ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Canada economy , nafta , US-Canada relations

Reply
Old 17th May 2017, 06:05 AM   #321
The Don
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cymru
Posts: 22,567
Originally Posted by logger View Post
This another rinse and repeat, how is it grandstanding?
Trump's using it to try and look like he's a tough international negotiator. Someone who wasn't grandstanding would have let the matter run its usual course.

Originally Posted by logger View Post
And how does it look like Canada is getting a better deal?
Trump's making a fool of himself and to save face will have to make concessions on lumber and dairy..
The Don is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th May 2017, 11:06 AM   #322
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,198
Originally Posted by The Don View Post
Trump's using it to try and look like he's a tough international negotiator. Someone who wasn't grandstanding would have let the matter run its usual course.
Oh opinion, got it. No he's doing exactly what he should be doing to get a better deal. Your side just crys about everything he does, which has elevated it.

Quote:
Trump's making a fool of himself and to save face will have to make concessions on lumber and dairy..
No, actually he isnt. I'm sure it looks that way to people who are losing money in this. And certainly concessions will have to be made, that is compromise. 30 years in business, you should know how this works.
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th May 2017, 02:19 PM   #323
Border Reiver
Philosopher
 
Border Reiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,015
Originally Posted by logger View Post
Oh opinion, got it. No he's doing exactly what he should be doing to get a better deal. Your side just crys about everything he does, which has elevated it.







No, actually he isnt. I'm sure it looks that way to people who are losing money in this. And certainly concessions will have to be made, that is compromise. 30 years in business, you should know how this works.


Yep, the US will make lots of noise, maybe go to the arbitration board again, and nothing will change.

NAFTA and the Canada-US Free Trade Deal have been too good to all parties overall to risk. Essentially the US is going to have to adjust its own business practices to compete in certain industries, or it's going to need to focus its industries in areas where it is competitive.
__________________
Questions, comments, queries, bitches, complaints, rude gestures and/or remarks?
Border Reiver is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.