|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
13th July 2018, 03:25 AM | #1 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
How to colonise space
I could not sleep last night and while laying awake I thought up the following idea for seeding the stars with the human race.
First you build an atomic powered space ship that need no fuel. Possibly powered by an ion drive. Then you create an army of artificially intelligent worker robots to run it. The key to the idea is quite simple. You have no living humans on the ship. So you need no oxygen, food or water. The human cargo is stored as eggs and sperm in frozen tanks. You would also freeze the eggs of farmyard animals and send crop seeds. When the ship found an inhabitable planet the robots would land and create farms bringing the frozen animal eggs to life. Lastly they would bring human baby's to life and raise them and teach them. The mother ships computer would contain all human knowledge in its data banks. The stores would contain lots of practical things like saucepans and tools, as there would be no metal industry until the colony grew up and created it. I think this idea is viable and can almost be done with existing technology. Tell me why it can't. |
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 03:49 AM | #2 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
Tell me why we should.
|
13th July 2018, 03:55 AM | #3 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
What do you mean why should we? for one thing this planet is over populated and in melt down. (Literally, the ice caps are melting) In any case sooner or later this planet will be destroyed by our own sun reaching the end of its life.
This would mean the end of the human race, unless we have gone to the stars. |
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 04:03 AM | #4 |
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
|
The universe itself will come to an end (we hear) in what's known as 'heat death'. Who cares about desperately spinning out humankind's existence to the maximum possible extent?
However, your plan looks great. There are a few technicalities that need sorting out (growing the embryos to viability, them growing up weird for lack of parental contact, and so on) but those are just detail. I'd guess the biggest hurdle might be that any planet that will happily support the humans and their animals is very likely to have its own life forms. They might object to the plan. |
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury |
|
13th July 2018, 04:05 AM | #5 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
If it's "atomic powered", then it has fuel. I'm guessing you're planning to use nuclear fission rather than fusion, but either way you need fuel. So maybe uranium?
Your ion drive also requires, well, ions. While they will have a much higher exhaust velocity than traditional chemical rockets, and thus you can get away with a lower mass, you still need some, and you're still subject to the rocket equation.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Finding a habitable planet" may also be difficult. A planet with an atmosphere with a pressure somewhat like ours and with liquid water might be common enough that we could find one (I'd rather find it first with telescopes and then send the ship rather than sending the ship to investigate). But that doesn't mean that you'll be able to just start farms like on earth. I'd expect you'll still be looking at greenhouses and domes, though the domes may be optional depending on the atmosphere.
Quote:
My vision resembles yours in some ways but is more extreme. Even the robots themselves will more closely resemble biology than modern robotics. Rather than bringing robots that can construct farms we bring "robots" that can grow/build (some combination of the two words may be more applicable than either one) new robots from local resources that will then go on to build the infrastructure of your colony.
Quote:
Furthermore there's a resource/economics problem. Yes, we may have the technology to build an interstellar craft with infinite funds, but we don't have infinite funds. What sort of mass are you expecting for this spacecraft? What is your timeframe for arrival? Those questions will impact how viable it is, but even with a very low mass and a very long timeframe it's still an extremely expensive project that perhaps no government has the budget to fund, even if they had the will to do so. |
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
13th July 2018, 04:14 AM | #6 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
|
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 04:25 AM | #7 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
|
13th July 2018, 04:35 AM | #9 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
This is quite a good idea. We should aim for a habitable planet within, say, 10 light-years, so we could get a signal back within our lifetime telling us the colony is successful. If our technology develops in the meantime, and we could get a viable near-lightspeed drive, then a 10 year journey might be possible so we could visit our children.
|
13th July 2018, 04:51 AM | #10 |
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,033
|
Space is big. Very big. You may think it's a long way to the corner chemist, but that's peanuts compared to space.
If you actually do the math, you will find that those roboships are travelling for hundreds of years before finding a suitable home. Eggs and sperm aren't perfectly preserved, even when frozen, for that period of time. In a living organism, DNA gets refreshed and repaired, but sitting in cryostorage there will be some damage. Meanwhile, keeping those ship's systems going for hundreds of years is a challenge. Oh.....and there's no such thing as an artificial womb, and there's no real path to making one. The developing animal and human fetuses, and then babies, are going to have to have at least some organic material to grow, which means somehow it has to be kept alive and ready to use. This is the one area where your plan is not only not doable with today's technology, but it may never be doable with tomorrow's technology. On top of that, can robo-nannies raise children in such a way that they turn into real, sociable, adults? Capable of speech and able to read the stored instructions in the ship's computers? Still, the above objections really only apply to the "today's technology" part of your idea. The core concept is sound. It's a heck of a lot easier to keep inert matter going for a long time than to keep humans and other organisms alive and breeding all that time. If you can get around the artificial womb problem, everything else is foreseeable, and makes sense, although if you do the math, you'll still see that that is one big, complex, ship that needs a lot of fuel. It's interesting to me that I've never seen a science fiction story with that premise. Of course, modern science fiction/science fantasy just wishes the problem away with "hyperspace" or "warp drive", but at least once upon a time there were "hard science" sci-fi types imagining things that might some day be, but I never heard of this one. I guess when I was reading this stuff, some of the ideas were too far out even for those authors. Do authors still write that sort of fiction? Am I just out of the loop? I suppose it's still out there, and I just don't look for that sort of thing anymore. |
13th July 2018, 04:52 AM | #11 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,950
|
This. Especially since you have stated on many occasions that you believe in spirits and reincarnation. If all human bodies die, the spirits either live on, or can reincarnate as some other intelligent creature elsewhere.
If you don't want to discuss this aspect, or think it's too far off topic for this thread, that's fine by me. I don't want to derail the thread. |
13th July 2018, 04:53 AM | #12 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
What do you mean by "near" in "near lightspeed"? 0.9c? Never going to happen.
0.1c is more plausible but the challenges involved are still incredibly difficult. Just take a look at the rocket equation and you'll see some of the issues. But there are issues not just with getting up to that speed but also with being at that speed with relation to the interstellar medium. And of course the fact that you have to slow down at the end increases the fuel requirements exponentially. |
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
13th July 2018, 04:59 AM | #13 |
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
|
|
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury |
|
13th July 2018, 05:33 AM | #15 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
|
13th July 2018, 05:34 AM | #16 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
|
13th July 2018, 05:37 AM | #18 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
13th July 2018, 05:57 AM | #19 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 18,667
|
Your plan in no way addresses the overpopulation problem, except that it seeks new space to populate into. The plan evacuates no one and leaves our planet as crowded as before.
As someone mentioned, it is unlikely in the extreme that anyone involved in lobbying for, funding, developing and running this plan will ever see the end of it, so who would you expect to expend the cost and effort to realize such an endeavour? I think that is the first mortal threat to your project - lack of motivation. |
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote) The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected. (Gilbert Keith Chesterton) |
|
13th July 2018, 06:07 AM | #20 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
Getting a stable, self sufficient, genetically diverse population off planet is the best, indeed by definition only, hope our species has for very long term survivor.
On a long enough timeline all species either become spacefaring or go extinct. The only difference between us and the dinosaurs is telescopes and a space program. |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
13th July 2018, 06:15 AM | #21 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
|
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 06:27 AM | #22 |
Lackey
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,982
|
And I'd say if we could build such robots as you describe we have pretty much recreated humans but using different materials, so why do we need the "biological" stage any longer?
ala Charles Stross's novels such as Saturn's Children |
__________________
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago |
|
13th July 2018, 06:40 AM | #23 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
That does not seem to me to be a very adventuress view. If Columbus had stayed at home, we would never have colonised America. Its part of Human tradition to explore and colonise. Space is the only place left we can go. Why would we sit around waiting to die off if there are new frontiers ?
|
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 06:45 AM | #24 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,661
|
|
13th July 2018, 06:46 AM | #25 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,265
|
Also, the AI needed to raise children is not even close to what we would need.
Think on how much social ques children pick up from interacting with their families and later schools and sport clubs. How much is learned by mimicking older generations. The first generations born in such a system would miss that, and I strongly suspect that will not be a good thing. |
13th July 2018, 06:48 AM | #26 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
If its only a ten year journey we could first send an entirely robot ship, complete with The eggs of animals (or cryogenically frozen adult animals) and the seeds to grow crops. Leaving out the human embryos, and just have the robots create viable farms.
Then when the robots signal us the planet is ready we could send adult humans to the new world. A ten year journey would require lots of supplies, but its not unfeasible. |
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 06:52 AM | #27 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
|
13th July 2018, 06:52 AM | #28 |
Loggerheaded, earth-vexing fustilarian
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 31,398
|
|
__________________
"There ain't half been some clever bastards" - Ian Dury |
|
13th July 2018, 06:54 AM | #29 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
We would definitely need advanced forms of AI robots to interact successfully with babies and rear them. A lot could rely on the mothership computer which could contain all human knowledge and expert systems such as medical.
The battery powered robots could have specialised plug in memory packs so they would not need such memory capacity. Their batteries could be recharged by the ships nuclear reactor. |
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 06:56 AM | #30 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
|
13th July 2018, 07:00 AM | #31 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
|
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 07:05 AM | #32 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
|
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 07:08 AM | #33 |
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 14,588
|
If it were actually possible to build machines that could properly produce, raise and care for humans without any help from humans on distant planets, then it is quite obvious that humans are not needed on these distant planets.
Therefore, it would be better if the machines were the colonists on these distant planets as opposed to somehow using machines to establish human colonies on these distant planets. |
__________________
A man's best friend is his dogma. |
|
13th July 2018, 07:08 AM | #34 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
|
13th July 2018, 07:10 AM | #35 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
Well that took less than a page.
If you don't think mankind should colonize space why do you care what books they take with them? |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
13th July 2018, 07:17 AM | #36 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,428
|
|
__________________
You see many stars in the sky at night, but not when the sun rises. Can you therefore say there are no stars in the heavens during the day? O man because you cannot find God in the days of your ignorance, say not that there is no God. Sri Ramakrishna Even in the valley of the shadow of death two and two do not make six. Leo Tolstoy |
|
13th July 2018, 07:17 AM | #37 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
|
13th July 2018, 07:24 AM | #38 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
|
|
13th July 2018, 07:28 AM | #39 |
Featherless biped
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 26,431
|
|
13th July 2018, 07:29 AM | #40 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,215
|
Colonizing America produced advantages for all concerned, people in Europe could leave if they so wished and expand into the new territory, people left behind (and in particular those directly or indirectly funding or contributing to it) benefited from incoming goods and materials from the new lands. Self interest is a much more powerful motivator than the future of humanity... Sadly.
|
__________________
"I know my brain cannot tell me what to think." - Scorpion "Nebulous means Nebulous" - Adam Hills |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|