[Merged] Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? - Page 75

Pixie of key · 20th March 2017, 10:47 AM

The electromagnetic field is made up of particles that move in space.

the particles have a physical concretely existing.

everything that moves in space, is something other than a space.

Love
1039
☺

The Man · 20th March 2017, 11:56 AM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

The electromagnetic field is made up of particles that move in space.

What particles would those be? Did you miss the part about free space having electromagnetic properties or did you simply ignore it?

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

the particles have a physical concretely existing.

Would that include virtual particles?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

everything that moves in space, is something other than a space.

Love
1039
☺

None of which addresses the fact that free space has electromagnetic properties just like materials do.

So have you tried that rope experiment yet?

If not, why not?

If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

Reality Check · 20th March 2017, 01:50 PM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

The changing light is from changing ...

Usual gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

Reality Check · 20th March 2017, 01:53 PM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Space moves one physical concretely existing. ...

More ignorant gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

E.g. "Space = nothing" sounds like the abysmal ignorance that position (space) is vacuum (outer space).

Reality Check · 20th March 2017, 01:57 PM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

The electromagnetic field is made up of particles that move in space. ...

Abysmal ignorance from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
This is an electromagnetic field. It is the value of the electric and magnetic fields at each point in space.

The source of an electric field can be stationary charges. The source of a magnetic field is moving charged particles.

smartcooky · 20th March 2017, 02:09 PM

Ever read one of those books where you read a paragraph and the language is so obscure that at the end of it, you are at a complete loss as to what the author was saying? (Poul Anderson comes to mind)

Well, this thread is just like that. I have no idea what the OP is saying/claiming/refuting.

MikeG · 20th March 2017, 02:12 PM

Originally Posted by Porpoise of Life

December 26th and 27th... .....

My point was to try to get the OP to consider the clarity of the his/ her post, and try to improve the experience for the reader next time.

MikeG · 20th March 2017, 02:13 PM

Originally Posted by smartcooky

Ever read one of those books where you read a paragraph and the language is so obscure that at the end of it, you are at a complete loss as to what the author was saying? (Poul Anderson comes to mind)

Well, this thread is just like that. I have no idea what the OP is saying/claiming/refuting.

We're rather spoiled for choice at the moment when it comes to incomprehensible posters.

Sherman Bay · 20th March 2017, 02:15 PM

What is asserted without logic can be dismissed without reason.

smartcooky · 20th March 2017, 03:28 PM

Originally Posted by Sherman Bay

What is asserted without logic can be dismissed without reason.

Excellent! A great paraphrase Hitchens' Razor!

Jim_MDP · 20th March 2017, 04:35 PM

Crap!

GOP gets wind of this thread... they'll be wanting to rename December.

Reality Check · 20th March 2017, 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

What really happend 2004 christmas 26.

What really happened was the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami.

What is happening in this thread is an incoherent story about an imaginary "energypulse" from a magnetar doing stuff on Earth.
What may happen to this thread is a merger with almost 9 years of similar stories from Pixie of key: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? (27 September 2008)

smartcooky · 21st March 2017, 02:15 AM

Originally Posted by Reality Check

What really happened was the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami.

What is happening in this thread is an incoherent story about an imaginary "energypulse" from a magnetar doing stuff on Earth.
What may happen to this thread is a merger with almost 9 years of similar stories from Pixie of key: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? (27 September 2008)

So to sum it up, its what Texans call "a whole bunch o' hooey"

fagin · 21st March 2017, 02:25 AM

Originally Posted by smartcooky

Ever read one of those books where you read a paragraph and the language is so obscure that at the end of it, you are at a complete loss as to what the author was saying? (Poul Anderson comes to mind)

Well, this thread is just like that. I have no idea what the OP is saying/claiming/refuting.

Using Poul Anderson in this thread is a travesty. Some of my favourite books.

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 03:41 AM

For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum

Video for you

https://youtu.be/A-45AqYtkFw

I hope, you make a video where you tell me what happening for expanding space when space metric coordinate getting bigger.

I already know. You can explain that!

Love
1039
☺

Norman Alexander · 21st March 2017, 04:03 AM

About 4:30, I think, and it terminates at the Town Hall.

Jim_MDP · 21st March 2017, 04:31 AM

"... maybe this is too much for you?" (repeat ad nauseum)

No.

Maybe you haven't the grasp of English you think you have, or need, to overcome your heavy accent (hell... we can hear it in your writing). Or the rapid pace of your speaking (I honestly can't tell what you're saying... or trying to convey).

Or maybe you're the new Borat.

Who knows.

Porpoise of Life · 21st March 2017, 04:37 AM

You had me at "phusical space congrate which moowing in space."

ETA: Your proposition to replace quantum mechanics with "more and more pushing force" intrigues me.

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 05:09 AM

Visible universe expanding.

Yes, it expanding, because it is expanding pushing force.

Expanding particle recycling expanding pushing force.

And faster and faster expanding visible universe moving faster and faster some direction "in" infinity space which is nothing.

Space cant change at any way.

It is nothing, just a stage where something concrete physical existence of the expanding force of injecting consist of expanding a condensation circulate among themselves an expanding pushing force.

It takes thousands or maybe millions billions years, but finally we are all behind extremely fast movement which get new expanding nucleus of atoms expanding faster and faster.

Love
1039
☺

Peregrinus · 21st March 2017, 05:27 AM

Same blathering blither repeated remains repeated blathering blither.

Porpoise of Life · 21st March 2017, 05:28 AM

Hearing his actual speech patterns did make his written text a lot less mysterious to me though.

MikeG · 21st March 2017, 05:29 AM

"The man". Which one? Which individual is this thread aimed at?

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 05:37 AM

Originally Posted by MikeG

"The man". Which one? Which individual is this thread aimed at?

.
All Men. Also that who write with nickname The Man. Even if that person, which write with nickname The Man, is woman.

Rakkautta
1039
☺

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 05:41 AM

From black holes to helium

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-black-holes-helium.html

From Black Holes?

Rakkautta
1039
☺

aleCcowaN · 21st March 2017, 05:55 AM

Latka Gravas would have said it in a clearer way, and made more sense.

I couldn't get passed the "I have the largest dick" part, you know, "you can explain, you can explain but I can explain".

MikeG · 21st March 2017, 05:57 AM

If you know the difference between "man" (singular) and "men" (plural) why go to all the trouble of using the wrong one in your sentence? Further, if "The man" actually means "everyone", why not just use "everyone"? It's almost like the entire purpose of your OP is to confuse.

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 06:16 AM

Originally Posted by MikeG

If you know the difference between "man" (singular) and "men" (plural) why go to all the trouble of using the wrong one in your sentence? Further, if "The man" actually means "everyone", why not just use "everyone"? It's almost like the entire purpose of your OP is to confuse.

.

My answer was stupid, because you question was stupid.

Love
1039
☺

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 06:17 AM

For The Man

For the man

Love
1039
☺

Porpoise of Life · 21st March 2017, 06:24 AM

That post is an excellent rebuttal to your signature.

MikeG · 21st March 2017, 06:32 AM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

.

My answer was stupid, because you question was stupid.

Love
1039
☺

Your answer wasn't stupid. Your OP was. Use words properly, or as near properly as you can, and communication will work much better. At the moment, it's just gibberish from you, so no one has the foggiest idea what the hell you are on about most of the time.

fuelair · 21st March 2017, 06:36 AM

Originally Posted by Jim_MDP

"... maybe this is too much for you?" (repeat ad nauseum)

No.

Maybe you haven't the grasp of English you think you have, or need, to overcome your heavy accent (hell... we can hear it in your writing). Or the rapid pace of your speaking (I honestly can't tell what you're saying... or trying to convey).

Or maybe you're the new Borat.

Who knows.

Not as funny, by a load, as Borat. And I do not find Borat funny - oif you get my drift and I doubt he does!!!

fuelair · 21st March 2017, 06:41 AM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Visible universe expanding.

Yes, it expanding, because it is expanding pushing force.

Expanding particle recycling expanding pushing force.

And faster and faster expanding visible universe moving faster and faster some direction "in" infinity space which is nothing.

Space cant change at any way.

It is nothing, just a stage where something concrete physical existence of the expanding force of injecting consist of expanding a condensation circulate among themselves an expanding pushing force.

It takes thousands or maybe millions billions years, but finally we are all behind extremely fast movement which get new expanding nucleus of atoms expanding faster and faster.

Love
1039
☺

I assure you the colored and embiggened I improved on above (aka FTFY) is wrong in so many ways that it alone kills the rest of your writing. This is not the first time that has been the case.

Pixie of key · 21st March 2017, 06:52 AM

Originally Posted by fuelair

I assure you the colored and embiggened I improved on above (aka FTFY) is wrong in so many ways that it alone kills the rest of your writing. This is not the first time that has been the case.

Maybe it is too much for you ?!?

Space is infinity.

There is everywhere areas where is born new expanding nucleus of atoms right now.

Very very far away outside expanding visible universe.

Too much for you.

Also yours body nucleus of atoms expanding all a time and recycling expanding pushing force with each other.

Are you afraid of it?

Love
1039
☺

abaddon · 21st March 2017, 07:16 AM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

What really happend 2004 christmas 26.

https://youtu.be/UDLDU10O7uI

I think that energypulse from magnetar had a pilotwave which was here one day before very strong energypulse 27 christmas 2004.

Love
1039
☺

Wow. One of the most incoherent videos ever inflicted on yooboob.

Giordano · 21st March 2017, 07:27 AM

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Maybe it is too much for you ?!?

Space is infinity.

There is everywhere areas where is born new expanding nucleus of atoms right now.

Very very far away outside expanding visible universe.

Too much for you.

Also yours body nucleus of atoms expanding all a time and recycling expanding pushing force with each other.

Are you afraid of it?

Love
1039
☺

I know you are seeking The Man from international SKEPTICS forum, and even though I am a guy I doubt I am the Man who you are looking for. But if I might be allowed to reply as one of the Men of ISF (I understand that we are issuing a cheesecake-like, semi-nude photo calendar as a fund raiser next New Year, although it probably will be a pay-if-you-don't-want-to-see-it kind of deal):

Speaking only for myself, I am not only afraid, but I am terrified by your theory of pushy, expanding, rebirthing, recycling atoms (assuming I got even that much correct from your posts). It is too much for me. Way too much. Even unbelievable one might say. But as has been said so many times- theories offered without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Of course there is enormous evidence against your theory- I just can't see how I can communicate the entire contents of any college physics library to you through the internet. Nor do I, given you could easily find much of this yourself on the web, think that you would bother to examine anything I sent you.

If "Math without words is meaningless" [and] "Words without math can have meaning" then what do "Words without meaning" have?

aleCcowaN · 21st March 2017, 07:34 AM

Why doesn't this pixie of key person have a dedicated exclusive thread like so many other ... gentlefolk ... here? You know, like any other "boogaloo" thread.

Giordano · 21st March 2017, 07:47 AM

Originally Posted by aleCcowaN

Why doesn't this pixie of key person have a dedicated exclusive thread like so many other ... gentlefolk ... here? You know, like any other "boogaloo" thread.

I'd vote for it!

Has anyone made this suggestion to the mods?

Steve001 · 21st March 2017, 07:55 AM

It's easier to understand PoK in his native tongue.
https://youtu.be/M2DSuDoVmTg. By the way what is a pixie of key?

CORed · 21st March 2017, 08:33 AM

Originally Posted by Steve001

It's easier to understand PoK in his native tongue.
https://youtu.be/M2DSuDoVmTg. By the way what is a pixie of key?

Given that I don't know any Finnish at all, it's a tossup whether he is more understandable in English or Finnish.

The Man · 21st March 2017, 10:01 AM

Originally Posted by aleCcowaN

Why doesn't this pixie of key person have a dedicated exclusive thread like so many other ... gentlefolk ... here? You know, like any other "boogaloo" thread.

He does.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=124956

I have reported the OP here, that it should be merged.

20th March 2017, 10:47 AM	#2961
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	The electromagnetic field is made up of particles that move in space. the particles have a physical concretely existing. everything that moves in space, is something other than a space. Love 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning."

20th March 2017, 11:56 AM	#2962
The Man Scourge, of the supernatural Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY Posts: 11,566	Originally Posted by Pixie of key The electromagnetic field is made up of particles that move in space. What particles would those be? Did you miss the part about free space having electromagnetic properties or did you simply ignore it? Originally Posted by Pixie of key the particles have a physical concretely existing. Would that include virtual particles? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle Originally Posted by Pixie of key everything that moves in space, is something other than a space. Love 1039 ☺ None of which addresses the fact that free space has electromagnetic properties just like materials do. So have you tried that rope experiment yet? If not, why not? If so, why haven't you reported what you found?
	__________________ BRAINZZZZZZZZ

20th March 2017, 01:50 PM	#2963
Reality Check Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New Zealand Posts: 19,459	Originally Posted by Pixie of key The changing light is from changing ... Usual gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
	__________________ NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist!

20th March 2017, 01:53 PM	#2964
Reality Check Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New Zealand Posts: 19,459	Originally Posted by Pixie of key Space moves one physical concretely existing. ... More ignorant gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos. E.g. "Space = nothing" sounds like the abysmal ignorance that position (space) is vacuum (outer space).
	__________________ NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist!

20th March 2017, 01:57 PM	#2965
Reality Check Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New Zealand Posts: 19,459	Originally Posted by Pixie of key The electromagnetic field is made up of particles that move in space. ... Abysmal ignorance from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos. This is an electromagnetic field. It is the value of the electric and magnetic fields at each point in space. The source of an electric field can be stationary charges. The source of a magnetic field is moving charged particles.
	__________________ NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist!

20th March 2017, 02:09 PM	#2966
smartcooky Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Nelson, New Zealand Posts: 5,741	Ever read one of those books where you read a paragraph and the language is so obscure that at the end of it, you are at a complete loss as to what the author was saying? (Poul Anderson comes to mind) Well, this thread is just like that. I have no idea what the OP is saying/claiming/refuting.
	__________________ _{► 9/11 was a terrorist attack by Islamic extremists; 12 Apollo astronauts really did walk on the Moon; JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald,who acted alone. ► Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed. - Jay Utah ► Heisenberg's Law - The weirdness of the Universe is inversely proportional to the scale at which you observe it, or not.}

20th March 2017, 02:12 PM	#2967
MikeG Now. Do it now. Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: UK Posts: 17,810	Originally Posted by Porpoise of Life December 26th and 27th... ..... My point was to try to get the OP to consider the clarity of the his/ her post, and try to improve the experience for the reader next time.
	__________________ After a while you can work on points for style Like the club tie, and the firm handshake, A certain look in the eye and an easy smile

20th March 2017, 02:13 PM	#2968
MikeG Now. Do it now. Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: UK Posts: 17,810	Originally Posted by smartcooky Ever read one of those books where you read a paragraph and the language is so obscure that at the end of it, you are at a complete loss as to what the author was saying? (Poul Anderson comes to mind) Well, this thread is just like that. I have no idea what the OP is saying/claiming/refuting. We're rather spoiled for choice at the moment when it comes to incomprehensible posters.
	__________________ After a while you can work on points for style Like the club tie, and the firm handshake, A certain look in the eye and an easy smile

20th March 2017, 02:15 PM	#2969
Sherman Bay Master Poster Join Date: May 2002 Location: Wisconsin, USA Posts: 2,058	What is asserted without logic can be dismissed without reason.

20th March 2017, 03:28 PM	#2970
smartcooky Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Nelson, New Zealand Posts: 5,741	Originally Posted by Sherman Bay What is asserted without logic can be dismissed without reason. Excellent! A great paraphrase Hitchens' Razor!
	__________________ _{► 9/11 was a terrorist attack by Islamic extremists; 12 Apollo astronauts really did walk on the Moon; JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald,who acted alone. ► Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed. - Jay Utah ► Heisenberg's Law - The weirdness of the Universe is inversely proportional to the scale at which you observe it, or not.}

20th March 2017, 04:35 PM	#2971
Jim_MDP Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: N.Cal/S.Or Posts: 5,286	Crap! GOP gets wind of this thread... they'll be wanting to rename December.
	__________________ ---------------------- Anything goes in the Goblin hut... anything. "Suggesting spurious explanations isn't relevant to my work." -- WTC Dust. "Both cannot be simultaneously true, and so one may conclude neither is true, and if neither is true, then Apollo is fraudulent." -- Patrick1000.

20th March 2017, 06:45 PM	#2972
Reality Check Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New Zealand Posts: 19,459	Originally Posted by Pixie of key What really happend 2004 christmas 26. What really happened was the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. What is happening in this thread is an incoherent story about an imaginary "energypulse" from a magnetar doing stuff on Earth. What may happen to this thread is a merger with almost 9 years of similar stories from Pixie of key: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? (27 September 2008)
	__________________ NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! Last edited by Reality Check; 20th March 2017 at 06:48 PM.

21st March 2017, 02:15 AM	#2973
smartcooky Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Nelson, New Zealand Posts: 5,741	Originally Posted by Reality Check What really happened was the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. What is happening in this thread is an incoherent story about an imaginary "energypulse" from a magnetar doing stuff on Earth. What may happen to this thread is a merger with almost 9 years of similar stories from Pixie of key: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? (27 September 2008) So to sum it up, its what Texans call "a whole bunch o' hooey"
	__________________ _{► 9/11 was a terrorist attack by Islamic extremists; 12 Apollo astronauts really did walk on the Moon; JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald,who acted alone. ► Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed. - Jay Utah ► Heisenberg's Law - The weirdness of the Universe is inversely proportional to the scale at which you observe it, or not.}

21st March 2017, 02:25 AM	#2974
fagin Illuminator Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: As far away from casebro as possible. Posts: 3,958	Originally Posted by smartcooky Ever read one of those books where you read a paragraph and the language is so obscure that at the end of it, you are at a complete loss as to what the author was saying? (Poul Anderson comes to mind) Well, this thread is just like that. I have no idea what the OP is saying/claiming/refuting. Using Poul Anderson in this thread is a travesty. Some of my favourite books.
	__________________ There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda

21st March 2017, 03:41 AM	#2975
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum Video for you https://youtu.be/A-45AqYtkFw I hope, you make a video where you tell me what happening for expanding space when space metric coordinate getting bigger. I already know. You can explain that! Love 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning."

21st March 2017, 04:03 AM	#2976
Norman Alexander Master Poster Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 2,052	About 4:30, I think, and it terminates at the Town Hall.
	__________________ _{...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015}

21st March 2017, 04:31 AM	#2977
Jim_MDP Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: N.Cal/S.Or Posts: 5,286	"... maybe this is too much for you?" (repeat ad nauseum) No. Maybe you haven't the grasp of English you think you have, or need, to overcome your heavy accent (hell... we can hear it in your writing). Or the rapid pace of your speaking (I honestly can't tell what you're saying... or trying to convey). Or maybe you're the new Borat. Who knows.
	__________________ ---------------------- Anything goes in the Goblin hut... anything. "Suggesting spurious explanations isn't relevant to my work." -- WTC Dust. "Both cannot be simultaneously true, and so one may conclude neither is true, and if neither is true, then Apollo is fraudulent." -- Patrick1000.

21st March 2017, 04:37 AM	#2978
Porpoise of Life Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,509	You had me at "phusical space congrate which moowing in space." ETA: Your proposition to replace quantum mechanics with "more and more pushing force" intrigues me.
	Last edited by Porpoise of Life; 21st March 2017 at 04:40 AM.

21st March 2017, 05:09 AM	#2979
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	Visible universe expanding. Yes, it expanding, because it is expanding pushing force. Expanding particle recycling expanding pushing force. And faster and faster expanding visible universe moving faster and faster some direction "in" infinity space which is nothing. Space cant change at any way. It is nothing, just a stage where something concrete physical existence of the expanding force of injecting consist of expanding a condensation circulate among themselves an expanding pushing force. It takes thousands or maybe millions billions years, but finally we are all behind extremely fast movement which get new expanding nucleus of atoms expanding faster and faster. Love 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." Last edited by Pixie of key; 21st March 2017 at 05:11 AM.

21st March 2017, 05:27 AM	#2980
Peregrinus Muse Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 598	Same blathering blither repeated remains repeated blathering blither.
Peregrinus Muse Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 598

21st March 2017, 05:28 AM	#2981
Porpoise of Life Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,509	Hearing his actual speech patterns did make his written text a lot less mysterious to me though.

21st March 2017, 05:29 AM	#2982
MikeG Now. Do it now. Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: UK Posts: 17,810	"*The man*". Which one? Which individual is this thread aimed at?
	__________________ After a while you can work on points for style Like the club tie, and the firm handshake, A certain look in the eye and an easy smile

21st March 2017, 05:37 AM	#2983
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	Originally Posted by MikeG "*The man*". Which one? Which individual is this thread aimed at? . All Men. Also that who write with nickname The Man. Even if that person, which write with nickname The Man, is woman. Rakkautta 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning."

21st March 2017, 05:41 AM	#2984
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	From black holes to helium https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-black-holes-helium.html From Black Holes? Rakkautta 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning."

21st March 2017, 05:55 AM	#2985
aleCcowaN imperfecto del subjuntivo Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer... Posts: 7,389	Latka Gravas would have said it in a clearer way, and made more sense. I couldn't get passed the "I have the largest dick" part, you know, "you can explain, you can explain but I can explain".
	__________________ Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated! These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out. I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.

21st March 2017, 05:57 AM	#2986
MikeG Now. Do it now. Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: UK Posts: 17,810	If you know the difference between "man" (singular) and "men" (plural) why go to all the trouble of using the wrong one in your sentence? Further, if "The man" actually means "everyone", why not just use "everyone"? It's almost like the entire purpose of your OP is to confuse.
	__________________ After a while you can work on points for style Like the club tie, and the firm handshake, A certain look in the eye and an easy smile

21st March 2017, 06:16 AM	#2987
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	Originally Posted by MikeG If you know the difference between "man" (singular) and "men" (plural) why go to all the trouble of using the wrong one in your sentence? Further, if "The man" actually means "everyone", why not just use "everyone"? It's almost like the entire purpose of your OP is to confuse. . My answer was stupid, because you question was stupid. Love 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." Last edited by Pixie of key; 21st March 2017 at 06:26 AM.

21st March 2017, 06:17 AM	#2988
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	For The Man For the man Love 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." Last edited by Pixie of key; 21st March 2017 at 06:24 AM.

21st March 2017, 06:24 AM	#2989
Porpoise of Life Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,509	That post is an excellent rebuttal to your signature.

21st March 2017, 06:32 AM	#2990
MikeG Now. Do it now. Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: UK Posts: 17,810	Originally Posted by Pixie of key . My answer was stupid, because you question was stupid. Love 1039 ☺ Your answer wasn't stupid. Your OP was. Use words properly, or as near properly as you can, and communication will work much better. At the moment, it's just gibberish from you, so no one has the foggiest idea what the hell you are on about most of the time.
	__________________ After a while you can work on points for style Like the club tie, and the firm handshake, A certain look in the eye and an easy smile

21st March 2017, 06:36 AM	#2991
fuelair Cythraul Enfys Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 53,269	Originally Posted by Jim_MDP "... maybe this is too much for you?" (repeat ad nauseum) No. Maybe you haven't the grasp of English you think you have, or need, to overcome your heavy accent (hell... we can hear it in your writing). Or the rapid pace of your speaking (I honestly can't tell what you're saying... or trying to convey). Or maybe you're the new Borat. Who knows. Not as funny, by a load, as Borat. And I do not find Borat funny - oif you get my drift and I doubt he does!!!
fuelair Cythraul Enfys Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 53,269	__________________ There is no problem so great that it cannot be fixed by small explosives carefully placed. Wash this space! We fight for the Lady Babylon!!!

21st March 2017, 06:41 AM	#2992
fuelair Cythraul Enfys Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 53,269	Originally Posted by Pixie of key Visible universe expanding. Yes, it expanding, because it is expanding pushing force. Expanding particle recycling expanding pushing force. And faster and faster expanding visible universe moving faster and faster some direction "in" infinity space which is nothing. Space cant change at any way. It is nothing, just a stage where something concrete physical existence of the expanding force of injecting consist of expanding a condensation circulate among themselves an expanding pushing force. It takes thousands or maybe millions billions years, but finally we are all behind extremely fast movement which get new expanding nucleus of atoms expanding faster and faster. Love 1039 ☺ I assure you the colored and embiggened I improved on above (aka FTFY) is wrong in so many ways that it alone kills the rest of your writing. This is not the first time that has been the case.
fuelair Cythraul Enfys Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 53,269	__________________ There is no problem so great that it cannot be fixed by small explosives carefully placed. Wash this space! We fight for the Lady Babylon!!!

21st March 2017, 06:52 AM	#2993
Pixie of key Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,482	Originally Posted by fuelair I assure you the colored and embiggened I improved on above (aka FTFY) is wrong in so many ways that it alone kills the rest of your writing. This is not the first time that has been the case. Maybe it is too much for you ?!? Space is infinity. There is everywhere areas where is born new expanding nucleus of atoms right now. Very very far away outside expanding visible universe. Too much for you. Also yours body nucleus of atoms expanding all a time and recycling expanding pushing force with each other. Are you afraid of it? Love 1039 ☺
	__________________ Originally Posted by Maartenn100 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning."

21st March 2017, 07:16 AM	#2994
abaddon Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 14,471	Originally Posted by Pixie of key What really happend 2004 christmas 26. https://youtu.be/UDLDU10O7uI I think that energypulse from magnetar had a pilotwave which was here one day before very strong energypulse 27 christmas 2004. Love 1039 ☺ Wow. One of the most incoherent videos ever inflicted on yooboob.
	__________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?

21st March 2017, 07:27 AM	#2995
Giordano Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 12,536	Originally Posted by Pixie of key Maybe it is too much for you ?!? Space is infinity. There is everywhere areas where is born new expanding nucleus of atoms right now. Very very far away outside expanding visible universe. Too much for you. Also yours body nucleus of atoms expanding all a time and recycling expanding pushing force with each other. Are you afraid of it? Love 1039 ☺ I know you are seeking The Man from international SKEPTICS forum, and even though I am a guy I doubt I am the Man who you are looking for. But if I might be allowed to reply as one of the Men of ISF (I understand that we are issuing a cheesecake-like, semi-nude photo calendar as a fund raiser next New Year, although it probably will be a pay-if-you-don't-want-to-see-it kind of deal): Speaking only for myself, I am not only afraid, but I am terrified by your theory of pushy, expanding, rebirthing, recycling atoms (assuming I got even that much correct from your posts). It is too much for me. Way too much. Even unbelievable one might say. But as has been said so many times- theories offered without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Of course there is enormous evidence against your theory- I just can't see how I can communicate the entire contents of any college physics library to you through the internet. Nor do I, given you could easily find much of this yourself on the web, think that you would bother to examine anything I sent you. If "Math without words is meaningless" [and] "Words without math can have meaning" then what do "Words without meaning" have?
	Last edited by Giordano; 21st March 2017 at 07:29 AM.