ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old Yesterday, 08:54 PM   #1321
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 26,233
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
Then why don't they try to publish their manuscript?
At least 1 of the "three or four active threads" authors did and got published even though his fantasy is worse than 21 January 2020 philippeb8: A "historical milestone" with repeated ignorant garbage and maybe additions..

There are journals that accept just about anything. The paper was "Extension to the Cause of the Allais Effect Solved" paper in the dubious 'Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology' journal. Look it up to see what an abysmal paper it was. This is the delusion that the debated dark flow will measurably affect gravimeters here on Earth and only during solar eclipses to cause the alleged Allais effect.
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 07:24 AM   #1322
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
At least 1 of the "three or four active threads" authors did and got published even though his fantasy is worse than 21 January 2020 philippeb8: A "historical milestone" with repeated ignorant garbage and maybe additions..



There are journals that accept just about anything. The paper was "Extension to the Cause of the Allais Effect Solved" paper in the dubious 'Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology' journal. Look it up to see what an abysmal paper it was. This is the delusion that the debated dark flow will measurably affect gravimeters here on Earth and only during solar eclipses to cause the alleged Allais effect.


First time I hear Reality Check saying something intelligent...
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 08:24 AM   #1323
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,741
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
That's what I've been doing for the last 40 days here on IS + former 90 days of CQ...
If that's what you think you've been doing, then I have full confidence that you won't get through the peer review process.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 08:33 AM   #1324
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Belz... View Post
If that's what you think you've been doing, then I have full confidence that you won't get through the peer review process.


Ok so please list the questions so I can give you clear answers.
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 08:40 AM   #1325
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,741
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
Ok so please list the questions so I can give you clear answers.
You've had a LOT of opportunities to clearly answer my questions and those of other posters. I don't believe you.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 09:24 AM   #1326
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Belz... View Post
You've had a LOT of opportunities to clearly answer my questions and those of other posters. I don't believe you.


I was busy perfecting the core of the manuscript. Please reiterate.
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 09:49 AM   #1327
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 12,771
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
I was busy perfecting the core of the manuscript. Please reiterate.
To start, I suggest that you back-up your claim that the 'last 300 years of physics is wrong' even though by using the Forum you are essentially showing that the last 300 years of physics has been proven to be quite valid.
__________________
On 22 JUL 2016, Candidate Donald Trump in his acceptance speech: "There can be no prosperity without law and order."
On 05 FEB 2019, President Donald Trump said in his Sate of the Union Address: "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
On 15 FEB 2019 'BobTheCoward' said: "I constantly assert I am a fool."
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 09:52 AM   #1328
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,741
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
I was busy perfecting the core of the manuscript.
You were participating actively in the thread at the time. I don't believe you.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 10:03 AM   #1329
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Belz... View Post
You were participating actively in the thread at the time. I don't believe you.


When I have > 10 questions a day then I need to cherry pick a sampling.
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 10:05 AM   #1330
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Crossbow View Post
To start, I suggest that you back-up your claim that the 'last 300 years of physics is wrong' even though by using the Forum you are essentially showing that the last 300 years of physics has been proven to be quite valid.


How? By showing the right rotation curve then I am directly refuting Newton.
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 10:10 AM   #1331
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 12,771
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
How? By showing the right rotation curve then I am directly refuting Newton.
So what if you refute Newton?

Anyone can refute Newton, but simply refuting Newton does not automatically make that person correct.
__________________
On 22 JUL 2016, Candidate Donald Trump in his acceptance speech: "There can be no prosperity without law and order."
On 05 FEB 2019, President Donald Trump said in his Sate of the Union Address: "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
On 15 FEB 2019 'BobTheCoward' said: "I constantly assert I am a fool."
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 10:14 AM   #1332
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Crossbow View Post
So what if you refute Newton?



Anyone can refute Newton, but simply refuting Newton does not automatically make that person correct.


Well yes but the likelihood I am correct = 1.
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 10:46 AM   #1333
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,741
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
When I have > 10 questions a day then I need to cherry pick a sampling.
Yes, and you transparently avoid the questions that require substance from you and focus on the surface.

No one is fooled.

Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
Well yes but the likelihood I am correct = 1.
Show your math.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 01:15 PM   #1334
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 12,771
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
Well yes but the likelihood I am correct = 1.
If you have indeed proven that Newton was wrong, then do us all a favor publish your work.
__________________
On 22 JUL 2016, Candidate Donald Trump in his acceptance speech: "There can be no prosperity without law and order."
On 05 FEB 2019, President Donald Trump said in his Sate of the Union Address: "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
On 15 FEB 2019 'BobTheCoward' said: "I constantly assert I am a fool."
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 01:16 PM   #1335
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 26,233
Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
First time I hear Reality Check saying something intelligent...
A stupid insult when 21 January 2020 philippeb8: A "historical milestone" with repeated ignorant garbage and maybe additions. and previous posts have intelligent statements.
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 01:26 PM   #1336
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 26,233
Thumbs down Persistent lie of "showing the right rotation curve"

Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
How? By showing the right rotation curve then I am directly refuting Newton.
Persistent lie of "showing the right rotation curve when he has no fit to the actual data. He used to have a blatantly wrong galaxy rotation curve that could never fit the data, He now magically has a galaxy rotation curve generated somehow that might be able to fit the data. But we have the deep stupidity of not matching that curve to the data that has been available for about 50 years!

A "directly refuting Newton" lie. He needs to learn about his own theory which is explicitly stated to be classical. Thus no change to Newtonian gravity! What he probably has is deluded calculations using Newton similar to his debunking of FT from his calculation the distance to the Moon by laser ranging. Started with being off by 2000 kilometers and corrected a few times to be off by a few kilometers in a measurement accurate to millimeters. He cannot refute Newton by using Newton ! He has never stated a replacement for Newton's law of gravitation. He has never stated a replacement for Newton's laws of motion.

Newton explains galaxy rotation curves by adding matter. That is one of 11 lines of evidence for dark matter. He has not even refuted dark matter !

Last edited by Reality Check; Today at 01:36 PM.
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 03:27 PM   #1337
philippeb8
Muse
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
Persistent lie of "showing the right rotation curve when he has no fit to the actual data. He used to have a blatantly wrong galaxy rotation curve that could never fit the data, He now magically has a galaxy rotation curve generated somehow that might be able to fit the data. But we have the deep stupidity of not matching that curve to the data that has been available for about 50 years!



A "directly refuting Newton" lie. He needs to learn about his own theory which is explicitly stated to be classical. Thus no change to Newtonian gravity! What he probably has is deluded calculations using Newton similar to his debunking of FT from his calculation the distance to the Moon by laser ranging. Started with being off by 2000 kilometers and corrected a few times to be off by a few kilometers in a measurement accurate to millimeters. He cannot refute Newton by using Newton ! He has never stated a replacement for Newton's law of gravitation. He has never stated a replacement for Newton's laws of motion.



Newton explains galaxy rotation curves by adding matter. That is one of 11 lines of evidence for dark matter. He has not even refuted dark matter !


Reality Check thinks because dark matter was proposed 70 years ago that makes it right over time.
philippeb8 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 04:29 PM   #1338
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 26,233
Exclamation A lie and abysmal ignorance about dark matter

Originally Posted by philippeb8 View Post
Reality Check thinks because dark matter was proposed 70 years ago that makes it right over time.
A lie and abysmal ignorance about dark matter.

Anyone with knowledge of astronomy (obviously not philippeb8 !) knows that many decades of research make up the 11 lines of observational evidence which shows the existence for dark matter is almost certain. Almost because nothing in science is absolutely certain.

Dark matter was proposed in 1884 () as "dark bodies" and the first empirical evidence published in 1922 and 1933. The 1960s and 1970s analysis of galaxy rotation curves by Rubin et. al. convinced astronomers that dark matter must exist. The analysis of CMB data convinced cosmologists that dark matter must exist. The analysis of colliding galaxy clusters established that dark matter is non-baryonic matter rather than a possible modification of Newtonian dynamics (MOND).
Reality Check is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:13 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.