ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Trials and Errors
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags !MOD BOX WARNING! , Amanda Knox , Italy cases , Meredith Kercher , murder cases , Raffaele Sollecito

Reply
Old Today, 02:34 PM   #1721
Methos
Muse
 
Methos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 668
Originally Posted by Numbers View Post
We must not underestimate the complexity, not only of Italian law, but even of language. Especially for those intent on making the innocent seem guilty.

After all, the Knox - Sollecito case depends on what "see you later, have a good evening" means. This phrase is so innocent that Mignini truncated it to "see you later" in the arrest warrant for Knox, Sollecito, and Lumumba; leaving out the "have a good evening" was more consistent with his crazy theory that Knox was agreeing to a meeting with Lumumba on November 1.

For the guilters, CPP Article 530.2; CPP Article 530,2; CPP Article 530 paragraph 2; and art. 530 comma 2 c.p.p., are all different legal beasts that they can define as they wish to further their agenda. The guilters engage in their bizarre confusion of nomenclatures and other baloney because they have no credible arguments.

Others may recognize that these are different labels for the same legal statement in the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

BTW, the Italian word "comma" translates to any of the following:

paragraph, subsection, subparagraph, comma, paragraph of

based on Google translate and Collins Reverso.

ETA: For each article of the CPP, each paragraph (=subsection) is numbered, beginning with "1" for the first paragraph.
Well, the "law" should be easy to understand, but I guess the "semantics game" is all that's left to play. "Acqiutted" doesn't mean "Exonerated" becomes "Knox wasn't definitely acquitted" and so on.
As LondonJohn wrote: "round and round and round we still go......................... "
__________________
"Found a typo? You can keep it..."
Methos is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Trials and Errors

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:56 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.