|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
8th January 2018, 10:27 AM | #1441 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
The comparison is the speculative investment that skyrockets without people knowing the basics of why the price is rising. I have seen no such investments in pink unicorns. How about a cryptocurrency called PinkUnicoin? Blockchain is a novel and probably useful technology. Bitcoin is an interesting but impractical application of that technology. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
8th January 2018, 10:31 AM | #1442 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
8th January 2018, 10:34 AM | #1443 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
8th January 2018, 10:58 AM | #1444 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Why should that particular pyramid scheme be labeled a crime in the first place? It just seems so arbitrary to me.
Err.. because Bernie Madoff didn't tell his investors that he was running a ponzi scheme? (Maybe you need to research the definition of "fraud"). |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
8th January 2018, 11:00 AM | #1445 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
The fact that no one has created a crypto-currency called "Tulip" yet makes me weep for this species.
|
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
8th January 2018, 11:09 AM | #1446 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Tulips were the flowers of the future in 1637. Railways were the transport mode of the future in 1845. Joint stock companies were the trading organisations of the future in 1720. They all bubbled and crashed. I'm not saying that blockchain will crash, and vanish as a technology; I'm saying that Bitcoin will crash. I'm not saying that joint stock companies disappeared in 1720. I'm saying that the South Sea Company bubbled and popped. Its shareholders lost their money, and its directors were indicted and sanctioned, crooks that they were.
|
8th January 2018, 11:31 AM | #1447 |
Orthogonal Vector
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 53,184
|
It just seems like a technology in search of a utility. These are all being treated as commodities with no inherent worth just speculation value. I think that bitcoin will stay around for a very long time, I just think that it is also over valued and will crash at some point.
|
__________________
Sufficiently advanced Woo is indistinguishable from Parody "There shall be no *poofing* in science" Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Force ***** on reasons back" Ben Franklin |
|
8th January 2018, 12:00 PM | #1448 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
8th January 2018, 12:33 PM | #1449 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Unless you have evidence to justify that, here is why I won't accept it. Bitcoin is bought and sold, by people who intend to secure capital gains from trading in it. That has plenty of "comparison with past investment". You're like some Bible thumper: my holy book is totally unlike any other book. There's no comparison. Well, show us why.
|
8th January 2018, 01:15 PM | #1450 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,941
|
The CME futures contract requires a margin of about 50%. 5 bitcoins is the size, and is doing about 1000 contracts a day. Most trading platforms these days require margins of about 1%.
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equi...x/bitcoin.html |
8th January 2018, 01:17 PM | #1451 |
Orthogonal Vector
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 53,184
|
|
__________________
Sufficiently advanced Woo is indistinguishable from Parody "There shall be no *poofing* in science" Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Force ***** on reasons back" Ben Franklin |
|
8th January 2018, 01:30 PM | #1452 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,941
|
|
8th January 2018, 01:32 PM | #1453 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
And yet in almost 500 years of history you can only find 3 examples where investments of that sort of investment that ended up badly. You can't say "ergo bitcoin" because you need more similarities that just people put a lot of money into them. You need to do a point by point comparison with each individual example and show that bitcoin is matching these points exactly.
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
8th January 2018, 01:36 PM | #1454 |
Orthogonal Vector
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 53,184
|
|
__________________
Sufficiently advanced Woo is indistinguishable from Parody "There shall be no *poofing* in science" Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Force ***** on reasons back" Ben Franklin |
|
8th January 2018, 01:41 PM | #1455 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
No I don't need to do anything like that, because your claim is that
Bitcoin is totally unique. There is no comparison with any past investment - successful or otherwise.Therefore if I can show a single point in common between BTC and any one other bubble I will have proved you wrong. |
8th January 2018, 02:22 PM | #1456 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
8th January 2018, 02:39 PM | #1457 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: near trees, houses and a lake.
Posts: 3,229
|
cryptocurrencies are Paradigm changing.
If you are applying the old rules of economics then you really have to keep up. The old way isn't going to work the way you want it to anymore. That's the mistake that is being made. |
8th January 2018, 09:31 PM | #1458 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hard Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 1,944
|
|
__________________
"May I interest you in some coconut milk?" ~Akhenaten Wallabe Esq |
|
8th January 2018, 10:40 PM | #1459 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
That's why bubbles are often created from impressive new technologies. The promoters have a convincing selling point: there's never in the past been anything like these ... railways, interncontinental trading organisations, internet, tulips ... whatever is being marketed. And that is often perfectly true. So, they say this time it's different. It will go up and up, and never come back down.
But it will. The basic laws of nature, let alone economics, have not been abrogated by the new technology, whatever it is. What does your post mean, by the way? It looks silly. Like a peurile schoolyard taunt, rather than a considered comment. |
8th January 2018, 11:47 PM | #1460 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
So what? Most businesses fail in their first year operation. The extreme examples that you cherry picked failed because ultimately they were based on contracts that would become unfulfillable. In the case of the tulip mania the problem was offering massive amounts of money for tulips that hadn't been grown yet. In the case of the company stocks that you cherry picked, the company couldn't match the hype and so failed.
Bitcoin is neither a business nor a contract. It is like stamp collecting. You either buy it, sell it or do neither. Those invested in bitcoin are not going to ditch them any more than stamp collectors will burn their stamps. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
9th January 2018, 02:43 AM | #1461 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
The tulips could have been delivered. The people did not want an expensive tulip. They wanted someone to buy the tulip. First, at a higher price, then as it crashed, at any price. If one paid the equivalent of 10 years salary for a single tulip, and then suddenly found no-one would buy at any price, why bother taking delivery? Stamps and art increase in value and have done so for decades, if not centuries. The increase is steady and reasonably reliable. One does not have to sell a rare stamp but put it on show for guests. Or just look at it in private in amazement with satisfaction at the value one got for the money paid. When bitcoin drops to one cent per coin, and stays there, what does one do then? Tell one's grandchildren a story of being caught in the bitcoin bubble? If one invests in a start-up company one assesses the risks and checks the business plan. Astute investing can be very rewarding on an ongoing basis. The underlying fundamentals are well understood, as are the risks. The risk with bitcoin is that if it continues to fall people will not buy. If people do not buy the demand falls off. With falling demand come ever larger drops in price. Might as well buy two pizza and brag about the most expensive pizza one ever bought. Oh I forgot. With falling value and interest will come fewer businesses willing to transact. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
9th January 2018, 03:17 AM | #1462 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
I picked these examples because I think Bitcoin is an extreme case. May I disagree with you that Bitcoin speculation resembles philately or art collecting. Here's why. The objects in that case have a physical form, so they may be admired for that, as well as be traded. Bitcoin is the first speculative subject that has no physical form at all. If you want something similar to stamp collection - go for tulips!
|
9th January 2018, 04:52 AM | #1463 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Physical delivery was practicable, if any speculator wanted it. The issue with the tulips that caused the crash was not that only undeliverable futures contracts were exchanged in the market.
In the Northern Hemisphere, tulips bloom in April and May for about one week. During the plant's dormant phase from (Northern Hemisphere) June to September, bulbs can be uprooted and moved about, so actual purchases (in the spot market) occurred during these months. During the rest of the year, florists, or tulip traders, signed contracts before a notary to buy tulips at the end of the season (effectively futures contracts).Tulip maniaWP |
9th January 2018, 10:20 AM | #1464 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Even when they are open "jokes" (read as "useless for anything"), the masses are "investing".
Same principle. Find a buyer willing to pay a higher price.
Quote:
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
9th January 2018, 01:18 PM | #1465 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 20,145
|
More fun than lotto
|
9th January 2018, 06:11 PM | #1466 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
Just as I said earlier. Find some extreme unrelated example and say "ergo bitcoin". It doesn't matter if it is a chalk and cheese comparison. It is only when bitcoin is compared to something that isn't bad that differences matter.
For example: That is a typical luddite reaction. If you can't hold it like a baby rattle then it doesn't exist. The only reason you don't want to compare bitcoin to stamps is because then you would have to describe everybody who buys stamps a "greater fool". When did stamp collecting become a tulip mania craze? |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
9th January 2018, 06:28 PM | #1467 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
That is trivially true for all forms of investment.
That is exactly what happened after the MtGox hack in 2011. The price of bitcoin went into free fall month after month. The price ultimately fell from nearly $30 to $3 and everybody thought that this was the end of the bitcoin experiment. Bitcoin has not gone through a sustained price fall like that since. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
9th January 2018, 10:03 PM | #1468 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
It didn't. That's why I think you were mistaken to write
And I think that comparison is completely laughable. Bitcoin's not like stamp collecting. It's like the Tulipomania of 1636-37, the South Sea Bubble of 1720, the Railway Mania of 1845, the Stock Market Bubble of 1929, the dot com internet boom of 1999-2000 or the credit bubble of 2003-08. My desire to rubbish the comparison made me write this
I then wrote
Quote:
Quote:
In short; the only person who thinks collecting Bitcoin is like philately is yourself. |
9th January 2018, 10:10 PM | #1469 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
|
9th January 2018, 10:44 PM | #1470 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
But you wrote, "If you want something similar to stamp collection - go for tulips!" If you didn't mean to imply that tulips was like collecting stamps then why would you write something like that?
Yes it is. Stamp collecting is the closest analogy to trading in bitcoin that I can think of. It is true that bitcoin has potentially more use than being locked up in a humidity free environment but what bitcoin can be used for (other than a store of value) is a minor consideration ATM. No it isn't for the reasons I have already given. No it isn't. From what I have seen of the south sea bubble, it was a complicated system of shares and contracts (which you will never understand) that fell into a heap because it couldn't deliver what was promised. I haven't studied this one. Maybe you can give us a point by point comparison. Now you are getting close. Any time stock or commodity prices rise too fast you can expect and equally dramatic fall. Of course, the stock market collapse was mad worse by the monetary policies of the time. Note that the stock market recovered nicely and 1929 is ancient history. This is something you claim won't happen with bitcoin. No it isn't. It was just a case of dot com business failing early like most business do. Many dot com companies are booming today. Bitcoin is not a debt instrument so "credit bubbles" are totally irrelevant. One of the supposed aims of crypto currencies is to avoid the need for money to be borrowed into existence. I point this out not because I support a digital gold standard but just to point out how way off course your ranting is. Why would I state something like that? Only you are psychic enough to make a certain prediction like that. All I can say is that there is nothing that indicates that the past trends in the last 8 years won't continue for some time into the future. I suspect that it would take a major global event to put a permanent dent in bitcoin. Would you like to divine what that event will be? |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
10th January 2018, 01:30 AM | #1471 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,941
|
Bitcoin is crashing. This follows the news cycle. Bitcoin will never trade 20k because there is no value. The Nigerians and Koreans are chasing a dream that corporate America will not validate.
|
10th January 2018, 03:32 AM | #1472 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
10th January 2018, 04:47 AM | #1473 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
No problem. Railway maniaWP
... the modern stock market made it easy for companies to promote themselves and provide the means for the general public to invest. Shares could be purchased for a 10% deposit with the railway company holding the right to call in the remainder at any time. The railways were so heavily promoted as a foolproof venture that thousands of investors on modest incomes bought large numbers of shares whilst only being able to afford the deposit. Many families invested their entire savings in prospective railway companies – and many of those lost everything when the bubble collapsed and the companies called in the remainder of their due payments.A pretty typical spec bubble. So is bitcoin. What will interest historians this time is the libertarian ideology whose influence suffuses this particular speculative episode. |
10th January 2018, 06:00 AM | #1474 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Psion10:
I am reading an article that says Bitcoin, unlike other crytocurrencies, will survive the coming crytocurrency crashes because it "has a store of value". It says that when fiat money also crashes, bitcoin will be there holding your value and enabling you to trade. Let me say that I do one hour of work for a company and they pay me electronically by an EFT into my bank account. That amount of "credit/money" would perhaps enable me to fill my car with one tank of gasoline. If I chose to wait a year and the price of gasoline in fiat money stays the same then I can still buy a tank of gasoline. If I buy the equivalent value of one tank of gasoline in bitcoin how sure I am that I will be able to buy a tank of gasoline in a years time? What "guarantees" do I have? Will the gas station take my bitcoin credit? Will an exchange pay me the fiat cash to do so? What guarantees the "store of value"? Who guarantees the "store of value"? If people decide to move away from bitcoin, and the price drops, how long do I have to wait for the value to return to the "store of value" I put in? |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
10th January 2018, 07:47 AM | #1475 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,681
|
|
__________________
Death to Videodrome! Long live the new flesh! |
|
10th January 2018, 08:11 AM | #1476 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
|
10th January 2018, 08:36 AM | #1477 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,681
|
The digital gold argument is strange to me.
You can leave gold at the bottom of the ocean for a thousand years and it will still be gold. But your grandchildren will find your digital wallet and not know what a USB port is for. You cannot get together with a bunch of programmers and create a new indestructible metal. Or write a whitepaper about how you intend to do that, cash in, and not even lift a finger. Bitcoin might maintain it's position as the first and original Crypto, but you're essentially talking about brain position then. That's branding. Brands can lose relevancy, just ask the Commodore computer brand. So, Bitcoin can be digital gold. But I and my buddies can also make a digital gold. That makes Bitcoin less of a store of value in my opinion. |
__________________
Death to Videodrome! Long live the new flesh! |
|
10th January 2018, 09:20 AM | #1478 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
So the railway companies were promoting themselves, selling shares in themselves directly to the public for 10% deposit?
I don't see how bitcoin itself could do any of that. Of course an exchange could do something similar but from your quote, it doesn't seem that the railway companies were using an exchange. |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
10th January 2018, 09:24 AM | #1479 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
None.
There is no indication that the bitcoin price cycles won't continue as they have done for the last 8 years (for a few years anyway). However, technology and the finance market change so rapidly that there is no telling what the future holds. As always, "caveat emptor". |
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975 |
|
10th January 2018, 09:53 AM | #1480 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,841
|
Brokers were doing something exactly similar in the 1929 boom.
... a great deal of speculative trading was based on credit, what was known as "margin buying". An investor during the 1920s could purchase stock for cash or use his available cash as a ten percent downpayment or margin on a more sizeable purchase with ninety percent financed on loans from stockbrokers. This allowed investors to purchase ten times as much stock as they had money to pay for. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|