Which makes me wonder about the pictures of 'animal torture' etc.

There was a really shocking picture of a fully clothed woman holding a whip. Oh noes.

The suggestion that these pictures could be used to groom kids for abuse, seems also te be pulled from the rectum of a sensationalist journalist or attention-hungry official.

He seems to have liked some edgy art. The altar to kids may have been ironic.
I briefly had an altar to Charlie Sheen in my mancave. (when mister Sheen was going through his 'winning'-period and was living with two porno actresses).
This is what I want to believe.

I'm hard pressed to see how he could have gotten his 2005 acquittal if they had that kind of stuff on him.
Tale is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 09:09 AM   #15
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator
 
Foolmewunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 40,640
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
Wait ? Is there more ? Linked articles says there were 'naked photos' .. nothing about what kind of naked photos it were. Child pornography is not mentioned. No new facts to old molestation cases are presented. So what's the fuzz ?
I'd be willing to bet that they former ass't d.a. they contacted wasn't far away, as he is most likely the one who gave them the evidence. His former office refused to comment, but the sheriff's department in Santa Barbara says the evidence didn't come from them. Zonen and his former boss are still trying to vindicate their case because they got crushed in the trial.

Typical tabloid crap - picked up by some actual news outlets, but all referring back to the tabloid. The anniversary of Jackson's death is this week.
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele

It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable.
Foolmewunz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 09:45 AM   #16
Rincewind
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Adirondacks, NY - with Magrat!
Posts: 8,051
But "scum" means "It has arrived" doesn't it?
Rincewind is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 10:09 AM   #17
Gilbert Syndrome
Philosopher
 
Gilbert Syndrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 6,259
Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer View Post
If I'm reading my Warrior Playbook correctly, I don't think you're allowed to judge people of color.

Reported.
It doesn't matter if you're black or white.
__________________
Generic proclamation of positivity:

Scouse saying - Go 'ed, is right, nice one, boss, well in, sound, belter, made up.

Usage: 'Go 'ed, lad, get us an ale in, nice one.'
Gilbert Syndrome is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 10:56 AM   #18
Scootch
Muse
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 513
Originally Posted by devnull View Post
Bad.
Billie Jean
Scootch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 11:23 AM   #19
Babbylonian
Penultimate Amazing
 
Babbylonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,625
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
Wait ? Is there more ? Linked articles says there were 'naked photos' .. nothing about what kind of naked photos it were. Child pornography is not mentioned. No new facts to old molestation cases are presented. So what's the fuzz ?
They were able to legitimately connect the terms "Michael Jackson," "naked," "children," and "photos" in one story. Who wouldn't want to publish that?

Seriously, I think it's possible (even probable) that Michael Jackson was a pedophile. But the article strings things together in such a way as to imply that what was found in his home was proof of that, including the implication that he was in possession of child pornography. If the police had found child pornography, he would have been charged as such and it would have been easy to prove even if the sexual abuse case fell apart.

Yep, it's garbage masquerading as journalism.
Babbylonian is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 11:33 AM   #20
Elagabalus
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,459
Originally Posted by Tale View Post
This is what I want to believe.

I'm hard pressed to see how he could have gotten his 2005 acquittal if they had that kind of stuff on him.

IIRC, post raid it went from "they found child pornography" to, gasp, "they found pornography" to "children doing adult things". It was at this point that I knew the S.B.D.A. didn't have ****.

The look on Nancy Grace's face when he was acquitted was priceless.
Elagabalus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 11:36 AM   #21
Elagabalus
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,459
Originally Posted by Eddie Dane View Post
This seems like the media giving very lurid descriptions of the materials found.

Some of the materials were shown on a site I visited recently. As I recall the 'photo's of underage boys doing adult things', was actually a picture of a 17-year-old Keanu Reeves smoking a cigarette.

Which makes me wonder about the pictures of 'animal torture' etc.

There was a really shocking picture of a fully clothed woman holding a whip. Oh noes.

The suggestion that these pictures could be used to groom kids for abuse, seems also te be pulled from the rectum of a sensationalist journalist or attention-hungry official.

He seems to have liked some edgy art. The altar to kids may have been ironic.
I briefly had an altar to Charlie Sheen in my mancave. (when mister Sheen was going through his 'winning'-period and was living with two porno actresses).
Amen, brother.
Elagabalus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 11:47 AM   #22
Denver
Penultimate Amazing
 
Denver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 10,015
Originally Posted by Elagabalus View Post
IIRC, post raid it went from "they found child pornography" to, gasp, "they found pornography" to "children doing adult things". It was at this point that I knew the S.B.D.A. didn't have ****.

The look on Nancy Grace's face when he was acquitted was priceless.
It was during this trial that I first became aware of Nancy Grace. She was so sure, so positive, of his guilt, and I just never got why.

And then we learned of the evidence and the verdict.

I've never seen a reason to watch her again since.
__________________
Dreams inevitably lead to hideous implosions -- Invader Zim
Denver is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 05:53 PM   #23
Tony Stark
Philosopher
 
Tony Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,626
From what I could tell this is stuff that investigators claimed was evidence that he was grooming kids for molestation but not actual child porn. Images of naked kids are not necessarily child porn. If it was child porn, they would have claimed that's what it was, charged him with that, and secured a conviction.

Last edited by Tony Stark; 24th June 2016 at 06:05 PM.
Tony Stark is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 06:07 PM   #24
Checkmite
Skepticifimisticalationist
 
Checkmite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 23,744
IIRC, Jackson owned an "art book" comprised entirely of artistic nudes of prepubescent boys, and the book was kept together with a supply of actual (adult) pornography. I think this is rather strongly suggestive of the artistic material's actual purpose for Jackson; and I'm even going to go further than Babbylonian and opine that in conjunction with all of the other unfortunate facts about the man and his tastes and habits I think it makes a case beyond any reasonable doubt that he was a male-fixated pedophile. Given that, and with Jackson's regular access to and frequently arranging special "alone times" specifically with young boys, it would be quite surprising to me if he had actually not molested at least some of them. As to whether he molested the specific ones who accused him, obviously there's no concrete proof.
__________________
"¿WHAT KIND OF BIRD?
¿A PARANORMAL BIRD?"
--- Carlos S., 2002
Checkmite is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 06:30 PM   #25
bruto
Penultimate Amazing
 
bruto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Way way north of Diddy Wah Diddy
Posts: 24,046
I would not be surprised to find that Jackson was all sorts of nasty things, and had all sorts of nasty thoughts, but thoughts are not acts, and one has to wonder how damning the material could be if it was not enough to convict him, and if we're reading about it now 13 years after the raid. Breaking news. Michael Jackson was peculiar.
__________________
I love this world, but not for its answers. (Mary Oliver)

Quand il dit "cuic" le moineau croit tout dire. (When he's tweeted the sparrow thinks he's said it all. (Jules Renard)
bruto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 06:59 PM   #26
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Originally Posted by Tale View Post
This is what I want to believe.

I'm hard pressed to see how he could have gotten his 2005 acquittal if they had that kind of stuff on him.
He paid most of them off
Originally Posted by Foolmewunz View Post
I'd be willing to bet that they former ass't d.a. they contacted wasn't far away, as he is most likely the one who gave them the evidence. His former office refused to comment, but the sheriff's department in Santa Barbara says the evidence didn't come from them. Zonen and his former boss are still trying to vindicate their case because they got crushed in the trial.

Typical tabloid crap - picked up by some actual news outlets, but all referring back to the tabloid. The anniversary of Jackson's death is this week.
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:01 PM   #27
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Originally Posted by Eddie Dane View Post
This seems like the media giving very lurid descriptions of the materials found.

Some of the materials were shown on a site I visited recently. As I recall the 'photo's of underage boys doing adult things', was actually a picture of a 17-year-old Keanu Reeves smoking a cigarette.

Which makes me wonder about the pictures of 'animal torture' etc.

There was a really shocking picture of a fully clothed woman holding a whip. Oh noes.

The suggestion that these pictures could be used to groom kids for abuse, seems also te be pulled from the rectum of a sensationalist journalist or attention-hungry official.

He seems to have liked some edgy art. The altar to kids may have been ironic.
I briefly had an altar to Charlie Sheen in my mancave. (when mister Sheen was going through his 'winning'-period and was living with two porno actresses).
He had little boys sleeping on his bed
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:03 PM   #28
Tony Stark
Philosopher
 
Tony Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,626
Originally Posted by cullennz View Post
He paid most of them off
If he had child porn, there was nobody to pay off. Unless you're suggesting he bribed the cops/prosecutors?
Tony Stark is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:04 PM   #29
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Originally Posted by Tony Stark View Post
If he had child porn, there was nobody to pay off. Unless you're suggesting he bribed the cops/prosecutors?
The accusations against him
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:13 PM   #30
Tony Stark
Philosopher
 
Tony Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,626
Originally Posted by cullennz View Post
The accusations against him
Your OP was about images they found in his house. Images that they didn't even claim were child porn.
Tony Stark is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:16 PM   #31
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
The pay offs were brought up by someone else.

To separate the two as evidence ! is pretty un skeptical and frankly laughable
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:28 PM   #32
Tony Stark
Philosopher
 
Tony Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,626
Originally Posted by cullennz View Post
The pay offs were brought up by someone else.

To separate the two as evidence ! is pretty un skeptical and frankly laughable
Posting an article about alleged child porn that even cops/prosecutors didn't claim was child porn as proof that MJ was a scumbag is pretty unskeptical and laughable.
Tony Stark is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:47 PM   #33
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Indeed. Nude pre pubescent boys are art.

And the pay offs were "gifts"
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:54 PM   #34
Tony Stark
Philosopher
 
Tony Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,626
Originally Posted by cullennz View Post
Indeed. Nude pre pubescent boys are art.

And the pay offs were "gifts"
If they were child porn why was he never charged with child porn?
Tony Stark is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:58 PM   #35
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Originally Posted by Tony Stark View Post
If they were child porn why was he never charged with child porn?
Because he had a group of some of the best and most expensive lawyers in the US saying it was art and to go settle for a pay off
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:59 PM   #36
Checkmite
Skepticifimisticalationist
 
Checkmite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 23,744
As I have already stated, the images themselves were not pornographic.

But it is preposterous to imply that it can't be separately determined via context that Jackson used them as pornography.
__________________
"¿WHAT KIND OF BIRD?
¿A PARANORMAL BIRD?"
--- Carlos S., 2002
Checkmite is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 07:59 PM   #37
Ray Brady
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,121
Originally Posted by Elagabalus View Post
IIRC, post raid it went from "they found child pornography" to, gasp, "they found pornography" to "children doing adult things".
It was a VHS tape of Bugsy Malone.
Ray Brady is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 08:01 PM   #38
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 49,154
Originally Posted by cullennz View Post
And the pay offs were "gifts"
You're not that familiar with the cases, are you?

The one you're thinking of recanted when he reached adulthood, admitted his parents pressured him into making the whole thing up. He subsequently got legally emanicipated from them.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 08:02 PM   #39
cullennz
Embarrasingly illiterate
 
cullennz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,621
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
You're not that familiar with the cases, are you?

The one you're thinking of recanted when he reached adulthood, admitted his parents pressured him into making the whole thing up. He subsequently got legally emanicipated from them.
Then why did he pay them off?
__________________
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000
cullennz is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th June 2016, 08:02 PM   #40
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 49,154
Originally Posted by cullennz View Post
Because he had a group of some of the best and most expensive lawyers in the US saying it was art and to go settle for a pay off
During his criminal trial? You're not just unfamiliar with the case, you're unfamiliar with how law works. You can't "settle" with the prosecution to exclude evidence of the thing they're trying to convict you of!
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.