|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
24th May 2018, 08:54 PM | #41 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,314
|
Einstein.
Because E = mc^2 was such an elegant summary of the body of mankind's knowledge on his subject. He designed such simple experiments for deep physics questions and wrote about them in a way a common person could understand. |
24th May 2018, 09:45 PM | #42 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,759
|
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen.
|
24th May 2018, 11:52 PM | #43 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
It will take more than a foreign language to make us shut up.
Quote:
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
25th May 2018, 12:53 AM | #44 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Remember that this is just a sample.
I remember an exercise where teachers were supposed to evaluate student writings according to these descriptors. The only thing the teachers got from a book of this nonsense was that if a student started a sentence with a capital letter and ended it with a full stop then they were functioning at "level 3" (typical year 9 standard). |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
25th May 2018, 12:58 AM | #45 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
It's even worse than that. The responsibility for what a student achieves has been transferred entirely from the student to the teacher. Therefore schools are under pressure to conceal under-achievement as far as possible.
In one set of reports, a teacher could only rate a number of student attitudes/attendance etc according to one of three categories: "Consistently", "Usually" or "Seldom". Of course most students fell between the "Usually" and "Seldom" categories but we weren't permitted to tell parents that so we were expected to lie on their report cards. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
25th May 2018, 03:18 AM | #46 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,314
|
Oh my God, yes.
And their parents. Kids need motivation and direction from their parents and unfortunately school is just a babysitter to most. They not only don't get involved, but have this sense of entitlement, that the school is obligated to produce literacy with no input from themselves.
Quote:
I saw this letter from the school, it was about a meeting for special parents, and decided I would go because her mother blew it off. I sat through this meeting, baffled about what the hell was going on and got increasingly agitated. I finally stood up in frustration and demanded to know in plain english what was going on. It sounded like she was doing everything she could to avoid saying Amanda couldn't read. She was in second grade, so this is extreme underperformance. Everyone looked at me in silence. The teacher didn't actually answer me directly. But it was then obvious it was true. We were just forbidden from saying it. |
26th May 2018, 04:04 AM | #47 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,759
|
|
27th May 2018, 01:06 AM | #48 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,511
|
|
27th May 2018, 05:02 AM | #49 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,539
|
|
__________________
/dann "Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht "The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx |
|
27th May 2018, 08:01 PM | #50 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
To be fair, there are a couple of differences. The main one, I think, is that writing is slower. You can say more words in less time than you can write or type them, unless you've done some serious practice in speed-typing or you know shorthand (and not many people still use that). And you can think words faster than you can say them. So slowing down your thoughts to the speed of writing is hard for some people. There's a knack to it, and it can be taught, but I don't think it's as simple as you're making it out to be.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
28th May 2018, 12:27 AM | #51 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Unfortunately, many students are taught to deal with the idea and the form or the writing simultaneously and that tends to poison the creativity.
A better method is to get the students to make two drafts. In the first draft, they write what they are thinking any old how without regard to grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. In the second draft, they don't worry about the idea, they just proof read the first draft and correct the grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
29th May 2018, 11:09 AM | #52 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,511
|
You're right and I am probably influenced by years of rewriting copy. If a story was a disorganized mess I would jot a few words by each paragraph to tell me why that paragraph existed. Then I would condense, cut and paste to make the story easier to follow. The inverse would be outlining and going on from there.
Another problem with the way writing is taught is that it's so often tied to literature. I'm not sure how this happened. It makes sense sometimes, but students also need a chance to write about stuff that interests them. |
29th May 2018, 08:45 PM | #53 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
Unfortunately it's been so long since I was taught to write (in the 70s and 80s) that I don't remember how it was done. I do remember high school English classes were entirely focused on literature - I learned more English grammar in Latin than I did in English. There were some creative writing classes, but I think they were electives rather than being part of standard English lessons.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
1st June 2018, 06:44 AM | #54 |
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 120
|
Similarly
Dear Jack, I want a man who knows what love is all about. You are generous, kind, thoughtful. People who are not like you admit to being useless and inferior. You have ruined me for other men. I yearn for you. I have no feelings whatsoever when were apart. I can be forever happy will you let me be yours? Jill Dear Jack, I want a man who knows what love is. All about you are generous, kind, thoughtful people, who are not like you. Admit to being useless and inferior. You have ruined me. For other men I yearn! For you I have no feelings whatsoever. When were apart I can be forever happy. Will you let me be? Yours, Jill |
1st June 2018, 08:42 PM | #55 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,511
|
|
1st June 2018, 10:02 PM | #56 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,539
|
The comma after "punctuation" separates the subject (test (or: test asking about punctuation)) from the verb (had) .
|
__________________
/dann "Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht "The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx |
|
2nd June 2018, 12:55 AM | #57 |
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 55
|
observing that kids are able and very keen to use a dizzying number of abbreviations, alternative spelling and giving new meanings to common words and expressions; and all of those change or get "old" so rapidly (they immediately spot the adult trying to be "cool"), makes me assume it's not laziness, but kids wanting to form their own language, separate from the imposed adult way of speaking.
|
2nd June 2018, 01:52 AM | #58 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,539
|
Maybe, but very often it's a question of emphasizing that they are part of a very exclusive group. Not just adults but also other groups of young people are excluded, the ones who don't belong.
|
__________________
/dann "Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht "The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx |
|
2nd June 2018, 06:21 AM | #59 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically not to accept uncritically whatever were told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
2nd June 2018, 06:42 AM | #60 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically not to accept uncritically whatever were told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
22nd June 2018, 08:10 AM | #61 |
New Blood
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 3
|
That is a misquote of James Nicoll.
The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary. Usenet article <1990May15.155309.8892@watdragon.waterloo.edu> (1990), updated in Usenet article <bi5d3u$hjl$1@panix1.panix.com> (2003) |
22nd June 2018, 08:16 AM | #62 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,001
|
arth's version is a little better.
|
22nd June 2018, 08:26 AM | #63 |
Disorder of Kilopi
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: State of Flux
Posts: 17,621
|
|
__________________
"His real name is Count Douchenozzle von Stenchfahrter und Lichtendicks." - Da Joik |
|
23rd June 2018, 04:24 PM | #64 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
Yes, I was putting it into my own words.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
26th June 2018, 07:55 AM | #65 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,157
|
Point me to Arth's version please! and thanks for posting that, Brett Dunbar. I chuckled heartily.
I used to become very irritated by the misuse of English, but have come to realise that it must necessarily change or evolve as it always has. I'm still quite annoyed that misused phrases become accepted phrases by virtue of their misuse. |
26th June 2018, 10:30 AM | #66 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
I've always been a pretty hardcore anti-pedant when it comes to language.
If you look back at the history of language as a concept and the English language in particular the idea of looking at the language and going there's a right and wrong way to do it and to that you can look at any point in development of a language and go "Okay lock in here, no more changes" (which like it or not, admit it or not is exactly what a lot of people are doing) is simply beyond absurd. It's basically declaring yourself the referee in a came of Calvinball. Like the whole idea that in "proper" English it's somehow wrong to end a sentence with a preposition... pretty much can be traced back to one guy, just a guy, who was influential in academic circles back in the 1700s who had a really big hard on for Latin just decided you couldn't, and a lot of the big Language No-nos that set off the Language Enforcers are like that. I've in the past referred to language pedants as trying to enforce their fandom as if it were a canon, but even that's not true. There's no canon for there to be a fandom of. Language Pedants will always fall back on "But we're just trying enforce clarity" but that's nonsense. Nobody's ever looked at the sign above a checkout lane that says "10 Items or Less" and been unable to parse the meaning. If one was to look at a field of castrated work cattle and go "Look at all the Oxes" instead of "Oxen" nobody would be confused in any way. English is pretty rare in "double negatives" even been a thing that anyone worries about. The list goes on. My #1 rule when dealing with language pedants has always been "If you understood me well enough to correct me, you understood well enough to understand me." |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
26th June 2018, 12:17 PM | #67 |
Disorder of Kilopi
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: State of Flux
Posts: 17,621
|
Not to mention the innate pointing skill, which gets many a traveler along on his/her way. Can massively backfire, though, unless you're ready for another kind of lip and tongue work.
|
__________________
"His real name is Count Douchenozzle von Stenchfahrter und Lichtendicks." - Da Joik |
|
26th June 2018, 01:05 PM | #68 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 60,375
|
|
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty. Robert Heinlein. |
|
26th June 2018, 04:10 PM | #69 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
Yeah, in most situations as long as communication was did.
There are circumstances however where correct spelling and grammar aren't just desirable, they are necessary. Writing for publicaion, for example. You're not going to sell your 300,000 word novel if it's riddled with errors. |
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
26th June 2018, 06:15 PM | #70 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Yes, language evolves over time and new words, expressions and even new ways of using punctuation can become commonplace. This is desirable.
However, it is so not a good idea that anything goes. Communication suffers if a Cheshire cat mentality applies. That is why professional standards exist especially for the written word where nuances can be lost. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
26th June 2018, 06:42 PM | #71 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
I agree with psion10! Ah, my heart!
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
27th June 2018, 03:36 AM | #72 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 22, Acacia Avenue
Posts: 3,356
|
|
__________________
Just drive. |
|
27th June 2018, 06:28 AM | #73 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
And again the whole "But we're just trying to be clear and efficient" argument doesn't make any sense because we're talking about English, the two dollar whore of languages.
If it was really about clarity and efficiency the rules of the English language should be under attack far, far, far more than any breaks from those rules. But no a double negative or a split infinitive is a sin because it's inefficient and unclear but spelling knife with a K, having the same word for a small insect, the act of moving through the air, and the front flaps of a man's trousers, and such are not because they are inefficient and unclear but "official" so that makes it different because of reasons. Why does Knife with a K not set up the Language Police but "10 Items or Less?" does? Because it's not about efficiency and clarity. It's about adherence to an arbitrary standard for no real purpose. We have to spell knife with a K because in Old English the K sound was present and that's the rule for some reason (forget that plenty of other words that dropped sounds also dropped the corresponding letters from their spelling because... why wouldn't you?) but we can't end a sentence with a preposition because Robert Lowth, a Catholic Church Bishop said so in 1760. |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
27th June 2018, 11:02 AM | #74 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
When you use an abbreviation, should you change 'a' to 'an'? As in 'a role playng game' and 'an RPG'?
I think so. |
27th June 2018, 01:31 PM | #75 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
27th June 2018, 01:56 PM | #76 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 707
|
|
27th June 2018, 04:21 PM | #77 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
The standard may be arbitrary, but it's still a standard. Furthermore, the standard, like most things in English, is a bit floppy and indistinct and there may be several ways to keep to the standard. It may not be necessary to strictly adhere to the rule to never end a sentence with a preposition, for example. There are plenty of situations where the rule does not necessarily apply. That doesn't mean that you can throw the entire grammatical structure and spelling conventions of English right out the window. Fuzzy though they are, they are still useful. Case in point: you, JoeMorgue, are still applying them in your own writing.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
27th June 2018, 05:43 PM | #78 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
|
It doesn't mean that, though. Natural languages are not systems of formal logic. You're being a dick to children, by denying the plain meaning of their speech, in favor of a doctrinaire and thus ignorant adherence to irrelevant rules.
Other languages makes this clearer. Portuguese, for example, explicitly treats a double negative as an emphatic negative. But even in English the emphasis is implicit. Stop shouting down the children you meet, and start making space in your mind to understand and address what they're actually saying. Sometimes I think that the high point of skepticism is an autistic failure to understand human interactions. Which isn't much of a high point at all. High horse? You should be so lucky. Get off your low horse before it tramples you underfoot. |
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division. |
|
27th June 2018, 06:39 PM | #79 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,212
|
In Japanese, if someone asks you "Don't you have any bananas?" and you don't have any bananas, the correct answer is "Yes, we have no bananas."
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
27th June 2018, 09:24 PM | #80 | |||
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,539
|
You would spell the verb now (past tense: new) without the k for the sake of clarity? I'm not saying that the sentence "She need him in the groin" would become impossible to understand, but I have a nee-jerk disklike of it. For the sake of clarity you could just go back to pronouncing the kn words with a k!
(By the way, the Danish word for naif is kniv, but we pronounce the k. We do the same thing with Knud.) |
|||
__________________
/dann "Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht "The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx |
||||
Thread Tools | |
|
|