IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags 2020 elections , donald trump , election conspiracies , Jenna Ellis , Lin Wood , rudy giuliani , Sidney Powell

Closed Thread
Old 29th November 2020, 10:29 PM   #881
Meadmaker
Penultimate Amazing
 
Meadmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 26,874
Originally Posted by Robin View Post
From the article they are requesting the Braynard data, ie the survey of Republican registered voters for whom ballots have been requested, but were not counted.

I believe the allegation is that many of these ballots were not requested by the voter in question and therefore requested by someone not the voter.

I will be interested to see what they turn up there.
Well that's pretty darned easy to check up on, isn't it?

Did you request a ballot?
Did you turn it in?
Can you sign this?

Be aware that submitting false information to the FBI is a crime. Do you want to revise any of your previous statements?
__________________
Proud of every silver medal I've ever received.
Meadmaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 10:32 PM   #882
GraculusTheGreenBird
Critical Thinker
 
GraculusTheGreenBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 394
My god, is Bubba still banging on about Dominion, despite the manual recounts matching voter machine tallies?

Surely, nobody could be actually STUPID enough to believe fraud claims after that definitive proof?

Could they?
GraculusTheGreenBird is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 10:50 PM   #883
Minoosh
Penultimate Amazing
 
Minoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,465
0
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Sounds like you'd say its really over, and there will be no fraud dramas unfolding in and out of courtrooms this week and next week.


What if it turns out differently??
Inductive reasoning. Out of 33 suits, 31 were dismissed (numbers somewhat dated) because Trump's legal team doesn't know or doesn't seem to know that claims must be supported with evidence that directly relates to that specific assertion. Not reports of something that happened or could have happened in a foreign country years ago. It just doesn't work that way.

Judge: What is your evidence of widespread fraud?
Powell: Something happened years ago in the Philippines. Hugo Chavez may have used Dominion software to cheat. Down-ticked Republicans got more votes than Trump. Etc., etc., etc.

Judge: What is your evidence of widespread fraud? (ETA: in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?)

Last edited by Minoosh; 29th November 2020 at 11:07 PM.
Minoosh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 10:55 PM   #884
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
So, is it safe to assume you are certain that all claims of fraud will be proven to be bogus??
Nope. I'm pretty sure the Trump Organisation will be indicted for tax fraud and/or securities fraud.

I'm moderately expecting the Trump Organisation will be indicted for donation fraud for unconscionable and misleading conduct like Steve Bannon.

Matthew Ellard is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 11:02 PM   #885
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Would they be they the same sources censoring stories about Hunter's laptop, and Tara Reid?
No news source is censoring "Hunter Biden's laptop" Bubba.

What happened was that the Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell comedy show pushed all other comedy stories out of newspapers.


What is Stormfront telling you about "Hunter Biden's laptop"?
Matthew Ellard is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 11:02 PM   #886
Minoosh
Penultimate Amazing
 
Minoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,465
To Bubba, again:
Originally Posted by Minoosh View Post
Now, where is it reported that the FBI is looking for evidence?
Minoosh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 11:05 PM   #887
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
What else have you missed??
Did Trump finish the wall? Did Mexico pay for it? Did Trump replace Obamacare? Did Covid-19 "turn the corner" during the election?

Tell us Bubba....using all your extremist right wing "news" sources.

Matthew Ellard is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 11:27 PM   #888
Norman Alexander
Penultimate Amazing
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Gundungurra
Posts: 10,793
Originally Posted by Minoosh View Post
0Inductive reasoning. Out of 33 suits, 31 were dismissed (numbers somewhat dated) because Trump's legal team doesn't know or doesn't seem to know that claims must be supported with evidence that directly relates to that specific assertion. Not reports of something that happened or could have happened in a foreign country years ago. It just doesn't work that way.

Judge: What is your evidence of widespread fraud?
Powell: Something happened years ago in the Philippines. Hugo Chavez may have used Dominion software to cheat. Down-ticked Republicans got more votes than Trump. Etc., etc., etc.

Judge: What is your evidence of widespread fraud? (ETA: in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?)
It would appear they are wanting these all to fail. Every single one. It's so they can eventually take their appeal to the US Supreme Court, argue that nobody and their dog is giving poor widdle president Trump-wumpy an even break, and thus get themselves an amazing automatic win because they stacked the SCOTUS so hard.

It's a great strategy, certain to succeed.

__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015

Last edited by Norman Alexander; 29th November 2020 at 11:28 PM.
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 11:37 PM   #889
DevilsAdvocate
Philosopher
 
DevilsAdvocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,038
Originally Posted by Meadmaker View Post
Well that's pretty darned easy to check up on, isn't it?

Did you request a ballot?
Did you turn it in?
Can you sign this?

Be aware that submitting false information to the FBI is a crime. Do you want to revise any of your previous statements?
I think Braynard is reporting some interesting data. What you are asking for is what Braynard did. They got the publicly available state data for voters that shows whether they requested an absentee ballot and whether they voted. They called some of those voters that were marked as being sent an absentee ballot but who were not marked as voted. A large number said that they had not requested an absentee ballot. Of those who said they did get a ballot, many said that they had returned it, even though their vote had not been counted according to state records. He says he has recordings of the calls.

Something isn't right. But I don't know what it is. My guess would be that it is an error on the part of Braynard. I don't think it said what state. That could make a big difference.

There is also something weird about the claim. If a high percentage of people who were recorded as being sent a ballot but not voting reported that they never received a ballot...then, what? They didn't ask for a ballot, they didn't get a ballot, they didn't vote, and they didn't have a vote counted. So, no affect on the election results. But a curiosity that could be looked into.

Also, voters who say they did request a ballot and got one and sent it in but no vote counted. Now we have narrowed down the group largely to voters who had absentee ballots rejected due to signatures, missing envelopes, and so on that Republicans have asked to disqualify ballots. So the number may not be surprising. But, if there is any error that it shows, it would be that many people mailed in valid ballots that were not counted, and we know that the mail-in ballots typically largely favored Biden. So, maybe, possibly, Biden won by more than we think, if this claim is true.

He also says he has data of people voting in different states. This comes up almost every election. It is almost always similar names to data entry errors that connect two voters who are not actually the same.

He also reports on voter registrations for addresses that are USPS, UPS, and FexEx postal centers where they list what would be that box number as an "Apt" or "Unit". He says a post office box is not allowed as an address for voter registration (which I know is typically true, because it does not establish residency). But I'm not sure about using something like a UPS store. I know homeless people will sometimes use a UPS box because they don't have a permanent residence but still need to be able to get mail. HE gives some examples, but not any numbers. The big question would be how many instances of this there are. A lot: possible mass fraud of indelible voters. A few: probably homeless people and others who use these type of services for various reasons as their address.

I am curious about the jurisdiction of the FBI in this case. Elections are run by states. Federal law for elections is mostly campaign finance and some issues of interference with elections and threatening candidates and similar stuff. This all seems like accusations of violations of state law. Also, he says he analyzed the data for swing states, but the request for his data is coming from an FBI office in....Los Angeles. Curious.
__________________
I don't need to fight to prove I'm right. - Baba O'Riley
DevilsAdvocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th November 2020, 11:52 PM   #890
Norman Alexander
Penultimate Amazing
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Gundungurra
Posts: 10,793
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
I think Braynard is reporting some interesting data. What you are asking for is what Braynard did. They got the publicly available state data for voters that shows whether they requested an absentee ballot and whether they voted. They called some of those voters that were marked as being sent an absentee ballot but who were not marked as voted. A large number said that they had not requested an absentee ballot. Of those who said they did get a ballot, many said that they had returned it, even though their vote had not been counted according to state records. He says he has recordings of the calls.

Something isn't right. But I don't know what it is. My guess would be that it is an error on the part of Braynard. I don't think it said what state. That could make a big difference.

There is also something weird about the claim. If a high percentage of people who were recorded as being sent a ballot but not voting reported that they never received a ballot...then, what? They didn't ask for a ballot, they didn't get a ballot, they didn't vote, and they didn't have a vote counted. So, no affect on the election results. But a curiosity that could be looked into.

Also, voters who say they did request a ballot and got one and sent it in but no vote counted. Now we have narrowed down the group largely to voters who had absentee ballots rejected due to signatures, missing envelopes, and so on that Republicans have asked to disqualify ballots. So the number may not be surprising. But, if there is any error that it shows, it would be that many people mailed in valid ballots that were not counted, and we know that the mail-in ballots typically largely favored Biden. So, maybe, possibly, Biden won by more than we think, if this claim is true.

He also says he has data of people voting in different states. This comes up almost every election. It is almost always similar names to data entry errors that connect two voters who are not actually the same.

He also reports on voter registrations for addresses that are USPS, UPS, and FexEx postal centers where they list what would be that box number as an "Apt" or "Unit". He says a post office box is not allowed as an address for voter registration (which I know is typically true, because it does not establish residency). But I'm not sure about using something like a UPS store. I know homeless people will sometimes use a UPS box because they don't have a permanent residence but still need to be able to get mail. HE gives some examples, but not any numbers. The big question would be how many instances of this there are. A lot: possible mass fraud of indelible voters. A few: probably homeless people and others who use these type of services for various reasons as their address.

I am curious about the jurisdiction of the FBI in this case. Elections are run by states. Federal law for elections is mostly campaign finance and some issues of interference with elections and threatening candidates and similar stuff. This all seems like accusations of violations of state law. Also, he says he analyzed the data for swing states, but the request for his data is coming from an FBI office in....Los Angeles. Curious.
There's other categories of respondents: People who lied to Braynard, and people who remembered wrong.

Q: Did you ask for a mail-in ballot?
A: Sure!
Q: Did you get it sent to you?
A: Sure!
Q: Did you complete it properly and send it in on time?
A: Sure!
Q: And you checked it was not registered as a vote?
A: Sure!

Four opportunities to lie. Or "misremember".


There are plenty of disgruntled Trump supporters who are not above shooting people in the streets to support their Trumpy convictions. So lying to a phone survey would be small fry. Nobody would know for sure if they did or did not submit a valid ballot. But it sure helps the Trump storyline if they say they didn't.

Then there are people who simply misremember. Often they are befuddled and bewildered about the whole voting thing in the first place. Perhaps they have confused the 2020 vote for the one in 2018, or even 2016. Or the last local council elections, or whatever. Maybe someone told them they must have done it wrong, even if they did it right. Honestly, some of the stories coming out by people cross-eyedly convinced the socialists are coming to steal their gunz and precious bodily fluids if they so much as whisper Obama's name or say the word "Democrat" without sneering...misremembering is the least of their problems.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 12:11 AM   #891
DevilsAdvocate
Philosopher
 
DevilsAdvocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,038
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
There's other categories of respondents: People who lied to Braynard, and people who remembered wrong.

<snip>

Then there are people who simply misremember.
Maybe. The numbers he reports are pretty high to account for those explanations. But it is hard to tell without a lot more information.

We don't even know if he was calling the right people. Before the election I was getting a ton of texts from political organizations. Referring to me by name. Except, the wrong name. Three different wrong names.

I looked up data on my phone number. I have had the same number for about 13 years. The first names they were using in the text were the names of people who had my phone number 15-25 years ago.

There are all kinds of errors Braynard may have made. Or that the state may have made. But the information provided is not easily explained by...anything. So something somewhere is wrong for some reason that we don't have enough data to determine. We will see how this goes.
__________________
I don't need to fight to prove I'm right. - Baba O'Riley
DevilsAdvocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 03:13 AM   #892
Norman Alexander
Penultimate Amazing
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Gundungurra
Posts: 10,793
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
Maybe. The numbers he reports are pretty high to account for those explanations. But it is hard to tell without a lot more information.

We don't even know if he was calling the right people. Before the election I was getting a ton of texts from political organizations. Referring to me by name. Except, the wrong name. Three different wrong names.

I looked up data on my phone number. I have had the same number for about 13 years. The first names they were using in the text were the names of people who had my phone number 15-25 years ago.

There are all kinds of errors Braynard may have made. Or that the state may have made. But the information provided is not easily explained by...anything. So something somewhere is wrong for some reason that we don't have enough data to determine. We will see how this goes.
Or, like Donny, they could have just made **** up.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 03:16 AM   #893
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,333
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzBJJ1sxtEA

Chris Krebs, a lifelong Republican, was put in charge of the agency handling election security by President Trump two years ago. When Krebs said the 2020 election was the country's most secure ever, Mr. Trump fired him.

Now, Krebs speaks to Scott Pelley.
__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 04:10 AM   #894
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,219
I always make it a point to lie to pest callers like that because I don't want to be party to building up data about me, I wonder how many others have that policy.

If people are going to pester me with cold calls then the least I can do for them is muck up their data.

"Can I confirm your age?"

"87"
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 04:34 AM   #895
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,219
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
Maybe. The numbers he reports are pretty high to account for those explanations. But it is hard to tell without a lot more information.

We don't even know if he was calling the right people. Before the election I was getting a ton of texts from political organizations. Referring to me by name. Except, the wrong name. Three different wrong names.

I looked up data on my phone number. I have had the same number for about 13 years. The first names they were using in the text were the names of people who had my phone number 15-25 years ago.

There are all kinds of errors Braynard may have made. Or that the state may have made. But the information provided is not easily explained by...anything. So something somewhere is wrong for some reason that we don't have enough data to determine. We will see how this goes.
If the FBI have the data now then I expect we will find out in due course. Not sure how quickly the FBI move on anything.
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 05:23 AM   #896
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: I live in a swamp
Posts: 24,059
The FBI has an election fraud online tip-line for election fraud. Some piece of Trumptrash must have called it, lied and then reported to a pro-Trump, anti-American "news" outlet that the FBI was investigating election fraud.
Craig4 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 07:06 AM   #897
eerok
Quixoticist
 
eerok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ON Canada
Posts: 4,192
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
So, is it safe to assume you are certain that all claims of fraud will be proven to be bogus??
The expert to trust on this subject is Chris Krebs, who ran CISA. That's my source. Who is yours?

Krebs says it was a secure election.

It's easy to conclude Trump is a lying jackass who is trying to steal the election. Fortunately the smart people who matter, including judges and most government officials, aren't buying it.
__________________
"Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." - Oscar Wilde

Last edited by eerok; 30th November 2020 at 07:08 AM.
eerok is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 07:19 AM   #898
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
 
Dave Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 32,810
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
So, is it safe to assume you are certain that all claims of fraud will be proven to be bogus??
So far, all claims that have been advanced have failed to meet the burden of proof, which quite rightly requires with the people making the claim to substantiate it rather than anyone not making the claim to disprove it. Given the total absence of evidence for these claims, together with the well documented lies of all those advancing them that they have ample evidence to offer when in fact they have negligible evidence in both quality and quantity, it's perfectly reasonable to form a provisional conclusion that the election result was in fact a reasonable reflection of the intentions of the voters. It's also reasonable to work on the assumption that no further proof will be forthcoming for claims that have already been brought to court and dismissed for lack of evidence.

Dave
__________________
There is truth and there are lies.

- President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021
Dave Rogers is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 07:26 AM   #899
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: I live in a swamp
Posts: 24,059
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
So, is it safe to assume you are certain that all claims of fraud will be proven to be bogus??
Claims of fraud don't have to be proven to be bogus. The person claiming fraud has to prove the fraud. The votes were certified. Biden will be president on January 20th at noon.
Craig4 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 07:29 AM   #900
Meadmaker
Penultimate Amazing
 
Meadmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 26,874
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
I think Braynard is reporting some interesting data. What you are asking for is what Braynard did. They got the publicly available state data for voters that shows whether they requested an absentee ballot and whether they voted. They called some of those voters that were marked as being sent an absentee ballot but who were not marked as voted. A large number said that they had not requested an absentee ballot. Of those who said they did get a ballot, many said that they had returned it, even though their vote had not been counted according to state records. He says he has recordings of the calls.
Very good, then. Someone should look into that, because if what he is saying is true, something's fishy.

My guess is that what's fishy is his data, but that's only a guess.

Even if you don't want to spend resources of the government on this, surely this is the thing an investigative journalist could have a peek at and share their results, assuming investigative journalists are still a thing.
__________________
Proud of every silver medal I've ever received.
Meadmaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 11:06 AM   #901
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,333
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
So, is it safe to assume you are certain that all claims of fraud will be proven to be bogus??
Claims and evidence don't work that way in the real world, they only work that way in the bizzarro world of tinfoil hats and alternative facts.

In the real world, nothing is assumed regarding a claim's veracity. Claims require supporting evidence, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and the onus is on the claimant to provide the supporting evidence.

The number of times the Trump Campaign (or those acting in their behalf) have gone to court claiming election fraud (thus far) = 39
The number of times the Trump Campaign (or those acting in their behalf) have gone to court and presented evidence of election fraud = 0


In fact, the Trump Campaign (or those acting in their behalf), have specifically said, under oath, that they are NOT alleging election fraud..... and there are two very good reasons for that.
1. They don't have any evidence of fraud, and
2. They will attract the sanctions of the court if they make that claim without evidence.
__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!

Last edited by smartcooky; 30th November 2020 at 11:15 AM.
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 01:01 PM   #902
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
 
JayUtah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 20,660
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
They will attract the sanctions of the court if they make that claim without evidence.
Especially since fraud is held to a higher standard of pleading under Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and must be pled "with particularity" regarding the details of the alleged fraud. This is difficult to accomplish even when an ordinary level of due diligence precedes the filing. You really do need to have your facts well established before you write the complaint. At this point there aren't even any legally cognizable claims of fraud, much less evidence that would prove them.
JayUtah is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 01:33 PM   #903
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 53,030
Originally Posted by GraculusTheGreenBird View Post
My god, is Bubba still banging on about Dominion, despite the manual recounts matching voter machine tallies?

Surely, nobody could be actually STUPID enough to believe fraud claims after that definitive proof?

Could they?

Yeah, people are stupid enough to buy into it.
Hell,back in the last decase a lot of people bought into a similar crackpot conspiracy theory are Diebolt machinges..only difference is the Diebolt crap was a Left wing conspiracy theory. Conspiracies kooks inhabit both wings of politics.
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th November 2020, 04:04 PM   #904
Roger Ramjets
Philosopher
 
Roger Ramjets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,578
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
Yeah, people are stupid enough to buy into it.
Hell,back in the last decase a lot of people bought into a similar crackpot conspiracy theory are Diebolt machinges..only difference is the Diebolt crap was a Left wing conspiracy theory. Conspiracies kooks inhabit both wings of politics.
Diebold
Quote:
In early 2006, a study for the state of California corroborated and expanded on the problem; on page 2 the California report states that:

"Memory card attacks are a real threat: We determined that anyone who has access to a memory card of the AV-OS, and can tamper it (i.e. modify its contents), and can have the modified cards used in a voting machine during election, can indeed modify the election results from that machine in a number of ways. The fact that the results are incorrect cannot be detected except by a recount of the original paper ballots"...

In January 2007, a photo of the key used to open Diebold voting machines was posted in the company's website. It was found possible to duplicate the key based on the photo. The key unlocks a compartment which contains a removable memory card, leaving the machine vulnerable to tampering.

A report commissioned by Ohio's top elections official on December 15, 2007 has found that all five voting systems used in Ohio (made by Elections Systems and Software; Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems); and Hart InterCivic) have critical flaws that could undermine the integrity of the 2008 general election...

In March 2009, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen decertified Diebold's GEMS version 1.18.19 after the Humboldt County Election Transparency Project discovered that GEMS had silently dropped 197 ballots from its tabulation of a single precinct in Eureka, California. The discovery was made after project members conducted an independent count...

When Cuyahoga county's primary was held on May 2, 2006, officials ordered the hand-counting of more than 18,000 paper ballots after Diebold's new optical scan machines produced inconsistent tabulations, leaving several local races in limbo for days and eventually resulting in a reversal of the outcome of one race for state representative.
Excerpts from memos -- in Diebold's employees' own words:
Quote:
"I need some answers! Our department is being audited by the County. I have been waiting for someone to give me an explanation as to why Precinct 216 gave Al Gore a minus 16022 [votes] when it was uploaded. Will someone please explain this so that I have the information to give the auditor instead of standing here 'looking dumb'."

"We had this happen in several precincts and one of these precincts managed to get her memory card out of election mode and then back in it, continued to read ballots, not realizing that the 300+ ballots she had read earlier were no longer stored in her memory card . Needless to say when we did our hand count this was discovered."
__________________
We don't want good, sound arguments. We want arguments that sound good.
Roger Ramjets is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 03:20 AM   #905
hurdygurdy
Critical Thinker
 
hurdygurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 319
"I have the best lawyers"

Trump Lawyer Calls for Ousted Cybersecurity Chief to Be 'Taken Out at Dawn and Shot'
hurdygurdy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 11:14 AM   #906
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,333
Originally Posted by hurdygurdy View Post
"That guy is a class A moron," diGenova said."

Let me see; diGenova calls Chris Krebs a "class A moron"? Projection much?

diGenova is someone who never met a conspiracy theory he didn't believe in. If anyone is a class A moron, its him.
__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!

Last edited by smartcooky; 1st December 2020 at 11:21 AM.
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 11:45 AM   #907
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 53,030
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
"That guy is a class A moron," diGenova said."

Let me see; diGenova calls Chris Krebs a "class A moron"? Projection much?

diGenova is someone who never met a conspiracy theory he didn't believe in. If anyone is a class A moron, its him.
The Class A Moron stuff does not bother me a lot;the suggestion that guy be shot does.
name calling is one thing, advocating violence is another.
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 12:02 PM   #908
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 19,333
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
The Class A Moron stuff does not bother me a lot;the suggestion that guy be shot does.
name calling is one thing, advocating violence is another.
Indeed. I wonder of the ABA is going to take some action over his utterances? What diGenova said here is a clear incitement to violence.

ETA: Looks like Krebs himself might be doing that
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-kr...things-coming/
__________________
► Evolution is "survival of the fittest" - the fittest being those who are stronger, healthier and better adapted. Covid-19 has changed that. The fittest are now the well informed, logical, science believers who listen to the experts and get vaccinated.
If you don't like my posts, opinions, or directness then put me on your ignore list. This will benefit both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste time talking to you... simples!

Last edited by smartcooky; 1st December 2020 at 12:04 PM.
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 03:49 PM   #909
Bubba
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,766
Little known facts and curiosities:


Quote:
https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/

I am a pollster and I find this election to be deeply puzzling.

Something very strange happened in America’s democracy in the early hours of Wednesday November 4 and the days that followed. It’s reasonable for a lot of Americans to want to find out exactly what.

Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking reelection. He got 11 million more votes than in 2016, the third largest rise in support ever for an incumbent. By way of comparison, President Obama was comfortably reelected in 2012 with 3.5 million fewer votes than he received in 2008.
Edited by zooterkin:  <SNIP>
Edited for rule 4.
.
https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/

Last edited by zooterkin; 2nd December 2020 at 04:45 AM.
Bubba is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 03:58 PM   #910
eerok
Quixoticist
 
eerok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ON Canada
Posts: 4,192
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Little known facts and curiosities:

https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/
And here's a well-known fact: Trump will keep lying about the election as long as his loyal suckers keep sending him money to "save" it. I heard he's up past $170m so far.

That's pathetic, but that's Trump.
__________________
"Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." - Oscar Wilde
eerok is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 04:13 PM   #911
trustbutverify
Philosopher
 
trustbutverify's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9,128
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Little known facts and curiosities:




https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/
Patrick Basham is a quack. He's lied about his academic credentials, and his "polling" predicted a Trump landslide.
__________________
"To me, Hitler is the greatest man who ever lived. He truly is without fault, so simple and at the same time possessed of masculine strength"
-Leni Riefenstahl
Wollen owns the stage
trustbutverify is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 04:15 PM   #912
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Little known facts and curiosities:
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, no evidence of fraud, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, no evidence of fraud, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, no evidence of fraud, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, no evidence of fraud,

Patrick Basham is director of the Democracy Institute.
Soooooo...... Bubba?

Why would Patrick Basham, a tobacco lobbyist who denied smoking caused cancer, also have any insight into election fraud. The Democracy Institute is funded by tobacco companies to stop plain packaging of cigarettes.



https://tobaccotactics.org/wiki/democracy-institute/
Matthew Ellard is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 04:18 PM   #913
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by trustbutverify View Post
Patrick Basham is a quack. He's lied about his academic credentials, and his "polling" predicted a Trump landslide.
Damn it. You beat me again.

Bubba must be getting very desperate for pro-Trump links, if he is now reading debunked tobacco lobbyist websites.
Matthew Ellard is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 04:43 PM   #914
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by Bubba, one day ago
Good news! FBI is getting involved, requesting fraud evidence.
Bubba. You made this up and exactly the opposite happened a day after you posted your lie. Stop lying and making stuff up.


Attorney General Bill Barr Says There’s No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud
https://www.motherjones.com/2020-ele...d-voter-fraud/

Who monitors or oversees the FBI?
The FBI is responsible to the Attorney General
https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/who-m...20Intelligence.
Matthew Ellard is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 04:48 PM   #915
Resume
Troublesome Passenger
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 20,279
Originally Posted by Matthew Ellard View Post
Bubba. You made this up and exactly the opposite happened a day after you posted your lie. Stop lying and making stuff up.


Attorney General Bill Barr Says There’s No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud
https://www.motherjones.com/2020-ele...d-voter-fraud/

Who monitors or oversees the FBI?
The FBI is responsible to the Attorney General
https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/who-m...20Intelligence.
Another loss for the Trump legal team of Dewey, Screwy, and Phooey: lost the election outright, lost the recounts, lost in court, ovah and ovah.
__________________
“One of the last things they do before they’re intubated is beg me for the vaccine. I hold their hand and tell them that I’m sorry, but it’s too late.”

Dr. Brytney Cobia

Last edited by Resume; 1st December 2020 at 04:49 PM.
Resume is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 08:17 PM   #916
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: I live in a swamp
Posts: 24,059
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Little known facts and curiosities:




https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/
Biden will become president on 20 January 2021.
Craig4 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 08:25 PM   #917
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: I live in a swamp
Posts: 24,059
Originally Posted by Matthew Ellard View Post
Bubba. You made this up and exactly the opposite happened a day after you posted your lie. Stop lying and making stuff up.


Attorney General Bill Barr Says There’s No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud
https://www.motherjones.com/2020-ele...d-voter-fraud/

Who monitors or oversees the FBI?
The FBI is responsible to the Attorney General
https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/who-m...20Intelligence.
That's right Bubba, the FBI did get involved. They got involved long enough to establish there was no fraud. You thought Trumpy was going to get saved and he and his landscaping, I mean legal team failed again. It must be awful for you, all your false hopes that keeping being dashed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ha ha.jpg (16.6 KB, 5 views)
Craig4 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 09:26 PM   #918
Meadmaker
Penultimate Amazing
 
Meadmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 26,874
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Little known facts and curiosities:




https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/
I listened to Strenstrom's (sp?) testimony from the press event in Gettysburg, and there was one thing I heard from him, that I would really like to know more about.

Quote:
6. Missing votes. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing
That's pretty serious, but I tried to google something about it, and I guess my Google Fu isn't very good, because I wanted to know more detail. Can you help me out? I've heard the statement, but I'm looking for the data to back it up. What can you do for me?



Meanwhile, I strongly encourage everyone to watch Gabriel Sterling's comments from today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLi-Yo6IucQ

I suspect most people here will recognize the name, or at least the face. He's the official who runs elections in Georgia. His boss is the Secretary of State.
__________________
Proud of every silver medal I've ever received.
Meadmaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 09:43 PM   #919
Norman Alexander
Penultimate Amazing
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Gundungurra
Posts: 10,793
Trump campaign lawyer Joe diGenova may even be disbarred.

Quote:
Frank Figliuzzi, a former FBI deputy director, said DiGenova had made “a retaliatory threat involving Krebs’ official duties, in violation of federal law Title 18 USC 351”.

Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor and senior aide to special counsel Robert Mueller in the Russia investigation, tweeted that the remark was “shocking” and DiGenova should “face disbarment at least”.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ris-krebs-shot
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st December 2020, 09:55 PM   #920
8enotto
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,255
Are these guys speaking from an official stance or just saying what could happen?

How long before we would hear something certian?
8enotto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Closed Thread

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:36 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.