ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Closed Thread
Old 24th June 2019, 02:17 PM   #4241
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.

Sol88's usual insanity about mainstream comets irrelevant to his demented cult's dogma about comets.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 24th June 2019, 02:18 PM   #4242
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.

Sol88's usual insanity about mainstream comets irrelevant to his demented cult's dogma about comets.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 24th June 2019, 02:25 PM   #4243
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity about mainstream comets irrelevant to his demented cult's dogma about comets.

Sol8's usual insanity, lies about mainstream working science and insane lies abut his demented cults dogma. Sol8's electric comet insanity is a set of ignorant delusions. Sol88's cult has similar delusions about how stellar systems form.

The Nebular hypothesis uses the real universe and working physics to show how stellar systems are created from the collapse of gas clouds.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 24th June 2019, 02:26 PM   #4244
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity about mainstream comets irrelevant to his demented cult's dogma about comets.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 24th June 2019, 02:30 PM   #4245
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity about mainstream comets irrelevant to his demented cult's dogma about comets.

Sol88's usual insane lies about clear English.
Rock comet
Quote:
A rock comet is a rare type of small Solar System body that exhibits features of both a comet and an asteroid, mainly in that it outgasses material primarily made up of grains of rock.
Rock comets, unlike other comets, which outgas primarily ice, have a nucleus made of rock. As a result, their outgassing can be unpredictable.
We have found 2 of these objects. Their mainly dust outgassing are explained by real physics. Sol88 insiatiy is that all comets are these rare objects.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 24th June 2019, 02:32 PM   #4246
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity about mainstream comets irrelevant to his demented cult's dogma about comets.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 24th June 2019, 10:47 PM   #4247
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
You really are dense, aren't you? The electrons are not being accelerated. The ions are. The effect of the field is to maintain quasi-neutrality. So, any claims that negatively charged anything are being ACCELERATED is plain wrong, and stupid into the bargain. Learn to read.
We agree the dust is negatively charged as per, 4.5 Charged Dust I hope?

Anywhoo



Quote:
With the help of the simulations it is possible to study effects of isolated processes, as demonstrated above, or a special combination of two or more processes on the dust outflow behaviour. This can help in the future with the differentiation between processes at work in the “acceleration region” where we observe deviations from 1j/r outflow behaviour. By studying effects of sublimation or fragmentation in the same manner as we studied the effects of acceleration on the azimuthal average in this paper it can help to determine the specific scale lengths of physical processes and thereby with the interpretation of results from data analysis.
On deviations from free-radial outflow in the inner coma of comet 67P



Reckon there’s your problem

Sublimation, needs ice(volatiles) last I heard. Not the ice over on Tempel 1but the ice we don’t see at 67P.

As for the rest of it, the dust and suprathermal seem to be doing some things jonesdave116 says cannot happen because the ambipolar electric fields sign is the wrong way?

So what’s missing jd116?
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 24th June 2019 at 11:56 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 25th June 2019, 04:01 AM   #4248
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
We agree the dust is negatively charged as per, 4.5 Charged Dust I hope?

Anywhoo





On deviations from free-radial outflow in the inner coma of comet 67P



Reckon there’s your problem

Sublimation, needs ice(volatiles) last I heard. Not the ice over on Tempel 1but the ice we don’t see at 67P.

As for the rest of it, the dust and suprathermal seem to be doing some things jonesdave116 says cannot happen because the ambipolar electric fields sign is the wrong way?

So what’s missing jd116?
Oh dear. More lies and idiocy! The ice at Tempel 1 killed your woo in 2005. Why are you still here? And ice is most definitely observed at 67P, so you can quit with the lying. And I just explained, in terms a 12 year old could understand, why the ambipolar field cannot accelerate dust. And no, why would it be all be charged that close to the nucleus? And much of it is far too massive to be affected by an electric field. Especially one that is pointed the wrong way! Lern to scienz.
You are the one with the problems - no science, no mechanisms, no evidence. A 'model' that has failed 100%. Deal with it, instead of continually displaying your ignorance on here.

Oh, and no ice = no suprathermal electrons. They are not of solar wind origin, so where are you getting them from? Duh!
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin

Last edited by jonesdave116; 25th June 2019 at 04:03 AM.
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 25th June 2019, 03:33 PM   #4249
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
So what’s missing jd116?
The answer as it has been for years is: Any relevance to Sol88's demented cult's dogma of electric comets !

The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insane lies about no ice found at comets.
Sol88's usual insane lies about mainstream ices and dust comet papers.
Sol88's new insanity of editing a mainstream ices and dust comet paper.

On deviations from free-radial outflow in the inner coma of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko
Quote:
6. Discussion and conclusions
...
With the help of the simulations it is possible to study effects of isolated processes, as demonstrated above, or a special combination of two or more processes on the dust outflow behaviour. This can help in the future with the differentiation between processes at work in the “acceleration region” where we observe deviations from 1/r outflow behaviour. By studying effects of sublimation or fragmentation in the same manner as we studied the effects of acceleration on the azimuthal average in this paper it can help to determine the specific scale lengths of physical processes and thereby with the interpretation of results from data analysis.
This paper has 12 instances of the word sublimation! The paper is about the inner coma so this is sublimation of icy dust grains in the inner coma as explicitly stated in the abstract ("sublimation of icy dust particles after ejection from the surface").

Last edited by Reality Check; 25th June 2019 at 03:43 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 25th June 2019, 10:53 PM   #4250
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
Oh dear. More lies and idiocy! The ice at Tempel 1 killed your woo in 2005. Why are you still here? And ice is most definitely observed at 67P, so you can quit with the lying. And I just explained, in terms a 12 year old could understand, why the ambipolar field cannot accelerate dust. And no, why would it be all be charged that close to the nucleus? And much of it is far too massive to be affected by an electric field. Especially one that is pointed the wrong way! Lern to scienz.
You are the one with the problems - no science, no mechanisms, no evidence. A 'model' that has failed 100%. Deal with it, instead of continually displaying your ignorance on here.

Oh, and no ice = no suprathermal electrons. They are not of solar wind origin, so where are you getting them from? Duh!

They are not of solar wind origin, so where are you getting them from?



Happily ignores
Quote:
What's your take on ALICE and the detection that 67P is IMMERSED in a charged nano dust environment?
So simple even the 12yr old gets it!

You really do only have Tempel 1 as your defence, so so sad.

Anyway these raft of new papers going to really get your back up. That's my prediction.

Electron acceleration at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko Cant happen can it jonesdave116?

and my absolute itching to read favorite; RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons
G. Wattieaux, N. Gilet, P. Henri, X. Vallières, L. Bucciantini

Double layers here we come!

Real scienz here we come!
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 25th June 2019 at 11:02 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 26th June 2019, 04:42 AM   #4251
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,880
Quote:
What's your take on ALICE and the detection that 67P is IMMERSED in a charged nano dust environment?
What the hell has that got to do with anything? Lol.We are talking about suprathermal electrons. Take a course in comprehension.

Quote:
You really do only have Tempel 1 as your defence, so so sad
Liar. How many times are you going to lie? You are pathetic. Tempel 1 killed your woo. However, we have ice at Hartley 2, 67P, Catalina, Hale-Bopp, 17P Holmes, et al. I do not need a defence, woo boy. This is about the completely failed ec woo, which you are supposed to be defending, and can't, due to having no evidence, no science and no mechanisms. Your woo has failed. Get over it.

Quote:
Anyway these raft of new papers going to really get your back up. That's my prediction.
And you have predicted nothing correctly so far, and do not have the qualifications, knowledge, nor intellect to understand the papers when they do come out. That is why you appear to be the only person left on the planet who is still conned by this woo.

Quote:
Cant happen can it jonesdave116?
Liar. Read the literature. And I have never said any such thing. I said that your idiotic claim that an ambipolar field, pointing in the wrong direction, could accelerate electrons outward. Any idiot can see that. It isn't my fault that you can't. Like I said - you need to stay away from plasma physics, as you are totally out of your depth;

Quote:
Double layers here we come!
Lol. Case in point.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 26th June 2019, 01:54 PM   #4252
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insane lies about comets. We have detected ices around comets. Tempel 1 and 67P are where we have detected subsurface ices from Deep Impact and surface ices on Tempel 1 and 67P.

Sol88's usual insane lies abut double layers at comets.

Sol88's usual insults of astronomers who would never write a paper that states the impossibility of double layers at comets.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 29th June 2019, 09:01 PM   #4253
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
What the hell has that got to do with anything? Lol.We are talking about suprathermal electrons. Take a course in comprehension.



Liar. How many times are you going to lie? You are pathetic. Tempel 1 killed your woo. However, we have ice at Hartley 2, 67P, Catalina, Hale-Bopp, 17P Holmes, et al. I do not need a defence, woo boy. This is about the completely failed ec woo, which you are supposed to be defending, and can't, due to having no evidence, no science and no mechanisms. Your woo has failed. Get over it.



And you have predicted nothing correctly so far, and do not have the qualifications, knowledge, nor intellect to understand the papers when they do come out. That is why you appear to be the only person left on the planet who is still conned by this woo.



Liar. Read the literature. And I have never said any such thing. I said that your idiotic claim that an ambipolar field, pointing in the wrong direction, could accelerate electrons outward. Any idiot can see that. It isn't my fault that you can't. Like I said - you need to stay away from plasma physics, as you are totally out of your depth;



Lol. Case in point.
Just so we are clear, jonesdave116, there is a mechanism accelerating negatively charged dust and electrons off 67P’s surface?

Or

The ambipolar electric field points the wrong way and NO negatively charged dust or electrons can be accelerated off 67P’s nucleus?

Your kinda wishy washy again, jd116.

stay away from plasma physics, as you are totally out of your depth;
because the maths to hard for you?
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 29th June 2019 at 09:02 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 30th June 2019, 01:39 PM   #4254
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity of demented, irrelevant questions.

Sol88's usual insane lies about comets - no "negatively charged dust and electrons" have been detected being ejected from the surface of any comet . The mainstream mechanism proposed to eject ice and dust grains electrostatically only works before a shielding coma forms. Suprathermal electrons near the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov‐Gerasimenko at 3 AU: Model comparisons with Rosetta data and other papers are about negatively charged dust and ice grains and electrons defected in the coma of 67P.

Sol88's usual insane lies about and insults of posters.
jonesdave116's post is about the demented dogma of electric comets and the abysmal ignorance that Sol88 is displaying: I said that your idiotic claim that an ambipolar field, pointing in the wrong direction, could accelerate electrons outward. Sol88 has been insanely ignorant of textbook physics for maybe decades, e.g. the several ways that comet density is measured to be less than water and much less than asteroids that his demented cult's electric comet insiatiy demands. It is Sol88 that needs to stay away from all physics [and mathematics and even basic arithmetic (0.6 is not 3.0!)], as he is totally out of his depth.

Sol88's idiocy also includes that any elections are accelerated outward. Rosetta detected low, medium and high energy electrons, not what directions they were going.
As jonesdave116 has stated many times, Suprathermal electrons near the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov‐Gerasimenko at 3 AU: Model comparisons with Rosetta data states that an ambipolar electric field accelerates electrons inward.
Quote:
The suprathermal electron distribution can have solar wind origin or can be produced by photoionization, or it can be accelerated inward through various processes such as ambipolar electric field.
...
5 Ambipolar Electric Field and Quasi‐neutrality
... External solar wind electrons are accelerated inward (roughly toward the nucleus) by this potential structure and have their energies enhanced by ~ eΔVpol. The motional electric field (E = ue × B) contribution to E from the GOL is also undoubtedly altered from its unperturbed solar wind value by the interaction with the comet.

Last edited by Reality Check; 30th June 2019 at 02:18 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st July 2019, 03:43 PM   #4255
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Just so we are clear, jonesdave116, there is a mechanism accelerating negatively charged dust and electrons off 67P’s surface?

Or

The ambipolar electric field points the wrong way and NO negatively charged dust or electrons can be accelerated off 67P’s nucleus?

Your kinda wishy washy again, jd116.

stay away from plasma physics, as you are totally out of your depth;
because the maths to hard for you?
Huh? The dust is mostly uncharged! It is lifted from the surface by the sublimating volatiles! Dust can become charged in the coma. If it has very little mass, and a reasonable charge, it can then be accelerated by the solar wind electric field. It cannot be accelerated by an ambipolar field that is retarding electrons!
Ditto, the electrons are not being accelerated from the surface by an electric field! Due to them not existing. They are electrons that have been knocked off of the neutrals that are the sublimation products, mostly water and carbon dioxide, as they reach the coma due to photo-ionisation for the most part. Which leaves (mostly) neutrals, with some percentage of ions and electrons. And then you get into the complicated stuff as described by Deca and others. The electrons created are escaping more rapidly than the ions. This cannot happen if quasi-neutrality is to be maintained. Therefore an ambipolar field springs into existence, which acts to retard the electrons and accelerate the ions, thereby maintaining quasi-neutrality. Simples. At least I thought it was!
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st July 2019, 06:46 PM   #4256
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
^^^^

Cheers Jonesdave116.

Clears that up, now for the new papers, see who's on the money.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st July 2019, 08:16 PM   #4257
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's insanity that any new mainstream ices and dust comet papers will support his demented cult's electric comet dogma.

Sol88's usual lies about posts - jonesdave116 explained why Sol88's posts about comets were deluded, e.g. dust becomes charged in the coma, not a delusion of on the surface.

Last edited by Reality Check; 1st July 2019 at 08:30 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 1st July 2019, 11:50 PM   #4258
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
^^^

If you say so...

Quote:
4 Conclusions

We performed simple simulation of Philae on 67P/Churyumov Gerasimenko using generic parameters for the comet composition that would have to be re.ned using the results of the ongoing experiments to accurately model the environment of Philae. Nonetheless, our purpose was to investigate the e.ect of the electrostatic charging of the dust grains on their interaction with Philae. We showed that even if the dominant dust production mechanism is the ejection of neutral dust caused by the sublimation of volatile material in the soil, the subsequent charging of the dust increased the dust collection by about an order of magnitude. This is an important e.ect that should be taken into account to interpret Philae's dust measurements.
SIMULATION OF THE ELECTROSTATIC CHARGING OF PHILAE ON 67P/CHURYUMOV-GERASIMENKO AND OF ITS INTERACTION WITH THE DUSTS.


for context
Quote:
It is lifted from the surface by the sublimating volatiles! Dust can become charged in the coma.
jonesdave116
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 1st July 2019 at 11:54 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 01:56 PM   #4259
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's insanity that the spacecraft Philae was a comet !

Sol88's usual insane lies about science - there is none of his cult's demented dogma on comets in that paper.

Sol88's usual insane lies abut posts. jonesdave116 was correct and supported by this paper. Dust is lifted by sublimation ("soil outgassing"). That dust is charged in the coma ("the dust grains charge electrostatically in the ambient plasma"). The paper has 2 additional mainstream mechanisms of "micro-meteorite impacts" and "electrostatic charging".

Simulation of the electrostatic charging of Philae on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and of its interaction with the dusts.
Quote:
ROSETTA's probe Philae landed on a dust covered soil. This dust may be ejected from the ground through many mechanisms (other than spacecraft landing) : micro-meteorite impacts, electrostatic charging and soil outgassing. In any cases, the dust grains charge electrostatically in the ambient plasma and this charge impacts the dust interaction with the spacecraft, which is itself differentially charged due to its partial exposure to the solar UV light. Using the DUST addition to the Spacecraft-Plasma Interaction Software (SPIS) routinely used to compute the charge state of the spacecraft surfaces, we simulate the electrostatic charging of Philae as well as its dust environment. SPIS-DUST allows one to compute the electrostatic charging of the dust grains on the ground and in the plasma, and to model their ejection and their recollection by the probe. We simulated one cometary day of the Philae environment at different distances from the sun to observe the variation of the dust collection with Philae's local time.
This is Philae being charged by the solar wind, dust grains being charged by UV light and a simulation of the resulting interaction that collected dust on Philae.

Last edited by Reality Check; 2nd July 2019 at 02:02 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 03:47 PM   #4260
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Glad that clears that up.


Philae is a comet...


Good one rc.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 2nd July 2019 at 03:55 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 04:43 PM   #4261
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's insanity remains that the spacecraft Philae was a comet (this is a thread on his cult's demented comet dogma, not spacecraft gaining charge in the real world) !

Last edited by Reality Check; 2nd July 2019 at 04:46 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 05:24 PM   #4262
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Reality Checks comet Philae, so funny.


So the dust is charged on the surface, reality check?
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2019, 05:42 PM   #4263
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity.

There is no empirical evidence of charged dust on the surface of any comet. Mainstream ices and dust comets have the possibility of charged dust on their surfaces when the solar wind and solar UV light reaches the surface of comet nuclei. The formation of the coma blocks the solar wind and will reduce UV. There are mainstream ices and dust comet papers about electrostatic lifting of dust far from the Sun at low comet activity (no coma).

Simulation of the electrostatic charging of Philae on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and of its interaction with the dusts. is not a published peer-reviewed paper. It is a presentation at a conference in 2015: SF2A-2015: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics and has only 1 citation. The presentation looks valid but very specialized (people interested in dust sticking to Philae?).

Last edited by Reality Check; 2nd July 2019 at 05:52 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 12:28 AM   #4264
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Great, so maybe it is charged! (all mainstream no ELECTRIC COMET nonsense)



Cheers
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 02:02 AM   #4265
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Great, so maybe it is charged! (all mainstream no ELECTRIC COMET nonsense)



Cheers
And......................? In which case, so are asteroids. Why are they not outgassing, other than a very few among millions? Why don't they have dust trails illuminating the asteroid belt for us?
Dumb idea. Next.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 05:34 AM   #4266
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
And......................? In which case, so are asteroids. Why are they not outgassing, other than a very few among millions? Why don't they have dust trails illuminating the asteroid belt for us?
Dumb idea. Next.
If you say so boss.

New papers here we come....
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 09:32 AM   #4267
Dancing David
Penultimate Amazing
 
Dancing David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,699
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
And......................? In which case, so are asteroids. Why are they not outgassing, other than a very few among millions? Why don't they have dust trails illuminating the asteroid belt for us?
Dumb idea. Next.
Time to role out the magic 'dark mode'!

Which is why Jupiter doesn't have a coma either
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn
And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch
You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager
Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar
Dancing David is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 10:03 AM   #4268
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
If you say so boss.

New papers here we come....
Flicked through the mag data on ESA PSA, have you? Seen discharges and EDM? Found rock in the thermal inertia data? Mupus data? RSI data? CONSERT data? Unless you have, then your woo is as stillborn as it ever was.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 01:16 PM   #4269
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase
C. Goetz, B. T. Tsurutani, P. Henri, M. Volwerk, E. Behar, N. J. T. Edberg, A. Eriksson, R. Goldstein, P. Mokashi, H. Nilsson, I. Richter, A. Wellbrock, and K. H. Glassmeier


Effect of radiative heat transfer in porous comet nuclei: case study of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
X. Hu, B. Gundlach, I, von Borstel, J. Blum, and X. Shi

Electron acceleration at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
R. Goldstein, J. L. Burch, K. Llera, P. Mokashi, H. Nilsson, K. Dokgo, A. Eriksson, E. Odelstad, I. Richter

Homogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by CONSERT: implication on composition and formation
A. Herique, W. Kofman, S. Zine, J. Blum, J.-B. Vincent, V. Ciarletti

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons
G. Wattieaux, N. Gilet, P. Henri, X. Vallières, L. Bucciantini

Properties of the singing comet waves in the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko plasma environment as observed by the Rosetta mission
H. Breuillard, P. Henri, L. Bucciantini, M. Volwerk, T. Karlsson, A. Eriksson, F. Johansson, E. Odelstad, I. Richter, C. Goetz, X. Vallières, and R. Hajra

Plasma properties of suprathermal electrons near comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with Rosetta
M. Myllys, P. Henri, M. Galand, K.L. Héritier, N. Gilet, R. Goldstein, A. I. Eriksson, F. Johansson, J. Deca

Let’s see now...
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 3rd July 2019 at 01:55 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 03:42 PM   #4270
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 03:45 PM   #4271
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
....
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 3rd July 2019, 03:51 PM   #4272
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity of ignoring his demented cult's electric comet dogma.
No evidence that comets are rocks blasted from rocky planets by electric discharges between planets whizzing around the solar system !
No evidence that comet jets are electric discharges !
No evidence that EDM machines the surface of comet nuclei !
No evidence of a solar electric field strong enough to do all this electric stuff !

Sol88's usual insanity of mainstream ices and dust comet papers that he is maybe going to spew demented fantasies about. We will wait and see if his persistent tactic posting lies and demented fantasies abut science continues ...
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 01:16 AM   #4273
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
It's all about the PLASMA, Charge separation and the associated electric currents!

As is just now being recognized.

Correct Tusenfem?
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 12:19 PM   #4274
tusenfem
Master Poster
 
tusenfem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,793
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase
C. Goetz, B. T. Tsurutani, P. Henri, M. Volwerk, E. Behar, N. J. T. Edberg, A. Eriksson, R. Goldstein, P. Mokashi, H. Nilsson, I. Richter, A. Wellbrock, and K. H. Glassmeier


Effect of radiative heat transfer in porous comet nuclei: case study of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
X. Hu, B. Gundlach, I, von Borstel, J. Blum, and X. Shi

Electron acceleration at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
R. Goldstein, J. L. Burch, K. Llera, P. Mokashi, H. Nilsson, K. Dokgo, A. Eriksson, E. Odelstad, I. Richter

Homogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by CONSERT: implication on composition and formation
A. Herique, W. Kofman, S. Zine, J. Blum, J.-B. Vincent, V. Ciarletti

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons
G. Wattieaux, N. Gilet, P. Henri, X. Vallières, L. Bucciantini

Properties of the singing comet waves in the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko plasma environment as observed by the Rosetta mission
H. Breuillard, P. Henri, L. Bucciantini, M. Volwerk, T. Karlsson, A. Eriksson, F. Johansson, E. Odelstad, I. Richter, C. Goetz, X. Vallières, and R. Hajra

Plasma properties of suprathermal electrons near comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with Rosetta
M. Myllys, P. Henri, M. Galand, K.L. Héritier, N. Gilet, R. Goldstein, A. I. Eriksson, F. Johansson, J. Deca

Let’s see now...
now i feel insulted
__________________
20 minutes into the future
This message is bra-bra-brought to you by z-z-z-zik zak
And-And-And I'm going to be back with you - on Network 23 after these real-real-real-really exciting messages

(Max Headroom)
follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC
tusenfem is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 12:20 PM   #4275
tusenfem
Master Poster
 
tusenfem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,793
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
It's all about the PLASMA, Charge separation and the associated electric currents!

As is just now being recognized.

Correct Tusenfem?
hardly, i wrote a whole review paper on that topic
__________________
20 minutes into the future
This message is bra-bra-brought to you by z-z-z-zik zak
And-And-And I'm going to be back with you - on Network 23 after these real-real-real-really exciting messages

(Max Headroom)
follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC
tusenfem is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 02:18 PM   #4276
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,935
Originally Posted by tusenfem View Post
now i feel insulted
See your name a couple times there mate, well done.
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 02:28 PM   #4277
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Solo88's usual insane lies about science. Plasma physics has been part of the mainstream model of comets for decades, e.g. tusenfem "wrote a whole review paper on that topic"

Since Sol88 is abysmally ignorant: A review paper is a paper that describes the current status of a field of research based on the existing literature in journals and textbooks. For plasma physics and comets that literature and those textbooks will go back to close to the formation of plasma physics, e.g. the plasma physicist Hannes Alfvén wrote a paper on comet tails in 1957.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 02:36 PM   #4278
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity.
Any mainstream scientist being cited by Sol88 to support the demented electric comet dogma is being insulted. Sol88 insults tusenfem by listing a couple of his papers to support Sol88's demented comet dogma when tusenfem has made it clear in this thread that tusenfem is not ignorant or insane enough to support that demented dogma !
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 02:42 PM   #4279
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,880
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
It's all about the PLASMA, Charge separation and the associated electric currents!

As is just now being recognized.

Correct Tusenfem?
Wrong. The EC woo is all about EDM (lol), electric discharges and rock. And is based on a non-existent solar radial electric field, and the eccentricity of comets. All of which is 100% wrong. Citing any number of papers, that you fail to understand, is not going to change that. Flogging a dead horse will not bring it back to life.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 4th July 2019, 03:44 PM   #4280
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,129
Thumbs down The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
It's all about the PLASMA...
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Missed Sol88's usual insane lies about his demented cult's electric comet dogma which has no plasma.
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
Sol88's usual insanity of ignoring his demented cult's electric comet dogma.
No evidence that comets are rocks blasted from rocky planets by electric discharges between planets whizzing around the solar system !
No evidence that comet jets are electric discharges !
No evidence that EDM machines the surface of comet nuclei !
No evidence of a solar electric field strong enough to do all this electric stuff !
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Closed Thread

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.