Merged: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? Pt 2

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Twice-distant galaxy cluster has been interpreted to "move" away twice as fast from us. ...

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Pixie of key's usual lies and gibberish.
That is Hubble's law !
Pixie of key's stupidity of quotes around move. The redshift of a galaxy is evidence is real movement of the galaxy away from us. High school children know about the Doppler effect. It is the increasing effect with distance that tells us that this is a cosmological equivalent of the Doppler effect.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...
Your are so stupid �������...

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Pixie of key's usual lies and gibberish.
The Man is telling the truth about textbook physics and Pixie of key has been lying about textbook physics fro 12 years now .
Pixie of key stupidly states basic physics (light that has travelled for X years was emitted X years ago). This is nothing to do with what The Man wrote:

Originally Posted by The Man

Nope it can't be, if the relation was only to the age of the light then the gravitational bound smaller clusters and galaxies themselves would appear red shifted as if they were moving away from each other. Your very assertion of what we don't observe disproves your own claim of the relation being simply the age of the light.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

With expanding energy fields ...

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Pixie of key's "dark wave/expanding light/light with mass !/etc." delusions.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Expanding light vs. expanding space.
...

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Pixie of key repeats his idiotic lies about textbook cosmology.

1. A "Expanding light vs. expanding space." lie when he does not compare his delusions to textbook cosmology!
2. The deluded "emperor naked" lie when he knows an expanding universe is clothed in a enormous body of evidence.
   Anyone with an education and who can read knows this. What is the evidence for the Big Bang? has been cited here many times.
3. He is the only one with the delusion that space "radiates information".
   Everyone else knows that space is the thing between objects in the universe and it is the objects that we observe.
4. His idiocy that we cannot manipulate spacetime.
   We do that when we measure gravity in experiments and the universe also does it for us.
5. His "expanding space is a completely religious concept" lie.
   Anyone with an education and who can read knows that an expanding universe is a scientific theory (the Big Bang) based on working laws of physics and with an overwhelming body of supporting evidence.What is the evidence for the Big Bang? has been cited here many times.
6. His "change the trajectory of expanding light ...by organizing a scientific experiment" delusion.
   That is how telescopes work . They change the trajectory of the light they gather. That includes real "billions of years old expanding light".

New delusions

1. "Man cannot make space"
   No space is made in the Big Bang. Distances between objects get longer. Think about the balloon analogy - new rubber is not made as it expands.
2. "Stop lying that space expanding"
   He is the only one lying here. We are stating the truth about textbook physics. There is overwhelming physical evidence (Hubble's law, CMB, etc.) that the universe is expanding.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Black holes vs. Expanding black stars

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

More of Pixie of key repeats his idiotic lies about textbook cosmology.
A crank "I am the one" video with a couple of minutes of Pixie of key's "expanding dark star" delusions.
A "I am the one who found out how the universe really work" delusion when Pixie of key is abysmally ignorant about the real universe.
More of Pixie of key repeats his idiotic lies about textbook cosmology.
Points to an artist's picture of a black hole in what looks like a x-ray binary.
His "dark energy" being emitted from a black hole delusion and doing whatever he imagines.
An "expanding star" delusion about the companion star when the star is losing mass.
"matter expanding fast/being pushed" delusions about the matter being pulled off the companion star by the black hole.
His constant delusion that gravity does not pull when we measure gravity pulling in the lab and the real universe !

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Reason why Earth spinning faster 2020 summer.

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

A video on Pixie of key's delusions about "magnetar 28.4.2020" when the signal from FRB are "less than 1000th of a mobile phone on the Moon"! Pixie of key's "Dark expanding pushing force" delusion.
A new Pixie of key delusion that FRB 200428 lasting less than a second and with less energy than from a mobile phone on the Moon changed the rotation of the Earth .

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Yes, the Sun therefore has a longer and bigger cycle of about 330 days in addition to a cycle of about 11 years.

How the planets maintain these cycles....

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

A spate of Pixie of key's idiotic gibberish and lies about the planets and Sun ends with his usual rants. Just about every sentence in this post is ignorant, gibberish, deluded or a lie.

• Seasonal, Year-Long Cycles Seen on the Sun
  There is a shorter and mostly smaller cycle in the magnetic field of about 330 days on the Sun in addition to the longer, major cycle of ~11 years.
• processes within the Sun alone do explain regular cycles
  It is textbook solar physics that this is what the solar dynamo does.
• a delusion that gas giants drive the 11 year cycle when there is no 11 year alignment of gas giants.
  Moreover, modern dynamo models precisely reproduce the solar cycle without any planetary influence.
• a "Stone planets have a shorter cycle of about 330 days" delusion.
  No inner planet has an orbit of 330 days. There is no alignment of the 4 planets every 330 days.
• His "dark expanding pushing force" delusion.
• The idiocy of calculating an average of the orbital period of inner planets.
  This is basically treating the inner planet as a single planet .
• A delusion that an average orbit of an imaginary planet of 340.75 days explains a 330 day cycle.
• Ignorant fantasies about his 340.75 day delusion.
• A "This is exactly how the planets work deep inside the Sun".
  What planets can do is pull on the outside of the Sun.
• A "matter is completely different from what physicists currently describe matter" delusion.
  How physicists describe matter is how real matter acts in the real universe !
• An irrelevant fact that entropy works on large and small scales.
• An stupid "Why not make an impact?" question when entropy always makes an impact..
• A deluded "The assumption of no effect prevents the development of any theory of physics." lie.
  Entropy is a physical property of a system. Changes in the system change entropy, not the other way around.
• "space-expanding matter" gibberish.
• His expanding atomic nuclei/electron/photon delusions
• More "expanding pushing force", etc. delusions.
• A delusion that his "much more expanding pushing force / energy" cannot be defected.
• Usual "expanding" stuff gibberish.
• Delusions about inner planets affecting different layers of the Sun.
• A "expanding dark matter protruding inside the Sun" delusion.
• His repeated delusion that black holes emit his "expanding dark matter" delusion when black holes emit nothing .
• A "rate of expansion of these dark matter densities" delusion.
  Real dark matter has no effect on stars.
• A "densities of expanding dark energy / pushing force" delusion.
  Real dark energy is nothing to do with stars or forces.
• What may be a new delusion that matter is created at the center of planets .
• A stupid "There is evidence ..." lie when he has presented no evidence for any of his ignorant fantasies and compete gibberish in the last 12 years.
• Repeats the stupidity of citing the deluded cartoonist Neal Adams and not knowing that Adam's expanding Earth animations are a symptom of Adam's insanity, not science.
• Pixie of key's expanding atom/dark energy delusions.
• A section of "Measuring devices" gibberish.
• His "space does not radiate information." delusions when no one believes it does,
• A deluded "space does not have any property that would allow it to expand." lie.
  A fundamental property of space is distance between points.
• His deluded "The expanding space is the emperor naked." lie when he knows the overwhelming physical evidence that covers an expanding universe.
• A deluded " THE EMPEROR IS NAKED" lie when he knows THE OVERWHELMING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THAT COVERS AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE.
• Supernova and "dark expanding energy" delusions about the Sun and solar minima.
• A deluded "what miracle would entropy not affect internally on a small scale of particles / densities?" question.
  Entropy never "affects" - it is a property of systems of all scales.
• An idiotic and irrelevant "No wonder they can't combine their small-scale theories with their large-scale theories" lie.
  The reasons have nothing to do with his abysmal ignorance of and lies about physics.
• A "large-scale theory involves hokkus pokkus space" delusion.
  GR involves real space that exists in the real universe because GR has passed all of the tests that the real universe has thrown at it.
• Gibberish about space, entropy and "small-scale densities".
• "Think with the thought." stupidity when he is the one not thinking by still spewing out gibberish and fantasies after 12 years.
• A new "expand the quarks" delusios?
• "expanding dark pushing force/expanding quarks " delusions.

[Pixie of key]

There is no curving space. No expanding space. No extra dimensions.

https://youtu.be/WwlA8a7RDdI

The nuclei of atoms recycle an expanding dark pushing force that has e.g. the nature of the expanding light.

Most of the expanding light is in the form of dark waves that we detect with the help of registrable photons. Photons also expand.

Expanding photons are a very small part of the expanding light.

Most of the mass of expanding light is in the expanding waves of expanding light, which consist of a zillions discrete expanding densities that our devices cannot register.


To form a single expanding photon, these separate expanding densities are needed in zillions, which protrude from the nuclei of the expanding atoms. These densities of dark energy protruding from the nuclei of atoms group into waves as they encounter the expanding dark waves of expanding light protruding.

If an expanding photon of suitable energy protrudes towards the nucleus of the atom, i.e. a photon of suitable density and volume, it can protrude closer to the expanding atomic nucleus and encounter the expanding densities of the dark wave protruding away from the nucleus as they become more densely electronically. That is, the photons accelerate their expansion into an explosive shape, and thus they combine / create a new expanding electron.

😃😃😃

[turingtest]

Zillions!

If anyone is still wondering whether there's any actual science in all this, you can stop now.

[Little 10 Toes]

Pixie of key. Failing to follow simple experiments since 2014.

From http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=750
So, have you actually tried that rope experiment as described yet?

If not, why not?

If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?


Pixie of Key: Failing to answer direct questions and provide evidence of his idea since 2020:

From http://www.internationalskeptics.com...3#post13325963
By all means, please, show any evidence of the planets moving away from, let alone being pushed away from, the sun.

Exactly how far away from the sun has the earth moved over the past year?

By all means, please, show any evidence of the planets and/or sun expanding.

Exactly how far has the sun expanded over the past year?

By all means, please, show any evidence of the galaxy and/or the solar system expanding.

Exactly how far has the galaxy expanded over the past year?

By all means, please, show any evidence of the solar system moving away from, let alone being pushed away from, the sun.

Exactly how far away from the center of the galaxy has the solar system moved over the past year?

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

There is no curving space. No expanding space. No extra dimensions.

https://youtu.be/WwlA8a7RDdI

The nuclei of atoms recycle an expanding dark pushing force that has e.g. the nature of the expanding light.

Most of the expanding light is in the form of dark waves that we detect with the help of registrable photons. Photons also expand.

Expanding photons are a very small part of the expanding light.

Most of the mass of expanding light is in the expanding waves of expanding light, which consist of a zillions discrete expanding densities that our devices cannot register.


To form a single expanding photon, these separate expanding densities are needed in zillions, which protrude from the nuclei of the expanding atoms. These densities of dark energy protruding from the nuclei of atoms group into waves as they encounter the expanding dark waves of expanding light protruding.

If an expanding photon of suitable energy protrudes towards the nucleus of the atom, i.e. a photon of suitable density and volume, it can protrude closer to the expanding atomic nucleus and encounter the expanding densities of the dark wave protruding away from the nucleus as they become more densely electronically. That is, the photons accelerate their expansion into an explosive shape, and thus they combine / create a new expanding electron.

������

Nope, it's called pair production for a reason.

Pair production


While it is entirely up to you how you indulge in your admittedly evidence free speculative fantasies. You could at least try to get the non-make-believe parts right.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

There is no curving space. No expanding space. No extra dimensions....

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Pixie of key has another deluded video ("Expanding Black Stars emit dark expanding pushing force which have nature of expanding dark photons.").

• A "no black holes" delusion.
• Points to an artists rendition of a black hole and states his "expanding dark star" delusion - star emit light !
• His "expanding dark light" delusion - light is not dark !
• Usual "expanding/dark/pushing" idiocy for stars and atomic nuclei.
• Utter stupidity of "using your imagination" when pointing to an picture of a black hole sucking matter from its companion star.
• A star "pushing away" from the black hole delusion.
• A deluded "spiral orbit" lie. Black holes are in normal orbits around any companion star. What spirals is the matter they pull from the star.
• Repeats his decades old delusion that there are no pulling forces.
  Gravity pulls.
  Unlike charges pull on each other.
  Atomic nuclei must explode because protons push each other unless there is a pulling force holding them in.

Pixie of key repeats his idiotic lies about textbook cosmology
A crank video with Pixie of key's black hole delusions
Another Pixie of key delusion about FRB 200428
Pixie of key's gibberish and lies about the planets and Sun

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by turingtest

Zillions!

If anyone is still wondering whether there's any actual science in all this, you can stop now.

You dont understand what zillions mean?


Lets try 😃

"You may have heard that a proton is made from three quarks. Indeed here are several pages that say so. This is a lie — a white lie, but a big one. In fact there are zillions of gluons, antiquarks, and quarks in a proton. The standard shorthand, “the proton is made from two up quarks and one down quark”, is really a statement that the proton has two more up quarks than up antiquarks, and one more down quark than down antiquarks. To make the glib shorthand correct you need to add the phrase “plus zillions of gluons and zillions of quark-antiquark pairs.” Without this phrase, one’s view of the proton is so simplistic that it is not possible to understand the LHC at all."

http://profmattstrassler.com/article...proton-anyway/

Yes, you can use zillions, even it is not real number.

Try 😃

[steenkh]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Yes, you can use zillions, even it is not real number.

Possibly, but after zillions of posts, you still have not managed to include a shred of science in them.

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Originally Posted by steenkh

Possibly, but after zillions of posts, you still have not managed to include a shred of science in them.

Or even after 2,280. Still a zillion to go?

[hecd2]

Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto

Or even after 2,280. Still a zillion to go?

One post 2,280 times?

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

You dont understand what zillions mean?
...[

The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 12 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Irrelevancy about turingtest's post which was the obvious fact that zillions is not a scientific term and not used in scientific theories. Thus the persistent use of zillions shows this thread is not science.
Zillion is an English word meaning a large unknown number.
What’s a Proton, Anyway? is a blog post where Matt Strassler uses the word zillions as a description.

Pixie of key repeats his idiotic lies about textbook cosmology
A crank video with Pixie of key's black hole delusions
Another Pixie of key delusion about FRB 200428
Pixie of key's gibberish and lies about the planets and Sun
Pixie of key has another deluded video ("Expanding Black Stars emit dark expanding pushing force which have nature of expanding dark photons.").