|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
13th December 2017, 04:33 AM | #1041 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,681
|
I forget her name, but there was a South American economist who -after the railroad bubble burst- proposed that these bubbles pay for the infrastructure and technological development that comes to fruition later.
This rings true. It happened with railroads, cars, the internet, and possibly now with blockchain. The promises of the dotcom hype are now coming true, twenty years later Amazon is actually the juggernaut that was predicted to materialise. |
__________________
Death to Videodrome! Long live the new flesh! |
|
13th December 2017, 04:49 AM | #1042 |
Muse
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
|
Since you wrote this as a response to me, I kinda feel like I may be expected to react to it in some way... but I can't really seem to link the highlighted quote to something particular I've written. If you were making a point and expect me to say something about it, my apologies for not understanding. If you just wanted to post this quote and don't need anything from me, no problem; it is an interesting quote.
|
13th December 2017, 04:59 AM | #1043 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
13th December 2017, 05:06 AM | #1044 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
|
13th December 2017, 05:13 AM | #1045 |
Muse
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
|
|
13th December 2017, 05:16 AM | #1046 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Not sure what you mean. Although the Dutch tulip industry is still with us, the people who paid hundreds of guilders for a bulb back in 1637 effectively lost the lot. By 1639 tulip bulbs could be bought from garden supply shops for a few stuivers apiece.
Another example. There was a huge real estate price boom in Florida in 1925-26. People who bought at the peak and held on, saw the nominal dollar value of their investment (not the real value) back to their purchase level around forty years later. But that isn't a good way of stashing money away for forty years, and although Florida is still there, and real estate is still bought there, these investors suffered a large irretrievable loss. The bubble burst. |
13th December 2017, 06:00 AM | #1047 |
Muse
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
|
I certainly don't think they will be the first people ever to lose even while intending to hold on to their assets. After the last crash, it took three years for the price to bounce back. After the next crash, it may be what, five years? Seven years? We don't know, do we?
Humans do not live forever. Some people will simply die while holding on to their bitcoin, never seeing any return in their life whatsoever. Some will see their bitcoins stolen or lost to exchange crashes, digital theft, hardware disasters. Some people will get into financial troubles for unrelated reasons (healthcare expenses, housing problems, family issues, whatever) and will be forced to liquidate their stock and lose money - or, if they refuse to sell, be even worse off, as they will effectively be short all that money at the time they need it the most. The simple fact is that the longer someone has to hold on to an asset to even break even, the more they expose themselves to all those risks - and of course, the worse they are simply as a consequence of having to live without their tied up money. If the next decline lasts long enough, then even though the price may technically bounce back up, hardly anyone will recover their losses. Because no matter how much they wish to, people cannot hold on to their assets indefinitely, and due to the finite nature of human lifespan, the utility of postponed monetary gains inevitably declines over time. |
13th December 2017, 06:20 AM | #1048 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
13th December 2017, 06:29 AM | #1049 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Of course we don't know. What we do know is that 3 years is the longest that anybody ever had to wait to see the price recover from a crash and that they all went on to make spectacular gains since. 3 years is hardly a life time.
Of course if you are going to gamble on bitcoin with money you can't afford to lose or are unable to wait a few years to see if the price will rebound then ..... Incidentally it took 5 years for the Dow Jones index to get back to the peak of 2007 after the 2008 crash. http://www.macrotrends.net/1319/dow-...storical-chart |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
13th December 2017, 07:00 AM | #1050 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
I haven't addressed the price history of any bubble or probable bubble directly, because I have observed in opposition to your general thesis about Bitcoin that
I am now very surprised at your protectiveness of this asset inflation against even neutral historical comments. Is this a question of some ideological standpoint that you are defending as a matter of principle against scoffers and heretics? As The Washington Post has noted.
That ... has become a Ponzi scheme for redistributing wealth from one libertarian to another. Actually, I would like to amend that a little bit: Bitcoin has now graduated to being a Ponzi scheme for redistributing wealth from one person to another.Are you defending it because of some ideology of this, or some other, type? |
13th December 2017, 07:06 AM | #1051 |
Muse
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
|
Almost every year of my life, I have been stronger than the year before. If there was a temporary setback, every time I later recovered and became stronger than ever before.
By applying the logic of your argument, this proves that I will keep getting stronger forever. With even greater confidence, because I have been around quite a bit longer than bitcoin, and this pattern has been reliable all this time. |
13th December 2017, 07:51 AM | #1052 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
That is not a valid analogy. You know that your physiological makeup is the same as that of all human beings in which at some point in you life, you will reach a peak physically and mentally then go into a decline that will continue until you are dead (barring unforeseen tragedies).
Bitcoin is like nothing that has been before. There is no way to tell if or when a saturation level might be reached where anybody who might be interested in bitcoin has had all they want to do with it. New players could enter and leave this system indefinitely. Some stocks last forever and some have a very short life. We have no way to tell where in that spectrum bitcoin lies. Another important factor is that the underlying blockchain technology is increasingly being seen as a legitimate way to eliminate unreliable central registries. Applications range from contracts to voting and there are many applications that haven't been imagined yet. As long as the blockchain technology becomes increasingly legitimate, cryptocurrencies are likely to gain mainstream acceptance. It may not be bitcoin that becomes a universal currency but as a store of value, this commodity/currency/whatever could have a place for the foreseeable future. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
13th December 2017, 08:18 AM | #1053 |
Muse
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
|
Yes, I agree with this.
What I'm saying is that the argument that the speculators cannot lose their money if they buy now, because every time there had been a dip in the past, the asset has recovered later, is fallacious. - That premise holds true for any asset whatsoever that is at its historical high when the statement is made, but obviously, many examples show that the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow. Basically, any argument that claims to be able to make predictions about future price developments based on price history alone (of bitcoin or any other asset) is flawed. That includes even claims as mild as that the current buyers will always be able to recover their losses. No, they may not, even if the asset itself eventually recovers at some later time. One could make an argument for predicting future price development based on the details of the asset itself. That I have no problem with. The argument could still be flawed or sound, convincing or not, but at least it wouldn't automatically be a fallacy. |
13th December 2017, 08:42 AM | #1054 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
13th December 2017, 09:32 AM | #1055 |
Muse
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
|
I'm not even sure what is the opposite argument - that the buyer must lose money? Obviously that would be just as fallacious.
There are some interesting things that can be proven, however. For example, that the average amount of money that the people trading bitcoin on exchanges have made is negative. |
13th December 2017, 10:53 AM | #1056 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,725
|
This reminds me a bit of the hype cycle theory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle There's a new technology and much hype and exuberance and then hype eventually peaks People become impatient and disillusioned as the reality doesn't meet expectations, then: Eventually the technology matures and starts to actually deliver after the hype crash |
13th December 2017, 11:11 AM | #1057 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
That is very apt. As I have said, in many cases the objects of speculation survive the bubble and crash, but many investments are lost anyway. The South Sea Bubble represented the introduction of joint stock companies, which are still with us. For that matter the South Sea Company itself survived (modestly) until 1853. Railways are also an excellent example, following the Railway ManiaWP of the 1840s.
|
13th December 2017, 05:45 PM | #1058 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
13th December 2017, 05:49 PM | #1059 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: near trees, houses and a lake.
Posts: 3,229
|
I don't think anyone is talking about proving anything, to be fair, so proving stuff in this context isn't really relevant?
|
13th December 2017, 06:21 PM | #1060 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
14th December 2017, 02:29 AM | #1061 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Not uncommon. It won't go on for ever. Here's dot com bubble period Nasdaq http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8558257.stm
Index of railway shares, 1840s http://www.thebubblebubble.com/wp-co...roadstocks.jpg This is the Dow Jones index 1929 https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sc...ion-2014-02-11 |
14th December 2017, 03:21 AM | #1062 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Those examples compare bitcoin to one shot investments even though bitcoin has been anything but.
That 3yo article compares the DJI then to the DJI as it was in 1929. Needless to say, it was as reliable an indicator of stock prices today as it was an indicator of bitcoin prices today. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
14th December 2017, 03:41 AM | #1063 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
There will be leaks and troughs, but this looks like a bubble. In fact it looks like the biggest in history. I ask again, are you stating that this will go on forever, and that people buying in at today's prices are making a sound investment? It's not clear what claim you are making, and I note with interest that you have made no response to my question whether you have an ideological commitment to Bitcoin, on libertarian or similar principles.
Here is an interesting passage from J K Galbraith, The Great Crash, 1929 ... it is in the nature of a speculative boom that almost anything can collapse it. Any serious shock to confidence can cause sales by those speculators who have always hoped to get out before the final collapse but after all possible gains from rising prices have been reaped. Their pessimism will infect those simpler souls who had thought the market might go up forever but who now will change their minds and sell. Soon there will be margin calls, and still others will be forced to sell. So the bubble breaks.Are you one of the simpler souls? |
14th December 2017, 04:57 AM | #1064 |
Orthogonal Vector
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 53,184
|
Doesn't the value of bitcoin have to constantly increase for the miners to remain profitable? If the value of the bitcoin recieved as payment for maintaining the block chain is less than the cost of electricity to mine it, you will lose miners and thus reduce the utility of the bitcoin as getting transactions registers will take longer and thus hurt the value of bitcoin. This will further decrease the value. But a constantly increasing value is simply not sustainable.
How can the limited number of bitcoins and the nature of mining do anything other than result in a crash? |
__________________
Sufficiently advanced Woo is indistinguishable from Parody "There shall be no *poofing* in science" Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Force ***** on reasons back" Ben Franklin |
|
14th December 2017, 08:04 AM | #1065 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
So you have told us.
.... and told us. .... and told us. .... and told us. .... and told us. .... and told us. .... and told us. ..... Yet not once have you given us reason to believe that this is the final bubble. No, I have an ideological commitment against BS and you are full of it. I see, shift the goal posts towards short term speculators because you might find more losers among that crowd. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
14th December 2017, 08:12 AM | #1066 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Incorrect. The mining difficulty automatically adjusts so that the block creation rate remains at 1 block every 10 minutes no matter how many miners there are. So if you get fewer miners then the cost of mining decreases and thus the rewards of mining increase for the remaining miners.
One thing you are likely to see is that as block rewards decrease, transactors will have to offer larger fees in order to get their transaction confirmed by a miner. This will further discourage the use of bitcoin as a currency. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
14th December 2017, 08:32 AM | #1067 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
This invective of yours is ignorable, but you seem confused. I'm saying that Bitcoin is a bubble. Do you agree or not? What may or may not be final is the current peak and trough price cycle. That is invariably unpredictable. It may go up and down again a number of times, but it is unquestionably a bubble. It will not last forever. It will pop sooner or later.
You have not answered the question about your ideological predisposition, but instead have rewarded me with invective. I take it therefore that you do have an ideological commitment to this object of speculation, which you think I have affronted. |
14th December 2017, 08:53 AM | #1068 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
GOTO 1000
I have no ideological predisposition towards or against bitcoin. It is just something you can buy or sell if you wish. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
14th December 2017, 08:58 AM | #1069 |
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a post-fact world
Posts: 96,875
|
|
14th December 2017, 12:28 PM | #1070 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,725
|
I'll go on record saying I think not only is it a bubble, I think bitcoin's destination is the dustbin. It is just a matter of time. I think in its wake, some of the technology is here to stay and we'll have crypto currency or currencies but there are a some unfixable flaws with bitcoin.
Maybe I'll have to come back to this thread in a few years and eat crow. Time will tell. |
14th December 2017, 01:37 PM | #1071 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
14th December 2017, 02:13 PM | #1072 |
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,038
|
|
14th December 2017, 02:43 PM | #1073 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,942
|
I do not see any barrier to entering this game. The analogy to gold is false, since we know the supply is finite in a physical sense. Not so with bitcoin, because a duplicate entity is possible.
Bitcoin is a brand which begs for imitators that are identical. The 20k ceiling is set in concrete. |
14th December 2017, 03:56 PM | #1074 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
|
14th December 2017, 03:58 PM | #1075 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
|
14th December 2017, 04:31 PM | #1076 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
I don't know why you consider that a non-answer.
YES. Bitcoin is in a bubble and is probably due for a significant price reversal any day now. However, there is no reason to believe that the price won't recover or that bitcoin will have an extended period of price falls. These usually happen after a bad news event like a bitcoin exchange going kaput (and keeping all the bitcoins) or stories about a government crackdown. Of course, there must be a lot of nervous nellies buying into bitcoin now so anything can happen. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
15th December 2017, 12:07 AM | #1077 |
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,038
|
|
15th December 2017, 12:44 AM | #1078 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Do you? Yes, conspiracy theorists have special understanding not known to the sheeple masses. They know that the world is run by secret committees plotting all the financial developments in their own interests. They know it better than other people do, largely because other people think it's nuts. It's impossible to argue with that kind of conspiracy mania, so I won't try.
But one thing that has been stated repeatedly in this discussion, is that many bubbles, I will say even most bubbles, are based on paradigm changing developments. Tulips, I and others have said, are still there, but were new in 1637 Netherlands. Dot com was a bubble, but the internet is still there. The South Sea Company was a bubble, but joint stock companies are still with us. The Railway mania was a bubble, but in 1845 railways were indeed the transport system of the future. This has all been said in this thread. This bubble may represent the introduction of blockchain as a paradigm changing technology. That is very possible. But that doesn't stop it being a bubble. Please do try and keep up. |
16th December 2017, 10:06 AM | #1079 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
When one buys a share, one buys a share in the value of the company.
As long as the company keeps producing or has physical assets, it has a value that can be calculated. Bitcoin has no intrinsic value other than a currency supposedly for trade. If a dealer sold 100,000 bitcoins a month ago they got paid a certain amount. If all their customers decided to cash in tomorrow do you think they have the money to pay out? If one holds on, and people find out how cumbersome bitcoin is to trade, what would it's future value be. Junk I think. I have some rocks in my garden - very special because they are sold with a certificate with my name. Limited supply. Special price limited offer - only $100 a rock. Buy now before the demand pushes up the price. The sky is the limit. Could reach $20,000 in the next six months. (PS - if the scheme crashes you will at least have an asset - a rock.) (BTW - Why is it that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Perhaps fools getting parted with their money?) |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
16th December 2017, 03:06 PM | #1080 |
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,038
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|