IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 19th June 2019, 04:58 PM   #201
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Jupiter and Saturn cycle Suns magnetic field twisted and broken.
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th June 2019 at 05:01 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th June 2019, 05:00 PM   #202
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Also explanation why south and north pole change. ...
10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Yet another deluded YouTube video does not explain any science. 2 minutes and 56 seconds of
  1. Delusion about Jupiter and Saturn "twisting" the Sun's magnetic field.
  2. Usual insanity of "pushing force".
  3. Points to what looks like a solar activity chart, graphics of the solar system in 1990/2000/2010 and we get his delusions about Jupiter and Saturn 'lines" and the Sun.
  4. Insanity that a measured average 22 year cycle for solar magnetic field reversal is 20 years.
  5. More gibberish.

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th June 2019 at 05:14 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th June 2019, 05:25 PM   #203
Little 10 Toes
Master Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,322
Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th June 2019, 09:15 PM   #204
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Jupiter and Saturn cycle Suns magnetic field twisted and broken.

Also explanation why south and north pole change.

https://youtu.be/hbV1bNMGDzo

🤔

Is this a coincidence?

https://youtu.be/hbV1bNMGDzo

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th June 2019, 09:22 PM   #205
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Is this a coincidence?
No. It is ignorance, delusions and/or lies.
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd June 2019, 09:43 AM   #206
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 15,183
Originally Posted by Little 10 Toes View Post
Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

Thanks for picking up my slack Little 10 Toes.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 08:02 AM   #207
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Earth warmup 1900-1940 because of dark pushing force from Tyko Brahe supernova 1572 deep inside Sun and later strong SunSpot or more regular energy up.

1980 - 2010 because of dark pushing force from Kepler Supernova 1604...

https://youtu.be/4wgD9qHDdxE

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 08:04 AM   #208
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Whats going on with weather?!?

Month ago Earth was between Sun and Jupiter.

Now Between Sun and Saturnus.

And also Earth been over month between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

Lot of small area collide deep inside expanding Earth.

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 02:03 PM   #209
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 06:09 AM   #210
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 6,150
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Whats going on with weather?!?

Month ago Earth was between Sun and Jupiter.

Now Between Sun and Saturnus.

And also Earth been over month between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

Lot of small area collide deep inside expanding Earth.
You are funny - in a sad way
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 06:11 AM   #211
MetalPig
Illuminator
 
MetalPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 22, Acacia Avenue
Posts: 3,320
A supernova deep inside the sun
__________________
Just drive.
MetalPig is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 08:24 AM   #212
WhatRoughBeast
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,450
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Earth warmup 1900-1940 because of dark pushing force from Tyko Brahe supernova 1572 deep inside Sun and later strong SunSpot or more regular energy up.

1980 - 2010 because of dark pushing force from Kepler Supernova 1604...

🤔
Umm.

So, the effects of SN1572 (8000 to 9800 light years away) took about 330 years to arrive and affect the sun, but SN1604 (20,0000 light years) only took about 410? Have I got that right? The SN1604 pushing force was much faster than that of SN1572?

Why? Why would something so fundamental as the pushing force show so much variation?
WhatRoughBeast is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 03:00 PM   #213
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Whats going on with weather?!?...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 06:20 AM   #214
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by WhatRoughBeast View Post
Umm.

So, the effects of SN1572 (8000 to 9800 light years away) took about 330 years to arrive and affect the sun, but SN1604 (20,0000 light years) only took about 410? Have I got that right? The SN1604 pushing force was much faster than that of SN1572?

Why? Why would something so fundamental as the pushing force show so much variation?
Are you kidding with me?

Expanding dark pushing force from Tyko Brahe supernova was here 1572 and it pushing deep inside expanding Sun.

It get Sun magnetic material expanding faster and that start pushing up that way where is Sun "skin". So Earth and other planets get some extraenergy from Sun 1900 - 1940.

Expanding dark pushing force from Kepler supernova was here 1604 and it pushing deep inside expanding Sun. Deeper that dark pushing force fromTyko Brahe supernova


It get Sun magnetic material expanding faster and that start pushing up that way where is Sun "skin". So Earth and other planets get some extraenergy from Sun 1980 - 2010.

Also thats why Sun had a Sun Spots 1900 century, With out that dark pushing force from this supernovas there be long time with out Sun Spots, like 1280-1350, 1460-1550, 1645-1715 and 1790-1830.

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100

Last edited by Pixie of key; 4th July 2019 at 06:24 AM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 01:59 PM   #215
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down Insane gibberish about 2 supernova and the Sun

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Insane because SN1572 and SN1604 were just 2 of the observed supernovae. The Milky Way has a supernova on average every 50 years !

Insane because supernova emit light and neutrinos and gas not his gibberish of "dark".

Insane because the emissions from most supernova cannot have any effect on the Sun. The emissions are totally insignificant compared to the Sun (parts per billion?). The emissions are absorbed by the photosphere and reemitted in all direction as light. An exception would be a supernova a few light years away.

Last edited by Reality Check; 4th July 2019 at 02:00 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 02:05 PM   #216
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down Lies about the Sun which has been decreasing in "warmth" since the 1970's

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
1980 - 2010 because of ...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Lies about the Sun which has been decreasing in "warmth" since the 1970's . That physical fact is why climate scientists ruled out the Sun as a cause of the current global warming.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 02:12 PM   #217
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down Delusion about global warming 1900-1940 which was partially due to the Sun

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Earth warmup 1900-1940 ...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Lies about the Sun which has been decreasing in "warmth" since the 1970's .

Delusion about global warming 1900-1940 which was partially due to the Sun's normal changes in irradiance but also because of increasing CO2.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th July 2019, 01:33 AM   #218
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Lot of Volcano actitivites.

Lot of Earth Quake activities

Strange weather like Australian and China rare tornadoes.

Because expanding pushing force from

Jupiter and Sun

Saturn and Sun

Galaxy center supermassive concentration and Sun

We was month ago between Sun and Jupiter

Now between Sun and Saturnus.

And all that time between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

When was last time when Juputer and Saturn was between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration?

How activate was Volcanoes then?

How much Earth Quake was then?!?

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 03:47 PM   #219
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Lot of Volcano actitivites....
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:31 AM   #220
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by Roboramma View Post
Damn. If you were willing to sell for 28 million I might willing but 38 is too steep for me.

Too bad.
Now it is 111 million euros ��

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100

Last edited by Pixie of key; 19th September 2019 at 01:34 AM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:33 AM   #221
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-captur...ansitions.html

""We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve.""

So, galaxys born inside to outside.

🤔

"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

Such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start pushing out from a black hole.

First it is expanding dark matter, but when is expanding very fast, then it is visible expanding matter from expanding supermassive concentration.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:34 AM   #222
Little 10 Toes
Master Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,322
Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 02:16 AM   #223
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Rope experiement

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 03:02 AM   #224
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 33,765
yt;dw
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 04:39 AM   #225
Steve001
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,722
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Rope experiement

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔
That's not an experiment. What it is is a visual presentation of same gibberish you have spewed forth for years.
Steve001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 06:17 AM   #226
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by Steve001 View Post
That's not an experiment. What it is is a visual presentation of same gibberish you have spewed forth for years.
It was science experiement with rope.

I push book with rope 😃

Yes, whaf?!?

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:36 PM   #227
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-captur...ansitions.html

""We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve.""
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

This is an deluded "galaxys born inside to outside" lie when the article is about already born galaxies and their evolution. An existing AGN turns on and turns a galaxy into a quasar (the same galaxy but with a very active AGN).
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:49 PM   #228
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Rope experiement
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

A repeated, deluded lie that an insane "Rope experiment / Randi / Stephen Hawking dont understund!" video is the rope experiment or any experiment. A demented few seconds describing a couple of strings on a compass. The rest is gibberish using coins and cartoons. Insanity of pushing a book by putting a string between his finger and the book and pushing with his finger

Pixie of key's main delusion is that there are no pulling forces such as every force that we know. Galaxies, etc. cannot exist in his world. Ropes cannot exist in his world. Atoms cannot exist in his world. !
But the real world exists and ropes can pull objects. He needs an experiment (not gibberish in a video with no experiment) showing that only pushing forces are involved. That is an experiment of pushing on one end (not a side as in that deluded video) of a rope and the other end pushing on say a book!

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th September 2019 at 01:58 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:53 PM   #229
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

It is not gas and dust which falling into a black hole.

This supermassive concentrations expanding and sometimes also this the supermassive objects are discharged, and then for us, the expanding substance of the dark exponentially expands, and then it becomes a perceptible expanding substance.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 01:58 PM   #230
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
It was science experiement with rope.
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

A repeated, deluded lie that an insane "Rope experiment / Randi / Stephen Hawking dont understund!" video is the rope experiment or any experiment. A demented few seconds describing a couple of strings on a compass. The rest is gibberish using coins and cartoons. Insanity of pushing a book by putting a string between his finger and the book and pushing with his finger.

An insane lie of pushing a book with a rope. He pushes it with his finger with a string squeezed in between.

Pixie of key's main delusion is that there are no pulling forces such as every force that we know. Galaxies, etc. cannot exist in his world. Ropes cannot exist in his world. Atoms cannot exist in his world. !
But the real world exists and ropes can pull objects. He needs an experiment (not gibberish in a video with no experiment) showing that only pushing forces are involved. That is an experiment of pushing on one end (not a side as in that deluded video) of a rope and the other end pushing on say a book!
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2019, 02:06 PM   #231
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start"...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

An insane "It is not gas and dust which falling into a black hole." delusion when the article is about gas and dust falling into a black hole and he quotes this !
Black holes have gas and dust discs around then and some "eat" the gas and dust from these discs. Supermassive black holes even have stars falling into them.

Actually insane "supermassive objects are discharged", etc. gibberish. Black holes do not emit anything - they are black! This is also massively stupid gibberish - his delusion is no falling gas and dust and he writes "discharging"/"expanding" gibberish.

For others: This is fascinating astronomy.
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions
There are low-ionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER) galaxies which are about a third of our nearby galaxies. They are in the spectrum between ordinal galaxies whose supermassive back holes are not consuming surrounding gas and dust and active galaxy nuclei galaxies whose supermassive back holes are consuming surrounding gas and dust. The debate is whether most of the light from LINER galaxies comes from weakly active nuclei or from star forming regions outside of the nuclei.
These astronomers saw 6 LINER galaxies transform into quasars (the brightest AGN galaxies). They found that these are consistent with known astronomy - "changing look transitions" as seen in Seyfert galaxies. The new astronomy is that these transformations were much faster than expected.

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th September 2019 at 02:22 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st September 2019, 09:05 AM   #232
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-captur...ansitions.html

""We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve.""

So, galaxys born inside to outside.

🤔

"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

Such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start pushing out from a black hole.

First it is expanding dark matter, but when is expanding very fast, then it is visible expanding matter from expanding supermassive concentration.

🤔

"It tells us that the theory is all wrong."

BINGO!!!

😃
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd September 2019, 01:15 PM   #233
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 15,183
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Rope experiement

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔

Nope, as well you know that doesn't comply with the experimental condition of pushing the object by the fully extended rope. Again it simply shows that you are well aware of what would happen if you did try the experiment as it was stated.

Why continue to try to obscure the fact that you evidently know, as demonstrated by your actions in the video, why the rope experiment would fail? Specifically because of the differences between pulling and pushing forces and their effects on materials.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd September 2019, 01:25 PM   #234
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 15,183
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post

So, galaxys born inside to outside.
The article you linked doesn't say or even suggest that.

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
🤔


Such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start pushing out from a black hole.

First it is expanding dark matter, but when is expanding very fast, then it is visible expanding matter from expanding supermassive concentration.

🤔
Not only doesn't the article you linked say or even suggest that, you even quote it as saying the opposite.

Quote:
"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."
Why do you feel the need to misrepresent articles that in some cases simply don't support your assertions and in other cases directly refutes them?
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd September 2019, 07:20 PM   #235
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"It tells us that the theory is all wrong."
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

The lie of quote mining a single sentence.
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions
Quote:
"We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve."
What is wrong is the timescale of quasars turning on. Obviously the theory producing that timescale is wrong. That suggests either a broader theory that includes the observed shorter timescales or a different mechanism for these observations.

Inane gibberish about galaxies is not about how quasars turn on.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd October 2019, 01:17 AM   #236
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Beyond Einstein: Physicists solve mystery surrounding photon momentum

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-einste...-momentum.html

"However, the answer that Hartung discovered through his experiment is—as is typical for quantum mechanics—more surprising. The electron not only receives the expected momentum, but additionally one third of the photon momentum that actually should have gone to the atom nucleus. The sail of the boat therefore "knows" of the impending accident before the cords tear and steals a bit of the boat's momentum. To explain the result more precisely, Hartung uses the concept of light as an electro-magnetic wave: "We know that the electrons tunnel through a small energy barrier. In doing so, they are pulled away from the nucleus by the strong electric field of the laser, while the magnetic field transfers this additional momentum to the electrons.""

Yes yes yes.

I was ahead of my time 😃😃😃

You dont understund that Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have example nature of expanding light.

Expanding light waves is dark for us, but we know, there is waves because we can register photons.

But almost all expanding light mass is in dark expanding waves.

Expanding lights interactive with eachother and get eachother expanding faster and faster. So expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

🤔

So, Dark Expanding light waves interactive with eachother and get eachother expanding faster. Thats why expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

Explanation for

1. Bending light near star and galaxy

2. Cosmologys way redshifted light

3. Gravity redshifted light

So, there is no expanding space!

No curving space!

Space is infinity 3 D place which is nothing.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd October 2019, 12:28 PM   #237
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Beyond Einstein: Physicists solve mystery surrounding photon momentum

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-einste...-momentum.html

"However, the answer that Hartung discovered through his experiment is—as is typical for quantum mechanics—more surprising. The electron not only receives the expected momentum, but additionally one third of the photon momentum that actually should have gone to the atom nucleus. The sail of the boat therefore "knows" of the impending accident before the cords tear and steals a bit of the boat's momentum. To explain the result more precisely, Hartung uses the concept of light as an electro-magnetic wave: "We know that the electrons tunnel through a small energy barrier. In doing so, they are pulled away from the nucleus by the strong electric field of the laser, while the magnetic field transfers this additional momentum to the electrons.""
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Usual insane gibberish lying about the science article.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th October 2019, 01:03 PM   #238
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Not long ago, the center of the Milky Way exploded

"A massive blast of energy and radiation came right out of the galactic centre and into the surrounding material. This shows that the centre of the Milky Way is a much more dynamic place than we had previously thought. It is lucky we're not residing there!""

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-center-milky.html

""These results dramatically change our understanding of the Milky Way," says co-author Magda Guglielmo from the University of Sydney.

"We always thought about our Galaxy as an inactive galaxy, with a not so bright centre. These new results instead open the possibility of a complete reinterpretation of its evolution and nature.

"The flare event that occurred three million years ago was so powerful that it had consequences on the surrounding of our Galaxy. We are the witness to the awakening of the sleeping beauty."

The latest work firms up SgrA* as prime suspect, but, the researchers concede, there is still a lot more work to be done. How black holes evolve, influence and interact with galaxies, they conclude, "is an outstanding problem in astrophysics"."

Galaxys born inside to outside.

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th October 2019, 01:40 PM   #239
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 15,183
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post

Galaxys born inside to outside.

��
The article you cite makes no such claims.

Again, why do you feel the need to misrepresent articles that in some cases simply don't support your assertions and in other cases directly refutes them?
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th October 2019, 02:40 PM   #240
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,720
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Not long ago, the center of the Milky Way exploded

"A massive blast of energy and radiation came right out of the galactic centre and into the surrounding material. This shows that the centre of the Milky Way is a much more dynamic place than we had previously thought. It is lucky we're not residing there!""

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-center-milky.html

""These results dramatically change our understanding of the Milky Way," says co-author Magda Guglielmo from the University of Sydney.

"We always thought about our Galaxy as an inactive galaxy, with a not so bright centre. These new results instead open the possibility of a complete reinterpretation of its evolution and nature.

"The flare event that occurred three million years ago was so powerful that it had consequences on the surrounding of our Galaxy. We are the witness to the awakening of the sleeping beauty."

The latest work firms up SgrA* as prime suspect, but, the researchers concede, there is still a lot more work to be done. How black holes evolve, influence and interact with galaxies, they conclude, "is an outstanding problem in astrophysics".
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Usual insanely blatant lying about a science article. This is a flare three million years ago. The Solar System alone is 4.6 billion years old ! The Milky Way was born maybe 13 billion years ago !
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.